You are right. If you study James Comey's past you will understand. James Comey was the Deputy Special Council for the White Water investigation. It seems that he also oversaw the investigations of the Bill Clinton pardons, and did not recommend charging Bill Clinton with anything. He was also involved with the prosecution of Sandy Berger, Clinton's friend who pleaded guilty in 2005 for taking classified documents out of the National Archives and intentionally destroying them. Let him plead guilty to a misdemeanor, in order to avoid a prison sentence. I just stumbled across this: At a news conference announcing the charges against Ms. Stewart, James B. Comey, the United States attorney for the Southern District of New York, said, "This criminal case is about lying--lying to the F.B.I., lying to the S.E.C., lying to investors." Addressing a question that has long hovered over the investigation, he added, "Martha Stewart is being prosecuted not for who she is, but because of what she did." Now why haven't we heard him say that about Hillary Clinton? I want to know, when James Comey went into the Clinton's pocket, before or after White Water? To me, Hillary did a lot more than Martha, and look what he did to Martha. So if he isn't in Hillary's pocket, he should have been as aggressive in his prosecution of Hillary, as he was in Martha Stewart's case.

You are right. If you study James Comey's past you will understand. James Comey was the Deputy Special Council for the White Water investigation. It seems that he also oversaw the investigations of the Bill Clinton pardons, and did not recommend charging Bill Clinton with anything. He was also involved with the prosecution of Sandy Berger, Clinton's friend who pleaded guilty in 2005 for taking classified documents out of the National Archives and intentionally destroying them. Let him plead guilty to a misdemeanor, in order to avoid a prison sentence. I just stumbled across this: At a news conference announcing the charges against Ms. Stewart, James B. Comey, the United States attorney for the Southern District of New York, said, "This criminal case is about lying--lying to the F.B.I., lying to the S.E.C., lying to investors." Addressing a question that has long hovered over the investigation, he added, "Martha Stewart is being prosecuted not for who she is, but because of what she did." Now why haven't we heard him say that about Hillary Clinton? I want to know, when James Comey went into the Clinton's pocket, before or after White Water? To me, Hillary did a lot more than Martha, and look what he did to Martha. So if he isn't in Hillary's pocket, he should have been as aggressive in his prosecution of Hillary, as he was in Martha Stewart's case.

According to Section 1001, of the Title 18 of the United States code makes it a criminal offense to make a willfully false statement or misrepresentation to any department or agency of the United States government as to any matter withing its jurisdiction.

Hillary under sworn testimony in Congress, violated the above. What the hell is Congress waiting for? They can proceed against her without the use of the DOJ or FBI! They should include Comey and Lynch as they have both violated the law, "obstruction of justice", for starters!

You are right. If you study James Comey's past you will understand. James Comey was the Deputy Special Council for the White Water investigation. It seems that he also oversaw the investigations of the Bill Clinton pardons, and did not recommend charging Bill Clinton with anything. He was also involved with the prosecution of Sandy Berger, Clinton's friend who pleaded guilty in 2005 for taking classified documents out of the National Archives and intentionally destroying them. Let him plead guilty to a misdemeanor, in order to avoid a prison sentence. I just stumbled across this: At a news conference announcing the charges against Ms. Stewart, James B. Comey, the United States attorney for the Southern District of New York, said, "This criminal case is about lying--lying to the F.B.I., lying to the S.E.C., lying to investors." Addressing a question that has long hovered over the investigation, he added, "Martha Stewart is being prosecuted not for who she is, but because of what she did." Now why haven't we heard him say that about Hillary Clinton? I want to know, when James Comey went into the Clinton's pocket, before or after White Water? To me, Hillary did a lot more than Martha, and look what he did to Martha. So if he isn't in Hillary's pocket, he should have been as aggressive in his prosecution of Hillary, as he was in Martha Stewart's case.

Well, she should have been indicted. And anybody who has a half a brain knows that. For a guy like Comey, who I HAD (past tense) a lot of respect for, and said he "didn't give a rip about politics", really missed the boat on this one. Maybe they had something hanging over his head, I don't know. Some great comments by Gov. Huckabee. Can't find it yet, but i will post it when it becomes available. Basically, he said that he had close friends, who are FBI agents. And when Dir. Comey said what he did and didn't indict, these FBI agents were coming unglued. Found it. Amazing! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bipqWCF4n6E The best!!!

I suppose that violating 18 USC 793 more than 100 times, each one a felony, doesn't count if your name is Hillary Clinton. "Intent" is not mentioned anywhere in this statute as a requirement to be in violation. There is also a little matter of numerous perjuries while under oath in front of a Congressional committee. These WERE intentional. Like Blow Job Bill, I suppose it depends on what your definition of is is.

You have a funny way of reading this. Comey cited numerous instances when Clinton knowingly violated 18 USC, and then stated that there was no "intent" to harm the US. Of course, this isn't the first time that Comey and Lynch have run interference and ass cover for the Clintons.