A Muslim judge using Quran for her swearing-in: I can't believe that NYC allowed a judge using Quran for swearing-in office. The US constitution and Quran are totally opposite from one...

SinnieK

I can't believe that NYC allowed a judge using Quran for swearing-in office. The US constitution and Quran are totally opposite from one another so how do we expect her to rule? By the Quran law or the US Constitution?

Using Quran to swear-in an office is totally against our Constitution.

http://www.snopes.com/muslim-woman-sworn-new-york-city-civil-judge/

PaulPisces Loc: San Francisco

SinnieK wrote:

I can't believe that NYC allowed a judge using Quran for swearing-in office. The US constitution and Quran are totally opposite from one another so how do we expect her to rule? By the Quran law or the US Constitution?

Using Quran to swear-in an office is totally against our Constitution.

http://www.snopes.com/muslim-woman-sworn-new-york-city-civil-judge/

Please advise the portion of The Constitution that indicates one may not use the Qu'ran for swearing-in ceremonies. Or if the Constitution makes a specific callout of what book must be used. I'm unaware of such rules being called out in our Constitution.

Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan

SinnieK wrote:

I can't believe that NYC allowed a judge using Quran for swearing-in office. The US constitution and Quran are totally opposite from one another so how do we expect her to rule? By the Quran law or the US Constitution?

Using Quran to swear-in an office is totally against our Constitution.

http://www.snopes.com/muslim-woman-sworn-new-york-city-civil-judge/

The No Religious Test Clause of the United States Constitution is a clause within Article VI, Clause 3. By its plain terms, no federal office holder or employee can be required to adhere to or accept any particular religion or doctrine as a prerequisite to holding a federal office or a federal government job. It immediately follows a clause requiring all federal and state officers to take an oath or affirmation to support the Constitution. This clause contains the only explicit reference to religion in the original seven articles of the U.S. Constitution.

You can swear on nothing or a coloring book, there is no requirement of one book or another.

This has been discussed several times on this site and you are furthering ignorance to continue to bring it up.

Our leadership is required to follow the law not their religion.

....or are you not familiar with the first amendment?

Raylan Wolfe Loc: earth

SinnieK wrote:

I can't believe that NYC allowed a judge using Quran for swearing-in office. The US constitution and Quran are totally opposite from one another so how do we expect her to rule? By the Quran law or the US Constitution?

Using Quran to swear-in an office is totally against our Constitution.

http://www.snopes.com/muslim-woman-sworn-new-york-city-civil-judge/

FACT! Nowhere in the US Constitution does it mention the word religion except for in exclusionary terms!

righty Loc: Tenn

SinnieK wrote:

I can't believe that NYC allowed a judge using Quran for swearing-in office. The US constitution and Quran are totally opposite from one another so how do we expect her to rule? By the Quran law or the US Constitution?

Using Quran to swear-in an office is totally against our Constitution.

http://www.snopes.com/muslim-woman-sworn-new-york-city-civil-judge/

SinnieK, unfortunately I have to agree with these posters. Although I do not like it or approve of it as I am a Christian, one can place their hand on anything they want when swearing into office. Maybe one day this can change to having one standard thing all who take on oath places their hands on so as to not offend anyone. America is filled with a broad range of Americans of different races and religions, but in the end all are Americans. Maybe all oath takers should be required to place their hands on a copy of the U.S. Constitution as that is what they are swearing to uphold.

Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan

righty wrote:

SinnieK, unfortunately I have to agree with these ... (show quote)

You are groovy.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

righty wrote:

SinnieK, unfortunately I have to agree with these ... (show quote)

That is a good idea.... Using the constitution... :thumbup: :thumbup:

Sicilianthing

SinnieK wrote:

I can't believe that NYC allowed a judge using Quran for swearing-in office. The US constitution and Quran are totally opposite from one another so how do we expect her to rule? By the Quran law or the US Constitution?

Using Quran to swear-in an office is totally against our Constitution.

http://www.snopes.com/muslim-woman-sworn-new-york-city-civil-judge/

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

This has gone around several times... I saw it a few months ago.

This is contrary to the Society & rules of Judgeships in America.
The swearing in is not recognized under the Koran.

I'm not an expert but would love for one to weigh in on this.

Her Oath is invalid

INVALID and as far as I know no Muslims are permitted to Judge a Christian Citizen or Catholic for that matter.

Either way she won't uphold the Jurisprudence Doctrines of the trade and our Bill of Rights as they are written under a Christian GOD !

GAME OVER !

I hope someone takes the shot or she dies in an accident or something.

Don't be surprised if they try to put a Muslim in SCOTUS !
This will trigger a Revolution and an assassination.

I hope that ScumBag Mother FUCKER Barry try's it.

GAME OVER Again !

jer48 Loc: perris ca

PaulPisces wrote:

Please advise the portion of The Constitution that indicates one may not use the Qu'ran for swearing-in ceremonies. Or if the Constitution makes a specific callout of what book must be used. I'm unaware of such rules being called out in our Constitution.

you should be deported along with the idiot who was swore in using the quran

PaulPisces Loc: San Francisco

jer48 wrote:

you should be deported along with the idiot who was swore in using the quran

While I appreciate your strong feelings on the topic, why haven't you answered my question?