New studies: Conspiracy theorists sane; government dupes crazy, hostile: "In short, the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist...

payne1000

"In short, the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it.

http://www.presstv.com/detail/2013/07/12/313399/conspiracy-theorists-v%20s-govt-dupes

Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA

payne1000 wrote:

"In short, the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it.

http://www.presstv.com/detail/2013/07/12/313399/conspiracy-theorists-v%20s-govt-dupes

In Bizarro World, maybe.

Occam's Razor... That says it all...

payne1000

Super Dave wrote:

In Bizarro World, maybe.

Occam's Razor... That says it all...

Occam's Razor would prove the government's conspiracy theory is bogus as well.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuC_4mGTs98

slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas

payne1000 wrote:

"In short, the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it.

http://www.presstv.com/detail/2013/07/12/313399/conspiracy-theorists-v%20s-govt-dupes

Two word summary: 'Confirmation bias.' 8-)

payne1000

slatten49 wrote:

Two word summary: 'Confirmation bias.' 8-)

You appear to be attempting to help confirm your bias.

slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas

payne1000 wrote:

You appear to be attempting to help confirm your bias.

And your evidence for this, sir :?: How have I expressed my opinion on the subject, much less show evidence of seeking such confirmation :?:

You are grasping in your 'tendency to search for, interpret, or recall information in a way that confirms one's beliefs or hypotheses' while accusing me of the same thing. I simply stated it is obvious you are guilty of seeking confirmation bias...as most are in defense of their views. Thou doth protest too much, methinks. :wink:

payne1000

slatten49 wrote:

And your evidence for this, sir :?: How have I expressed my opinion on the subject, much less show evidence of seeking such confirmation :?:

You are grasping in your 'tendency to search for, interpret, or recall information in a way that confirms one's beliefs or hypotheses' while accusing me of the same thing. I simply stated it is obvious you are guilty of seeking confirmation bias...as most are in defense of their views. Thou doth protest too much, methinks. :wink:

Doublespeak seems to be your intention here. Hasbarat trolls are skilled in doublespeak. Are you a Hasbarat?

slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas

payne1000 wrote:

Doublespeak seems to be your intention here. Hasbarat trolls are skilled in doublespeak. Are you a Hasbarat?

Nope, I have nothing to do with Israel or Zionism...just an independent thinking native Texan who has read many of your posts.

"Those disputing, contradicting, and confuting people are generally unfortunate in their affairs. The get victory, sometimes, but they never get good will...which would be of more use to them." [quote/BenFranklin] You should heed Mr. Franklin's words. :wink:

payne1000

slatten49 wrote:

Nope, I have nothing to do with Israel or Zionism...just an independent thinking native Texan who has read many of your posts.

"Those disputing, contradicting, and confuting people are generally unfortunate in their affairs. The get victory, sometimes, but they never get good will...which would be of more use to them." [quote/BenFranklin] You should heed Mr. Franklin's words. :wink:

I doubt seriously if Franklin was referring to the 9/11 Truth movement. (wink)

slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas

payne1000 wrote:

I doubt seriously if Franklin was referring to the 9/11 Truth movement. (wink)

:lol: Although he was a man ahead of his time...Franklin wasn't that far ahead :!: However, I wan't speaking directly to the 9/11 tragedy, but to your tendencies. I stated I have read many of your posts. You may/may not have a chip on your shoulder, but...you certainly play the role of a contrarian. You too often seek confrontation, IMO, to dismiss it as an anomaly in this case. :wink:

Enjoy the rest of your thread, 'M'.

PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.

slatten49 wrote:

:lol: Although he was a man ahead of his time...Franklin wasn't that far ahead :!: However, I wan't speaking directly to the 9/11 tragedy, but to your tendencies. I stated I have read many of your posts. You may/may not have a chip on your shoulder, but...you certainly play the role of a contrarian. You too often seek confrontation, IMO, to dismiss it as an anomaly in this case. :wink:

Enjoy the rest of your thread, 'M'.

He is really kookie. His hatred of Jews has sent him over the edge.

payne1000

PoppaGringo wrote:

He is really kookie. His hatred of Jews has sent him over the edge.

payne1000

slatten49 wrote:

:lol: Although he was a man ahead of his time...Franklin wasn't that far ahead :!: However, I wan't speaking directly to the 9/11 tragedy, but to your tendencies. I stated I have read many of your posts. You may/may not have a chip on your shoulder, but...you certainly play the role of a contrarian. You too often seek confrontation, IMO, to dismiss it as an anomaly in this case. :wink:

Enjoy the rest of your thread, 'M'.

Trolling for truth is not that popular on this forum which is infested with hasbarats.

Sicilianthing

payne1000 wrote:

"In short, the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it.

http://www.presstv.com/detail/2013/07/12/313399/conspiracy-theorists-v%20s-govt-dupes

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Sounds clear to me.

dwallace2015

payne1000 wrote:

"In short, the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it.

http://www.presstv.com/detail/2013/07/12/313399/conspiracy-theorists-v%20s-govt-dupes

There is a push on to force the Obama administration to release the 28 pages of documentation showing the it was Bush and his CIA who recruited, trained to fly jetliners, (in our own facilities) and crash them into the towers and Pentagon. It was an inside job by our own traitorous government. Thanks to the traitors we also got the "Patriot Act" and "Homeland Security" hung around our necks like nooses. Thanks to Obama, since the "Patriot Act" has lapsed we now have the so-called "Freedom Act" which has nothing to do with freedom. It is the same thing as the Patriot Act dressed up in a new slip-cover and has more to do with tyranny than freedom. It is time America learned the truth. Harass your representatives to release these documents so we can finally have at least some truth. It wasn't Islamic terrorists who flew the planes, it was CIA operatives. Incidentally the CIA is not supposed to mount operations anywhere inside US borders. What happened about that?