One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Rules of Ethics
Aug 10, 2013 13:23:01   #
octogenarian
 
Dr. Thomas E. Davis, Colonel, USA, (ret) Word Count: 800
326 F Nantucket Lane
Monroe Twp, NJ 08831
Ph: 609.395.7951
tomdavis@comcast.net







Congressional Lack of Ethics

By Tom Davis



Anthony Weiner is just the most recent and not the worst of a plethora of Congress people to breach the Government’s own Rules of Ethics. It was reported by the Sunlight Foundation that two Congressmen-to-be, Pete Sessions and Mike Fitzpatrick failed to attend the swearing-in ceremony on Wednesday, January 5, 2011. Rather they were attending a fundraiser at the US Capitol in Fitzpatrick’s honor, a clear violation of the House rules.

Clear, overt, knowing and callous regard for their own rules and standards is commonplace in our government. Presidents, Senators, Representatives, Judges, Civil servants and others bound by the two codes in effect violate the rules on a daily basis. The code of silence and its complement, do not point a finger at a violator, or else, are the prevailing status quo. Acceptable seems to be anything with which one can get away undetected by an outsider. That approximately Ten Square Mile area known as Washington, DC is a veritable cesspool of all manner of nefarious behavior.

From Ethics in Business & Society: Selected Quotations Compiled by Dr. L. Murphy Smith, Texas A&M University comes this exhortation from the most ethical of our Presidents, George Washington, "Associate with men of good quality, if you esteem your own reputation; for it is better to be alone than in bad company."

Washington, in his farewell address, urged his countrymen to forswear excessive party spirit and geographical distinctions. That admonition was ignored during the Administration of Thomas Jefferson when inter-party strife became nearly intolerable. With the election of Andrew Jackson, the two-party system was here to stay.

President John Adams was also a highly moral man and from him we get the following from the same source, "We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."

President Abraham Lincoln was more succinct; "Honor is better than honors." Also from Dr, Smith.

Two more quotes from Dr. Smith’s work indicate the value of religion and morality in politics and in the government.” To educate a person in mind and not in morals is to educate a menace to society." (President Theodore Roosevelt). "When the Nazis came to power, I looked to the universities that prided themselves upon their intellectual freedom, and they failed me. I looked to the German press, which prided itself on the freedom of the press, and it failed me. Until at last the churches stood alone, and that for which I once had little regard earned my respect." (Albert Einstein, after World War II).
http://acct.tamu.edu/smith/ethics/quotes.htm

While seeking reliable sources of information for this article, I found several so flagrantly biased, I considered them far too unreliable to cite here.

It is safe to say, “An individual without a connection to our Creator has refused to adopt the moral standards consistent with the House Ethics Rules or the Standards of Conduct expected of every government employee. No human is perfect and is not expected to be. However, we all expect our elected officials to act in a manner consistent with good moral behavior, to refrain from promiscuity, pedophilia, bestiality, homosexuality, wife beating, child abuse, cheating, stealing and a myriad of other acts you would not want to become public knowledge.

The advent of social networking is in and of itself not evil, pernicious or causative of bad behavior. The popular networking sites have the potential of much public good and, if so inclined, users can make a travesty out of the facility of the net. Anthony Weiner is not a victim of the inhuman Twitter site, he is a violator of the site’s own rules. http://twitter.com/tos

Mr. Weiner has demonstrated extremely bad judgment, violated the House rules, and brought shame on the US House, himself and his blameless spouse. For all these indiscretions and violations, Mr. Weiner deserves to face the rules committee, stand in the Well of the House, be tried and summarily dismissed. He should not be permitted the cowardly and unpunished evasion of justice for his offenses. Good Americans neither need nor want people so lacking in character to represent them in Our House.

To clean The House, the Rules committee might reconsider the cases of Charles Rangel, Maxine Waters, Sheila Lee Jackson, Al Green, Keith Ellison, Nancy Pelosi, Rush Holt and others. Just in case the powers that be are unable to get the goods on these latter folks, I will be more than happy to provide documentary evidence. At least Pelosi and Holt could be impeached and should be.



Reply
Aug 10, 2013 17:21:40   #
bahmer
 
octogenarian wrote:
Dr. Thomas E. Davis, Colonel, USA, (ret) Word Count: 800
326 F Nantucket Lane
Monroe Twp, NJ 08831
Ph: 609.395.7951
tomdavis@comcast.net







Congressional Lack of Ethics

By Tom Davis



Anthony Weiner is just the most recent and not the worst of a plethora of Congress people to breach the Government’s own Rules of Ethics. It was reported by the Sunlight Foundation that two Congressmen-to-be, Pete Sessions and Mike Fitzpatrick failed to attend the swearing-in ceremony on Wednesday, January 5, 2011. Rather they were attending a fundraiser at the US Capitol in Fitzpatrick’s honor, a clear violation of the House rules.

Clear, overt, knowing and callous regard for their own rules and standards is commonplace in our government. Presidents, Senators, Representatives, Judges, Civil servants and others bound by the two codes in effect violate the rules on a daily basis. The code of silence and its complement, do not point a finger at a violator, or else, are the prevailing status quo. Acceptable seems to be anything with which one can get away undetected by an outsider. That approximately Ten Square Mile area known as Washington, DC is a veritable cesspool of all manner of nefarious behavior.

From Ethics in Business & Society: Selected Quotations Compiled by Dr. L. Murphy Smith, Texas A&M University comes this exhortation from the most ethical of our Presidents, George Washington, "Associate with men of good quality, if you esteem your own reputation; for it is better to be alone than in bad company."

Washington, in his farewell address, urged his countrymen to forswear excessive party spirit and geographical distinctions. That admonition was ignored during the Administration of Thomas Jefferson when inter-party strife became nearly intolerable. With the election of Andrew Jackson, the two-party system was here to stay.

President John Adams was also a highly moral man and from him we get the following from the same source, "We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."

President Abraham Lincoln was more succinct; "Honor is better than honors." Also from Dr, Smith.

Two more quotes from Dr. Smith’s work indicate the value of religion and morality in politics and in the government.” To educate a person in mind and not in morals is to educate a menace to society." (President Theodore Roosevelt). "When the Nazis came to power, I looked to the universities that prided themselves upon their intellectual freedom, and they failed me. I looked to the German press, which prided itself on the freedom of the press, and it failed me. Until at last the churches stood alone, and that for which I once had little regard earned my respect." (Albert Einstein, after World War II).
http://acct.tamu.edu/smith/ethics/quotes.htm

While seeking reliable sources of information for this article, I found several so flagrantly biased, I considered them far too unreliable to cite here.

It is safe to say, “An individual without a connection to our Creator has refused to adopt the moral standards consistent with the House Ethics Rules or the Standards of Conduct expected of every government employee. No human is perfect and is not expected to be. However, we all expect our elected officials to act in a manner consistent with good moral behavior, to refrain from promiscuity, pedophilia, bestiality, homosexuality, wife beating, child abuse, cheating, stealing and a myriad of other acts you would not want to become public knowledge.

The advent of social networking is in and of itself not evil, pernicious or causative of bad behavior. The popular networking sites have the potential of much public good and, if so inclined, users can make a travesty out of the facility of the net. Anthony Weiner is not a victim of the inhuman Twitter site, he is a violator of the site’s own rules. http://twitter.com/tos

Mr. Weiner has demonstrated extremely bad judgment, violated the House rules, and brought shame on the US House, himself and his blameless spouse. For all these indiscretions and violations, Mr. Weiner deserves to face the rules committee, stand in the Well of the House, be tried and summarily dismissed. He should not be permitted the cowardly and unpunished evasion of justice for his offenses. Good Americans neither need nor want people so lacking in character to represent them in Our House.

To clean The House, the Rules committee might reconsider the cases of Charles Rangel, Maxine Waters, Sheila Lee Jackson, Al Green, Keith Ellison, Nancy Pelosi, Rush Holt and others. Just in case the powers that be are unable to get the goods on these latter folks, I will be more than happy to provide documentary evidence. At least Pelosi and Holt could be impeached and should be.
Dr. Thomas E. Davis, Colonel, USA, (ret) Word Co... (show quote)




:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Aug 10, 2013 19:57:06   #
octogenarian
 
Thanks, Bahmer.

Octogenarian

Reply
 
 
Aug 11, 2013 01:36:26   #
Worried for our children Loc: Massachusetts
 
octogenarian wrote:
Dr. Thomas E. Davis, Colonel, USA, (ret) Word Count: 800
326 F Nantucket Lane
Monroe Twp, NJ 08831
Ph: 609.395.7951
tomdavis@comcast.net







Congressional Lack of Ethics

By Tom Davis



Anthony Weiner is just the most recent and not the worst of a plethora of Congress people to breach the Government’s own Rules of Ethics. It was reported by the Sunlight Foundation that two Congressmen-to-be, Pete Sessions and Mike Fitzpatrick failed to attend the swearing-in ceremony on Wednesday, January 5, 2011. Rather they were attending a fundraiser at the US Capitol in Fitzpatrick’s honor, a clear violation of the House rules.

Clear, overt, knowing and callous regard for their own rules and standards is commonplace in our government. Presidents, Senators, Representatives, Judges, Civil servants and others bound by the two codes in effect violate the rules on a daily basis. The code of silence and its complement, do not point a finger at a violator, or else, are the prevailing status quo. Acceptable seems to be anything with which one can get away undetected by an outsider. That approximately Ten Square Mile area known as Washington, DC is a veritable cesspool of all manner of nefarious behavior.

From Ethics in Business & Society: Selected Quotations Compiled by Dr. L. Murphy Smith, Texas A&M University comes this exhortation from the most ethical of our Presidents, George Washington, "Associate with men of good quality, if you esteem your own reputation; for it is better to be alone than in bad company."

Washington, in his farewell address, urged his countrymen to forswear excessive party spirit and geographical distinctions. That admonition was ignored during the Administration of Thomas Jefferson when inter-party strife became nearly intolerable. With the election of Andrew Jackson, the two-party system was here to stay.

President John Adams was also a highly moral man and from him we get the following from the same source, "We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."

President Abraham Lincoln was more succinct; "Honor is better than honors." Also from Dr, Smith.

Two more quotes from Dr. Smith’s work indicate the value of religion and morality in politics and in the government.” To educate a person in mind and not in morals is to educate a menace to society." (President Theodore Roosevelt). "When the Nazis came to power, I looked to the universities that prided themselves upon their intellectual freedom, and they failed me. I looked to the German press, which prided itself on the freedom of the press, and it failed me. Until at last the churches stood alone, and that for which I once had little regard earned my respect." (Albert Einstein, after World War II).
http://acct.tamu.edu/smith/ethics/quotes.htm

While seeking reliable sources of information for this article, I found several so flagrantly biased, I considered them far too unreliable to cite here.

It is safe to say, “An individual without a connection to our Creator has refused to adopt the moral standards consistent with the House Ethics Rules or the Standards of Conduct expected of every government employee. No human is perfect and is not expected to be. However, we all expect our elected officials to act in a manner consistent with good moral behavior, to refrain from promiscuity, pedophilia, bestiality, homosexuality, wife beating, child abuse, cheating, stealing and a myriad of other acts you would not want to become public knowledge.

The advent of social networking is in and of itself not evil, pernicious or causative of bad behavior. The popular networking sites have the potential of much public good and, if so inclined, users can make a travesty out of the facility of the net. Anthony Weiner is not a victim of the inhuman Twitter site, he is a violator of the site’s own rules. http://twitter.com/tos

Mr. Weiner has demonstrated extremely bad judgment, violated the House rules, and brought shame on the US House, himself and his blameless spouse. For all these indiscretions and violations, Mr. Weiner deserves to face the rules committee, stand in the Well of the House, be tried and summarily dismissed. He should not be permitted the cowardly and unpunished evasion of justice for his offenses. Good Americans neither need nor want people so lacking in character to represent them in Our House.

To clean The House, the Rules committee might reconsider the cases of Charles Rangel, Maxine Waters, Sheila Lee Jackson, Al Green, Keith Ellison, Nancy Pelosi, Rush Holt and others. Just in case the powers that be are unable to get the goods on these latter folks, I will be more than happy to provide documentary evidence. At least Pelosi and Holt could be impeached and should be.
Dr. Thomas E. Davis, Colonel, USA, (ret) Word Co... (show quote)





👍👍👍👏👏👏👏🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🇺🇸

Thank you for taking the time octogenarian.

Reply
Aug 11, 2013 01:48:45   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
An excellent presentation with the exception of the fact Mr. Weiner is no longer in the House of Representatives.

The House found Rangel guilty; however, took no substantive action against him.

Pelosi is high on the list simply by fact her husband is currently making a substantial amount through real estate transactions relative to USPS building sales.

The difficulty is you start with those, you would have to look at the Republican side of the House. You cannot honestly think there are none on that side without guilt.

Reply
Aug 11, 2013 09:26:05   #
bahmer
 
AuntiE wrote:
An excellent presentation with the exception of the fact Mr. Weiner is no longer in the House of Representatives.

The House found Rangel guilty; however, took no substantive action against him.

Pelosi is high on the list simply by fact her husband is currently making a substantial amount through real estate transactions relative to USPS building sales.

The difficulty is you start with those, you would have to look at the Republican side of the House. You cannot honestly think there are none on that side without guilt.
An excellent presentation with the exception of th... (show quote)


This is true AuntiE the surgeon always scrubs first before going in to remove the cancerous cells in another. I would suggest that we clean our own house before we try and take the beam out of the other parties eye. I truly do wish that all of our representatives in both the congress and the senate were as pure as the driven snow but I am afraid that that isn't the case. We do have to get our own house in order to be truly effective in any kind of removal operation. Not that we don't need to rid both the congress and senate of these warts on society but we should be able to do it with a clear conscience knowing that we cleaned the house on our side of the isle as well.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.