Pennylynn wrote:
This is much to funny to be real, you mean that Zionist hacked into what you said, and I quote "I use Wikipedia because most readers see them as a neutral source" Let me repeat your statement, "I use Wikipedia because most readers see them as a neutral source"..... now you claim that it has been hacked by those evil Zionist!!! Therefore you use it as a reference to prove that Zionist and Israel are horrible and commit so many crimes against your people, but the information has been rewritten by Israel to show only the positive about the nation...... Just too funny for words. Even you can not be this conflicted.
And if you notice, I have said time and time again, Wikipedia is NOT written by historians and should NEVER be used as the source. However, the references.....if you read them, may be accurate.
This is much to funny to be real, you mean that Zi... (
show quote)
As usual Pennylynn, you don't make any sense at all.
Most people do consider Wikipedia to be a neutral site.
The articles state that Wikipedia personnel are attempting to stop the organized Zionist attempt to revise history about Israel and Zionism.
I have no problem recognizing an article which has been hacked by Zionists because I know the past and present history of Zionism.
Hopefully, those in control of Wikipedia know the history as well.