Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jQs_D-DYI4


I would be interested in your opinions.

I know that some supporters will call this video Tea Party nonsense, but the video is of Obama and it goes through his promises and what he has done, both good and bad. It show the actual laws signed, newspapers, and source documents for all information presented.

I warn you, it is long but interesting.

Trailboss51

Not sure what point you're trying to make, none of this make much sense.

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

Sorry, let me be clear. Many of Obama's promises are unfulfilled according to the video. Also, the video infers that the US has been harmed after he took office. So, I want to know what others think of the video and how Obama is living up to his campaign promises, or is the narrator in the video correct and all presidents, both past and present are the same.

Trailboss51

Go back to Reagan's Inaugural speech, he promises to lower taxes, decrease the government and it's spending, and the main b.s. line was that American's can have it all, but instead he had to raise taxes because he started printing money which increased inflation, increased defense spending by 200%, cut taxes for the uber rich, increased government by 100%, cut programs for the poor, and a lot more besides starting the trickle down theory which is the opposite of what they teach you in econ 101 and his form of government is the reason why we're in the pickle we are in now.

alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa

I bet the deals he made with those lying liberals had nothing that

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

Point taken. Some individuals thought that President Regan was a poor example of a leader. But, in the beginning of Obama's reign he blamed President Bush for all of the economic problems. Has it now shifted to being that President Regan is to blame for all of today's problems? President Regan left office 24 years ago.

How about the other issued raised? And, just for the sake of conversation; are Americans better off now or before Obama took office?

horsey

Obama is attempting to by pass Congress on everything by using Executive Power. The bum should be impeached before he turns the U.S. into a Socialist country.

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

There are some people on this site that claim I am a racist and that is why I do not support Obama. The truth is, Obama is not only NOT qualified intellectually for the office of President, he is NOT eligible for the office. His policies are Socialist, and he has circumvented our Constitution.

Therefore, Impeachment is the only sensible outcome which will give American citizens a chance to undo the many harms this man has caused.

alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa

there are some on this post that believe anyone that disagrees with obozo is a racist I just had a thought as I wrote this ,the reason the libs didn't like that clown in Mo.is because he gave obozo competition

Trailboss51

I don't think he was a good choice at all (meaning Obama), but I think he was the better choice, Romney was busy moving a company to China the entire time he was campaigning for the presidency, so it was a pretty clear choice for me who should have been elected. Having said that, I don't put much stock in politicians anyway. There is no one person that is going save the U.S. or even Congress, with the Corporate machine guiding politics the direction they want it to go, we as a people, as a nation must make our own way without profit being the main objective. We have to start producing goods that are exportable to off-set the 750 billion dollar plus deficit that we face every year and most of that comes from foreign oil. We will have to take little steps to recover on a very long road and reducing our consumption of fossil fuels is the first step. This point I agree with the Obama administration. I have tons to say on what should be done and what should have already been done. (My southwestern accent is showing.)

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

I did not vote for Obama and did vote for Romeny simply because of his history in business and he appeared to have values that complimented mine. I consider myself a concretive but I do not necessarily vote on party lines. I listen to what is said, how it is said, the body language of the speaker, and then I look at their history. What have they done in the past, what did they vote for and against. What bills did they author or co-author. All those things. Now regarding our need to break away from fossil fuel. This I wholeheartedly agree with you. There are alternatives and we must explore them. Our dependence on foreign fuel is harmful to our nation and also our environment. Although this may anger some people because it will necessarily force people working in the oil industry to find alternatives to their current employment. Another though about dependence on foreign fuel, it puts us in a position that we have to support governments even when those governments go contrary to democracy.