One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
NDAA 2017: Draft for Women, Indefinite Detention of Citizens
Jun 18, 2016 08:29:50   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
NDAA 2017: Draft for Women, Indefinite Detention of Citizens


This article is online at the Oath Keepers national website.
https://www.oathkeepers.org/ndaa-2017-includes-draft-for-women-indefinite-detention-of-american-citizens/
_______


NDAA 2017 Includes Draft for Women, Indefinite Detention of American Citizens

by
Activist Post
with comment by Elias Alias

*
Statist Heydaze: NDAA 2017
Hell, let's draft the women and arrest anyone we want to get rid of, because we can. We can, because the people refuse to stop us. They are afraid to oppose us because to oppose us places them on "lists". Lists designate enemies of the government. That designation qualifies one to be detained under the NDAA. That is how it works. That is why it's in our Congress right now.

So it appears that the government would now own women as equally as it purports to own men, and now it seems that both men and women are subject to indefinite detention without charge or jury trial. That is the final writing on the Wall. The government is declaring, without saying it in specific terms, that the government owns us all.

Should that bother us?

Most intelligent beings understand that the definition of slavery includes any scenario in which something or someone external to one's own mind, body, and soul, owns one. When something or someone owns anyone, that ownership can be, and usually is, manifest in the ability to control one. Slavery is a captive's subjugation under the authority of an owner, one's controller, one's "ruler". Always remember this - self-ownership is the opposite of slavery. When a government asserts some fictitious authority to force a citizen into service in the government's military adventures, that government is asserting its ownership over the citizen. Again I repeat - self-ownership is the opposite of slavery.

But why am I going on about self-ownership vs government ownership of its citizens? It is because our fearless leaders in WDC are once again slipping it to the American people with the latest wax job on the NDAA. Here is the article from Activist Post, sent in to me by Kirk McKenzie of Defend Rural America. Read it and weep, and ask oneself after reading, this -

"Do I, can I, shouldn't I, own myself?"...

Reply
Jun 18, 2016 08:59:26   #
robmull Loc: florida
 
eagleye13 wrote:
NDAA 2017: Draft for Women, Indefinite Detention of Citizens


This article is online at the Oath Keepers national website.
https://www.oathkeepers.org/ndaa-2017-includes-draft-for-women-indefinite-detention-of-american-citizens/
_______


NDAA 2017 Includes Draft for Women, Indefinite Detention of American Citizens

by
Activist Post
with comment by Elias Alias

*
Statist Heydaze: NDAA 2017
Hell, let's draft the women and arrest anyone we want to get rid of, because we can. We can, because the people refuse to stop us. They are afraid to oppose us because to oppose us places them on "lists". Lists designate enemies of the government. That designation qualifies one to be detained under the NDAA. That is how it works. That is why it's in our Congress right now.

So it appears that the government would now own women as equally as it purports to own men, and now it seems that both men and women are subject to indefinite detention without charge or jury trial. That is the final writing on the Wall. The government is declaring, without saying it in specific terms, that the government owns us all.

Should that bother us?

Most intelligent beings understand that the definition of slavery includes any scenario in which something or someone external to one's own mind, body, and soul, owns one. When something or someone owns anyone, that ownership can be, and usually is, manifest in the ability to control one. Slavery is a captive's subjugation under the authority of an owner, one's controller, one's "ruler". Always remember this - self-ownership is the opposite of slavery. When a government asserts some fictitious authority to force a citizen into service in the government's military adventures, that government is asserting its ownership over the citizen. Again I repeat - self-ownership is the opposite of slavery.

But why am I going on about self-ownership vs government ownership of its citizens? It is because our fearless leaders in WDC are once again slipping it to the American people with the latest wax job on the NDAA. Here is the article from Activist Post, sent in to me by Kirk McKenzie of Defend Rural America. Read it and weep, and ask oneself after reading, this -

"Do I, can I, shouldn't I, own myself?"...
NDAA 2017: Draft for Women, Indefinite Detention o... (show quote)






Our current "Marx/Alinsky" administration is now learning what King George III learned so long ago. "WE," have now gone into a Constitutionally OBLIGATED "civil disobedience," State by State, to impune and disregard the tyranny that ALL governments assume with an "unarmed" citizenship - hummmmmmmmm. "Unarmed?" Like Paris and most all of Western Europe??? FAT CHANCE!!! Oh, bad luck, Cynthia. "WE" {America & Israel} are different animals than tyrants seem to LOVE to "control," and no third rate radical dictator or 7th century barbarous Sharia ideology will EVER negate [or shred] OUR God given Constitutional rights. Disarming America has been the secular/communist liberal progressive agenda in America since about 1897, continued to call themselves (D), and have not only FAILED to disarm America, but our; "rifle behind every blade of grass" [Japan, 1941], but the "rifle" count may now be about 12, "behind every blade of grass" [tree, bush, house, barn, hedge, etc.], and now the grass has turned to forest after mountain after forest after grove after forest after hill; and they can't see the forest through the trees; as usual. Hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO TRUMP!!!

Reply
Sep 20, 2017 10:01:08   #
sum
 
What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance?

Reply
 
 
Sep 20, 2017 10:04:36   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
sum wrote:
What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance?


The jig is up, and our defense is secure.

Reply
Sep 20, 2017 10:27:11   #
sum
 
If tyranny is so wonderful, why do people try to escape North Korea?

Reply
Sep 2, 2018 10:14:09   #
newyork
 
Sounds like our overlords are planning to start WWIII soon and want to be sure that they have enough cannon fodder.

https://redguardsaustin.com/t/whatever/new/

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.