One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The continued silence/ignorance of Clinton supporters
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Oct 26, 2016 13:48:14   #
kenjay Loc: Arkansas
 
PaulPisces wrote:
I think there's a difference between consensual extramarital sex (Clinton) and predatory, unwanted advances (Trump).
They may both be pretty bad, but not to the same degree.

What part of rape do you consider consensual Paul. And plenty of women claimed Bill made unwanted advances at them.

Reply
Oct 26, 2016 13:52:08   #
kenjay Loc: Arkansas
 
lindajoy wrote:
She has authored nothing to help children or women..look it up, she joined in the bills authored by others, and even took credit but if you look at the actual bills many show she was a member of, not the one bringing the action for anyone...and many failed the floor let alone passage......

All hype, J...

Have to run out or I'd look them up for you...Will do when I return..Talk about a
Do nothing, no credentials to warrant presidency,....wow...She's the epidemiology of a patsy from get go...An owned patsy for the big money that does run this country..
She has authored nothing to help children or women... (show quote)

Maybe she is helping children through Planned Parenthood.

Reply
Oct 26, 2016 15:54:04   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Or the predatory women just making this crap up, after years of silence, simply because they can turn a dime on it now??????


Bingo!!!! Or is that let's make a deal???

Reply
 
 
Oct 26, 2016 16:03:32   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Not the one I want to show you..Going thru my library..Back on a few...

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/hillary_clinton/300022

Another Politico~~

Laws with Clinton’s name

Clinton was first elected as a senator from New York in 2000 and re-elected in 2006. She resigned to become secretary of state, so her Senate tenure was from January 2001 to January 2009.

Bush’s spokesman sent us a list of three bills Clinton sponsored hat became law. These laws were uncontroversial matters that passed by unanimous consent in the Senate and voice vote in the House and then were signed by President George W. Bush:

S. 1241: A bill to establish the Kate Mullany National Historic Site in the State of New York. Bush signed the bill Dec. 3, 2004.

S. 3613: A bill to name a post office the "Major George Quamo Post Office Building." Bush signed the bill Oct. 6, 2006.

S. 3145: A bill to designate a highway in New York as the Timothy J. Russert highway. Bush signed the bill July 23, 2008.

They also bring up she "co~sponsored" which is not something she did on her own, but pTcipated in in some capcitt nor did it cite whether or not thr co sponsored bills passed Senate....

Some accomplishments, I tell ya..
Back to : Qualifications are??????
~~~~~~~~~
National Security of Country~NO
Foreign Affairs~~NO, OTHER THAN TO SECURE PAY AND PLAY FUNDING..
Job Growth~~well WHERE IS IT
Advancement of Women~~30 plus years in, where's the passed legislation?? Where is anything she, herself sponsored and got through Senate?? How much did she pay women while in office, compared to men??
Who did she ever promote over a man??
ISIS treats their women how, and how many Muslim affiliates ( like that?) does she employ and just exactly what is their affiliation to known terrorist groups we are supposedly watching???

Reply
Oct 26, 2016 16:47:31   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Here you go, J, note with interest her accomplishments while senator...The bills she introduced and the three that passed...

Now, let's wait for some rebuttal...Even where she co~sponsored, which means worked with others on a bill, do you see passed and enacted ???

Maybe this election has been nothing but mud slinging, lacking accomplishments because there is nothing there that qualifiers her after 30 plus years...Other than, we'll, no need to repeat it.mm

http://www.congress.gov/member/hillary-clinton/C001041?q=%7B%22congress%22%3A%22all%22%2C%22sponsorship%22%3A%22sponsored%22%2C%22type%22%3A%22bills%22%2C%22bill-status%22%3A%22law%22%7D

Reply
Oct 26, 2016 16:58:10   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
kenjay wrote:
Maybe she is helping children through Planned Parenthood.


She was involved in as co sponsoring of the bill but she was not responsible for authoring or getting it past..Ted Kennedy was at first angry she claimed it as hers too....They were working on it 2006 if memory serves correctly...She has frequently claimed as hers but that is just another lie...

Ted Kennedy is the true motivator of the child health care bill...

Awe, heck, read this instead. .Your always giving me work....😄

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_Children%27s_Health_Insurance_Program

Or did you mean her overly liberal view of abortion even in late term pregnancy and killing the now infant so it doesn't have to live in the world..???

Reply
Oct 26, 2016 20:18:08   #
kenjay Loc: Arkansas
 
lindajoy wrote:
She was involved in as co sponsoring of the bill but she was not responsible for authoring or getting it past..Ted Kennedy was at first angry she claimed it as hers too....They were working on it 2006 if memory serves correctly...She has frequently claimed as hers but that is just another lie...

Ted Kennedy is the true motivator of the child health care bill...

Awe, heck, read this instead. .Your always giving me work....😄

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_Children%27s_Health_Insurance_Program

Or did you mean her overly liberal view of abortion even in late term pregnancy and killing the now infant so it doesn't have to live in the world..???
She was involved in as co sponsoring of the bill b... (show quote)

The latter Linda sorry my wife tell me I should put sarcasm after my post. Thanks for catching it.

Reply
 
 
Oct 26, 2016 21:24:54   #
PaulPisces Loc: San Francisco
 
kenjay wrote:
What part of rape do you consider consensual Paul. And plenty of women claimed Bill made unwanted advances at them.


I'm unclear why you ask that question, kenjay. Of course rape is never consensual.

In the one case where Clinton was accused of rape (by Juanita Broaddrick) it was never proven.
Not only that, she had signed a deposition stating that no sexual contact between them had ever occurred, and she continued to support Clinton at rallie for weeks after the alleged incident.

And it is not disputed a all that Clinton has made unwanted advances to women.
I'm just wondering why some seem to feel that is OK for Trump but not OK for Clinton.

Reply
Oct 26, 2016 21:25:02   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
kenjay wrote:
The latter Linda sorry my wife tell me I should put sarcasm after my post. Thanks for catching it.


It's cool, I've done the same and now include something like" ok, sarcasm mode off now..."

Again it's cool...

Reply
Oct 26, 2016 21:32:19   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
PaulPisces wrote:
I'm unclear why you ask that question, kenjay. Of course rape is never consensual.

In the one case where Clinton was accused of rape (by Juanita Broaddrick) it was never proven.
Not only that, she had signed a deposition stating that no sexual contact between them had ever occurred, and she continued to support Clinton at rallie for weeks after the alleged incident.

And it is not disputed a all that Clinton has made unwanted advances to women.
I'm just wondering why some seem to feel that is OK for Trump but not OK for Clinton.
I'm unclear why you ask that question, kenjay. Of... (show quote)


I don't think it's ok for either....The difference being by action, settlements with bills accusers etcc it establishes a pattern of validity to the crime (s) that neither could afford at the time accused...

Trump's have been debunked, but no one throws that tide bit of information in when reciting what took place...or at least acknowledging they have been debunked..15 minutes of fame to go on and lie doesn't lend much credibility to them but everyone seems sooo very eager to automatically condemn Trump while slick willy was just being slick willy..


There is the industries injustice.....

Reply
Oct 26, 2016 21:45:50   #
PaulPisces Loc: San Francisco
 
lindajoy wrote:
I don't think it's ok for either....The difference being by action, settlements with bills accusers etcc it establishes a pattern of validity to the crime (s) that neither could afford at the time accused...

Trump's have been debunked, but no one throws that tide bit of information in when reciting what took place...or at least acknowledging they have been debunked..15 minutes of fame to go on and lie doesn't lend much credibility to them but everyone seems sooo very eager to automatically condemn Trump while slick willy was just being slick willy..


There is the industries injustice.....
I don't think it's ok for either....The difference... (show quote)




Linda - what are your sources that the claims against Trump have been debunked?

Reply
 
 
Oct 26, 2016 22:28:02   #
kenjay Loc: Arkansas
 
PaulPisces wrote:
I'm unclear why you ask that question, kenjay. Of course rape is never consensual.

In the one case where Clinton was accused of rape (by Juanita Broaddrick) it was never proven.
Not only that, she had signed a deposition stating that no sexual contact between them had ever occurred, and she continued to support Clinton at rallie for weeks after the alleged incident.

And it is not disputed a all that Clinton has made unwanted advances to women.
I'm just wondering why some seem to feel that is OK for Trump but not OK for Clinton.
I'm unclear why you ask that question, kenjay. Of... (show quote)

Why are these women coming forward now Paul not ten months are ten years ago ask your self that.

Reply
Oct 26, 2016 22:29:16   #
kenjay Loc: Arkansas
 
lindajoy wrote:
It's cool, I've done the same and now include something like" ok, sarcasm mode off now..."

Again it's cool...

Thanks Linda I appreciate you.

Reply
Oct 26, 2016 23:28:56   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
PaulPisces wrote:
I'm unclear why you ask that question, kenjay. Of course rape is never consensual.

In the one case where Clinton was accused of rape (by Juanita Broaddrick) it was never proven.
Not only that, she had signed a deposition stating that no sexual contact between them had ever occurred, and she continued to support Clinton at rallie for weeks after the alleged incident.

And it is not disputed a all that Clinton has made unwanted advances to women.
I'm just wondering why some seem to feel that is OK for Trump but not OK for Clinton.
I'm unclear why you ask that question, kenjay. Of... (show quote)


It's not OK, but the alternative is Clinton. What can be said?

Reply
Oct 27, 2016 15:37:39   #
jer48 Loc: perris ca
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
If Trump had only rapped his grab'em by the pussy remark, they'd see it as art!


LMAO

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.