thebigp

Here's the alternative to fossil fuels--18kh., b28


Welcome to “The Michael Savage Newsletter,” your daily report on all things “Savage.”
In today’s issue: As world leaders met in Paris for the climate summit, Dr. Savage noted there is a “vendetta against fossil fuels” but no viable alternative being offered.
“We all want a cleaner earth but not at the expense of our survival and the expense of the truth itself,” he told “The Savage Nation.”
“And, if we want cleaner energy, there’s no cleaner energy than nuclear energy, by the way.”
You want me to tell you about the devastation of windmills? Would you like to know about the devastation of windmills to avian life? And I don’t mean water. I mean things with wings.
Do you know how many endangered birds there are now because of windmills in Scotland, windmills offshore, off the British Isles?
They’re killing birds by the millions, do you know that? You don’t know anything about that? Didn’t make it to your local paper. OK. It’s a boring topic. I get it.
The safest energy, the cleanest energy, is nuclear energy.
You want clean energy, you want to give up on the coal? Build nuclear power plants.
But, see, that’s not what you want to build if you’re in the green racket.
If you’re in the green racket, what you want to do is make sure that green money flows to you.
You’ve got to build another beach house somewhere.

source-michael savage

Pulfnick Loc: Knoxville, TN

Nuclear is certainly a no-brainer best way to generate electricity. But it can NEVER be an alternative to major applications of fossil fuels. Unless a feasible, economic magical means of using electricity to power flight, transportation, pharmaceuticals, plastics including synthetic fabrics, fertilizer, and on and on, exists. But such technology does NOT exist and never will. There is no scientifically or economic substitute for hydrocarbons in such areas.

jim keris

The nuclear myth leaves out one thing, nuclear waste. hot for 10,000 years. Who is going to watch over this stuff?

Kevyn

Ask the people aroun Fukushima and Cherinobyl how clean nuclear energy is. The windmills do kill birds and create flicker in their shadow and make some noise. The number of birds killed by coal plants is far greater than killed by windmills when measured against how many Kilowatts are generated. Wind and solar significantly reduce environmental impact, they do not eliminate it. The alternative to fossil fuels offered in Paris is simple, conservation, real conservitives conserve. Michael Savage is a half bright fool, he couldn't find his own ass with both hands. Anyone who entertains anything he says has their head in their ass.

DamnYANKEE

STFU MAGGOT ... :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: GO BLOW YOUR WINDMILL

ghostgotcha Loc: The Florida swamps

Pulfnick Loc: Knoxville, TN

Save disposal is a total no brainer, most cheaply by injection in deep salt caverns, or most sophisticatedly by permanently placing in Yucca Mountain, you know, the project Obama the Destroyer killed after we had spend over $5 Billion (if you don't understand Billions, that is $5,000 MILLION dollars) and it was nearing completion. The fact Yucca Mountain wasn't finished - but could easily be completed - is solely due to progressive politics, not any technical reason.

The one and only reason Progressives (at least those with IQ above room temperature) always oppose nuclear energy is that as good fascists, they do not want to improve our lives, but want government politicians and bureaucrats to dictate every move and take care of them by dictating how every other person and business must operate. And fascist government is not about to cede any power it has grabbed, nor stop trying to increase its tyranny. They don't need to as long as so many stupid and/or greedy people vote for them, thinking they get more free stuff from them.