Check out topic: Abnormally hot summer is predicted
Is Eveyone Happy with their new Healthcare?
Oct 3, 2013 22:34:31 #
Butch Matthews a die-hard Republican saves $13,000 with ACA! http://www.healthbeatblog.com/2013/10/take-your-time-they-are-not-going-to-run-out-of-policies/
Oct 3, 2013 22:52:46 #
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
Butch Matthews a die-hard Republican saves $13,000 with ACA! http://www.healthbeatblog.com/2013/10/take-your-time-they-are-not-going-to-run-out-of-policies/
Savings like that has to be subsidized by someone. My guess it is the taxpayer. Im happy for this man, but there is far too much load on the taxpayer as is. When does the taxpayer get a break? I am certain this man who saves $13,000 pays taxes also. So how much in taxes and government intrusion into his private life is that costing? There is far more to Obama Care than meets the eye. If you trade freedom for security you deserve neither.
Oct 3, 2013 23:00:32 #
donc711 wrote:
Savings like that has to be subsidized by someone. My guess it is the taxpayer. Im happy for this man, but there is far too much load on the taxpayer as is. When does the taxpayer get a break? I am certain this man who saves $13,000 pays taxes also. So how much in taxes and government intrusion into his private life is that costing? There is far more to Obama Care than meets the eye. If you trade freedom for security you deserve neither.
Butch a die-hard Republican had the same reservations but is elated now, maybe all that propaganda that you and him were listening to is hogwash !
Oct 3, 2013 23:01:19 #
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
Butch Matthews a die-hard Republican saves $13,000 with ACA! http://www.healthbeatblog.com/2013/10/take-your-time-they-are-not-going-to-run-out-of-policies/
What a bunch of tripe.
Oct 3, 2013 23:06:57 #
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
Butch a die-hard Republican had the same reservations but is elated now, maybe all that propaganda that you and him were listening to is hogwash !
I guess you never read the law or even some of the amendments to it either. You need to do some real reading before speaking. I have read the original and some of the amendments to it. Can't do anything about stupid, but ignorance can be corrected. Where do you fit?
Oct 3, 2013 23:13:14 #
LurkingTom wrote:
What a bunch of tripe.
I went to the web page and it said he saved. Don't know if it is true or not. Not familiar with the page. Left a comment. If it's true we are paying for his savings.
:hunf:
Oct 3, 2013 23:29:22 #
donc711 wrote:
I guess you never read the law or even some of the amendments to it either. You need to do some real reading before speaking. I have read the original and some of the amendments to it. Can't do anything about stupid, but ignorance can be corrected. Where do you fit?
Just tell us what the first paragraph say's!
Oct 3, 2013 23:45:39 #
Have been there 7 times get two pages in and it fails. MSNBC and CNN aren't having much luck either. Excuces are like AH and they've had three years to have this ready. Great Butch got in hope more like him do that way they'll shut it down because on money.
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
Butch Matthews a die-hard Republican saves $13,000 with ACA! http://www.healthbeatblog.com/2013/10/take-your-time-they-are-not-going-to-run-out-of-policies/
Oct 3, 2013 23:49:09 #
bmac32 wrote:
Have been there 7 times get two pages in and it fails. MSNBC and CNN aren't having much luck either. Excuces are like AH and they've had three years to have this ready. Great Butch got in hope more like him do that way they'll shut it down because on money.
Not hardly the ACA is here to stay.
Oct 4, 2013 09:09:08 #
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
Not hardly the ACA is here to stay.
If that's true (which I hope it's not) then that would be a shame. ACA may be here to stay, however, even dems/progs/libs agree that it needs "adjustments". Those "adjustments" mean that it won't be the same program we have today.
BTW, one "adjustment" would be more "exemptions". Those that are "exempt" do not need "adjustments".
Oct 4, 2013 10:34:59 #
If you made it to the second paragraph you would notice he "applied his government subsidy". So yes the tax payers are paying for it.
Also if I recall correctly, after a period of time, the subsidies will no longer exist. Wonder what he will have to pay then?
Also if I recall correctly, after a period of time, the subsidies will no longer exist. Wonder what he will have to pay then?
Oct 4, 2013 10:38:51 #
Just from reading the closet thing I find is about double after the third year. Not if or if not true after the third yearis more than people can afford.
JerryMac wrote:
If you made it to the second paragraph you would notice he "applied his government subsidy". So yes the tax payers are paying for it.
Also if I recall correctly, after a period of time, the subsidies will no longer exist. Wonder what he will have to pay then?
Also if I recall correctly, after a period of time, the subsidies will no longer exist. Wonder what he will have to pay then?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.