Maybe a Little Hypocrisy? While I haven't seen anyone on OPP decrying Dick Cheney's profiteering, my guess is there was no outrage from the far right when his company was raking in...

PaulPisces Loc: San Francisco

While I haven't seen anyone on OPP decrying Dick Cheney's profiteering, my guess is there was no outrage from the far right when his company was raking in billions because of his relationship to those in power.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

PaulPisces wrote:

While I haven't seen anyone on OPP decrying Dick Cheney's profiteering, my guess is there was no outrage from the far right when his company was raking in billions because of his relationship to those in power.

Um...Cheney isn't running, but if someone wants to charge him for whatever I wouldn't be against it.

no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun

PaulPisces wrote:

While I haven't seen anyone on OPP decrying Dick Cheney's profiteering, my guess is there was no outrage from the far right when his company was raking in billions because of his relationship to those in power.

While chaney was in office, the shares of stock he and his family owned were controlled in such a way that he could not vote the shares, and had no control of Haliburton's decisions. If someone were required to sell all his shares of a stock before he could be president, vice president or hold any high office, successful, market savey people would not seek government office. The Clinton Foundation which according to all I have seen, donates only ten percent to any charity, is owned and run by the Clinton family and the 90% which apparently is "expenses" is available for the Clintons to use for personal needs. Yes, I know that a lot of the "progressives" are already demanding Trump sell all his financial holdings before January if he is elected President

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

PaulPisces wrote:

While I haven't seen anyone on OPP decrying Dick Cheney's profiteering, my guess is there was no outrage from the far right when his company was raking in billions because of his relationship to those in power.

No one!!!!! Well, I see I've been wasting MY time! I've explained about Cheney's ghost account, where he retained full ownership of his Halliburton stock, using a proxy to vote his shares, his streamlining of defense contracts and his ruthless destruction of those that dared question his actions. No telling how many other people got shot in the face.

I believe I even mentioned his ties to Blackwater. I've been asking for some time when the Congressional investigations will begin. I know they just haven't had time - but the Benghazi investigations are done, so - I guess they'll be starting any day now.

Little Ball of Hate

PaulPisces wrote:

While I haven't seen anyone on OPP decrying Dick Cheney's profiteering, my guess is there was no outrage from the far right when his company was raking in billions because of his relationship to those in power.

Oh look! Another lame attempt to make Hillary look good, because someone else did it. How pathetic.

Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas

PaulPisces wrote:

While I haven't seen anyone on OPP decrying Dick Cheney's profiteering, my guess is there was no outrage from the far right when his company was raking in billions because of his relationship to those in power.

The Clinton Pig is diseased.

And I couldn't care less about Cheney, Haliburton, and your opinion.

Both the Clintons are diseased Pigs.

And you are possessed and controlled by the demon Sitri Habbalah.

He has made you his............PUNK !!

PaulPisces Loc: San Francisco

Wolf counselor wrote:

The Clinton Pig is diseased.

And I couldn't care less about Cheney, Haliburton, and your opinion.

Both the Clintons are diseased Pigs.

And you are possessed and controlled by the demon Sitri Habbalah.

He has made you his............PUNK !!

So glad to know it isn't my fault!!!

PeterS

no propaganda please wrote:

While chaney was in office, the shares of stock he... (show quote)

No, but he did steer a ton of business Halliburton's way from which he knew damn well he would make money from. I would also love to see the piece of propaganda that say's the Clinton foundation only donates 10%. Again, when are you going to live up to your name because every time I read one of your post it's nothing but propaganda. Should that be your new name, "Nothing But Propaganda?" Seems so...

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

no propaganda please wrote:

While chaney was in office, the shares of stock he... (show quote)

What part of "ghost account" and "proxy vote" did you not get? If one wishes to be in public service, they should do that, if one wishes to be in business, they should do that - Cheney ( and many others ) did them both at once - and we got screwed twice.

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

PaulPisces wrote:

So glad to know it isn't my fault!!!

I'd be worried about someone that is on a first name basis with demons.

Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas

PaulPisces wrote:

So glad to know it isn't my fault!!!

You're right, it's not your fault.

You have no soul, therefore you can't be blamed for your defilement.

So, I forgive you of your debauchery............PUNK !!.

PeterS

Little Ball of Hate wrote:

Oh look! Another lame attempt to make Hillary look good, because someone else did it. How pathetic.

Hillary did it? God I love you Christians. Do you have any kind of proof behind your accusation or do you even care if the accusation is true or not--you think it's true so that's all that matters. Jesus must really be proud of you. I guess I'll see you in hell huh!

Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas

lpnmajor wrote:

I'd be worried about someone that is on a first name basis with demons.

I would be worried about someone who is ignorant of the existence and modus operandi of demons.

Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas

PeterS wrote:

Hillary did it? God I love you Christians. Do you have any kind of proof behind your accusation or do you even care if the accusation is true or not--you think it's true so that's all that matters. Jesus must really be proud of you. I guess I'll see you in hell huh!

Don't look now stupid, but you're already in hell.

And Jesus ain't proud of YOU.

You dumb........................Spook !!

PaulPisces Loc: San Francisco

PeterS wrote:

No, but he did steer a ton of business Halliburton's way from which he knew damn well he would make money from. I would also love to see the piece of propaganda that say's the Clinton foundation only donates 10%. Again, when are you going to live up to your name because every time I read one of your post it's nothing but propaganda. Should that be your new name, "Nothing But Propaganda?" Seems so...

I'm not one to say The Clinton Foundation is without stain. Virtually every major charity we give to has its moments of misconduct.
The Clinton Foundation's may be larger than some and smaller than others.

But the claim that The Clinton Foundation donates only 10% is a twisted fact.
It makes very few grants to other organizations, which accounts for such a small portion of its expenditures to be donations.

Instead implements programs itself and does the work and funds them itself.
So it is fair to say that most of its expenditures go to charity work.

http://www.factcheck.org/2015/06/where-does-clinton-foundation-money-go/