Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

I stand corrected, this is exactly what you wrote: "My attention span is short on articles posted by propagandists such as you, emarine and Blade Runner. I know that anything you post will either be designed to demonize Muslims or cover up the crimes of Zionism. It takes a lot of lies to sell that agenda. I don't have time to read your lies." So let me revise my statement about you. You will not take the time to read the documents or witness statements from the Nuremberg Trails because you do not have the time. Better?

And I also stand corrected, photographs and YouTube are probably your mainstay on links. Saves you from having to read anything....right?

payne1000

Thanks for admitting that you lied about what I said. You don't show any websites I've posted which are written at a 5 grade level so you obviously lied about that as well.
From what I have read, eyewitnesses and survivors were not allowed to testify at the Nuremberg trials.
http://www.cardozolawreview.com/Joomla1.5/content/27-4/MARRUS.WEBSITE.pdf

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

When I make a mistake, as I did, I will admit it. Unlike some folks who ignore the own blunders and just keep on going. As for investigating your websites, I just do not want to take the time to do the research for you to pronounce it inadequate. Lastly, the evidence for the Nuremburg trials is over 19,000 boxes or over 4 tons of documents!. Most of the documents have been or are in the process of being digitized and can be accessed from most law libraries in the USA. I suggest, because you are making the claim (because your website published) that there were no defense or witness called, that you go to one of these libraries and dig through the information. As for me.... those Nazi are dead, for me the issue is a mute point.

What we have now is a brand new generation of Nazi, and they are even here on OPP. Do not think so, check out the running debates put forth about the Zionist and by association Jews. These people pose danger, not the 90 year old Germans. "According to the American Nazi Party’s website, National Socialists “are certainly NOT ‘supremacists,’ rather we are SEPERATISTS (sic) – we believe that RACIAL SEPERATION (sic) is best for all concerned. White and non-White alike.”

In other words, “IF there could be ONE ALL-WHITE nation on planet earth, where we Racialists could happily live – AWAY – from ‘others,’ whom we would prefer not to co-exist beside…, we would move there,” the group says.

ANP’s second goal “is to achieve Social Justice for the White Working Class,” adding that it is not one of their goals to “‘exterminate’ each and every jewish person in existence.

“What we ARE out to destroy – is, the JEWISH MONIED ‘ELITES’ POWERHOLD in America, where for example ISRAEL’S best interests are put BEFORE the best interests of America and its citizens,” ANP’s website says.

“The ‘small jew,’ who works for a living like everyone else, and has no ‘say’ over the current situation, than you or I – has nothing to fear from National Socialism. Neither does ANY non-Aryan. (National Socialism) stands FOR separate, self-determination and autonomy for ALL the peoples of the world. Only those who would do harm to the Aryan Folk, are our enemies.” http://www.mintpressnews.com/the-rebirth-of-american-nazism/180286/ Does this sound familiar? It should, it has been repeated here on OPP.

payne1000

I'm surprised you'd post an article from mintpressnews. The main writer, Richard Silverstein, is obviously a liberal and an anti-Zionist. http://www.mintpressnews.com/213478-2/213478/

Destroying the Jewish monied elite's powerhold on America sounds like a noble goal.

The National Socialist Movement desires to live in an all-Aryan nation. Zionists desire to live in an all-Jewish nation.
How are they really that different?