One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
I will refrain from my vitriol if others will return the favor, in this section.
Page <prev 2 of 6 next> last>>
Oct 3, 2016 13:48:46   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
MarvinSussman wrote:
Frankly, I've had enough of this stupid drivel. I'm getting mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore!

Dammit! Start being civil or else!?*%$#@!



Reply
Oct 3, 2016 13:54:03   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
Bad Bob wrote:
They can't because they are ozzzing with hate.


oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing oozing!!!!!

I got!!!!!!!!!!



Reply
Oct 3, 2016 13:54:51   #
bilordinary Loc: SW Washington
 
JW wrote:
I didn't realize he was Australian.


Do you know what an Australian kiss is?

Reply
 
 
Oct 3, 2016 14:00:23   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
Loki wrote:
I suppose we can give it a try, and see if we can have civil disagreements.


OK Loki now that your a new man, let's see if you can be honest too. How does anyone break a leg walking a dog?

Reply
Oct 3, 2016 14:02:30   #
bilordinary Loc: SW Washington
 
bilordinary wrote:
Do you know what an Australian kiss is?


It's a lot like a French kiss!

Reply
Oct 3, 2016 14:04:56   #
vernon
 
MarvinSussman wrote:
Frankly, I've had enough of this stupid drivel. I'm getting mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore!

Dammit! Start being civil or else!?*%$#@!



or else what?

Reply
Oct 3, 2016 14:08:26   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
vernon wrote:
or else what?


Vern we will burn your Depends.

Reply
 
 
Oct 3, 2016 14:10:28   #
bilordinary Loc: SW Washington
 
bilordinary wrote:
It's a lot like a French kiss!


Only, down under!


Reply
Oct 3, 2016 14:13:37   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
bilordinary wrote:
Only, down under!



Only, down under! What?

Reply
Oct 3, 2016 14:16:31   #
bilordinary Loc: SW Washington
 
Bad Bob wrote:
Only, down under! What?


What's an Australian kiss?
It's like a French kiss.
Only down under!
Duh!

Reply
Oct 3, 2016 14:30:12   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
bilordinary wrote:
What's an Australian kiss?
It's like a French kiss.
Only down under!
Duh!


OK, does it smell a little bit and is it hard to hang on to?

Reply
 
 
Oct 3, 2016 16:16:40   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
Loki wrote:
I suppose we can give it a try, and see if we can have civil disagreements.


That sounds like a Trumpification, "he started it" and "I'll do this when she does that". I prefer to see it as me setting MY tone, the way that feels right to me - and let others do whatever the hell they want. Letting others turn me into a mean SOB makes me a wienie. We are responsible for our own behaviors and cannot blame them on someone else, no matter how badly they act.

Besides, treating each other with respect, doesn't mean agreeing with everything, or not calling out each others lunacy. It really only means not taking things personally - even when someone intends them that way. Know watta mean?

Reply
Oct 3, 2016 18:28:15   #
reconreb Loc: America / Inglis Fla.
 
Loki wrote:
I suppose we can give it a try, and see if we can have civil disagreements.


O.K. The written language I (we) use here can be very foul to say the least . I will try to speak to those I disagree with ( progressives ) like we are in a public court house .
It's worth a shot ..

Reply
Oct 3, 2016 18:48:44   #
MarvinSussman
 
reconreb wrote:
O.K. The written language I (we) use here can be very foul to say the least . I will try to speak to those I disagree with ( progressives ) like we are in a public court house .
It's worth a shot ..


I beg your polite, considered response to the following suggestions:

1. During World War II, Americans working double shifts and weekends bought “War Bonds”. At peace, they cashed in their bonds for cars and homes, finally getting the prosperity that enough government spending could have given them a decade earlier, when Hitler’s spending gave Germans prosperity and made him popular and powerful.
2. Our GDP grows approximately $2 for each Congressional $1 spent again and again until either taxed, saved, or exported. Our Debt/GDP ratio dropped from 120% in 1944 to 30% during 35 prosperous years due to moderate inflation and heavy spending on veteran housing and education, the Marshall Plan, nuclear energy, the Korean War, Cold War rearmament, the Interstate Highway, the Man-on-the-Moon, and the Vietnam War.
3. Nobody would refuse a salary boost to avoid a tax hike but, to avoid a tax hike, this Congress refuses to boost our infrastructure! In our past, Congressional spending gave us national parks, dams, rural electrification, transistors, computers, the internet, jet planes, rocket ships, satellites, solar energy, LCD, the mouse, touch-screens, SIRI, search algorithms, GPS, genomics, nanotechnology, and the greatest pharmaceutical industry!
4. About 85% of Congress’ spending becomes cash for our tax payments. We save about 5% of it and spend the rest on imports. More deficit spending by Congress would give taxpayers more after-tax savings and more money to spend on Asian bargains.
5. Unless a trade surplus will always finance our annual net savings, members of Congress seeking a “balanced-budget” law are like fools commanding the tides to ebb!
6. Congress’ spending should be limited only by the onset of harmful inflation when it is controlled by moderate long-term interest rates and by adequate progressive taxes on discretionary incomes, financial transactions, and large estates. More spending would increase inflation; less spending would increase deflation and unemployment.
7. The Fed’s purchase of US debt cuts debt interest rates by reducing the supply. It also effectively reduces the debt and debt interest expense because the Fed gets the interest and principal at maturity and returns 94% of its annual profit to the Treasury.
8. If the interest rate on our federal debt is less than our GDP growth rate, the debt can grow indefinitely and safely since the Debt/GDP ratio will remain or descend well below 100%. (Check the math: http://www.levyinstitute.org/publications/?docid=1379.)
9. Foreign exporters will either accept our dollars and bonds or stop selling us goods. The US dollar’s reserve currency status favors US consumers, traders, etc., and requires that we maintain a large national debt, much of it held by foreign nations.
10. Increased output for the same input is anti-inflationary so inflation is not increased when Congress hires the unemployed to gain infrastructure and productivity. The goods that the unemployed now get with stamps would instead be bought with their salaries, ending the humiliations of the idle poor and the resentments of the working poor.
Excessive unemployment is due only to Congress’ refusal to build infrastructure.

Reply
Oct 3, 2016 20:45:06   #
reconreb Loc: America / Inglis Fla.
 
MarvinSussman wrote:
I beg your polite, considered response to the following suggestions:

1. During World War II, Americans working double shifts and weekends bought “War Bonds”. At peace, they cashed in their bonds for cars and homes, finally getting the prosperity that enough government spending could have given them a decade earlier, when Hitler’s spending gave Germans prosperity and made him popular and powerful.
2. Our GDP grows approximately $2 for each Congressional $1 spent again and again until either taxed, saved, or exported. Our Debt/GDP ratio dropped from 120% in 1944 to 30% during 35 prosperous years due to moderate inflation and heavy spending on veteran housing and education, the Marshall Plan, nuclear energy, the Korean War, Cold War rearmament, the Interstate Highway, the Man-on-the-Moon, and the Vietnam War.
3. Nobody would refuse a salary boost to avoid a tax hike but, to avoid a tax hike, this Congress refuses to boost our infrastructure! In our past, Congressional spending gave us national parks, dams, rural electrification, transistors, computers, the internet, jet planes, rocket ships, satellites, solar energy, LCD, the mouse, touch-screens, SIRI, search algorithms, GPS, genomics, nanotechnology, and the greatest pharmaceutical industry!
4. About 85% of Congress’ spending becomes cash for our tax payments. We save about 5% of it and spend the rest on imports. More deficit spending by Congress would give taxpayers more after-tax savings and more money to spend on Asian bargains.
5. Unless a trade surplus will always finance our annual net savings, members of Congress seeking a “balanced-budget” law are like fools commanding the tides to ebb!
6. Congress’ spending should be limited only by the onset of harmful inflation when it is controlled by moderate long-term interest rates and by adequate progressive taxes on discretionary incomes, financial transactions, and large estates. More spending would increase inflation; less spending would increase deflation and unemployment.
7. The Fed’s purchase of US debt cuts debt interest rates by reducing the supply. It also effectively reduces the debt and debt interest expense because the Fed gets the interest and principal at maturity and returns 94% of its annual profit to the Treasury.
8. If the interest rate on our federal debt is less than our GDP growth rate, the debt can grow indefinitely and safely since the Debt/GDP ratio will remain or descend well below 100%. (Check the math: http://www.levyinstitute.org/publications/?docid=1379.)
9. Foreign exporters will either accept our dollars and bonds or stop selling us goods. The US dollar’s reserve currency status favors US consumers, traders, etc., and requires that we maintain a large national debt, much of it held by foreign nations.
10. Increased output for the same input is anti-inflationary so inflation is not increased when Congress hires the unemployed to gain infrastructure and productivity. The goods that the unemployed now get with stamps would instead be bought with their salaries, ending the humiliations of the idle poor and the resentments of the working poor.
Excessive unemployment is due only to Congress’ refusal to build infrastructure.
I beg your polite, considered response to the foll... (show quote)


Outta my league Marv. , your attempt to bait me in fails but I'm sure you will try again .. You like to project your intellect and like most who do this it shows a lack of character and misjudgement on your part .. Have a great day ..

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.