One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Windmills and solar plants kill hundreds of times more birds than oil spills
Page 1 of 6 next> last>>
Jun 19, 2015 08:01:18   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/06/windmills_and_solar_plants_kill_hundreds_of_times_birds_than_oil_spills.html

Reply
Jun 19, 2015 08:56:35   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Here is a big killer of most everything . Geoengineering policy of "our" US government.
Droughts, floods, etc.
JMHO wrote:
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/06/windmills_and_solar_plants_kill_hundreds_of_times_birds_than_oil_spills.html


US Congressional Research Services: Geoengineering: Governance and Technology Policy

US Congressional Research Service
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41371.pdf

Then come back and tell us we are "conspiracy" nutjobs.
Don't worry....if you do take the time to read all about this, you won't be calling us anything but the exposers of truth!
Summary
Climate change policies at both the national and international levels have traditionally focused on
measures to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and to adapt to the actual or anticipated
impacts of changes in the climate. As a participant in several international agreements on climate
change, the United States has joined with other nations to express concern about climate change.
Some recent technological advances and hypotheses, generally referred to as “geoengineering”
technologies, have created alternatives to traditional approaches to mitigating climate change. If
deployed, these new technologies could modify the Earth’s climate on a large scale. Moreover,
these new technologies may become available to foreign governments and entities in the private
sector to use unilaterally—without authorization from the United States government or an
international treaty—as was done in the summer of 2012 when an American citizen conducted an
ocean fertilization experiment off the coast of Canada.
The term “geoengineering” describes an array of technologies that aim, through large-scale and
deliberate modifications of the Earth’s energy balance, to reduce temperatures and counteract
anthropogenic climate change. Most of these technologies are at the conceptual and research
stages, and their effectiveness at reducing global temperatures has yet to be proven. Moreover,
very few studies have been published that document the cost, environmental effects, sociopolitical
impacts, and legal implications of geoengineering. If geoengineering technologies were
to be deployed, they are expected to have the potential to cause significant transboundary effects.
In general, geoengineering technologies are categorized as either a carbon dioxide removal
(CDR) method or a solar radiation management (SRM) method. CDR methods address the
warming effects of greenhouse gases by removing carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere.
CDR methods include ocean fertilization, and carbon capture and sequestration. SRM methods
address climate change by increasing the reflectivity of the Earth’s atmosphere or surface.
Aerosol injection and space-based reflectors are examples of SRM methods. SRM methods do
not remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, but can be deployed faster with relatively
immediate global cooling results compared to CDR methods.
To date, there is limited federal involvement in, or oversight of, geoengineering. However, some
states as well as some federal agencies, notably the Environmental Protection Agency,
Department of Energy, Department of Agriculture, and the Department of Defense, have taken
actions related to geoengineering research or projects. At the international level, there is no
international agreement or organization governing the full spectrum of possible geoengineering
activities. Nevertheless, provisions of many international agreements, including those relating to
climate change, maritime pollution, and air pollution, would likely inform the types of
geoengineering activities that state parties to these agreements might choose to pursue. In 2010,
the Convention on Biological Diversity adopted provisions calling for member parties to abstain
from geoengineering unless the parties have fully considered the risks and impacts of those
activities on biodiversity.
With the possibility that geoengineering technologies may be developed and that climate change
will remain an issue of global concern, policymakers may determine whether geoengineering
warrants attention at either the federal or international level. If so, policymakers will also need to
consider whether geoengineering can be effectively addressed by amendments to existing laws
and international agreements or, alternatively, whether new laws and international treaties would
need to be developed.

Where is jmho when you need him?

Contents
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1
Geoengineering Governance............................................................................................................ 3
Risk Factors ............................................................................................................................... 4
Policy Considerations ................................................................................................................ 6
Geoengineering Technologies .......................................................................................................... 9
Carbon Dioxide Removal ........................................................................................................ 10
Carbon Capture and Sequestration .................................................................................... 10
Ocean Fertilization ............................................................................................................ 12
Afforestation ...................................................................................................................... 13
Enhanced Weathering ........................................................................................................ 14
Solar Radiation Management .................................................................................................. 15
Enhanced Albedo (Surface and Cloud) ............................................................................. 16
Aerosol Injection ............................................................................................................... 18
Space-Based Reflectors ..................................................................................................... 19
........................................... open the site for it all.
Save, copy, paste, and share.

Reply
Jun 19, 2015 09:03:55   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
JMHO wrote:
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/06/windmills_and_solar_plants_kill_hundreds_of_times_birds_than_oil_spills.html


HAARP – High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program:
HAARP Pooned Humanity - We Are Being Exterminated - Scripted Doom
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bl6froZhog

Geo Engineering - The Silence of Engineered Genocide
http://youtu.be/C07EddRW2uU

HAARP System In Place To Manipulate The Jet Stream, And The Weather
http://youtu.be/_z7qrRp7YSc
Geo Engineering - EM Weather Warfare & Directed Mass Genocide
http://youtu.be/ZbB-bNEa1kY

Reply
 
 
Jun 19, 2015 09:09:47   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
eagleye13 wrote:
HAARP – High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program:
HAARP Pooned Humanity - We Are Being Exterminated - Scripted Doom
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bl6froZhog

Geo Engineering - The Silence of Engineered Genocide
http://youtu.be/C07EddRW2uU

HAARP System In Place To Manipulate The Jet Stream, And The Weather
http://youtu.be/_z7qrRp7YSc
Geo Engineering - EM Weather Warfare & Directed Mass Genocide
http://youtu.be/ZbB-bNEa1kY


Anybody who believes this hogwash is a complete moron!

Reply
Jun 19, 2015 09:12:56   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Speaking of morons. My little air head just will not read.
After all there is no need:-)
JMHO wrote:
Anybody who believes this hogwash is a complete moron!


10 Tools Needed By Globalists To Finally Get Their One World Government
What tools might the globalists be using right now to advance their plans for a one world government, the so-called new world order of global enslavement?

Understanding the necessary tools the controllers need and are currently using to meet their goals might allow us to figure out where we should focus our energy; and it may show us what things we might be able to do to slow down, derail or even stop their new world order plans altogether.
So here are ten powerful tools being used by the controllers, ten tools without which there will be no new world order.

1 - Global warming/Climate change psyop

It is becoming abundantly clear. No global warming means no new world order, no Agenda 21, no global carbon tax, no usurping of local and states' rights in favor of global agendas, no domination over the individual and no micromanaging of the individual's energy expenditure for the sake of the planet and a "sustainable" earth. No one should be surprised by the locked-in ignorant and stubborn mindset of this movement.
2 - Government "scientific consensus"

Without government pseudo-science, the globalists recent plans would have fallen apart long ago. Truth does not make money; in fact, it's a money loser. Conclusions that support government agendas on the other hand do make a lot of money. For this reason science has been hijacked by government for political agendas. In place right now are numerous prominent "scientific" journals all waiting to publish whatever studies support the new world order agenda. Without this powerful weapon, the globalists would lose their ability to push all the medical, food related, environmental and chemical related "studies" on the masses. This would immediately pose a threat to large pharmaceutical companies, vaccine makers and many other drug-related companies.

3 - Geoengineering and chemtrails spraying
The plans are central to controlling the weather, manipulating the environment for political and financial gain and engineering drought to control food and water supply, thus controlling population among other reasons. ... Problem: Global warming - Reaction: to emotional stimulators like the polar bears, ice capsule melting, human extinction stories - Solution: Spray the planet with metal particles every day.

4 - ISIS psyop

The recent Mosul-style "takeover" of Ramadi in Iraq by ISIS is another example of how ISIS, who gets exclusive image-glorifying public relations from the U.S. mainstream media, is portrayed as an invisible, lucky, superior fighting force who can only be stopped using tactics that move the PNAC plans forward. . He also then explains how ISIS is now crawling all over Afghanistan and needs to be stopped there, too. Let's see - Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Afghanistan - isn't it convenient how ISIS only shows up in PNAC-approved countries where the U.S. needs to expand their occupation and/or lost influence? Shaffer also rambles on telling you what ISIS is thinking, detailing their victories (problem, reaction) then telling us how the "solution" is with selecting WHO gets to fight ISIS, that being ONLY the Kurds. Let's not forget the global ISIS super fighting machine recently was said to be in Mexico and showing up in Texas and California in information gathered via "chatter". This is just another reminder of the super human powers ISIS has, just in case anyone has forgotten.
with the help of Intelligence-Mainstream media coordinated reports to keep the domestic threat of terror alive in the minds of the masses, thus justifying the police state and more surveillance and tyranny, all the while CIA's and Mossad's ISIS cruise on right along helping nail down the PNAC plans for the Zionists and Western U.S. NATO alliance.

5 - Secret global trade agreements

All global trade agreements are quietly looming in the background as critical components of the new world order. The Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement for one (and other similar agreements) are all top-secret global corporate agreements that transcend and undermine sovereign governments and impose their will on the individual, and they are powerful tools for the new world order plans.
6 - Debt-based dollar fraud

Another huge ongoing fraud critical to the one world government enslavement system is the money system itself. Think of how quickly globalist plans would fall apart if everyone realized how money works. Most people have no idea that the U.S. dollar is nothing more than an IOU. They have no idea how the Federal Reserve came into being and they have no clue that the Federal Reserve is a private corporation with no authority whatsoever to print money on behalf of the United States government. The entire debt-based dollar system is based on lies, fraud, and deceit. Due to this hidden knowledge about money, people feel threatened when they begin to research it or call it out for what it is - possibly the greatest fraud perpetrated on the American people.

7 - Lobbyist-to-law cycle

Everyone should be aware of how money from large corporations and individuals goes to paying lobbyists who then make sure the politicians go along with the wishes of the person (who is funding the lobbyist). This lobbyist-to-law cycle not only ensures that the laws that get passed are laws representing the wishes of the lobbyists, but even more importantly it ensures that the average American has no voice whatsoever. Without this important corrupt cycle in place too many morally sound and justified laws representing the will of the people would get through. Then, before you know it, the globalist new world order plans would begin to burn out by necessity. For this reason the lobbyist-to-law cycle remains a key component for achieving the new world order plans.

8 - Left-Right paradigm

The ongoing Left-Right paradigm is another quiet ace in the hole. It's the large part of the script upon which the globalist success depends. That's right, voter ignorance is actually driving the new world order plans. Millions of Americans still follow Hillary, Jeb Bush, Rand Paul and the rest of the bought-out political stooges whose loyalties are to the companies putting money in their pockets. It's difficult to imagine that anyone actually believes there is a difference between Left and Right, Democrats and Republicans. Without the ability of the control system to maintain the illusion of choice between two parties which serve the exact same master, the new world order control plans would fall apart overnight.

9 - CIA's mainstream media
. A life without mainstream media would warrant a topic of its own. Suffice to say, CIA's mainstream media is potentially the lifeline of the entire new world order and future control of all humanity. It is the very matrix by which the globalists exert their influence, deception and control over humanity. It is the radio signal feeding your brain the next episode of mind control, the next psyop, the next lie. The history of media and its use as a mind control tool is well established, and for that reason mainstream mass media is another must-have tool for the advancement of the globalist new world order plans. Unfortunately for them, less and less people today are watching TV so they are being forced to keep up with the times by broadening their reach with other technologies.

10 - Entertainment distraction

Finally, none of the above would ever come to pass were it not for the forever valuable, forever reliable (if you are the globalists) entertainment distraction. . People might actually have enough time to research things, to care, to educate themselves. The globalists have stated that a well educated critical thinking public is a threat to their plan. This last super important tool ensures that everything goes as planned, for now.

Solutions-
. Watch the news stories every day and see how they are using and feeding into these 10 tools every day. That's because they need these tools for survival. That's right. To the globalist controllers these 10 tools are a matter of life and death. So let's keep pushing to expose these critical issues because, to truth seekers, stopping these globalist tools is also a matter of life and death.
source-bernie syarez, activist post, anthony shaffer, cia,

Reply
Jun 19, 2015 09:22:04   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Speaking of morons. My little air head just will not read.
After all there is no need:-)


I sure didn't see anything worth reading. Post some thing that is worth reading, and I'll read it. All I see is a bunch of bogus manufactured (for gullible people such as yourself) YouTube conspiracy videos, that only an idiot would believe.

Reply
Jun 19, 2015 09:32:33   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
JMHO wrote:
I sure didn't see anything worth reading. Post some thing that is worth reading, and I'll read it. All I see is a bunch of bogus manufactured (for gullible people such as yourself) YouTube conspiracy videos, that only an idiot would believe.


Yep; jmho, just ignore government documents:
US Congressional Research Services: Geoengineering: Governance and Technology Policy

US Congressional Research Service
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41371.pdf

Summary
Climate change policies at both the national and international levels have traditionally focused on
measures to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and to adapt to the actual or anticipated
impacts of changes in the climate. As a participant in several international agreements on climate
change, the United States has joined with other nations to express concern about climate change.
Some recent technological advances and hypotheses, generally referred to as “geoengineering”
technologies, have created alternatives to traditional approaches to mitigating climate change.....

Reply
 
 
Jun 19, 2015 09:56:38   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Isn't thee a site people like eagleye can go to and talk too other conspiracy theorists? They could all communicate eat jiffypop popcorn then put the tin pan on their head for protection against whatever.

JMHO wrote:
I sure didn't see anything worth reading. Post some thing that is worth reading, and I'll read it. All I see is a bunch of bogus manufactured (for gullible people such as yourself) YouTube conspiracy videos, that only an idiot would believe.

Reply
Jun 19, 2015 10:04:18   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
JFlorio wrote:
Isn't thee a site people like eagleye can go to and talk too other conspiracy theorists? They could all communicate eat jiffypop popcorn then put the tin pan on their head for protection against whatever.


so jf; are you an ostrich also. No sense in finding out what is going on?

US Congressional Research Service
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41371.pdf

Then come back and tell us we are "conspiracy" nutjobs.
Don't worry....if you do take the time to read all about this, you won't be calling us anything but the exposers of truth!
Summary
Climate change policies at both the national and international levels have traditionally focused on
measures to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and to adapt to the actual or anticipated
impacts of changes in the climate. As a participant in several international agreements on climate
change, the United States has joined with other nations to express concern about climate change.
Some recent technological advances and hypotheses, generally referred to as “geoengineering”
technologies, have created alternatives to traditional approaches to mitigating climate change. If
deployed, these new technologies could modify the Earth’s climate on a large scale. Moreover,
these new technologies may become available to foreign governments and entities in the private
sector to use unilaterally—without authorization from the United States government or an
international treaty—as was done in the summer of 2012 when an American citizen conducted an
ocean fertilization experiment off the coast of Canada.
The term “geoengineering” describes an array of technologies that aim, through large-scale and
deliberate modifications of the Earth’s energy balance, to reduce temperatures and counteract
anthropogenic climate change. Most of these technologies are at the conceptual and research
stages, and their effectiveness at reducing global temperatures has yet to be proven. Moreover,
very few studies have been published that document the cost, environmental effects, sociopolitical
impacts, and legal implications of geoengineering. If geoengineering technologies were
to be deployed, they are expected to have the potential to cause significant transboundary effects.
In general, geoengineering technologies are categorized as either a carbon dioxide removal
(CDR) method or a solar radiation management (SRM) method. CDR methods address the
warming effects of greenhouse gases by removing carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere.
CDR methods include ocean fertilization, and carbon capture and sequestration. SRM methods
address climate change by increasing the reflectivity of the Earth’s atmosphere or surface.
Aerosol injection and space-based reflectors are examples of SRM methods. SRM methods do
not remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, but can be deployed faster with relatively
immediate global cooling results compared to CDR methods.
To date, there is limited federal involvement in, or oversight of, geoengineering. However, some
states as well as some federal agencies, notably the Environmental Protection Agency,
Department of Energy, Department of Agriculture, and the Department of Defense, have taken
actions related to geoengineering research or projects. At the international level, there is no
international agreement or organization governing the full spectrum of possible geoengineering
activities. Nevertheless, provisions of many international agreements, including those relating to
climate change, maritime pollution, and air pollution, would likely inform the types of
geoengineering activities that state parties to these agreements might choose to pursue. In 2010,
the Convention on Biological Diversity adopted provisions calling for member parties to abstain
from geoengineering unless the parties have fully considered the risks and impacts of those
activities on biodiversity.
With the possibility that geoengineering technologies may be developed and that climate change
will remain an issue of global concern, policymakers may determine whether geoengineering
warrants attention at either the federal or international level. If so, policymakers will also need to
consider whether geoengineering can be effectively addressed by amendments to existing laws
and international agreements or, alternatively, whether new laws and international treaties would
need to be developed.

Where is jmho when you need him?

Contents
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1
Geoengineering Governance............................................................................................................ 3
Risk Factors ............................................................................................................................... 4
Policy Considerations ................................................................................................................ 6
Geoengineering Technologies .......................................................................................................... 9
Carbon Dioxide Removal ........................................................................................................ 10
Carbon Capture and Sequestration .................................................................................... 10
Ocean Fertilization ............................................................................................................ 12
Afforestation ...................................................................................................................... 13
Enhanced Weathering ........................................................................................................ 14
Solar Radiation Management .................................................................................................. 15
Enhanced Albedo (Surface and Cloud) ............................................................................. 16
Aerosol Injection ............................................................................................................... 18
Space-Based Reflectors ..................................................................................................... 19
The Debate over the Methods of Oversight ................................................................................... 20
The Status Quo ........................................................................................................................ 20
Threshold for Oversight .......................................................................................................... 20
Methods for Oversight ............................
.......................................... open the site for it all. Save, copy, paste, and share.

Reply
Jun 19, 2015 10:09:53   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Couldn't hear you. I have sand in my ears.
eagleye13 wrote:
so jf; are you an ostrich also. No sense in finding out what is going on?

US Congressional Research Service
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41371.pdf

Then come back and tell us we are "conspiracy" nutjobs.
Don't worry....if you do take the time to read all about this, you won't be calling us anything but the exposers of truth!
Summary
Climate change policies at both the national and international levels have traditionally focused on
measures to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and to adapt to the actual or anticipated
impacts of changes in the climate. As a participant in several international agreements on climate
change, the United States has joined with other nations to express concern about climate change.
Some recent technological advances and hypotheses, generally referred to as “geoengineering”
technologies, have created alternatives to traditional approaches to mitigating climate change. If
deployed, these new technologies could modify the Earth’s climate on a large scale. Moreover,
these new technologies may become available to foreign governments and entities in the private
sector to use unilaterally—without authorization from the United States government or an
international treaty—as was done in the summer of 2012 when an American citizen conducted an
ocean fertilization experiment off the coast of Canada.
The term “geoengineering” describes an array of technologies that aim, through large-scale and
deliberate modifications of the Earth’s energy balance, to reduce temperatures and counteract
anthropogenic climate change. Most of these technologies are at the conceptual and research
stages, and their effectiveness at reducing global temperatures has yet to be proven. Moreover,
very few studies have been published that document the cost, environmental effects, sociopolitical
impacts, and legal implications of geoengineering. If geoengineering technologies were
to be deployed, they are expected to have the potential to cause significant transboundary effects.
In general, geoengineering technologies are categorized as either a carbon dioxide removal
(CDR) method or a solar radiation management (SRM) method. CDR methods address the
warming effects of greenhouse gases by removing carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere.
CDR methods include ocean fertilization, and carbon capture and sequestration. SRM methods
address climate change by increasing the reflectivity of the Earth’s atmosphere or surface.
Aerosol injection and space-based reflectors are examples of SRM methods. SRM methods do
not remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, but can be deployed faster with relatively
immediate global cooling results compared to CDR methods.
To date, there is limited federal involvement in, or oversight of, geoengineering. However, some
states as well as some federal agencies, notably the Environmental Protection Agency,
Department of Energy, Department of Agriculture, and the Department of Defense, have taken
actions related to geoengineering research or projects. At the international level, there is no
international agreement or organization governing the full spectrum of possible geoengineering
activities. Nevertheless, provisions of many international agreements, including those relating to
climate change, maritime pollution, and air pollution, would likely inform the types of
geoengineering activities that state parties to these agreements might choose to pursue. In 2010,
the Convention on Biological Diversity adopted provisions calling for member parties to abstain
from geoengineering unless the parties have fully considered the risks and impacts of those
activities on biodiversity.
With the possibility that geoengineering technologies may be developed and that climate change
will remain an issue of global concern, policymakers may determine whether geoengineering
warrants attention at either the federal or international level. If so, policymakers will also need to
consider whether geoengineering can be effectively addressed by amendments to existing laws
and international agreements or, alternatively, whether new laws and international treaties would
need to be developed.

Where is jmho when you need him?

Contents
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1
Geoengineering Governance............................................................................................................ 3
Risk Factors ............................................................................................................................... 4
Policy Considerations ................................................................................................................ 6
Geoengineering Technologies .......................................................................................................... 9
Carbon Dioxide Removal ........................................................................................................ 10
Carbon Capture and Sequestration .................................................................................... 10
Ocean Fertilization ............................................................................................................ 12
Afforestation ...................................................................................................................... 13
Enhanced Weathering ........................................................................................................ 14
Solar Radiation Management .................................................................................................. 15
Enhanced Albedo (Surface and Cloud) ............................................................................. 16
Aerosol Injection ............................................................................................................... 18
Space-Based Reflectors ..................................................................................................... 19
The Debate over the Methods of Oversight ................................................................................... 20
The Status Quo ........................................................................................................................ 20
Threshold for Oversight .......................................................................................................... 20
Methods for Oversight ............................
.......................................... open the site for it all. Save, copy, paste, and share.
so jf; are you an ostrich also. No sense in findin... (show quote)

Reply
Jun 19, 2015 10:27:18   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
JFlorio wrote:
Couldn't hear you. I have sand in my ears.


No need if you can read.
Put on a pair of glasses, and read.
Then comment. Don't just be another airhead like jmho.

Reply
 
 
Jun 19, 2015 11:07:37   #
payne1000
 
JMHO wrote:
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/06/windmills_and_solar_plants_kill_hundreds_of_times_birds_than_oil_spills.html


Windows on your home and house cats kill more birds each year than either solar or windmills.

Reply
Jun 19, 2015 11:13:15   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
payne1000 wrote:
Windows on your home and house cats kill more birds each year than either solar or windmills.


Now I know you're a complete looney tunes...so full of crap.

Reply
Jun 19, 2015 11:14:13   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
payne;
What do you think?
Should we get rid of house cats or windows?:-)

payne1000 wrote:
Windows on your home and house cats kill more birds each year than either solar or windmills.

Reply
Jun 19, 2015 12:14:30   #
payne1000
 
eagleye13 wrote:
payne;
What do you think?
Should we get rid of house cats or windows?:-)


Ridding the world of JMHO's mendacity should come first.

Reply
Page 1 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.