OPP Newsletter wrote:
http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2013/08/schlafly-voter-suppression-laws-partisan
I think the problem of understanding how these voter ID laws, which include other provisions that have nothing to do with preventing voter fraud but are targeted demographic-specific, suppress the vote is not understanding or refusing to believe what abject poverty is like.
It seems many have a rather low opinion of the poor: they are lazy and irresponsible spending their fat welfare checks on drugs and Oreos and diapers for the children they mass produce to get mo' money to spend on drugs and Oreos. For those who believe this way, the expense of getting an official state ID will not appear like a Poll Tax.
A brief history lesson:
In U.S. practice, a poll tax was used as a de facto or implicit pre-condition of the exercise of the ability to vote. This tax emerged in some states of the United States in the late 19th century as part of the Jim Crow laws. After the ability to vote was extended to all races by the enactment of the Fifteenth Amendment, many Southern states enacted poll tax laws as a means of restricting eligible voters; such laws often included a grandfather clause, which allowed any adult male whose father or grandfather had voted in a specific year prior to the abolition of slavery to vote without paying the tax. These laws, along with unfairly implemented literacy tests and extra-legal intimidation,[1] achieved the desired effect of disfranchising African-American and Native American voters, as well as poor whites.
If there is no state law to carry an official ID, demanding one go through the time and expense to get one in order to vote qualifies as a Jim Crow Law in the form of a Poll Tax.
For millions of families, the cost is a burden. When PA passed their voter ID law (with those targeted demographic provisions), it was announced from the floor of the PA legislature that it would help elect Romney in 2012. It didn't work but they knew the reason for their law: suppress the democratic turn out.
Churchill said, "If you aren't a liberal when you are young, you have no heart, and if you are not a conservation when you get older, you have no brain." In general, the majority of young people vote liberal. NC did away with early registration for 16 and 17 year olds: why? In other Red states, a hunting license is valid to vote but a student ID is not: why?
If you follow the demographics, the provisions of the NC voter ID law targets restricting traditional Democrat voters. Is that fraud? Or just dirty politics?