Kevyn wrote:
The fact that Astronomers fail to discuss or debate the presentation of a nut that the moon is made of green cheese gives the nut no more credibility and in fact the opposite would happen if they engaged him. The same is true in this instance, the holocaust is well documented by thousands of independent sources. It is no more worthwhile an exercise to engage in conversation with someone denying this historical fact than it would be to argue with someone who insisted the ocean was not filled with water. Think about it, OPP is filled with some of the most vile, racist, anti Semitic right wing nutters you will find in the country, they buy into just about any conspiricy theory from the airplane contrails, black helicopters, Jade Helm takeover, Bilderbergers, they think our beer drinking pork eating President is a Kenyan Muslim you name it they are gullible enough to believe it, and the majority still will not believe Nazi Holocaust deniers.
The fact that Astronomers fail to discuss or debat... (
show quote)
As I said, it would be more convincing if you chose the rebut the article rather than attacking the messenger.
Defending lies is difficult. Throwing out insults takes little effort.