One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Saudi Press: U.S. Blew Up World Trade Center To Create a War On Terror
Page <<first <prev 28 of 28
Dec 3, 2016 18:38:08   #
payne1000
 
emarine wrote:
I hope you went to private schools... But then you would understand Newton's basic laws... so public school for you putz


The comic book mentality strikes again.

Yes Newton's Laws.
Didn't Newton's Laws specify that the force of gravity was straight down?



Reply
Dec 3, 2016 18:45:25   #
payne1000
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
And you spend ALL of your time on this forum attacking Israel and defending the subhuman cockroaches that want to wipe the Jews off the face of the earth. That's very unhuman of you. BTW: what bayou in Louisiana did you crawl out of?


No one I know wants to wipe the Jews off the face of the earth.
What I am asking is that Zionists stop attempting to control what Americans think by owning all our mainstream media and motion picture and TV production.
Because of this Zionist control most Americans don't know the crimes Israel is committing against the Palestinians. The rest of the world knows, according to these poll results:



Reply
Dec 3, 2016 19:11:59   #
emarine
 
payne1000 wrote:
The comic book mentality strikes again.

Yes Newton's Laws.
Didn't Newton's Laws specify that the force of gravity was straight down?




Yes putz that's what Newton said... but a sky scraper is not gravity dip stick its a man made structure... it falls anywhere it has to by anything that effects the fall... just like a tree ... the effect of gravity pulls straight down but the tree will fall over to the side... trees don't compress straight down ... while some parts may fall straight down some parts fly all over ... if it was an apple tree my Newtonian numb nut... some apples may fall straight down just like Newton said ... but the tree still falls to the side both from the same force of gravity

Reply
 
 
Dec 3, 2016 19:26:28   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
payne1000 wrote:
The comic book mentality strikes again.

Yes Newton's Laws.
Didn't Newton's Laws specify that the force of gravity was straight down?
No, it doesn't. It depends on circumstances. For example, the Apollo astronauts used the moon's gravity to pull their ship into a predetermined orbit around it, thereby sustaining a steady orbit of the command module without the need for the engine. Nothing went "straight down". And this applies to all bodies in the universe--due to gravitational force, satellites orbit the earth on this principle, the moon orbits earth, the earth orbits the sun, and so on.

Newton's law of universal gravitation states that every mass attracts every other mass in the universe, and the gravitational force between two bodies is proportional to the product of their masses, and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. Figure that one out, genius.

Doesn't say anything about "straight down." "Straight down" as an accurate description of gravitational force is a child's concept.

It is no surprise that your grasp of scientific laws and principles is fantasy comic book shit that has nothing to do with reality. What you fail to comprehend about the WTC collapses is there was considerable mass in the path of the collapsing portion of the building, an obstacle that deflected massive pieces of the building away from the center of gravity of the entire mass, the result being that those pieces took a trajectory before falling to the earth. There were many forces in play during the collapses, not just gravity.

Maybe you don't even know what a trajectory is. Due to the force of gravity, a bullet follows a trajectory rather than a straight line. A car driving at high speed off a cliff follows a trajectory--

BTW: explosives played no role in the collapse of the WTC buildings, and any attempt to prove the use of explosives with a photograph is unadulterated idiocy. Anyone who believes that is totally full of shit.

Reply
Dec 3, 2016 19:39:50   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
payne1000 wrote:
No one I know wants to wipe the Jews off the face of the earth.
What I am asking is that Zionists stop attempting to control what Americans think by owning all our mainstream media and motion picture and TV production.
Because of this Zionist control most Americans don't know the crimes Israel is committing against the Palestinians. The rest of the world knows, according to these poll results:
Yeah, anti-Semitism has been around for a long long time, the Jews are the most hated people on earth. Jews were hated long before media, movies and TV, and polls. But, geez, those poor little saintly Palestinians, the bastards just can't purge themselves of their virulent hatred of the Jews. And you actually believe the Palestinians are trying for a land grab. Such ignorance.

Reply
Dec 4, 2016 08:28:41   #
payne1000
 
emarine wrote:
Yes putz that's what Newton said... but a sky scraper is not gravity dip stick its a man made structure... it falls anywhere it has to by anything that effects the fall... just like a tree ... the effect of gravity pulls straight down but the tree will fall over to the side... trees don't compress straight down ... while some parts may fall straight down some parts fly all over ... if it was an apple tree my Newtonian numb nut... some apples may fall straight down just like Newton said ... but the tree still falls to the side both from the same force of gravity
Yes putz that's what Newton said... but a sky scr... (show quote)


"trees don't compress straight down" . . . All three towers on 9/11 did come straight down at the speed of controlled demolitions. The twin towers displayed the effect of explosive forces radiating outward in all directions from the center of the explosions. WTC7 fell straight down in 8 seconds even though the damage which is alleged to have brought it down was on one side.



Reply
Dec 4, 2016 08:41:25   #
payne1000
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
No, it doesn't. It depends on circumstances. For example, the Apollo astronauts used the moon's gravity to pull their ship into a predetermined orbit around it, thereby sustaining a steady orbit of the command module without the need for the engine. Nothing went "straight down". And this applies to all bodies in the universe--due to gravitational force, satellites orbit the earth on this principle, the moon orbits earth, the earth orbits the sun, and so on.

Newton's law of universal gravitation states that every mass attracts every other mass in the universe, and the gravitational force between two bodies is proportional to the product of their masses, and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. Figure that one out, genius.

Doesn't say anything about "straight down." "Straight down" as an accurate description of gravitational force is a child's concept.

It is no surprise that your grasp of scientific laws and principles is fantasy comic book shit that has nothing to do with reality. What you fail to comprehend about the WTC collapses is there was considerable mass in the path of the collapsing portion of the building, an obstacle that deflected massive pieces of the building away from the center of gravity of the entire mass, the result being that those pieces took a trajectory before falling to the earth. There were many forces in play during the collapses, not just gravity.

Maybe you don't even know what a trajectory is. Due to the force of gravity, a bullet follows a trajectory rather than a straight line. A car driving at high speed off a cliff follows a trajectory--

BTW: explosives played no role in the collapse of the WTC buildings, and any attempt to prove the use of explosives with a photograph is unadulterated idiocy. Anyone who believes that is totally full of shit.
No, it doesn't. It depends on circumstances. For e... (show quote)


In addition to attempting to get readers disbelieve what their eyes tell them, you are now attempting to convince readers that the same effect of gravity here on earth they have experienced all their lives does not work the way they think it does. Buildings collapsing from fire damage fall straight down as gravity dictates.
Buildings being blown up with explosives go in all directions as shown here.



Reply
 
 
Dec 4, 2016 08:51:22   #
payne1000
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Yeah, anti-Semitism has been around for a long long time, the Jews are the most hated people on earth. Jews were hated long before media, movies and TV, and polls. But, geez, those poor little saintly Palestinians, the bastards just can't purge themselves of their virulent hatred of the Jews. And you actually believe the Palestinians are trying for a land grab. Such ignorance.


Unfortunately, The good Jews of the world are forced to suffer because of the bad behavior of a smaller segment of members of their bloodline. The smaller segment which is doing the damage today are Zionists such as yourself. Disrespect for Jews will continue until they're able to discard Zionism and make amends for their crimes against the Palestinians.







Reply
Dec 4, 2016 09:39:54   #
emarine
 
payne1000 wrote:
"trees don't compress straight down" . . . All three towers on 9/11 did come straight down at the speed of controlled demolitions. The twin towers displayed the effect of explosive forces radiating outward in all directions from the center of the explosions. WTC7 fell straight down in 8 seconds even though the damage which is alleged to have brought it down was on one side.


Yes Adolf trees for the most part trees don't compress straight down... there is no seed of a controlled demolition, they are all different...

"The twin towers displayed the effect of explosive forces radiating outward in all directions from the center of the explosions." VERY TRUE...BUT...you still fail to grasp weight in motion... you seem to reject Newton's laws... almost a half mega ton of energy was released on each tower on 911... Newton's laws explain it very well... your many theory's are a joke



Reply
Dec 4, 2016 09:59:25   #
payne1000
 
emarine wrote:
Yes Adolf trees for the most part trees don't compress straight down... there is no seed of a controlled demolition, they are all different...

"The twin towers displayed the effect of explosive forces radiating outward in all directions from the center of the explosions." VERY TRUE...BUT...you still fail to grasp weight in motion... you seem to reject Newton's laws... almost a half mega ton of energy was released on each tower on 911... Newton's laws explain it very well... your many theory's are a joke
Yes Adolf trees for the most part trees don't comp... (show quote)


Newton's third law is even more evidence that explosives were used to bring down the twin towers.
"Formally stated, Newton's third law is: For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. The statement means that in every interaction, there is a pair of forces acting on the two interacting objects. The size of the forces on the first object equals the size of the force on the second object."

In the case of the twin towers, the equal and opposite reaction was totally missing. When the top section started to fall, there was no jolt or hesitation when the upper section hit the solid structure below. The entire tower came down as if there was no resistance at all. This can only be accomplished by explosives.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGAofwkAOlo

Reply
Page <<first <prev 28 of 28
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.