Here's an interesting timeline, a true time line of the past few years of ISIS
Aug 8, 2016 15:45:17 #
Robert Wilson
Loc: Texas
Glaucon wrote:
Every person is imperfect and every administration is imperfect. What law is the current administration supposedly circumventing? What is Congress doing about the supposed circumvention ? What is the Supreme Court doing about the supposed circumvention of OUR law(s)?
It seems to me we have a very big problem here and you are the only one who knows anything about it and that is only one of several explanations.
It seems to me we have a very big problem here and you are the only one who knows anything about it and that is only one of several explanations.
Circumventing the CONSTITUTION is circumventing the law, allowing Hillary to "walk"= same. True, we are all imperfect,it's just that some are similiar to H/C; more so. How could anybody in their right mind bring her before, and, to represent their party? Richard Nixon would have had an easy go of it running on the demo ticket, even with previous knowlege of his atrocities. At what point will we decide that America needs/ wants a president above reproach?
Aug 8, 2016 15:56:26 #
Robert Wilson wrote:
Circumventing the CONSTITUTION is circumventing the law, allowing Hillary to "walk"= same. True, we are all imperfect,it's just that some are similiar to H/C; more so. How could anybody in their right mind bring her before, and, to represent their party? Richard Nixon would have had an easy go of it running on the demo ticket, even with previous knowlege of his atrocities. At what point will we decide that America needs/ wants a president above reproach?
I think Americans have always decided they need a president who is above reproach, but the smart Americans have discovered that all humans (We know of) are flawed and we chose our leaders who we believe are the least flawed (agree with us the most) and vote for them.
We have checks and balances to discourage or prevent circumventing our constitution and it usually works. What do you believe is the circumventing to which you refer? Why doesn't anyone but you know about it. Do you find it at all curious that you are the only one who knows about it
I didn't know Nixon committed atrocities. What were they and why didn't anyone but you know about them?
Do you know where your head is right now? You are responsible for it and you need to protect it from misinformation and nonsense.
Aug 8, 2016 16:00:22 #
Robert Wilson wrote:
Circumventing the CONSTITUTION is circumventing the law, allowing Hillary to "walk"= same. True, we are all imperfect,it's just that some are similiar to H/C; more so. How could anybody in their right mind bring her before, and, to represent their party? Richard Nixon would have had an easy go of it running on the demo ticket, even with previous knowlege of his atrocities. At what point will we decide that America needs/ wants a president above reproach?
You suggest Hillary has been allowed to walk from a crime or crimes you believe she has committed. I hadn't heard about that and no one I have brought this up to has heard of it either,
Aug 10, 2016 20:39:13 #
Robert Wilson
Loc: Texas
Glaucon wrote:
I think Americans have always decided they need a ... (show quote)
Correct me if i'm wrong but B.O. and his admin did a "Fast and furious" attempt to go arround the first ammendment to give drug runners from Mexico automatic weapons while making attempts to take ours, (Does this count, or are you a liberal?)
Aug 10, 2016 21:59:13 #
Robert Wilson wrote:
Correct me if i'm wrong but B.O. and his admin did a "Fast and furious" attempt to go arround the first ammendment to give drug runners from Mexico automatic weapons while making attempts to take ours, (Does this count, or are you a liberal?)
I am not a liberal and you are dead wrong about Fand F.
Aug 10, 2016 22:08:02 #
Glaucon wrote:
I am not a liberal and you are dead wrong about Fand F.
Yeah.....he said 1st instead of 2nd. Otherwise, right.
Aug 10, 2016 23:36:24 #
Robert Wilson wrote:
You asked to be corrected if you are wrong and you are. However, if it feels good to believe it, go for it.Correct me if i'm wrong but B.O. and his admin did a "Fast and furious" attempt to go arround the first ammendment to give drug runners from Mexico automatic weapons while making attempts to take ours, (Does this count, or are you a liberal?)
Aug 10, 2016 23:39:06 #
archie bunker wrote:
Yeah.....he said 1st instead of 2nd. Otherwise, right.
You make even less sense than usual and I didn't think that was possible. Congratulations!! Are your rrhoids acting up again?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.