Nice video's here.
It took me all the way down to the last link to get a response, but it was worth the wait!
Very interesting, and very convincing article. Certainly, it made a lot of sense.
I will investigate further, but feel positive this runs very close to the truth about Washington politics, if not local and state level, also. :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
slatten49 wrote:
It took me all the way down to the last link to get a response, but it was worth the wait!
Very interesting, and very convincing article. Certainly, it made a lot of sense.
I will investigate further, but feel positive this runs very close to the truth about Washington politics, if not local and state level, also. :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
If you want to watch the videos they are on Peter schwiezers web site and the one from the Hannity show is on Yahoo.
hang in there brother
:thumbup:
claytonln wrote:
If you want to watch the videos they are on Peter schwiezers web site and the one from the Hannity show is on Yahoo.
hang in there brother
:thumbup:
Thanks, I'm "hanging". :lol:
I don't have a high regard for Sean Hannity, generally, nor Sarah Palin, either. But, that doesn't allow for dismissal in the logic of Schwiezers' comments, nor the reality of the situation..regarding monetary input into D.C. politics.
I separate politics from reality at all times, when plausible.
:lol: It is usually, and easily, plausible to do so! :mrgreen:
slatten49 wrote:
Thanks, I'm "hanging". :lol:
I don't have a high regard for Sean Hannity, generally, nor Sarah Palin, either. But, that doesn't allow for dismissal in the logic of Schwiezers' comments, nor the reality of the situation..regarding monetary input into D.C. politics.
I separate politics from reality at all times, when plausible.
:lol: It is usually, and easily, plausible to do so! :mrgreen:
And I might add it is also a very good idea :thumbup: I on the other hand allow myself to be consumed by it all :oops: and I am not sure that is at all healthy. :lol:
claytonln wrote:
And I might add it is also a very good idea :thumbup: I on the other hand allow myself to be consumed by it all :oops: and I am not sure that is at all healthy. :lol:
It is healthier to be involved, than to be apathetic to it all.
I applaud your involvement, totally consumed or not, as opposed to not giving a damn, one way or the other!
And, besides being a dog-lover...you seem like a good, all-around kind of guy, ClaytonIn. :thumbup: :mrgreen:
slatten49 wrote:
It is healthier to be involved, than to be apathetic to it all.
I applaud your involvement, totally consumed or not, as opposed to not giving a damn, one way or the other!
And, besides being a dog-lover...you seem like a good, all-around kind of guy, ClaytonIn. :thumbup: :mrgreen:
Thank you sir :thumbup: And I have to say you I have the utmost respect for you and your opinion. :thumbup: Oh, and my dog is learning to howl the Star Spangled Banner. :-P
claytonln wrote:
Thank you sir :thumbup: And I have to say you I have the utmost respect for you and your opinion. :thumbup: Oh, and my dog is learning to howl the Star Spangled Banner. :-P
All verses?:roll:In what key?:lol:In English, or "dog"? :wink: :thumbup: :mrgreen:
AuntiE
Loc: 45th Least Free State
slatten49 wrote:
Thanks, I'm "hanging". :lol:
I don't have a high regard for Sean Hannity, generally, nor Sarah Palin, either. But, that doesn't allow for dismissal in the logic of Schwiezers' comments, nor the reality of the situation..regarding monetary input into D.C. politics.
I separate politics from reality at all times, when plausible.
:lol: It is usually, and easily, plausible to do so! :mrgreen:
A gentle question, what is the objection to Mr. Hannity? I have periodically watched when he has group discussions, back checked some facts and found them to be relatively accurate. We will not even go down the highway on Mrs. Palin.
Apparently, the book has 600 footnotes of proof. That much evidence is very frightening.
[quote=AuntiE]A gentle question, what is the objection to Mr. Hannity? I have periodically watched when he has group discussions, back checked some facts and found them to be relatively accurate. We will not even go down the highway on Mrs. Palin.
Apparently, the book has 600 footnotes of proof. That much evidence is very frightening.[/quote
I have no problem with Mr. Schwiezers' book, as far as I can tell. It is, indeed, full of evidence and, so far, in my light probe into it, very credible.
Gently put: Sean Hannity is simply not credible, often, in my mind.
I find him no more or less guilty than any of the cable news channels' opinion mouthpieces. You can throw in all the "alphabet" stations into that catagory! I put little faith in any of them to consistently speak the truth. All, including Hannity, have an agenda.
I form my own opinions.
AuntiE
Loc: 45th Least Free State
[quote=slatten49][quote=AuntiE]A gentle question, what is the objection to Mr. Hannity? I have periodically watched when he has group discussions, back checked some facts and found them to be relatively accurate. We will not even go down the highway on Mrs. Palin.
Apparently, the book has 600 footnotes of proof. That much evidence is very frightening.[/quote
I have no problem with Mr. Schwiezers' book, as far as I can tell. It is, indeed, full of evidence and, so far, in my light probe into it, very credible.
Gently put: Sean Hannity is simply not credible, often, in my mind.
I find him no more or less guilty than any of the cable news channels' opinion mouthpieces. You can throw in all the "alphabet" stations into that catagory! I put little faith in any of them to consistently speak the truth. All, including Hannity, have an agenda.
I form my own opinions.[/quote]
Unfortunately to reach our opinions we have to listen to several agenda driven "mouthpieces". My progeny has been pushing hard for this household to do only overseas media. Yes, they have their own agenda; however, a number tend to do a more credible job on objectivity.
AuntiE wrote:
Unfortunately to reach our opinions we have to listen to several agenda driven "mouthpieces". My progeny has been pushing hard for this household to do only overseas media. Yes, they have their own agenda; however, a number tend to do a more credible job on objectivity.
I have no problem with that assessment, AuntiE. I, like all, glean from many sources, without dismissing any of them completely, nor accepting any as "gospel".:wink::mrgreen:
slatten49 wrote:
I have no problem with that assessment, AuntiE. I, like all, glean from many sources, without dismissing any of them completely, nor accepting any as "gospel".:wink::mrgreen:
I am a seeker of truth. I was once told to not believe anything I hear and 1/10 of what I see and that seeking the truth on my own would give me the big picture. :lol:
claytonln wrote:
I am a seeker of truth. I was once told to not believe anything I hear and 1/10 of what I see and that seeking the truth on my own would give me the big picture. :lol:
That sounds like a plan to me!
I will be awaiting the completion of your dogs' learning the Star Spangled Banner.
Maybe you could get him on "Star Search", "The Voice", or even, "American Idol". I have no doubt he would be better than some of the other contestants.
Half-time at the Super Bowl, perhaps? :wink:
I know my dogs would watch. :thumbup: :mrgreen:
slatten49 wrote:
That sounds like a plan to me!
I will be awaiting the completion of your dogs' learning the Star Spangled Banner.
Maybe you could get him on "Star Search", "The Voice", or even, "American Idol". I have no doubt he would be better than some of the other contestants.
Half-time at the Super Bowl, perhaps? :wink:
I know my dogs would watch. :thumbup: :mrgreen:
Oh, yes she has such a beautiful voice. I spoke with her last night and she is pondering about maybe running for a political off. :shock: But, I think she would really like her own reality show. :thumbup:.
She could probably become a huge hit. :mrgreen: :shock:
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.