Tasine wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I like your spunk, but we can still use police, at least as long as there are laws on the books that prevent us from protecting ourselves. If all laws were removed, we could survive without police - every victim and his family could do the investigation, convene the court, and pass judgement and provide the punishment. There would be a LOT LESS CRIME committed around the country!
;-)
I did not mean to imply that the police aren't neccessary. What I wish to stress is that we could do with fewer laws, and weed is one of them. Prop 36 in California was passed by a significant majority of voters. In a nutshell it said that you couldn't treat a person like a criminal simply because they had a substance abuse problem. The legal community fought Prop 36 tooth and nail and after it passed they went to a great deal of trouble to find ways of circumventing it, because, you see, criminals are a commodity. There is a vast interwoven group of public employees that directly benefit from criminals. Is weed good for us? No, but arguably its much less harmful than alcohol and just about everyone who wants to smoke the stuff does anyway. Why waste time and resources on it? Don't we have bigger fish to fry? I can gaurantee this: legalize weed and the crime rate will go down overnight!