One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Clinton gives out National security information on public television
Page <prev 2 of 2
Oct 22, 2016 15:31:19   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
Hemiman wrote:
Yes we all do.


Archie just posted him a ham sandwich on Philosophical food. I wll not let him have a beer, even virtual with it though.

I think he is going to be all right. Last time he walked into the room his first comment was. Shawn (their Wolfhound) needs his nails cut. I had to get the nail clippers right away so he wouldn't try to do it.

Reply
Oct 22, 2016 15:36:05   #
Hemiman Loc: Communist California
 
no propaganda please wrote:
Archie just posted him a ham sandwich on Philosophical food. I wll not let him have a beer, even virtual with it though.

I think he is going to be all right. Last time he walked into the room his first comment was. Shawn (their Wolfhound) needs his nails cut. I had to get the nail clippers right away so he wouldn't try to do it.


He is getting back to his old self,good to hear.Thanks for the update.

Reply
Oct 22, 2016 16:17:31   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
Hemiman wrote:
He is getting back to his old self,good to hear.Thanks for the update.


You can't keep a good man down!!

Reply
 
 
Oct 22, 2016 16:23:59   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
PaulPisces wrote:
Her mention of timing was hardly "secure information". The short time between the the information supporting the use of nuclear weapons and their actual deployment has hardly been a secret for some time now.


http://www.snopes.com/clinton-four-minute-nuclear/


I suggest you consult our military. They are furious and I assume they know more about this than any of us do. I have read numerous articles and commentaries by people who do know, many of them both active and retied militaty, and they say you are quite incorrect.

She has no excuse for revealing what she revealed and neither does anyone making excuses for her.

Does she have to personally and in front of you, kill someone in your family before you will see her for what she is?

How can anyone be so blind?

Reply
Oct 22, 2016 16:27:21   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
Hemiman wrote:
Yes we all do.


Prayer...daily.

Reply
Oct 22, 2016 16:29:33   #
zillaorange
 
no propaganda please wrote:
Archie just posted him a ham sandwich on Philosophical food. I wll not let him have a beer, even virtual with it though.

I think he is going to be all right. Last time he walked into the room his first comment was. Shawn (their Wolfhound) needs his nails cut. I had to get the nail clippers right away so he wouldn't try to do it.


Irish wolfhounds ? we've had 2, would love to get another ! only problem is they have to be put down too soon !!!

Reply
Oct 22, 2016 16:31:12   #
PaulPisces Loc: San Francisco
 
Docadhoc wrote:
I suggest you consult our military. They are furious and I assume they know more about this than any of us do. I have read numerous articles and commentaries by people who do know, many of them both active and retied militaty, and they say you are quite incorrect.

She has no excuse for revealing what she revealed and neither does anyone making excuses for her.

Does she have to personally and in front of you, kill someone in your family before you will see her for what she is?

How can anyone be so blind?
I suggest you consult our military. They are furi... (show quote)



All I am saying, and what this article supports, is the she revealed nothing that is secret. You may dislike that she mentioned a general idea of timing, but it could hardly be considered a guarded secret if it had already been published years ago.

The best anyone might be able to say is, being privy to the top secret truth, that she is incorrect. Anything else is substantiating her comments as formerly secret, thereby participating in the validation of what was "revealed".

Reply
 
 
Oct 22, 2016 18:47:53   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
PaulPisces wrote:
All I am saying, and what this article supports, is the she revealed nothing that is secret. You may dislike that she mentioned a general idea of timing, but it could hardly be considered a guarded secret if it had already been published years ago.

The best anyone might be able to say is, being privy to the top secret truth, that she is incorrect. Anything else is substantiating her comments as formerly secret, thereby participating in the validation of what was "revealed".


And as I indicated, the military past and present members say what she did was inexcusable and goes directly to her lack of judgement and her overall lack of control. That makes her an absolutely unacceptable commander in chief and far more dangerous to America than any of this innuendo ssilliness about Trump.

She cannot be trusted.

Reply
Oct 23, 2016 01:06:50   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
no propaganda please wrote:
The fact that it just another lack of proper judgement example should make a big difference to those voters who are paying attention, but it won't make one iota of difference to the "progressives" who make up the base of the Democrat part. Remember that Democrat and socialist are now one and the same, and destruction of the West is their goal. any way they get there is fine with them.

SWMBO


We have some here who swear it's no big deal. Much ado about norhing. And Trump said a bad thing, so there!. They're even.

Their depravity has no bottom.

Reply
Oct 23, 2016 09:29:54   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
Docadhoc wrote:
We have some here who swear it's no big deal. Much ado about norhing. And Trump said a bad thing, so there!. They're even.

Their depravity has no bottom.


Pathetic isn't it? But when you understand the communist, socialist infiltration in the school system since the early 1900's it becomes logical, though frightening, for these responses. By the way, good morning. Thanks for your concern about me. I'M BACK!!!
NPP

Reply
Oct 23, 2016 21:05:30   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
no propaganda please wrote:
Pathetic isn't it? But when you understand the communist, socialist infiltration in the school system since the early 1900's it becomes logical, though frightening, for these responses. By the way, good morning. Thanks for your concern about me. I'M BACK!!!
NPP


HEY! WELCOME BACK!!!

GOD IS GOOD!!!

I've come to the conclusion that most of these libs could be replaced by a couple cheat sheets and "Stupid Comments for Morons" Cliff Notes.

I know how they are programmed, but don't any of them pay attention?

There is an old saying:

Don't pee on my.leg and tell me it's raining.

Don't they know the difference?

By the way, SWMBO was great in your absence and a delight to talk with. She needs her own account here. She has much to contribute.

Lucky guy.

Reply
 
 
Oct 24, 2016 08:55:50   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
Docadhoc wrote:
HEY! WELCOME BACK!!!

GOD IS GOOD!!!

I've come to the conclusion that most of these libs could be replaced by a couple cheat sheets and "Stupid Comments for Morons" Cliff Notes.

I know how they are programmed, but don't any of them pay attention?

There is an old saying:

Don't pee on my.leg and tell me it's raining.

Don't they know the difference?

By the way, SWMBO was great in your absence and a delight to talk with. She needs her own account here. She has much to contribute.

Lucky guy.
HEY! WELCOME BACK!!! br br GOD IS GOOD!!! br br... (show quote)


I am that, a lucky guy. When my brother died, I couldn't handle the hateful comments from the left, so SWMBO did. unfortunately a lot of people said she did a better job that i could. While true, it did hurt my feelings-- sort of.


Reply
Oct 24, 2016 17:29:19   #
Hemiman Loc: Communist California
 
no propaganda please wrote:
I am that, a lucky guy. When my brother died, I couldn't handle the hateful comments from the left, so SWMBO did. unfortunately a lot of people said she did a better job that i could. While true, it did hurt my feelings-- sort of.



I like you both.......good to have you back.

Reply
Oct 25, 2016 00:53:25   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
no propaganda please wrote:
I am that, a lucky guy. When my brother died, I couldn't handle the hateful comments from the left, so SWMBO did. unfortunately a lot of people said she did a better job that i could. While true, it did hurt my feelings-- sort of.



The leftys are a hateful bunch andit permeates most all they do, but the thing I see is how they transfer their motives onto others.

They can't just disagree. They have to include ridicule and animosity. Then they accuse their opposition of those things because they think it is normal and they know no better, so if that is how they operate, get think everyone does the same.

We must consider the source.

If the divide Obama has caused in America becomes insurrection, it will be because the left has pushed it there with their collective belligerent attitude.

They are going to continue until they push half of America into a fight or flight syndrome reaction. They won't like it because if the gloves come off, there will be no taking prisoners.

Right now your main job is to get your strength back so you can take your share out when it's time...lol.

Reply
Oct 25, 2016 01:08:26   #
JimMe
 
PaulPisces wrote:
Her mention of timing was hardly "secure information". The short time between the the information supporting the use of nuclear weapons and their actual deployment has hardly been a secret for some time now.


http://www.snopes.com/clinton-four-minute-nuclear/



As I stated... It's not a concern of Legality with Hillary Clinton... It's a concern with a Lack of Ethics...

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.