President Rubio? I'm neither for it nor agin' it. I'll just post occasional comments. What I like about Marco is that he is able to ferret out the truth (or lack thereof) of certain...

CarolSeer2016

I'm neither for it nor agin' it. I'll just post occasional comments.

What I like about Marco is that he is able to ferret out the truth (or lack thereof) of certain "facts" and then use his considerable capacity to reason to either change his policy or stick with it.

And, Senator, you certainly showed your mettle in the last debates!!

LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA

CarolSeer2016 wrote:

I'm neither for it nor agin' it. I'll just post occasional comments.

What I like about Marco is that he is able to ferret out the truth (or lack thereof) of certain "facts" and then use his considerable capacity to reason to either change his policy or stick with it.

And, Senator, you certainly showed your mettle in the last debates!!

Thank you. Rubio is perhaps the smartest and most informed of the remaining Republican candidates, although Cruz would be close, and he totally gets a bad rap from conservatives. I think he deserves a little credit for totally winning the day in that last debate.

CarolSeer2016

LAPhil wrote:

Thank you. Rubio is perhaps the smartest and most informed of the remaining Republican candidates, although Cruz would be close, and he totally gets a bad rap from conservatives. I think he deserves a little credit for totally winning the day in that last debate.

I liked Rubio for the winner.

Ricko Loc: Florida

LAPhil wrote:

Thank you. Rubio is perhaps the smartest and most informed of the remaining Republican candidates, although Cruz would be close, and he totally gets a bad rap from conservatives. I think he deserves a little credit for totally winning the day in that last debate.

LAPhil-Rubio is smart and articulate. He has many facts concerning government at his fingertips because it is his full time job. I would certainly prefer him over any democrat but his experience is limited to government. Anyone with a modicum of common sense can become a politician, but it takes a special person to become a successful businessman/woman. We need someone who can revive the economy because without economic strength all other agenda items are moot. Why send someone to DC to clean up a mess they helped create ?? I think the petty bickering is childish and plays into the hands of the democrats. There are enough serious issues to talk about without having to resort to school boy antics. Good Luck America !!!

Loki Loc: Georgia

CarolSeer2016 wrote:

I liked Rubio for the winner.

Rubio, like Trump, appears to have had a Paul-on-the-road-to-Damascus epiphany vis-a-vis illegal immigration. I do not trust Rubio for a second on Immigration and border security, and I only trust Trump a little more.
Whenever you consider a candidate, you'd better let one fact burn in; the next president will appoint one or two Supreme Court judges, and if the majority turns Liberal, there will be, in effect, be no more southern border and no more Second Amendment, and what is left of US sovereignty is is serious trouble. A Liberal Justice on the Court will be a disaster that will take years to undo, if it can be undone.
That is why I voted for Ted Cruz. I think he will appoint Conservative Constitutional Originalists to the Supreme and Appellate courts.

Hemiman Loc: Communist California

Ricko wrote:

LAPhil-Rubio is smart and articulate. He has many... (show quote)

Make America great again, elect Trump.🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

reconreb Loc: America / Inglis Fla.

CarolSeer2016 wrote:

I'm neither for it nor agin' it. I'll just post occasional comments.

What I like about Marco is that he is able to ferret out the truth (or lack thereof) of certain "facts" and then use his considerable capacity to reason to either change his policy or stick with it.

And, Senator, you certainly showed your mettle in the last debates!!

Carol , If you check with the folks in Fla. most like myself see nothing but a slick fast talking politition , yea we voted him in then he did just what the washington cartel wanted not what he promised and ran on , FFFFF Rubio!!!!!!!

Loki Loc: Georgia

reconreb wrote:

Carol , If you check with the folks in Fla. most like myself see nothing but a slick fast talking politition , yea we voted him in then he did just what the washington cartel wanted not what he promised and ran on , FFFFF Rubio!!!!!!!

Sounds like our new Senator. Sort of. He voted to fund amnesty, but blocked the confirmation of a pro-wetback judge.

J Anthony Loc: Connecticut

A pandering poser. Even his Republican colleagues can't name a single minor, beneficial accomplishment of his since he's been in the Senate. Another crass opportunist with stars (or should I say dollar-signs) in his eyes, beholden to his deep-pocketed donors, not unlike a younger Obama.

valkyrierider Loc: "Land of Trump"

CarolSeer2016 wrote:

I'm neither for it nor agin' it. I'll just post occasional comments.

What I like about Marco is that he is able to ferret out the truth (or lack thereof) of certain "facts" and then use his considerable capacity to reason to either change his policy or stick with it.

And, Senator, you certainly showed your mettle in the last debates!!

I voted for him to be a Senator for Florida and the dipshit has done nothing for our State and never will. He is strictly a man out to better himself and no one else. he has not done a good job in the senate and will not do a good job as President. You can take this to the bank and earn interest on youur money.

Homestead

CarolSeer2016 wrote:

I'm neither for it nor agin' it. I'll just post occasional comments.

What I like about Marco is that he is able to ferret out the truth (or lack thereof) of certain "facts" and then use his considerable capacity to reason to either change his policy or stick with it.

And, Senator, you certainly showed your mettle in the last debates!!

Marco Rubio is not a Natural-Born-Citizen as required by the Constitution of the United States.

LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA

Homestead wrote:

Marco Rubio is not a Natural-Born-Citizen as required by the Constitution of the United States.

I think you'd get an argument about that from either of the resident experts on this thread:
http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-65403-3.html

From Loki's post on page 3:

"Actually, the point was these people who claim that Congress cannot make a law conferring Natural Born Status on someone ignore this Act, and the Acts of 1790, 1795, 1805, 1840, on up through 1986. Anyone who adheres to the doctrine that natural born ONLY means birth in the US to 2 citizen parents ignores this, and invalidates the presidencies of Andy Jackson, James Buchanan, Chester Arthur, and Obooboo. They ignore the FACT that both JohnMcCain and George Romney were made natural born citizens by Acts of Congress."

Homestead

LAPhil wrote:

I think you'd get an argument about that from eith... (show quote)

All this deals with the naturalization of citizens.

Congress can make a naturalized citizen, but it cannot make a Natural-Born-Citizen.

Ricko Loc: Florida

Loki wrote:

Rubio, like Trump, appears to have had a Paul-on-t... (show quote)

Loki-Cruz is a strict Constitutionalist-could he get anything done ?? Good Luck America !!!

LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA

Homestead wrote:

All this deals with the naturalization of citizens.

Congress can make a naturalized citizen, but it cannot make a Natural-Born-Citizen.

Where do you find it written that there is any difference between a citizen at birth and a natural born citizen?