One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Is Islamic Terror America's Future???
Jun 17, 2016 13:32:47   #
Don G. Dinsdale Loc: El Cajon, CA (San Diego County)
 
Is Islamic Terror America's Future?

By Pat Buchanan - June 17, 2016


If the cliches hold — nothing succeeds like success, the past is prologue — this generation will not likely see an end to the jihadist terror that was on display at Pulse in Orlando on Sunday.

For terrorism has proven to be among the most cost-effective and successful strategies of war that the world has ever seen.

Consider. The 9/11 attacks involved 19 hijackers willing to crash airliners into four buildings: the World Trade Center towers, the Pentagon and the Capitol.

So doing, those 19 altered the foreign policy of the United States.

They drew the world's last superpower into wars that have bled and almost bankrupted us, broken a president, and left us mired in half a dozen civil and sectarian conflicts with no exit or end in sight.

As a political terrorist, Osama bin Laden rivals Gavrilo Princip, whose assassination of the Austrian archduke set in train the events that led to the Great War that brought on the downfall of the West.

Consider the success of Islamist terror since 9/11.

As Gerry Seib of The Wall Street Journal notes, in the 15 years since then, just 95 Americans have died in jihadist attacks in the U.S.

Yet, one atrocity in Orlando, where 49 were slaughtered, polarized the nation, brought the presidential candidates to savaging one another, and held a national TV audience spellbound for a week.

The whole world is talking about Orlando.

And what did this victory cost the Islamic State? Zero.

What Omar Mateen did suicide bombers do every day in Iraq, Syria, and Afghanistan —kill dozens of innocent people while shouting "Allahu Akbar!"

Yet compare the returns from this act of Islamist terror in Orlando, to those from similar attacks in Kabul, Baghdad or Damascus.

Any wonder ISIS would implore its followers to strike where they are, inside the U.S., inside Europe, and not come to Syria to die anonymously?

Under siege in Raqqa, Mosul and Fallujah, being bombed and bled as it surrenders the conquered lands of its caliphate, ISIS' shift in strategy and targeting makes perfect sense.

Consider, now, the triumphs of Islamist terrorism in Europe.

The 2004 Madrid train bombings led to the defeat of a centrist government and rise of a socialist regime that pulled Spanish troops out of Iraq.

The Paris attacks on Charlie Hebdo and the Bataclan theater strengthened the National Front of Marine Le Pen.

The Beslan massacre of school children in North Ossetia in 2004 led to a consolidation of power by Russian strongman Vladimir Putin.

Across Europe, the political impact of Islamist terrorism, though the numbers of dead and wounded have been, measured against the casualties of conventional war, relatively few, has been extraordinary.

Islamist terrorism has helped spawn anti-immigrant parties and "illiberal" regimes.

The association of Islamic terror with Muslim immigration and refugees from Syria's war has helped to drive "Brexit," the British campaign to secede from the EU.

Islamist attacks have helped propel anti-EU movements and to incite nationalist demands for a recapture of state control of borders and security policy from Brussels.

Obama explains his reluctance to use the term "radical Islamic terror" on his not wishing to validate ISIS' claim to be the spear point, the fighting arm of the world's largest religion in fulfilling the mission given to it by Allah — to make the whole world Islamic.

And this is exactly what ISIS has in mind.

By the frequency and ferocity of its attacks, it seeks to displace al-Qaida and other Islamic resistance movements in the eyes of the 1.6 billion Muslims worldwide, and to be seen by the young as the great liberator of the Islamic world and future conqueror of the West.

The crushing of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria is a necessary but not a sufficient condition of victory in this war, for ISIS is not just an organization but a cause, a movement, an idea.

ISIS believes that by repeatedly wounding and provoking the West, it can reignite a war of civilizations. And though the West is vastly superior in nuclear weapons and conventional arms, economic power and technology, ISIS believes it can gradually drive the West out of the Middle East, as it has already helped to drive the Christians out.

Then, ISIS believes, through mass Muslim migration into a West whose native-born are dying out, Muslims can reoccupy these lands they had almost wholly conquered, until stopped by Charles Martel 14 centuries ago.

For some few Muslims, as we saw at Fort Hood, San Bernardino and Orlando, ISIS offers a dream worth dying for. And as they kill and die for ISIS, they will push America where they are pushing Europe — to the right.

http://www.newsmax.com/PatrickBuchanan/jihadist-right-strategies/2016/06/17/id/734402/#ixzz4BrBPxTcz

Reply
Jun 17, 2016 13:47:10   #
Homestead
 
Don G. Dinsdale wrote:
Is Islamic Terror America's Future?

By Pat Buchanan - June 17, 2016


If the cliches hold — nothing succeeds like success, the past is prologue — this generation will not likely see an end to the jihadist terror that was on display at Pulse in Orlando on Sunday.

For terrorism has proven to be among the most cost-effective and successful strategies of war that the world has ever seen.

Consider. The 9/11 attacks involved 19 hijackers willing to crash airliners into four buildings: the World Trade Center towers, the Pentagon and the Capitol.

So doing, those 19 altered the foreign policy of the United States.

They drew the world's last superpower into wars that have bled and almost bankrupted us, broken a president, and left us mired in half a dozen civil and sectarian conflicts with no exit or end in sight.

As a political terrorist, Osama bin Laden rivals Gavrilo Princip, whose assassination of the Austrian archduke set in train the events that led to the Great War that brought on the downfall of the West.

Consider the success of Islamist terror since 9/11.

As Gerry Seib of The Wall Street Journal notes, in the 15 years since then, just 95 Americans have died in jihadist attacks in the U.S.

Yet, one atrocity in Orlando, where 49 were slaughtered, polarized the nation, brought the presidential candidates to savaging one another, and held a national TV audience spellbound for a week.

The whole world is talking about Orlando.

And what did this victory cost the Islamic State? Zero.

What Omar Mateen did suicide bombers do every day in Iraq, Syria, and Afghanistan —kill dozens of innocent people while shouting "Allahu Akbar!"

Yet compare the returns from this act of Islamist terror in Orlando, to those from similar attacks in Kabul, Baghdad or Damascus.

Any wonder ISIS would implore its followers to strike where they are, inside the U.S., inside Europe, and not come to Syria to die anonymously?

Under siege in Raqqa, Mosul and Fallujah, being bombed and bled as it surrenders the conquered lands of its caliphate, ISIS' shift in strategy and targeting makes perfect sense.

Consider, now, the triumphs of Islamist terrorism in Europe.

The 2004 Madrid train bombings led to the defeat of a centrist government and rise of a socialist regime that pulled Spanish troops out of Iraq.

The Paris attacks on Charlie Hebdo and the Bataclan theater strengthened the National Front of Marine Le Pen.

The Beslan massacre of school children in North Ossetia in 2004 led to a consolidation of power by Russian strongman Vladimir Putin.

Across Europe, the political impact of Islamist terrorism, though the numbers of dead and wounded have been, measured against the casualties of conventional war, relatively few, has been extraordinary.

Islamist terrorism has helped spawn anti-immigrant parties and "illiberal" regimes.

The association of Islamic terror with Muslim immigration and refugees from Syria's war has helped to drive "Brexit," the British campaign to secede from the EU.

Islamist attacks have helped propel anti-EU movements and to incite nationalist demands for a recapture of state control of borders and security policy from Brussels.

Obama explains his reluctance to use the term "radical Islamic terror" on his not wishing to validate ISIS' claim to be the spear point, the fighting arm of the world's largest religion in fulfilling the mission given to it by Allah — to make the whole world Islamic.

And this is exactly what ISIS has in mind.

By the frequency and ferocity of its attacks, it seeks to displace al-Qaida and other Islamic resistance movements in the eyes of the 1.6 billion Muslims worldwide, and to be seen by the young as the great liberator of the Islamic world and future conqueror of the West.

The crushing of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria is a necessary but not a sufficient condition of victory in this war, for ISIS is not just an organization but a cause, a movement, an idea.

ISIS believes that by repeatedly wounding and provoking the West, it can reignite a war of civilizations. And though the West is vastly superior in nuclear weapons and conventional arms, economic power and technology, ISIS believes it can gradually drive the West out of the Middle East, as it has already helped to drive the Christians out.

Then, ISIS believes, through mass Muslim migration into a West whose native-born are dying out, Muslims can reoccupy these lands they had almost wholly conquered, until stopped by Charles Martel 14 centuries ago.

For some few Muslims, as we saw at Fort Hood, San Bernardino and Orlando, ISIS offers a dream worth dying for. And as they kill and die for ISIS, they will push America where they are pushing Europe — to the right.

http://www.newsmax.com/PatrickBuchanan/jihadist-right-strategies/2016/06/17/id/734402/#ixzz4BrBPxTcz
Is Islamic Terror America's Future? br br By Pat ... (show quote)


Three Stages of Jihad
http://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_468896&feature=iv&src_vid=-SoXs0_rHY&v=ERou_Q5l9Gw

SHARIA LAW in AMERICA What You Need to Know - GOD HELP US! Viewer Discretion Advised)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=PW62aQMy3_s

Ann Barnhardt Islamic Sexuality- A Survey of Evil
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xqhrhi_ann-barnhardt-islamic-sexuality-a-survey-of-evil_news

Fighting against Islam? A new weapon is now available.
http://thestoryofmohammed.blogspot.com.au/p/blog-page.html

The Truth About The Crusades (Short version of the 1400 year secret)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_To-cV94Bo

Reply
Jun 17, 2016 13:53:40   #
Radiance3
 
Don G. Dinsdale wrote:
Is Islamic Terror America's Future?

By Pat Buchanan - June 17, 2016


If the cliches hold — nothing succeeds like success, the past is prologue — this generation will not likely see an end to the jihadist terror that was on display at Pulse in Orlando on Sunday.

For terrorism has proven to be among the most cost-effective and successful strategies of war that the world has ever seen.

Consider. The 9/11 attacks involved 19 hijackers willing to crash airliners into four buildings: the World Trade Center towers, the Pentagon and the Capitol.

So doing, those 19 altered the foreign policy of the United States.

They drew the world's last superpower into wars that have bled and almost bankrupted us, broken a president, and left us mired in half a dozen civil and sectarian conflicts with no exit or end in sight.

As a political terrorist, Osama bin Laden rivals Gavrilo Princip, whose assassination of the Austrian archduke set in train the events that led to the Great War that brought on the downfall of the West.

Consider the success of Islamist terror since 9/11.

As Gerry Seib of The Wall Street Journal notes, in the 15 years since then, just 95 Americans have died in jihadist attacks in the U.S.

Yet, one atrocity in Orlando, where 49 were slaughtered, polarized the nation, brought the presidential candidates to savaging one another, and held a national TV audience spellbound for a week.

The whole world is talking about Orlando.

And what did this victory cost the Islamic State? Zero.

What Omar Mateen did suicide bombers do every day in Iraq, Syria, and Afghanistan —kill dozens of innocent people while shouting "Allahu Akbar!"

Yet compare the returns from this act of Islamist terror in Orlando, to those from similar attacks in Kabul, Baghdad or Damascus.

Any wonder ISIS would implore its followers to strike where they are, inside the U.S., inside Europe, and not come to Syria to die anonymously?

Under siege in Raqqa, Mosul and Fallujah, being bombed and bled as it surrenders the conquered lands of its caliphate, ISIS' shift in strategy and targeting makes perfect sense.

Consider, now, the triumphs of Islamist terrorism in Europe.

The 2004 Madrid train bombings led to the defeat of a centrist government and rise of a socialist regime that pulled Spanish troops out of Iraq.

The Paris attacks on Charlie Hebdo and the Bataclan theater strengthened the National Front of Marine Le Pen.

The Beslan massacre of school children in North Ossetia in 2004 led to a consolidation of power by Russian strongman Vladimir Putin.

Across Europe, the political impact of Islamist terrorism, though the numbers of dead and wounded have been, measured against the casualties of conventional war, relatively few, has been extraordinary.

Islamist terrorism has helped spawn anti-immigrant parties and "illiberal" regimes.

The association of Islamic terror with Muslim immigration and refugees from Syria's war has helped to drive "Brexit," the British campaign to secede from the EU.

Islamist attacks have helped propel anti-EU movements and to incite nationalist demands for a recapture of state control of borders and security policy from Brussels.

Obama explains his reluctance to use the term "radical Islamic terror" on his not wishing to validate ISIS' claim to be the spear point, the fighting arm of the world's largest religion in fulfilling the mission given to it by Allah — to make the whole world Islamic.

And this is exactly what ISIS has in mind.

By the frequency and ferocity of its attacks, it seeks to displace al-Qaida and other Islamic resistance movements in the eyes of the 1.6 billion Muslims worldwide, and to be seen by the young as the great liberator of the Islamic world and future conqueror of the West.

The crushing of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria is a necessary but not a sufficient condition of victory in this war, for ISIS is not just an organization but a cause, a movement, an idea.

ISIS believes that by repeatedly wounding and provoking the West, it can reignite a war of civilizations. And though the West is vastly superior in nuclear weapons and conventional arms, economic power and technology, ISIS believes it can gradually drive the West out of the Middle East, as it has already helped to drive the Christians out.

Then, ISIS believes, through mass Muslim migration into a West whose native-born are dying out, Muslims can reoccupy these lands they had almost wholly conquered, until stopped by Charles Martel 14 centuries ago.

For some few Muslims, as we saw at Fort Hood, San Bernardino and Orlando, ISIS offers a dream worth dying for. And as they kill and die for ISIS, they will push America where they are pushing Europe — to the right.

http://www.newsmax.com/PatrickBuchanan/jihadist-right-strategies/2016/06/17/id/734402/#ixzz4BrBPxTcz
Is Islamic Terror America's Future? br br By Pat ... (show quote)


==================
I certainly believe that Islamizing the US is Obama's "Hope and Change". For almost 8 years, he has been actively making it happen. It was a well planned strategy. First, he hired top and powerful positions for the Muslims to advise him in policies that govern our country. Then he imports millions of Muslims into the US including Islam Radicals. It was reported that 93.1% of all Muslims are on food stamps, and 65% are on welfare. At present he orders HSD in alliance with the UN to rapidly transport hundreds of thousands of Muslims more into the US until end of Dec. 2016.

Every time terror attacks happen to Americans, he orders his DOJ Loretta Lynch to prosecute those who speak bad against Muslims like: Radical Islam, Jihad, and Sharia. Anybody caught are prosecuted. He is preparing all public school children learn Islam, and praise allah in public schools. While they punish those who mention about Christ or Jesus. Islam is now required subject in Public Schools funded by our tax money, as Islam terrorize and kill us. President Obama is preparing the future kids to embrace ISLAM, the religion of his peace!

Reply
 
 
Jun 17, 2016 17:29:56   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
Don G. Dinsdale wrote:
Is Islamic Terror America's Future?

By Pat Buchanan - June 17, 2016


If the cliches hold — nothing succeeds like success, the past is prologue — this generation will not likely see an end to the jihadist terror that was on display at Pulse in Orlando on Sunday.

For terrorism has proven to be among the most cost-effective and successful strategies of war that the world has ever seen.

Consider. The 9/11 attacks involved 19 hijackers willing to crash airliners into four buildings: the World Trade Center towers, the Pentagon and the Capitol.

So doing, those 19 altered the foreign policy of the United States.

They drew the world's last superpower into wars that have bled and almost bankrupted us, broken a president, and left us mired in half a dozen civil and sectarian conflicts with no exit or end in sight.

As a political terrorist, Osama bin Laden rivals Gavrilo Princip, whose assassination of the Austrian archduke set in train the events that led to the Great War that brought on the downfall of the West.

Consider the success of Islamist terror since 9/11.

As Gerry Seib of The Wall Street Journal notes, in the 15 years since then, just 95 Americans have died in jihadist attacks in the U.S.

Yet, one atrocity in Orlando, where 49 were slaughtered, polarized the nation, brought the presidential candidates to savaging one another, and held a national TV audience spellbound for a week.

The whole world is talking about Orlando.

And what did this victory cost the Islamic State? Zero.

What Omar Mateen did suicide bombers do every day in Iraq, Syria, and Afghanistan —kill dozens of innocent people while shouting "Allahu Akbar!"

Yet compare the returns from this act of Islamist terror in Orlando, to those from similar attacks in Kabul, Baghdad or Damascus.

Any wonder ISIS would implore its followers to strike where they are, inside the U.S., inside Europe, and not come to Syria to die anonymously?

Under siege in Raqqa, Mosul and Fallujah, being bombed and bled as it surrenders the conquered lands of its caliphate, ISIS' shift in strategy and targeting makes perfect sense.

Consider, now, the triumphs of Islamist terrorism in Europe.

The 2004 Madrid train bombings led to the defeat of a centrist government and rise of a socialist regime that pulled Spanish troops out of Iraq.

The Paris attacks on Charlie Hebdo and the Bataclan theater strengthened the National Front of Marine Le Pen.

The Beslan massacre of school children in North Ossetia in 2004 led to a consolidation of power by Russian strongman Vladimir Putin.

Across Europe, the political impact of Islamist terrorism, though the numbers of dead and wounded have been, measured against the casualties of conventional war, relatively few, has been extraordinary.

Islamist terrorism has helped spawn anti-immigrant parties and "illiberal" regimes.

The association of Islamic terror with Muslim immigration and refugees from Syria's war has helped to drive "Brexit," the British campaign to secede from the EU.

Islamist attacks have helped propel anti-EU movements and to incite nationalist demands for a recapture of state control of borders and security policy from Brussels.

Obama explains his reluctance to use the term "radical Islamic terror" on his not wishing to validate ISIS' claim to be the spear point, the fighting arm of the world's largest religion in fulfilling the mission given to it by Allah — to make the whole world Islamic.

And this is exactly what ISIS has in mind.

By the frequency and ferocity of its attacks, it seeks to displace al-Qaida and other Islamic resistance movements in the eyes of the 1.6 billion Muslims worldwide, and to be seen by the young as the great liberator of the Islamic world and future conqueror of the West.

The crushing of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria is a necessary but not a sufficient condition of victory in this war, for ISIS is not just an organization but a cause, a movement, an idea.

ISIS believes that by repeatedly wounding and provoking the West, it can reignite a war of civilizations. And though the West is vastly superior in nuclear weapons and conventional arms, economic power and technology, ISIS believes it can gradually drive the West out of the Middle East, as it has already helped to drive the Christians out.

Then, ISIS believes, through mass Muslim migration into a West whose native-born are dying out, Muslims can reoccupy these lands they had almost wholly conquered, until stopped by Charles Martel 14 centuries ago.

For some few Muslims, as we saw at Fort Hood, San Bernardino and Orlando, ISIS offers a dream worth dying for. And as they kill and die for ISIS, they will push America where they are pushing Europe — to the right.

http://www.newsmax.com/PatrickBuchanan/jihadist-right-strategies/2016/06/17/id/734402/#ixzz4BrBPxTcz
Is Islamic Terror America's Future? br br By Pat ... (show quote)


If it replaces the terror we've all been experiencing for years ( and gotten used to ), that wouldn't be a bad thing. We are more in danger from each other, then we are from Islamic terrorists. More people are killed and injured DAILY in this country by violent means, than all the terrorist attacks we've experienced in the last few months COMBINED. That means that each citizen is MUCH more likely to be attacked by another citizen, than they are by a terrorist.

In My State, it is the exception for there NOT to be more than one shooting per day, as it's usually at least two and sometimes as many as 5. That's just MY State, there are 49 more to add to those statistics. That means there are at least 365 people shot every year and as many as 1000. With a kill rate of 50%, that's 180 - 500 people killed every year, each and every year and that's just SHOOTINGS, not counting stabbings and beatings. BTW, the actual kill rate is over 80%.

There have been NO terrorist attacks in my State - yet. Since 2001, there have been over 4500 people killed by violence in my State -which exceeds ALL the casualties of the 9/11 attacks and all subsequent attacks - and that's just MY State. So, tell me again why I should fear Islamic terrorists above all else?

In my State, we have killed more of our own, than were killed in action in Iraq and Afghanistan. It might be safer to go to war somewhere else -and for many States, it definitely WOULD be safer. We are looking in the wrong place - and at the wrong boogyman. We should fear terrorists - we should fear each other more.

Reply
Jun 17, 2016 18:04:52   #
Homestead
 
lpnmajor wrote:
If it replaces the terror we've all been experiencing for years ( and gotten used to ), that wouldn't be a bad thing. We are more in danger from each other, then we are from Islamic terrorists. More people are killed and injured DAILY in this country by violent means, than all the terrorist attacks we've experienced in the last few months COMBINED. That means that each citizen is MUCH more likely to be attacked by another citizen, than they are by a terrorist.

In My State, it is the exception for there NOT to be more than one shooting per day, as it's usually at least two and sometimes as many as 5. That's just MY State, there are 49 more to add to those statistics. That means there are at least 365 people shot every year and as many as 1000. With a kill rate of 50%, that's 180 - 500 people killed every year, each and every year and that's just SHOOTINGS, not counting stabbings and beatings. BTW, the actual kill rate is over 80%.

There have been NO terrorist attacks in my State - yet. Since 2001, there have been over 4500 people killed by violence in my State -which exceeds ALL the casualties of the 9/11 attacks and all subsequent attacks - and that's just MY State. So, tell me again why I should fear Islamic terrorists above all else?

In my State, we have killed more of our own, than were killed in action in Iraq and Afghanistan. It might be safer to go to war somewhere else -and for many States, it definitely WOULD be safer. We are looking in the wrong place - and at the wrong boogyman. We should fear terrorists - we should fear each other more.
If it replaces the terror we've all been experienc... (show quote)


Don't be absurd.

Three Stages of Jihad
http://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_468896&feature=iv&src_vid=-SoXs0_rHY&v=ERou_Q5l9Gw

Islamist Leader: ‘Our Religion And Our Way Of Worship Is Nothing But Killings, Killings And Killings … Killing Is My Job’
http://midnightwatcher.wordpress.com/2014/03/25/islamist-leader-our-religion-and-our-way-of-worship-is-nothing-but-killings-killings-and-killings-killing-is-my-job/

Terorrism in America: An Interview With Steve Klein spokes man for Innocents of the Muslims
Terrorism in America: An Interview With Steve Klein – NewsWithViews.TV
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iuFFacx6re8
Steve Klein www.Atvsat.com

Ann Barnhardt Islamic Sexuality- A Survey of Evil
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xqhrhi_ann-barnhardt-islamic-sexuality-a-survey-of-evil_news

Walid Shoebat explains Islamic Muruna strategy
http://therightscoop.com/walid-shoebat-explains-islamic-muruna-strategy/

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.