thebigp

Hillary and the FBI--47gh, b43
DiGenova:
Her biggest problem right now is the FBI. They’re not going away. They have reached a critical mass in their investigation of the Secretary and all of her senior staff. And, it’s going to come to a head, I would suggest, in the next sixty days. And, I predict that Hillary will not make it to the finish line. She’s not going to be able to complete her campaign.

This criminal investigation must, of necessity, focus on her and all the people around her. And, if Jim Comey, the FBI director, is doing his job — which I expect him to do as an honorable man — she cannot be the nominee of the Democratic Party.
She’s going to have to be charged with a crime. It’s going to be a very complex matter for the Department of Justice, but they’re not going to be able to walk away from it.

She and her staff have committed numerous federal crimes involving negligent and improper handling of classified information. They are now at over 1,200 classified emails, and those are just for the ones we know about from the State Department. That doesn’t include the ones that the FBI is, in fact, recovering from her hard drives.

She has definitely made false statements, under oath, both in interviews and on Capitol Hill. She has not yet been interviewed by the FBI in their investigation. That will be the final step in their investigation. The Bureau has so much information about criminal conduct by her and her staff that there is no way that they walk away from this. They’re going to make a recommendation that people be charged, and then Loretta Lynch is going to have the decision of a lifetime.

Ingraham:
Do you have confidence that Loretta Lynch, from what we saw with her handling of the Baltimore riots and all that, is going to okay to green light an indictment of Hillary Clinton in an election year?

DiGenova:
I believe that the evidence that the FBI is compiling will be so compelling that unless she agrees to the charges, there will be a massive revolt inside the FBI, which she will not be able to survive as an Attorney General. It will be like Watergate. It will be unbelievable. The evidence against the Clinton staff and the Secretary is so overwhelming at this point that if, in fact, she chooses not to charge Hillary, they will never be able to charge another federal employee with the negligent handling of classified information.

The intelligence community will not stand for that — they will fight for an indictment, and they are already in the process of girding themselves to, basically, revolt against the Attorney General if she refuses to bring charges. There is a massive breach between the intelligence community, the military community, at the Department of State, and the national security superstructure inside the intelligence community. There is vitriol of an intense amount developing — you can hear it in your conversations with people in the intelligence community. They will fight to the death if the Attorney General attempts to bury this case.

It’s going to be very, very ugly for her. And it’s going to be an awful ending to the Obama Administration, but one which they richly deserve.

source- digenova, ingraham

skott Loc: Bama

It will once again become a big nothing. She will not be prosecuted for anything.
If the private emails and private server was really a YUGE concern, then the two previous Secretaries of State would also be under investigation, for the exact same thing., which they did. Both Powell and Rice said it was absurd for their non-classified emails to later be marked as classified.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Are you jmho, or just using his tactics of filling up the page?

skott Loc: Bama

How many guys post on here stuff from totally made up "news" sites, only to blame the main-stream media of lying?

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Not enough.
""made up "news" sites""? Really?

Harpooner1

Neither Powell nor Rice used a private server out of the government network. And, having a private email is not the issue.
Setting up a private network with a private email and conducting ALL government business from said server and network is the issue, so comparing the previous Sec. States situation is like comparing apples to oranges.

skott Loc: Bama

Not if "security" is the issue. It just proves that this is about Hillary, and not security. Thanks for confirming that which everyone knows.

Ricko Loc: Florida

skott- Neither Powell nor Rice did anything that even comes close to what Hillary was involved in. Classification is based on contents and it does not matter one whit if the material was stamped or not. Hillary should have been able to determine whether material she was receiving or sending was sensitive and thus required some level of classification. She was either negligent or was not qualified to do the job. What Gen. Petraeus did was miniscule compared to Hillary's mis- handling of some of our most sensitive information and they hung him out to dry. So Hillary needs to be held accountable. You may be correct in that Lynch will not indict as the fix is probably already in. Good Luck America !!!

Harpooner1

In case you haven't figured it out yet, Hillary Clinton's use of a private server and network did potentially compromise United States secret information security since governmental security protocols were not in place on her private network. It strains credulity, despite her denials, that a Sec. State NEVER sent or received classified or top secret emails.
In fact, that is part and parcel of what the position entails. The fact that a number of the emails have yet to be made public because they are of the highest security classification speaks volumes as well as all the redacted emails. And, taking into account that Clinton's "story" has changed numerous times casts doubts about her truthfulness regarding this matter. But, I am stating something we all know....Hillary is a liar.
Now, by her own admissions, she and her "staff" arbitrarily deleted over 30,000 emails deemed "personal". Since we don't know as yet who in fact viewed these emails or the content therein, this aspect alone is very suspicious, wouldn't you think? After all, the entirety of the emails, both personal and state related had to be read to determine which was which, and, did the "staff" have the proper security clearances to read classified information? Remember, it is a crime to knowingly share classified information with other persons not granted the proper security clearances. Does General Patraeus ring a bell?
Also, maybe you fail to consider that the reason this whole thing came to light was through a Romanian hacker who was able to compromise the emails of Clinton's close friend, Sydney Blumenthal, who was communicating information with Hillary regarding, among other things, situations in Libya. This is also cause for concern as Clinton was told in no uncertain terms that Blumenthal was NOT to work for the Sec. State.
Now, you have the programmer who has been granted immunity regarding the case. The FBI does not grant immunity unless it pertains to a criminal case. Recall that he pleaded the fifth already when brought before congress to testify. Does a person with no guilty knowledge plead the fifth?

What was the motive for creating the private network? Hillary has said she did it for "simplicity" so she only had to use one device. We know this is a lie because she used multiple devices from the get go.

Yes, this is about Hillary Clinton. And, no, this is not a "normal security review" as she claims. The FBI does not conduct "security reviews" and they only investigate when the potential for a crime, or crimes, is believed to have taken place.
It is what Hillary did, ordered to be done, and what others under her supervision did that has caused all of this.

If this is not clear enough for you, Skott, you need to see a doctor.

skott Loc: Bama

Perhaps you should look up what they said in response to being told that their old emails that were sent on their private cell phones were later marked classified.
This is just as political as Benghazi, and we will see the same court outcomes.
Oh, thats right, no court charges in Benghazi.

Ricko Loc: Florida

skott-that happens in the intel. business. As pieces of a puzzle are put together , data that might not have merited classification at the time now becomes classified as the picture unfolds. Since the whole picture is determined to be classifed each piece now becomes classified as well. Conversely, SAP material is highly classified upon origination and Hillary had some of that material on an unprotected server. Huge difference. If Hillary skates on this, several people need to have their convictions overturned. Good Luck America !!!

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Yep; both parties are so dirty, they have to cover for each other.
Go trump go.
Throw the bums out.

Ricko Loc: Florida

skott-re Benghazi-investigation ongoing. We know that Hillary lied about why four men died. The woman is a pathological lair and bad news for America. Too bad so many people are too ignorant to see the obvious. Good Luck America !!!

katgiles

The FBI has so many crimes against both Obama and Hillary that it is pitiful. If the DOJ doesn't prosecute. they are releasing the facts to the public.

Liberty Tree

The final outcome is not up to the FBI. It will only make a recommendation which may be done through a confidential report. Any prosecution will be up to AG Lynch and really Obama. It will not happen.