Alicia wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/01/us/politics/donald-trump-university.html?emc=edit_th_20160601&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=60104255
I just don't trust anybody who seems to be AGAINST Trump, Alicia!!!! Even for a low-information, useful-idiot Marxist; how hard is it to understand THAT??? GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO TRUMP!!!
Alicia wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/01/us/politics/donald-trump-university.html?emc=edit_th_20160601&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=60104255
The N.Y.Times???? OK.... What did the Mayberry Gazette say????
Mr. Trump is a big risk taker and that is what his school sold. That's why it's such a big deal that he is running.The U.S. needs thinkers like him. Maybe he has remorse but he also has many students who gave quality reviews...I don't like the idea of maxing out credit cards and am surprised a business would encourage that.... but its all because that gentleman who did the article was given a lot of money by Hillary to write such trash that we're seeing it.
Alicia wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/01/us/politics/donald-trump-university.html?emc=edit_th_20160601&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=60104255
Alicia wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/01/us/politics/donald-trump-university.html?emc=edit_th_20160601&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=60104255
Perhaps you should have titled the thread
HOW MANY TRULY STUPID PEOPLE DO WE HAVE ON OPP?
One moron responding to another. What a great country
where you two can join in mutual defense of your wacko
far left loony tunes thoughts.
Group hug ya'll.
jelun wrote:
Perhaps you should have titled the thread
HOW MANY TRULY STUPID PEOPLE DO WE HAVE ON OPP?
jelun wrote:
Perhaps you should have titled the thread
HOW MANY TRULY STUPID PEOPLE DO WE HAVE ON OPP?
You for sure, red diaper doper moron.
maryla wrote:
Mr. Trump is a big risk taker and that is what his school sold. That's why it's such a big deal that he is running.The U.S. needs thinkers like him. Maybe he has remorse but he also has many students who gave quality reviews...I don't like the idea of maxing out credit cards and am surprised a business would encourage that.... but its all because that gentleman who did the article was given a lot of money by Hillary to write such trash that we're seeing it.
Trump isn't a risk taker with his own money, in reality it is very obvious that he is a cannival barker in a fancy suit who cons poor folks out of what little they have by making them a promise of great success. Think about Trumps clothing line. He has cheap suits and ties made in Chinese sweat shops and puts his name on them then convinces morons that the crap is worth something. He wouldn't be caught dead in the rags he peddles, his suits come from tailor shops in London and Milan; you can bet he laughs his ass off on the way to the bank pocketing the money of the "losers" he has bilked. He is a skilled con man better at his craft than a used car salesman. Trump is so crooked he has servants screw his pants on every morning.
The law firm Robbins Geller Rudman and Dowd behind the class action suit, has paid the Clintons $675,000 in speaking fees since 2009 alone. No political motive there is there? Idiot!!! The whole phony suit is rigged.
Alicia, you are a typical moonbatty idiot. I don't trust moonbats or idiots.
Oh come on buffalo. You are interrupting the group hug these three small minded commie rat bastards
were having. Now how are they going to regain the warm and fuzzies .
buffalo wrote:
The law firm Robbins Geller Rudman and Dowd behind the class action suit, has paid the Clintons $675,000 in speaking fees since 2009 alone. No political motive there is there? Idiot!!!
Alicia, you are a typical moonbatty idiot. I don't trust moonbats or idiots.
maryla wrote:
Mr. Trump is a big risk taker and that is what his school sold. That's why it's such a big deal that he is running.The U.S. needs thinkers like him. Maybe he has remorse but he also has many students who gave quality reviews...I don't like the idea of maxing out credit cards and am surprised a business would encourage that.... but its all because that gentleman who did the article was given a lot of money by Hillary to write such trash that we're seeing it.
Well said along with the fact that the closing statement :She added that many of the instructors had the quality that the school seemed to value most: “They were skilled at high-pressure sales,” she said." is exactly the reason those students were enrolled there...To become proficient at selling their real estate ventures and how to do it...Trump was the owner and not involved in the daily operations of the University..Not an excuse because as the owner he should have had more interaction from a checks and balance stand point of authenticity in what was being sold to safeguard his reputation..But owning as many businesses as he does I am sure his time is never enough time...
The students that have positive reviews are discredited, or dismissed,maryla because it does not fit the spin trying to be shed on this one........
Anyway~~
Kevyn wrote:
Trump isn't a risk taker with his own money, in reality it is very obvious that he is a cannival barker in a fancy suit who cons poor folks out of what little they have by making them a promise of great success. Think about Trumps clothing line. He has cheap suits and ties made in Chinese sweat shops and puts his name on them then convinces morons that the crap is worth something. He wouldn't be caught dead in the rags he peddles, his suits come from tailor shops in London and Milan; you can bet he laughs his ass off on the way to the bank pocketing the money of the "losers" he has bilked. He is a skilled con man better at his craft than a used car salesman. Trump is so crooked he has servants screw his pants on every morning.
Trump isn't a risk taker with his own money, in re... (
show quote)
Most all clothes, shoes, purses, etc even with name brand labels come from the very place you claim about Trumps line, if that is even true..Soooo, my, point, what's YOUR point?
buffalo wrote:
The law firm Robbins Geller Rudman and Dowd behind the class action suit, has paid the Clintons $675,000 in speaking fees since 2009 alone. No political motive there is there? Idiot!!! The whole phony suit is rigged.
Alicia, you are a typical moonbatty idiot. I don't trust moonbats or idiots.
And you? Want to define what you are typical of?
This firm litigates class action suits for people who need help going up against the big thugs, the bullies who do what they can to grasp money that should never be theirs. You know people who lost their money in the banking debacle of 2008? Maybe those folks should have just lost ALL of their retirement funds with no restitution?
And before you start whining about KOS provide another source, even if it doesn't have the magic $675K number if you doubt this source.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/4/16/1516374/-The-Big-Speaking-Fee-NothingOne of the organizations worth noting on Hillary’s paid speech list is Robbins Geller Rudman Dowd LLP, which is one of the largest plaintiffs’-side securities class action firms in the country. Robbins Geller obtained a $500 million settlement against Countrywide Financial (now owned by Bank of America) on behalf of investors in mortgage backed securities, as well as a $627 million settlement against Wachovia on behalf of bondholders defrauded in connection with the bank’s mortgage holdings leading up to the financial crisis. Why is no one clamoring to get the transcript of this speech? Oh right, it doesn’t fit the narrative that Hillary is cozy with Wall Street.
Once the primaries are over, it is likely that the speech issue will go away, as it should. The issue fits Bernie’s anti-Wall Street rhetoric, but it is quite doubtful that Trump, who used large financial institutions to help build his empire, or Cruz, whose wife was a Managing Director at Goldman Sachs and who took loans from the company, will be going after Hillary for purportedly being in the tank for the banks. (Not to mention that Donald Trump purportedly commands $1.5 million in speaking fees.) I doubt we will hear much more about this issue after June.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/4/16/1516374/-The-Big-Speaking-Fee-Nothing
jelun wrote:
Perhaps you should have titled the thread
HOW MANY TRULY STUPID PEOPLE DO WE HAVE ON OPP?
Good point nappy cap.
You, cool breeze, a democrat in 2016, and raylan wuss, are the top four most,stupid spooks on OPP.
And you're all four in the running for the world's most ignorant, ill-educated, moronic negroids in America.
Now go hide behind your ignore button................................PUNK !!!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.