lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

No, the US did not land on the moon, it stayed anchored to the Earth. A few American astronauts landed on the moon however.

payne1000

If you'd watched the documentary, you might not be so sure . . .

emarine

But I love you... you make me laugh without trying

payne1000

If you have to continue to post selfies, post them on your your Facebook page instead.

gladerlo

You are ignorant and should not comment

payne1000

Can you make an intelligent comment which might indicate you're not the ignoramus you appear to be?

GRB777

You should research "Operation Highjump" . In 1947 Admiral Byrd was sent to the Antarctica to investigate "the dome". The bible calls it the firmament. It is invisible and impregnable. NASA and Russia both shot missiles into the atmosphere a number of times from 1958 thru 1962 to teat what they called the "inverted fishbowl". They gave up because they couldn't penetrate it. They couldn't shoot thru the firmament. It was about that same time they began lying about space travel. It is much better to know the truth than to go on discussing the ridiculous lies the government has been feeding you all of your life. There has never been any space travel, there are no "aliens". The aliens spoken of are fallen angels who have been here long before there were humans, they never left and are still giving humans advanced technology .The problem is it has never been helpful technology. Who do you think gave humans the cell phone technology that is virtually destroying the social fiber of this world? That is unless you think talking without speaking, hearing without listening is a good thing. America you have become a nation of androids who can't go from point A to point B without staring into your digital device. They, these fallen angels, have completely conquered the minds of most humans and that has always been their intent.

JW

You can provide the proof for yourself. Get a moderately good telescope and look at the landing sites. The LEM components they used are still there, the lunar vehicles they used are still there, the flags and experimental devices are still there and the footprints are still there.

payne1000

On a visit to MacDonald Observatory in West Texas I asked one of the resident astronomers if their telescopes could show the moon rover or any other equipment left by the Apollo missions.
He said there was not a telescope in existence which could pick up that amount of detail from 238,900 miles away. The MacDonald Observatory telescopes were quite a bit beyond "moderately good."

This telescope couldn't show the Apollo debris.

saltwind 78 Loc: Murrells Inlet, South Carolina

Congratulations, You have surpassed your Zionist conspiracy theories with one on the space program. Your right on target for the biggest sucker/liar award!!!

payne1000

You'd have to give up that award if you want me to have it.

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

Nope. The thread says "decide for yourself". I have.

We did.

JW

You were lied to. My telescope cost under $200.00 when Haley's comment came through, and it is sufficient to see remnants of the LEM. No, it doesn't allow seeing footprints but it is capable of seeing the landing areas. I am certain that Hubble aimed in that direction could show the rest.

payne1000

So why is NASA now saying they don't know if it's safe for astronauts to pass through the Van Allen radiation belts?

payne1000

You're lying.

"As you're well aware, no telescope on Earth can see the leftover descent stages of the Apollo Lunar Modules or anything else Apollo-related. Not even the Hubble Space Telescope can discern evidence of the Apollo landings. The laws of optics define its limits." http://www.skyandtelescope.com/observing/celestial-objects-to-watch/moon/how-to-see-all-six-apollo-moon-landing-sites/

NASA says they have photographed the landing sites with a lunar orbiter but NASA is the same NASA which supplied the hoax photos in the first place.