Check out topic: Biden v Trump Debate Topics?
Pilotsfor9/11truth expose many of the lies of 9/11.
Oct 15, 2015 12:55:01 #
Super Dave wrote:
You know... Like anything else that happens in chaos, there are always going to be disarray in the information.
But seriously?
But seriously?
You're not supporting this hog wash? Are you?
Oct 15, 2015 12:56:26 #
JMHO wrote:
And, you're going into your broken record of posting B.S.!!!! Does your mommy know that you're on the computer?
Does your mommy know how ignorant you are?
Oct 15, 2015 12:58:16 #
Does David know what a failure you are?
BTW; I am referring to David Horowitz ( X Commie, now on the "right"). Fascist?
BTW; I am referring to David Horowitz ( X Commie, now on the "right"). Fascist?
JMHO wrote:
And, you're going into your broken record of posting B.S.!!!! Does your mommy know that you're on the computer?
Oct 15, 2015 12:58:27 #
payne1000 wrote:
Does your mommy know how ignorant you are?
A whole lot smarter than you...pea brain. And, not even close to as gullible as you.
Oct 15, 2015 13:03:53 #
JMHO wrote:
You're not supporting this hog wash? Are you?
No.. I guess I wasn't clear.
I'm just amazed at just how many people believe in something this bizarre.
I'm a big fan of Occam's Razor.
Oct 15, 2015 13:08:51 #
JMHO wrote:
You're not supporting this hog wash? Are you?
OOOOH, Super Dave, you're not leaving me are you??!!!
Boooo Hoooo!!!!
Oct 15, 2015 13:10:43 #
JMHO wrote:
A whole lot smarter than you...pea brain. And, not even close to as gullible as you.
Prove how smart you are. Give readers a rebuttal of the video.
I know how you'll reply. You'll use your standard troll excuse.
But that won't fly because if it were bullshit it would be very easy to refute. Since the work of Pilotsfor9/11truth can't be refuted by anyone as ignorant as yourself, you'll continue with your prepubescent insults.
Check out topic: Has America Finally Had It With Joe Biden?
Oct 15, 2015 13:13:27 #
Super Dave wrote:
No.. I guess I wasn't clear.
I'm just amazed at just how many people believe in something this bizarre.
I'm a big fan of Occam's Razor.
I'm just amazed at just how many people believe in something this bizarre.
I'm a big fan of Occam's Razor.
Occam's Razor would say that since the hole in the Pentagon was not big enough for 757 to enter, it makes sense that the government and media lied to us. About that hole: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=71c_1311362426
Oct 15, 2015 13:14:16 #
payne1000 wrote:
Prove how smart you are. Give readers a rebuttal of the video.
I know how you'll reply. You'll use your standard troll excuse.
But that won't fly because if it were bullshit it would be very easy to refute. Since the work of Pilotsfor9/11truth can't be refuted by anyone as ignorant as yourself, you'll continue with your prepubescent insults.
I know how you'll reply. You'll use your standard troll excuse.
But that won't fly because if it were bullshit it would be very easy to refute. Since the work of Pilotsfor9/11truth can't be refuted by anyone as ignorant as yourself, you'll continue with your prepubescent insults.
I wonder if Super Dave will lend jmo a spare diaper?:-)
And an extra one to use as a crying towel.
Mean while; getting back to the subject at hand. The one jmo wants others to miss.
By obtaining the flight data recorders from Flight 77 through the Freedom of Information Act, Pilots are able to show how the government's conspiracy theory is impossible.
http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/skygate-911/
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Oct 15, 2015 13:17:45 #
payne1000 wrote:
Why give a rebuttal to unsubstantiated accusations, claims, and inferences?Prove how smart you are. Give readers a rebuttal of the video.
I know how you'll reply. You'll use your standard troll excuse.
But that won't fly because if it were bullshit it would be very easy to refute. Since the work of Pilotsfor9/11truth can't be refuted by anyone as ignorant as yourself, you'll continue with your prepubescent insults.
I know how you'll reply. You'll use your standard troll excuse.
But that won't fly because if it were bullshit it would be very easy to refute. Since the work of Pilotsfor9/11truth can't be refuted by anyone as ignorant as yourself, you'll continue with your prepubescent insults.
If I said aliens hit the WTC with an asteroid and hid it with Star Trek cloaking tech, a rebuttal would not be warranted or earned.
Your video didn't 'rebut' the flight plan of the airplane. All it did was give an uncorroborated report that some of the data wasn't accurate.
If the aircraft didn't take off and crash, where did it go?
Where did the people go?
How do you rebut that?
Oct 15, 2015 13:23:59 #
payne1000 wrote:
Right.... And only one person out of the 1000s and 1000s of people that repaired the Pentagon noticed it.Occam's Razor would say that since the hole in the Pentagon was not big enough for 757 to enter, it makes sense that the government and media lied to us. About that hole: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=71c_1311362426
By your logic maybe the plane landed on top of the Pentagon and is still there and nobody has reported on it.
Check out topic: Fairness In The Debates
Oct 15, 2015 13:25:02 #
The people, luggage and clothing sure were not in the pre-existing ditch in PA. They just vaporized?
The plane occupants, luggage, and clothing were not there at the Pentagon. It all just vaporized?
that hit the Pentagon ju
The plane occupants, luggage, and clothing were not there at the Pentagon. It all just vaporized?
that hit the Pentagon ju
Super Dave wrote:
Why give a rebuttal to unsubstantiated accusations, claims, and inferences?
If I said aliens hit the WTC with an asteroid and hid it with Star Trek cloaking tech, a rebuttal would not be warranted or earned.
Your video didn't 'rebut' the flight plan of the airplane. All it did was give an uncorroborated report that some of the data wasn't accurate.
If the aircraft didn't take off and crash, where did it go?
Where did the people go?
How do you rebut that?
If I said aliens hit the WTC with an asteroid and hid it with Star Trek cloaking tech, a rebuttal would not be warranted or earned.
Your video didn't 'rebut' the flight plan of the airplane. All it did was give an uncorroborated report that some of the data wasn't accurate.
If the aircraft didn't take off and crash, where did it go?
Where did the people go?
How do you rebut that?
Oct 15, 2015 13:30:13 #
eagleye13 wrote:
I have no idea. But me not bringing a suitcase to you doesn't prove it wasn't there.The people, luggage and clothing sure were not in the pre-existing ditch in PA. They just vaporized?
The plane occupants, luggage, and clothing were not there at the Pentagon. It all just vaporized?
that hit the Pentagon ju
The plane occupants, luggage, and clothing were not there at the Pentagon. It all just vaporized?
that hit the Pentagon ju
If you can't find your favorite shoes, that doesn't mean G. Gordon Liddy Liddy broke into your house and stole them.
Oct 15, 2015 13:54:59 #
JMHO wrote:
Tin foil sale at Wal Mart...better hurry!
I see you are still sticking to your idiotic, stupid, irrational arguments, JMHO. You don't belong around honest people. Your stupidity is unbelievable.
This whole thing is so obvious. It is clear that many here have never read nor analyzed the 9/11 commission report. Yet they just insist on putting their stupid ideas out here as if they actually have some idea what is going on. They do not. And their argument always, ALWAYS boils down to this, it can't be true because the government wouldn't do that. You are wearing the tin foil hat you idiot. Go play with your pen pals in la la land, because you can't make a decent argument and you have no business here. You are the idiot that tried to tell me it is all photoshopped. How stupid can you get. So YOU wear the tin foil hat. It belongs on you, and leave the rest of us alone. I have tried to avoid name calling and such here, and have free discussion. But this goes beyond the pale. You do not know the truth because you do not WANT to know the truth. You are pathetic.
Oct 15, 2015 14:05:21 #
Super Dave wrote:
Why give a rebuttal to unsubstantiated accusations, claims, and inferences?
If I said aliens hit the WTC with an asteroid and hid it with Star Trek cloaking tech, a rebuttal would not be warranted or earned.
Your video didn't 'rebut' the flight plan of the airplane. All it did was give an uncorroborated report that some of the data wasn't accurate.
If the aircraft didn't take off and crash, where did it go?
Where did the people go?
How do you rebut that?
If I said aliens hit the WTC with an asteroid and hid it with Star Trek cloaking tech, a rebuttal would not be warranted or earned.
Your video didn't 'rebut' the flight plan of the airplane. All it did was give an uncorroborated report that some of the data wasn't accurate.
If the aircraft didn't take off and crash, where did it go?
Where did the people go?
How do you rebut that?
How do I rebut that?
That's very easy to rebut.
Where did Malaysian Flight 370 go?
There were about 4 times as many people aboard that flight.
Malaysian 370 and all the people aboard vanished completely.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.