Obama's very unusual path to the presidency.
Aug 27, 2016 09:45:39 #
Mark H. Gorton, the author, is a successful Wall Street entrepreneur.
The popular myth about Barack Obama is that he was a charismatic community organizer who rose to political prominence based upon his natural abilities. However, a deeper look shows Obama to have been groomed from the time he was in college by members of the power elite. My reading of the situation is that he was recruited as a CIA asset while a student at Occidental. His family had been in the orbit of CIA operations since before Barack was born.
Obama transferred from Occidental to Columbia University during his junior year in college. His time at Columbia is cloaked in mystery. Wayne Allyn Root was, like Obama, a political science major at Columbia who also graduated in 1983. In 2008, Root said of Obama, "I don't know a single person at Columbia that knew him, and they all know me. I don't have a classmate who ever knew Barack Obama at Columbia. Ever! Nobody recalls him. I'm not exaggerating, I'm not kidding.” According to Professor Henry Graff, “I don’t consider him a Columbia student. I have no idea what he did on the Columbia campus. No one knows him.” In an age where the college records of presidential candidates are generally released to the public, Barack Obama stands alone in keeping his college records are sealed. In June of 1981, right after moving to NYC with almost no money, Obama was able to travel to Indonesia and Pakistan despite Pakistan being on the State Department’s “no travel” list in 1981. In Pakistan, Obama went on a partridge hunting trip with Muhammad Soomro, who would go on to become acting president of Pakistan in 2008.
At Columbia, Obama wrote his thesis on arms reduction negotiations between the US and the USSR. US/Soviet relations was the specialty area of Columbia faculty member, Trilateral Commission founder, and Obama policy advisor, Zbigniew Brzezninski. Immediately after college, Obama took a job in New York with Business International Corporation, which served as a CIA front in various operations around the globe. After two years at BIC, Obama moved to Chicago and began work as a community organizer.
While working as a community organizer, Obama applied to Harvard Law School. However, Obama was not just another law school applicant. He had help from a network of wealthy, powerful people. Khalid al-Mansour was “the principal advisor to one of the world’s richest men”, Saudi prince Al-Waleed bin Talal. In 1987, Al-Mansour approached prominent black leader and former Manhattan Borough President, Percy Sutton and asked him to write a recommendation to his friends at Harvard Law School on Obama’s behalf.[56]
At Harvard Law School, Obama was selected to the prestigious role of president of the law review. After law school, Obama moved back to Chicago where he took a job as a lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School. According to Doug Ross, Obama applied for a teaching position at the University of Chicago Law School and was rejected, but a few weeks later, the Board of Trustees called the law school and told them to put Obama on the faculty. Obama then used the UofC position as a platform for a future career. Despite not having accomplished anything in his life more significant than attending prestigious schools, Obama used the faculty position to write his memoir “Dreams of my Father”. The University of Chicago boasts the highest output of published papers per professor of any law school in the country, however, in 12 years on the faculty, Obama did not publish a single journal article. While in Chicago, Obama cultivated powerful friends like Penny Pritzker, and a network of Chicago’s elite. While running for US Senate in 2004, Obama benefited from aggressive reporting from the Chicago Tribune that targeted first his primary opponent Blair Hull, and then Republican nominee Jack Ryan who was destroyed when in a highly unusual move a Los Angeles judge granted a request by the Chicago Tribune to unseal Ryan’s divorce records despite both Ryan and his ex-wife Jeri Ryan’s wishes that the records be kept sealed. The records contained a claim by Jack he had suggested that Jeri have sex with him in public at a swingers club. This revelation undermined Ryan’s campaign, and he withdrew from the race.
While he was still just a candidate for Senate, Obama was selected to give the keynote address at the Democratic National Convention in 2004. Obama’s speech rocketed him to national prominence. By the time the 2008 presidential election rolled around, Obama had become the favorite democratic candidate of the power elite. With the remarkable uniformity that is evidence of a massive intelligence propaganda campaign, the controlled corporate media backed Obama heavily and pummeled Senator Clinton. Obama went on to victory in November with talk of hope and change.
The Obama administration has proven to be a great disappointment for most Obama supporters. Instead of delivering change, Obama has continued most of the worst of the policies of the Bush administration. The Patriot Act has been renewed. Government secrecy has been taken to new levels. Obama has conducted a war on whistleblowers who seek to improve the government. The US military is active in more countries blah blah. Obama can be seen as a right wing spy with the cover of a liberal democrat. This characterization correctly fits all available information about Obama’s background, and it also fits with the policy positions that Obama has taken. Using this analysis, back in March 2008, Webster Tarpley was able to correctly predict Obama’s behavior in office. By analyzing the policies of Obama advisor Zbigniew Brzezninski, Tarpley was able to predict that Obama would pivot from trying to start a war with Iran to the more dangerous approach of militarily provoking Russia.
More of Gorton's research titled, "Fifty Years of the Deep State," can be accessed here:
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Document:Fifty_Years_of_the_Deep_State#The_Obama_Administration
The popular myth about Barack Obama is that he was a charismatic community organizer who rose to political prominence based upon his natural abilities. However, a deeper look shows Obama to have been groomed from the time he was in college by members of the power elite. My reading of the situation is that he was recruited as a CIA asset while a student at Occidental. His family had been in the orbit of CIA operations since before Barack was born.
Obama transferred from Occidental to Columbia University during his junior year in college. His time at Columbia is cloaked in mystery. Wayne Allyn Root was, like Obama, a political science major at Columbia who also graduated in 1983. In 2008, Root said of Obama, "I don't know a single person at Columbia that knew him, and they all know me. I don't have a classmate who ever knew Barack Obama at Columbia. Ever! Nobody recalls him. I'm not exaggerating, I'm not kidding.” According to Professor Henry Graff, “I don’t consider him a Columbia student. I have no idea what he did on the Columbia campus. No one knows him.” In an age where the college records of presidential candidates are generally released to the public, Barack Obama stands alone in keeping his college records are sealed. In June of 1981, right after moving to NYC with almost no money, Obama was able to travel to Indonesia and Pakistan despite Pakistan being on the State Department’s “no travel” list in 1981. In Pakistan, Obama went on a partridge hunting trip with Muhammad Soomro, who would go on to become acting president of Pakistan in 2008.
At Columbia, Obama wrote his thesis on arms reduction negotiations between the US and the USSR. US/Soviet relations was the specialty area of Columbia faculty member, Trilateral Commission founder, and Obama policy advisor, Zbigniew Brzezninski. Immediately after college, Obama took a job in New York with Business International Corporation, which served as a CIA front in various operations around the globe. After two years at BIC, Obama moved to Chicago and began work as a community organizer.
While working as a community organizer, Obama applied to Harvard Law School. However, Obama was not just another law school applicant. He had help from a network of wealthy, powerful people. Khalid al-Mansour was “the principal advisor to one of the world’s richest men”, Saudi prince Al-Waleed bin Talal. In 1987, Al-Mansour approached prominent black leader and former Manhattan Borough President, Percy Sutton and asked him to write a recommendation to his friends at Harvard Law School on Obama’s behalf.[56]
At Harvard Law School, Obama was selected to the prestigious role of president of the law review. After law school, Obama moved back to Chicago where he took a job as a lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School. According to Doug Ross, Obama applied for a teaching position at the University of Chicago Law School and was rejected, but a few weeks later, the Board of Trustees called the law school and told them to put Obama on the faculty. Obama then used the UofC position as a platform for a future career. Despite not having accomplished anything in his life more significant than attending prestigious schools, Obama used the faculty position to write his memoir “Dreams of my Father”. The University of Chicago boasts the highest output of published papers per professor of any law school in the country, however, in 12 years on the faculty, Obama did not publish a single journal article. While in Chicago, Obama cultivated powerful friends like Penny Pritzker, and a network of Chicago’s elite. While running for US Senate in 2004, Obama benefited from aggressive reporting from the Chicago Tribune that targeted first his primary opponent Blair Hull, and then Republican nominee Jack Ryan who was destroyed when in a highly unusual move a Los Angeles judge granted a request by the Chicago Tribune to unseal Ryan’s divorce records despite both Ryan and his ex-wife Jeri Ryan’s wishes that the records be kept sealed. The records contained a claim by Jack he had suggested that Jeri have sex with him in public at a swingers club. This revelation undermined Ryan’s campaign, and he withdrew from the race.
While he was still just a candidate for Senate, Obama was selected to give the keynote address at the Democratic National Convention in 2004. Obama’s speech rocketed him to national prominence. By the time the 2008 presidential election rolled around, Obama had become the favorite democratic candidate of the power elite. With the remarkable uniformity that is evidence of a massive intelligence propaganda campaign, the controlled corporate media backed Obama heavily and pummeled Senator Clinton. Obama went on to victory in November with talk of hope and change.
The Obama administration has proven to be a great disappointment for most Obama supporters. Instead of delivering change, Obama has continued most of the worst of the policies of the Bush administration. The Patriot Act has been renewed. Government secrecy has been taken to new levels. Obama has conducted a war on whistleblowers who seek to improve the government. The US military is active in more countries blah blah. Obama can be seen as a right wing spy with the cover of a liberal democrat. This characterization correctly fits all available information about Obama’s background, and it also fits with the policy positions that Obama has taken. Using this analysis, back in March 2008, Webster Tarpley was able to correctly predict Obama’s behavior in office. By analyzing the policies of Obama advisor Zbigniew Brzezninski, Tarpley was able to predict that Obama would pivot from trying to start a war with Iran to the more dangerous approach of militarily provoking Russia.
More of Gorton's research titled, "Fifty Years of the Deep State," can be accessed here:
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Document:Fifty_Years_of_the_Deep_State#The_Obama_Administration
Aug 27, 2016 14:11:31 #
Mark Gorton's Deep State section on the 9/11 cover-up by the mainstream media:
Press Cover-up
Integral to the 9/11 op has been the media cover. Leveraging many decades of work controlling the press by the national security state, the Bush Syndicate continued the ongoing program of press control to effectively censor coverage of 9/11. The mechanics of the media cover up involve a number of different components.
In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, the country came together in a burst of patriotic fervor. The Bush administration skillfully manipulated this patriotic response to create an environment where questioning the government was considered unpatriotic.
Air Force Colonel and key Pentagon official Karen Kwiatkowski, who blew the whistle on the Bush administration’s efforts to concoct false intelligence about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, wrote (page 26): “I have been told by reporters that they will not report their own insights or contrary evaluations of the official 9/11 story, because to question the government story about 9/11 is to question the very foundations of our entire modern belief system regarding our government, our country, and our way of life. To be charged with questioning these foundations is far more serious than being labeled a disgruntled conspiracy nut or anti-government traitor, or even being sidelined or marginalized within an academic, government service, or literary career. To question the official 9/11 story is simply and fundamentally revolutionary. In this way, of course, questioning the official story is also simply and fundamentally American.”Several months after 9/11, famed news anchor Dan Rather told the BBC that American reporters were practicing “a form of self-censorship”: “There was a time in South Africa that people would put flaming tires around peoples’ necks if they dissented. And in some ways the fear is that you will be necklaced here, you will have a flaming tire of lack of patriotism put around your neck. Now it is that fear that keeps journalists from asking the toughest of the tough questions.... And again, I am humbled to say, I do not except myself from this criticism. What we are talking about here – whether one wants to recognize it or not, or call it by its proper name or not – is a form of self-censorship.”
The head of CNN agreed: “There was ‘almost a patriotism police’ after 9/11 and when the network showed [things critical of the administration's policies] it would get phone calls from advertisers and the administration and “big people in corporations were calling up and saying, ‘You’re being anti-American here.’”
Keith Olbermann said: “You can rock the boat, but you can never say that the entire ocean is in trouble .... You cannot say: By the way, there’s something wrong with our .... system.” Former Washington Post – and now Huffington Post – columnist Dan Froomkin wrote in 2006: Mainstream-media political journalism is in danger of becoming increasingly irrelevant, but not because of the Internet, or even Comedy Central. The threat comes from inside. It comes from journalists being afraid to do what journalists were put on this green earth to do...
There’s the intense pressure to maintain access to insider sources, even as those sources become ridiculously unrevealing and oversensitive. There’s the fear of being labeled partisan if one’s bullshit- calling isn’t meted out in precisely equal increments along the political spectrum. If mainstream-media political journalists don’t start calling bullshit more often, then we do risk losing our primacy — if not to the comedians then to the bloggers.
I still believe that no one is fundamentally more capable of first-rate bullshit-calling than a well-informed beat reporter – whatever their beat. We just need to get the editors, or the corporate culture, or the self-censorship – or whatever it is – out of the way.”
Press Cover-up
Integral to the 9/11 op has been the media cover. Leveraging many decades of work controlling the press by the national security state, the Bush Syndicate continued the ongoing program of press control to effectively censor coverage of 9/11. The mechanics of the media cover up involve a number of different components.
In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, the country came together in a burst of patriotic fervor. The Bush administration skillfully manipulated this patriotic response to create an environment where questioning the government was considered unpatriotic.
Air Force Colonel and key Pentagon official Karen Kwiatkowski, who blew the whistle on the Bush administration’s efforts to concoct false intelligence about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, wrote (page 26): “I have been told by reporters that they will not report their own insights or contrary evaluations of the official 9/11 story, because to question the government story about 9/11 is to question the very foundations of our entire modern belief system regarding our government, our country, and our way of life. To be charged with questioning these foundations is far more serious than being labeled a disgruntled conspiracy nut or anti-government traitor, or even being sidelined or marginalized within an academic, government service, or literary career. To question the official 9/11 story is simply and fundamentally revolutionary. In this way, of course, questioning the official story is also simply and fundamentally American.”Several months after 9/11, famed news anchor Dan Rather told the BBC that American reporters were practicing “a form of self-censorship”: “There was a time in South Africa that people would put flaming tires around peoples’ necks if they dissented. And in some ways the fear is that you will be necklaced here, you will have a flaming tire of lack of patriotism put around your neck. Now it is that fear that keeps journalists from asking the toughest of the tough questions.... And again, I am humbled to say, I do not except myself from this criticism. What we are talking about here – whether one wants to recognize it or not, or call it by its proper name or not – is a form of self-censorship.”
The head of CNN agreed: “There was ‘almost a patriotism police’ after 9/11 and when the network showed [things critical of the administration's policies] it would get phone calls from advertisers and the administration and “big people in corporations were calling up and saying, ‘You’re being anti-American here.’”
Keith Olbermann said: “You can rock the boat, but you can never say that the entire ocean is in trouble .... You cannot say: By the way, there’s something wrong with our .... system.” Former Washington Post – and now Huffington Post – columnist Dan Froomkin wrote in 2006: Mainstream-media political journalism is in danger of becoming increasingly irrelevant, but not because of the Internet, or even Comedy Central. The threat comes from inside. It comes from journalists being afraid to do what journalists were put on this green earth to do...
There’s the intense pressure to maintain access to insider sources, even as those sources become ridiculously unrevealing and oversensitive. There’s the fear of being labeled partisan if one’s bullshit- calling isn’t meted out in precisely equal increments along the political spectrum. If mainstream-media political journalists don’t start calling bullshit more often, then we do risk losing our primacy — if not to the comedians then to the bloggers.
I still believe that no one is fundamentally more capable of first-rate bullshit-calling than a well-informed beat reporter – whatever their beat. We just need to get the editors, or the corporate culture, or the self-censorship – or whatever it is – out of the way.”
Aug 27, 2016 16:54:43 #
Continuation of Mark Gorton's research:
George H.W. Bush as the mastermind of the 9/11 op
I have seen no evidence directly linking George H.W. (Poppy) Bush to the 9/11 attacks, but just as physicists can detect the presence of black hole by the actions of other bodies around it, so the massive force of George H.W. Bush in the 9/11 op can be inferred. Many people extremely close to Poppy Bush were actively involved in the 9/11 op, including: his oldest son, George W. Bush; his youngest son, Marvin Bush; Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Prince Bandar, the Iran Contra network, and the BCCI network. On Sept 10, 2001, George H. W. Bush was in Washington, DC where he attended the investor conference of the Carlyle Group along with Osama bin Laden's brother Shafig bin Laden. Poppy Bush then spent the night of Sept 10th at the White House despite the fact that his son was in Florida.[36]
Poppy Bush was a master spy. He has been at the heart of the CIA his entire career. In honor of his crucial role at the core of the CIA, the CIA headquarters in Langley, VA is now named the George Bush Center for Intelligence. As a protégé of Allen Dulles, Bush learned the tradecraft that kept him in the shadows and his crimes hard to detect. During his tenure as Vice President under Reagan, Poppy Bush was the head of the secret government apparatus. The networks of people involved in the 9/11 operation line up perfectly with Poppy Bush’s own networks: CIA, Saudi leadership, Saudi Intelligence, Pakistani ISI, etc. These are the same networks that had been involved with Poppy Bush’s previous criminal acts: the CIA/Republican Counter Surprise, Iran-Contra, BCCI, and Poppy Bush had been the prime mover in all of these operations.
Whoever conceived the 9/11 attacks had to be a heartless killer. For years, Poppy Bush had been authorizing the killings of hundreds of innocent American citizens to cover up his earlier crimes. From the early 1970’s to the present day, Poppy Bush has owned the responsibility for covering up JFK’s assassination, including the killing of many dozens of people. 400 people were killed to cover up the Enterprise/Iran-Contra alone.
Whoever planned the 9/11 op, had to have the boldness to think that a massive crime could be committed in broad daylight. Most people could not even imagine daring to get away with such a crime, but Poppy Bush had decades of experience getting away with bold, high profile crimes: from the Coup of ’63 to Watergate to the CIA/Republican Counter Surprise to Iran-Contra.
After LBJ, Allen Dulles and J. Edgar Hoover died, Poppy Bush assumed responsibility for the ongoing cover-up of the Coup of ’63. He would carry this responsibility with him for the rest of his life. He could never retire. The fear of exposure of his past crimes would haunt him every day for the rest of his life. An outbreak of peace, a victory in the cold war presented a profound threat to his liberty. As head of the secret government, Poppy Bush had responsibility for insuring that the U.S. stay on a perpetual war footing so that the crimes of the national security state would continue to be suppressed. The original planning for the 9/11 op occurred either during Bush’s tenure as Vice President or during his Presidential administration. During the 1980’s, Bush led the secret government apparatus buried within the national security state. The secret government had been functioning for decades and had the ability to operate outside the constitutional chain of command.Much of the execution of the 9/11 op occurred within the U.S. government during the Clinton administration. Due to Clinton’s complicity in the Contra drug trafficking and Enterprise related financial crimes, Clinton kept in office over one thousand Bush appointees who helped keep these crimes under wraps. This same network of people played a crucial role in enabling 9/11 to happen, and this network was loyal to Poppy Bush.
The 9/11 op needed to have a sympathetic president of the U.S. in order to make it work. In this sense, 9/11 was a gift from a father to a son. Few other people could conceivably count on a future president being supportive of such a heinous crime.
Poppy Bush operations worked on many levels and served many purposes. The 9/11 op has the hallmarks of a Poppy Bush operation. 9/11 helped create a permanent war on terror that has served as a justification for two imperialistic wars. It also enabled the [Patriot Act|"Patriot" Act]] and its massive expansion of government secrecy which helps keep old crimes buried. 9/11 helped destroy a large number of criminal and civil investigations which would have led to the Bush Syndicate, and 9/11 justified a surge in military/intelligence spending much of which went into the pockets of Bush allies. In addition, many different types of financial crimes (insider trading, insurance fraud, money laundering, financial looting) were embedded within the plot.
George H.W. Bush as the mastermind of the 9/11 op
I have seen no evidence directly linking George H.W. (Poppy) Bush to the 9/11 attacks, but just as physicists can detect the presence of black hole by the actions of other bodies around it, so the massive force of George H.W. Bush in the 9/11 op can be inferred. Many people extremely close to Poppy Bush were actively involved in the 9/11 op, including: his oldest son, George W. Bush; his youngest son, Marvin Bush; Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Prince Bandar, the Iran Contra network, and the BCCI network. On Sept 10, 2001, George H. W. Bush was in Washington, DC where he attended the investor conference of the Carlyle Group along with Osama bin Laden's brother Shafig bin Laden. Poppy Bush then spent the night of Sept 10th at the White House despite the fact that his son was in Florida.[36]
Poppy Bush was a master spy. He has been at the heart of the CIA his entire career. In honor of his crucial role at the core of the CIA, the CIA headquarters in Langley, VA is now named the George Bush Center for Intelligence. As a protégé of Allen Dulles, Bush learned the tradecraft that kept him in the shadows and his crimes hard to detect. During his tenure as Vice President under Reagan, Poppy Bush was the head of the secret government apparatus. The networks of people involved in the 9/11 operation line up perfectly with Poppy Bush’s own networks: CIA, Saudi leadership, Saudi Intelligence, Pakistani ISI, etc. These are the same networks that had been involved with Poppy Bush’s previous criminal acts: the CIA/Republican Counter Surprise, Iran-Contra, BCCI, and Poppy Bush had been the prime mover in all of these operations.
Whoever conceived the 9/11 attacks had to be a heartless killer. For years, Poppy Bush had been authorizing the killings of hundreds of innocent American citizens to cover up his earlier crimes. From the early 1970’s to the present day, Poppy Bush has owned the responsibility for covering up JFK’s assassination, including the killing of many dozens of people. 400 people were killed to cover up the Enterprise/Iran-Contra alone.
Whoever planned the 9/11 op, had to have the boldness to think that a massive crime could be committed in broad daylight. Most people could not even imagine daring to get away with such a crime, but Poppy Bush had decades of experience getting away with bold, high profile crimes: from the Coup of ’63 to Watergate to the CIA/Republican Counter Surprise to Iran-Contra.
After LBJ, Allen Dulles and J. Edgar Hoover died, Poppy Bush assumed responsibility for the ongoing cover-up of the Coup of ’63. He would carry this responsibility with him for the rest of his life. He could never retire. The fear of exposure of his past crimes would haunt him every day for the rest of his life. An outbreak of peace, a victory in the cold war presented a profound threat to his liberty. As head of the secret government, Poppy Bush had responsibility for insuring that the U.S. stay on a perpetual war footing so that the crimes of the national security state would continue to be suppressed. The original planning for the 9/11 op occurred either during Bush’s tenure as Vice President or during his Presidential administration. During the 1980’s, Bush led the secret government apparatus buried within the national security state. The secret government had been functioning for decades and had the ability to operate outside the constitutional chain of command.Much of the execution of the 9/11 op occurred within the U.S. government during the Clinton administration. Due to Clinton’s complicity in the Contra drug trafficking and Enterprise related financial crimes, Clinton kept in office over one thousand Bush appointees who helped keep these crimes under wraps. This same network of people played a crucial role in enabling 9/11 to happen, and this network was loyal to Poppy Bush.
The 9/11 op needed to have a sympathetic president of the U.S. in order to make it work. In this sense, 9/11 was a gift from a father to a son. Few other people could conceivably count on a future president being supportive of such a heinous crime.
Poppy Bush operations worked on many levels and served many purposes. The 9/11 op has the hallmarks of a Poppy Bush operation. 9/11 helped create a permanent war on terror that has served as a justification for two imperialistic wars. It also enabled the [Patriot Act|"Patriot" Act]] and its massive expansion of government secrecy which helps keep old crimes buried. 9/11 helped destroy a large number of criminal and civil investigations which would have led to the Bush Syndicate, and 9/11 justified a surge in military/intelligence spending much of which went into the pockets of Bush allies. In addition, many different types of financial crimes (insider trading, insurance fraud, money laundering, financial looting) were embedded within the plot.
Aug 28, 2016 07:10:36 #
WE know that Iraq has the chemical Weapons and he before the war began Saadam give all the weapons to Syria So let speak the truth
Aug 28, 2016 08:20:36 #
old woman wrote:
WE know that Iraq has the chemical Weapons and he before the war began Saadam give all the weapons to Syria So let speak the truth
You're commenting on something not covered in the articles submitted.
Can you post a link to the source of your false information? That might give readers some context.
Aug 28, 2016 09:06:38 #
crazylibertarian
Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
payne1000 wrote:
i Mark H. Gorton, the author, is a successful Wal... (show quote)
I've always had a question; what was he taught at that public school in Indonesia, the largest Muslim country on earth?
Aug 28, 2016 09:12:36 #
crazylibertarian wrote:
I've always had a question; what was he taught at that public school in Indonesia, the largest Muslim country on earth?
A much more intelligent question would be to ask what Obama was taught by agents of the "Deep State."
Aug 28, 2016 11:59:02 #
More from Mark Gorton:
The 9/11 attacks
Saudi Government involvement in the 9/11 attacks: Superficially, the story behind 9/11 attacks is that a group of Muslim fundamentalists hijacked planes and crashed them into the WTC and Pentagon. However, a deeper look shows these hijackers to be puppets manipulated by a series of intelligence agencies, and these intelligence agencies are then connected to the global criminal syndicate centered upon the Bush family and the Saudi leadership. The 2002 Congressional inquiry into the 9/11 attacks contained a section named: âspecific sources of foreign supportâ for the hijackers. President Bush censored these 28 full pages from the report. In 2013, after great effort, Representatives Walter Jones (R-NC) and Stephen Lynch (D-Mass) were allowed to read the classified section. They said they were, âabsolutely shockedâ at levels of foreign state involvement in the attacks.[1]
The hijackers were funded by Saudi and Pakistani intelligence. The wife of Saudi Prince Bandar sent checks totaling $130,000 to Saudi agents that was then funneled to the hijackers. But beyond the funding, the hijackers required operational support in order to be able to pull off the hijackings. All along the way, the hijackers had their hands held by either Saudi or Pakistani operatives. Senator Bob Graham, who co-headed the 2002 joint congressional inquiries into the 9/11 attacks, filed a sworn affidavit in 2012 which said, âI am convinced that there was a direct line between at least some of the terrorists who carried out the September 11th attacks and the government of Saudi Arabia.â[2] Eckehardt Werthebach, former head of Germanyâs domestic intelligence service said, âSuch a sophisticated operation would require the fixed frame of a state intelligence organization, something not found in a loose group like the one lead by the student Mohammed Atta in Hamburg.â[3] The rulers of Saudi Arabia are very conservative. They are among the very richest people on the planet. Saudi Arabia is a very close ally to the U.S. The Saudi ambassador to the U.S. from 1983 â 2005 was Prince Bandar bin Sultan. Prince Bandar was so close to George H.W. Bush that he was often described as a member of the former presidentâs family and was given the nickname Bandar Bush.
So why would the rulers of Saudi Arabia risk bringing the wrath of the U.S. down upon them by attacking a close ally? How could the rulers of Saudi Arabia be certain that in the days after the 9/11 attacks President Bush would open the closed U.S. airspace to only allow flights of senior Saudiâs including relatives of Osama Bin Laden to leave the country without being questioned? How could the rulers of Saudi Arabia know that the Bush administration would suppress, censor, and downplay information related to Saudi government involvement in the 9/11 attacks? How could the Saudi rulers be certain that the Bush administration would commit acts of treason to protect an enemy state that attacked America?
The answer to these questions is that the Saudi rulers would never have risked such a foolhardy attack without the prior knowledge, consent and support of President Bush, Vice President Cheney and the people around them. Attacking America was the one thing that could have displaced the rulers of Saudi Arabia from their extremely cushy spot awash in oil, cash, palaces, power, and women. The Saudi rulers would have needed great assurances that their complicity in these attacks would not have been allowed to blow back at them. A further examination of evidence surrounding the 9/11 attacks will show that 9/11 was a Bush Syndicate plot in which the Saudis were complicit rather than a Saudi plot in which the Bush Syndicate was complicit.
The 9/11 attacks
Saudi Government involvement in the 9/11 attacks: Superficially, the story behind 9/11 attacks is that a group of Muslim fundamentalists hijacked planes and crashed them into the WTC and Pentagon. However, a deeper look shows these hijackers to be puppets manipulated by a series of intelligence agencies, and these intelligence agencies are then connected to the global criminal syndicate centered upon the Bush family and the Saudi leadership. The 2002 Congressional inquiry into the 9/11 attacks contained a section named: âspecific sources of foreign supportâ for the hijackers. President Bush censored these 28 full pages from the report. In 2013, after great effort, Representatives Walter Jones (R-NC) and Stephen Lynch (D-Mass) were allowed to read the classified section. They said they were, âabsolutely shockedâ at levels of foreign state involvement in the attacks.[1]
The hijackers were funded by Saudi and Pakistani intelligence. The wife of Saudi Prince Bandar sent checks totaling $130,000 to Saudi agents that was then funneled to the hijackers. But beyond the funding, the hijackers required operational support in order to be able to pull off the hijackings. All along the way, the hijackers had their hands held by either Saudi or Pakistani operatives. Senator Bob Graham, who co-headed the 2002 joint congressional inquiries into the 9/11 attacks, filed a sworn affidavit in 2012 which said, âI am convinced that there was a direct line between at least some of the terrorists who carried out the September 11th attacks and the government of Saudi Arabia.â[2] Eckehardt Werthebach, former head of Germanyâs domestic intelligence service said, âSuch a sophisticated operation would require the fixed frame of a state intelligence organization, something not found in a loose group like the one lead by the student Mohammed Atta in Hamburg.â[3] The rulers of Saudi Arabia are very conservative. They are among the very richest people on the planet. Saudi Arabia is a very close ally to the U.S. The Saudi ambassador to the U.S. from 1983 â 2005 was Prince Bandar bin Sultan. Prince Bandar was so close to George H.W. Bush that he was often described as a member of the former presidentâs family and was given the nickname Bandar Bush.
So why would the rulers of Saudi Arabia risk bringing the wrath of the U.S. down upon them by attacking a close ally? How could the rulers of Saudi Arabia be certain that in the days after the 9/11 attacks President Bush would open the closed U.S. airspace to only allow flights of senior Saudiâs including relatives of Osama Bin Laden to leave the country without being questioned? How could the rulers of Saudi Arabia know that the Bush administration would suppress, censor, and downplay information related to Saudi government involvement in the 9/11 attacks? How could the Saudi rulers be certain that the Bush administration would commit acts of treason to protect an enemy state that attacked America?
The answer to these questions is that the Saudi rulers would never have risked such a foolhardy attack without the prior knowledge, consent and support of President Bush, Vice President Cheney and the people around them. Attacking America was the one thing that could have displaced the rulers of Saudi Arabia from their extremely cushy spot awash in oil, cash, palaces, power, and women. The Saudi rulers would have needed great assurances that their complicity in these attacks would not have been allowed to blow back at them. A further examination of evidence surrounding the 9/11 attacks will show that 9/11 was a Bush Syndicate plot in which the Saudis were complicit rather than a Saudi plot in which the Bush Syndicate was complicit.
Aug 29, 2016 18:15:50 #
More from mark Gorton:
The Crippling of U.S. Air Defenses
Most people have been given the idea that there was little the U.S. Air Force could have done to stop the hijacked airliners from crashing into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. However, intercepting the hijacked airliners would have been a simple, straight forward exercise for the U.S. Air Force. US air defense planners had spent tens of thousands of man years and hundreds of billions of dollars designing, developing and deploying the U.S. domestic air defenses. For decades, the U.S. Air Force had been continually ready to intercept any threat that approached or entered the U.S. airspace. As part of its standard operating procedures, the Air Force scrambled jet fighters whenever a jetliner went off course or radio contact with it was lost. In the year 2000, fighters were scrambled to intercept aircraft in response to 129 cases where problems were not immediately resolved.[16] Given the capabilities of the U.S. air defenses and the relative ease of intercepting commercial airliners, the Bush/Cheney cabal had to work hard to cripple the U.S. air defenses.
The two main organizations focused on protecting the U.S. from air attack were NORAD (the North American Aerospace Defense Command) and the FAA (the Federal Aviation Administration). Both NORAD and the FAA were infiltrated by cabal members who proceeded to work to sabotage the U.S. air defenses from within. In addition, special attention was paid to jamming the communication interfaces between the FAA and NORAD. Key people were put in place at the FAA and NORAD who took actions to reduce the effectiveness of the U.S. defenses and, then on September 11, 2001, these agents of the secret government within the FAA and NORAD repeatedly failed to respond to the hijackings, were absent, gave orders which paralyzed the fighter response, or sent fighters in the wrong direction. In order to dismantle the capabilities of the U.S. air defenses on May 8, 2001, President Bush asked Dick Cheney to oversee the National Preparedness Review to evaluate and make recommendations to “strengthen preparedness against acts of terrorism”. In response to requests from the National Preparedness Review, on June 1, 2001, the Joint Chiefs of Staff issued a memo that overhauled long established air defense protocols and required that the Secretary of Defense personally authorize any request for fighter intercept of hijacked airliners. This procedure change prevented the intercept of errant airliners that had been a regular occurrence.[17] Air Force Lt. Colonel Robert Bowman, former director of Advanced Space Programs Development during the Ford and Carter administrations and a former U.S. Air Force colonel who flew 101 combat missions said in 2005, “If our government had merely [done] nothing, and I say that as an old interceptor pilot — I know the drill, I know what it takes, I know how long it takes, I know what the procedures are, I know what they were, and I know what they’ve changed them to - if our government had merely done nothing, and allowed normal procedures to happen on that morning of 9/11, the Twin Towers would still be standing and thousands of dead Americans would still be alive."[18]
Just as Bush took office, Lt. General Michael Canavan was placed in the role of hijack coordinator at the FAA. General Canavan had an unusual background for a hijack coordinator. Prior to taking the job of hijack coordinator, Canavan had been the commander of the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), which ran the military’s counterterrorism operations and covert missions. In 1998, Canavan and JSOC undermined a CIA plan to capture Osama Bin Laden. As hijack coordinator, Canavan ordered the cover up of security weakness at airports which gave the hijackers the ability to take over the planes. During the 9/11 attacks, Canavan was inexplicably absent from his job as hijack coordinator. Yet despite his abysmal performance as hijack coordinator during the worst series of hijackings in U.S. history, just two days later, Canavan took part in a “Principals Committee Meeting” chaired by Condoleezza Rice that included all of George W. Bush’s “war cabinet”.[19] A key tool to confuse the U.S. air defenses and provide cover for the stand down operation was the use of simulated training exercises. Training exercises are the perfect cover to operationalize real life terrorist attacks because they provide the opportunity to have people acting like terrorists and also doing things that terrorists might do. At the same time, these exercises confuse non-participants about whether events are real or simulations. In addition, some exercises were used to occupy resources that could have prevented the terrorist attacks with out of the way training missions. Fighter aircraft that normally would have been stationed along the Eastern seaboard were sent to Alaska and Northern Canada as part of Operation Northern Vigilance, which left airbases near New York and Washington short on fighter aircraft with which to respond to the hijackings. NORAD conducted an annual exercise called Vigilant Guardian. In previous years, Vigilant Guardian was held in late October, but in 2001, Vigilant Guardian was moved to the Sept 6-11th time period. As part of Vigilant Guardian, false blips were inserted onto the radar screens of the FAA and NORAD’s Northeast Air Defense Sector (NEADS). Many FAA and Air Force personal initially mistook the actual hijacked aircraft for simulated aircraft that were part of Vigilant Guardian.[20][21] While fake radar tracks were inserted onto radar screens, real aircraft were allowed into restricted airspace under the pretext of another training exercise. Three E-4B’s and a militarized 747-200 were launched between 8:30 – 9 AM on Sept 11th as part of the Global Guardian exercise.[22] One of these E-4B’s is photographed flying in the closed airspace over the White House at the same time as hijacked planes are on their way to their targets.[23]
On the day of September 11, 2001, numerous examples exist of fighters not launched, or launched from distant as opposed to closer airbases, and when launched were sent in the wrong direction, or put into holding patterns. This sequence of multiple protocol failures and missteps could only have been accomplished by a large coordinated action involving many people scattered throughout NORAD and the FAA. Very senior people at both NORAD and the FAA had to have been knowingly involved in a stand down operation.[24][25]
Dr. Steven Pieczenik, a former US Navy Captain who served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under Nixon, Ford and Carter and also won two prestigious Solomon Awards at the Harvard Medical School as he simultaneously completed a PhD at MIT, said “It [9/11] was called a stand down, a false flag operation in order to mobilize the American public under false pretenses... it was told to me even by the general on the staff of Wolfowitz. I will go in front of a federal committee and swear on perjury who the name was of the individual so that we can break it open.”[26]
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Document:Fifty_Years_of_the_Deep_State#The_Obama_Administration
The Crippling of U.S. Air Defenses
Most people have been given the idea that there was little the U.S. Air Force could have done to stop the hijacked airliners from crashing into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. However, intercepting the hijacked airliners would have been a simple, straight forward exercise for the U.S. Air Force. US air defense planners had spent tens of thousands of man years and hundreds of billions of dollars designing, developing and deploying the U.S. domestic air defenses. For decades, the U.S. Air Force had been continually ready to intercept any threat that approached or entered the U.S. airspace. As part of its standard operating procedures, the Air Force scrambled jet fighters whenever a jetliner went off course or radio contact with it was lost. In the year 2000, fighters were scrambled to intercept aircraft in response to 129 cases where problems were not immediately resolved.[16] Given the capabilities of the U.S. air defenses and the relative ease of intercepting commercial airliners, the Bush/Cheney cabal had to work hard to cripple the U.S. air defenses.
The two main organizations focused on protecting the U.S. from air attack were NORAD (the North American Aerospace Defense Command) and the FAA (the Federal Aviation Administration). Both NORAD and the FAA were infiltrated by cabal members who proceeded to work to sabotage the U.S. air defenses from within. In addition, special attention was paid to jamming the communication interfaces between the FAA and NORAD. Key people were put in place at the FAA and NORAD who took actions to reduce the effectiveness of the U.S. defenses and, then on September 11, 2001, these agents of the secret government within the FAA and NORAD repeatedly failed to respond to the hijackings, were absent, gave orders which paralyzed the fighter response, or sent fighters in the wrong direction. In order to dismantle the capabilities of the U.S. air defenses on May 8, 2001, President Bush asked Dick Cheney to oversee the National Preparedness Review to evaluate and make recommendations to “strengthen preparedness against acts of terrorism”. In response to requests from the National Preparedness Review, on June 1, 2001, the Joint Chiefs of Staff issued a memo that overhauled long established air defense protocols and required that the Secretary of Defense personally authorize any request for fighter intercept of hijacked airliners. This procedure change prevented the intercept of errant airliners that had been a regular occurrence.[17] Air Force Lt. Colonel Robert Bowman, former director of Advanced Space Programs Development during the Ford and Carter administrations and a former U.S. Air Force colonel who flew 101 combat missions said in 2005, “If our government had merely [done] nothing, and I say that as an old interceptor pilot — I know the drill, I know what it takes, I know how long it takes, I know what the procedures are, I know what they were, and I know what they’ve changed them to - if our government had merely done nothing, and allowed normal procedures to happen on that morning of 9/11, the Twin Towers would still be standing and thousands of dead Americans would still be alive."[18]
Just as Bush took office, Lt. General Michael Canavan was placed in the role of hijack coordinator at the FAA. General Canavan had an unusual background for a hijack coordinator. Prior to taking the job of hijack coordinator, Canavan had been the commander of the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), which ran the military’s counterterrorism operations and covert missions. In 1998, Canavan and JSOC undermined a CIA plan to capture Osama Bin Laden. As hijack coordinator, Canavan ordered the cover up of security weakness at airports which gave the hijackers the ability to take over the planes. During the 9/11 attacks, Canavan was inexplicably absent from his job as hijack coordinator. Yet despite his abysmal performance as hijack coordinator during the worst series of hijackings in U.S. history, just two days later, Canavan took part in a “Principals Committee Meeting” chaired by Condoleezza Rice that included all of George W. Bush’s “war cabinet”.[19] A key tool to confuse the U.S. air defenses and provide cover for the stand down operation was the use of simulated training exercises. Training exercises are the perfect cover to operationalize real life terrorist attacks because they provide the opportunity to have people acting like terrorists and also doing things that terrorists might do. At the same time, these exercises confuse non-participants about whether events are real or simulations. In addition, some exercises were used to occupy resources that could have prevented the terrorist attacks with out of the way training missions. Fighter aircraft that normally would have been stationed along the Eastern seaboard were sent to Alaska and Northern Canada as part of Operation Northern Vigilance, which left airbases near New York and Washington short on fighter aircraft with which to respond to the hijackings. NORAD conducted an annual exercise called Vigilant Guardian. In previous years, Vigilant Guardian was held in late October, but in 2001, Vigilant Guardian was moved to the Sept 6-11th time period. As part of Vigilant Guardian, false blips were inserted onto the radar screens of the FAA and NORAD’s Northeast Air Defense Sector (NEADS). Many FAA and Air Force personal initially mistook the actual hijacked aircraft for simulated aircraft that were part of Vigilant Guardian.[20][21] While fake radar tracks were inserted onto radar screens, real aircraft were allowed into restricted airspace under the pretext of another training exercise. Three E-4B’s and a militarized 747-200 were launched between 8:30 – 9 AM on Sept 11th as part of the Global Guardian exercise.[22] One of these E-4B’s is photographed flying in the closed airspace over the White House at the same time as hijacked planes are on their way to their targets.[23]
On the day of September 11, 2001, numerous examples exist of fighters not launched, or launched from distant as opposed to closer airbases, and when launched were sent in the wrong direction, or put into holding patterns. This sequence of multiple protocol failures and missteps could only have been accomplished by a large coordinated action involving many people scattered throughout NORAD and the FAA. Very senior people at both NORAD and the FAA had to have been knowingly involved in a stand down operation.[24][25]
Dr. Steven Pieczenik, a former US Navy Captain who served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under Nixon, Ford and Carter and also won two prestigious Solomon Awards at the Harvard Medical School as he simultaneously completed a PhD at MIT, said “It [9/11] was called a stand down, a false flag operation in order to mobilize the American public under false pretenses... it was told to me even by the general on the staff of Wolfowitz. I will go in front of a federal committee and swear on perjury who the name was of the individual so that we can break it open.”[26]
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Document:Fifty_Years_of_the_Deep_State#The_Obama_Administration
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.