One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Who changed the Benghazi talking points.
Page 1 of 2 next>
Aug 11, 2013 21:12:41   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
Chairman Darrell Issa has demanded that the old mouth for Hillary, Nuland come up with all those answers he has been demanding, especially who changed the talking points from the riot caused by a video that none of those Libyans knew anything about. He has given her till August 15, 2013.

http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/darrellissa-to-state-dept-who-changed-the-benghazi-talking-points/

Reply
Aug 11, 2013 21:18:53   #
Noahsgrammie
 
oldroy wrote:
Chairman Darrell Issa has demanded that the old mouth for Hillary, Nuland come up with all those answers he has been demanding, especially who changed the talking points from the riot caused by a video that none of those Libyans knew anything about. He has given her till August 15, 2013.

http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/darrellissa-to-state-dept-who-changed-the-benghazi-talking-points/


Wonder if the old brain tumor will pop up again???

Reply
Aug 12, 2013 17:21:16   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
Noahsgrammie wrote:
Wonder if the old brain tumor will pop up again???


It surely won't make any difference since she is out of the government and campaigning for 2016 now. I don't know who changed the talking points but do believe that someday Trety Gowdy will find out for us. Issa may be the head man on that committee but as far as getting to the bottom of the question at hand Gowdy will be the man who pushes for an answer from them.

Reply
 
 
Aug 12, 2013 22:55:48   #
Worried for our children Loc: Massachusetts
 
oldroy wrote:
It surely won't make any difference since she is out of the government and campaigning for 2016 now. I don't know who changed the talking points but do believe that someday Trety Gowdy will find out for us. Issa may be the head man on that committee but as far as getting to the bottom of the question at hand Gowdy will be the man who pushes for an answer from them.




oldroy, if I may expose my ignorance a little here, hypothetically speaking if "they" decide to throw Hillary under the bus with this, now that she's out of the government can she still be held accountable as a civilian, and if so to what extent?

Reply
Aug 12, 2013 23:51:58   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
Worried for our children wrote:
oldroy, if I may expose my ignorance a little here, hypothetically speaking if "they" decide to throw Hillary under the bus with this, now that she's out of the government can she still be held accountable as a civilian, and if so to what extent?


I really don't know the answer to what you say but the Democrat voters can get back at her in the primaries of 2016. That is if we have primaries and a general election. I don't know how Obama and his group will make the change but they will certainly try.

Reply
Aug 13, 2013 00:59:35   #
Noahsgrammie
 
oldroy wrote:
It surely won't make any difference since she is out of the government and campaigning for 2016 now. I don't know who changed the talking points but do believe that someday Trety Gowdy will find out for us. Issa may be the head man on that committee but as far as getting to the bottom of the question at hand Gowdy will be the man who pushes for an answer from them.


Saying a prayer that God protects him from her & the rest of the criminals in our White House. Seems those that pursue her with the most success don't live long enough to tell about it.

Reply
Aug 13, 2013 04:01:47   #
rumitoid
 
oldroy wrote:
Chairman Darrell Issa has demanded that the old mouth for Hillary, Nuland come up with all those answers he has been demanding, especially who changed the talking points from the riot caused by a video that none of those Libyans knew anything about. He has given her till August 15, 2013.

http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/darrellissa-to-state-dept-who-changed-the-benghazi-talking-points/


Issa is not a person to be in charge of overseeing anything.

Reply
 
 
Aug 13, 2013 19:50:22   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
rumitoid wrote:
Issa is not a person to be in charge of overseeing anything.


But Rummy, he is the chairman of the oversight committee and he has some good people under him. They will take care of it for him. He happens to be the longest in terms of service on the committee which puts him in that seat.

Reply
Aug 13, 2013 19:59:30   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
rumitoid wrote:
Issa is not a person to be in charge of overseeing anything.


Why?

Reply
Aug 13, 2013 20:05:55   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
Worried for our children wrote:
oldroy, if I may expose my ignorance a little here, hypothetically speaking if "they" decide to throw Hillary under the bus with this, now that she's out of the government can she still be held accountable as a civilian, and if so to what extent?


I am unable to answer concerning Hillary; however, Nuland can be held to account. Oops, brain freeze. Is she, Nuland, still with the State Department?

Reply
Aug 13, 2013 23:15:54   #
Noahsgrammie
 
400 surface to air missiles anyone hear about this yet???? Again I must ask why is this man not in prison for treason yet?

http://www.wnd.com/2013/08/new-revelation-explains-why-no-benghazi-air-support/

Reply
 
 
Aug 14, 2013 00:08:40   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
AuntiE wrote:
I am unable to answer concerning Hillary; however, Nuland can be held to account. Oops, brain freeze. Is she, Nuland, still with the State Department?


I think she is still there but am not certain of it. If she is she needs to be hiding because one or more of those House committees will be coming after her.

Reply
Aug 14, 2013 00:11:13   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
Noahsgrammie wrote:
400 surface to air missiles anyone hear about this yet???? Again I must ask why is this man not in prison for treason yet?

http://www.wnd.com/2013/08/new-revelation-explains-why-no-benghazi-air-support/


I believe that those missiles were there to be shipped to the Syrian rebels, the heroes of the Obama agenda. Now who got them? That is the question.

Reply
Aug 14, 2013 01:46:20   #
Worried for our children Loc: Massachusetts
 
AuntiE wrote:
I am unable to answer concerning Hillary; however, Nuland can be held to account. Oops, brain freeze. Is she, Nuland, still with the State Department?



I don't think so AuntiE.....




http://blog.heritage.org/2013/07/12/benghazi-scandal-haunts-nuland-nomination/

Reply
Aug 14, 2013 02:29:20   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
Worried for our children wrote:


You are correct. She left State in February 2013.

How convenient no one seems liable. :hunf:

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.