Cool Breeze

Seems the low informational 'citizens' have been out Foxed again! Behold! Sean is a guy who only wanted to be known by his first name, which should have at least sparked a warning enough that her producers did a background check. I did it yesterday. And guess what?

Dude has a record. Dude was arrested for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon in September 2000, for which he served 75 days in jail, according to the Guardian.

This doesn’t mean that his account isn’t accurate, but it does call into question his character when he is justifying violence. It would give a reasonable person pause with one conviction (wait for it).

After all, Toon was one of the people who called police, and his wife Barber Toon was also at the pool party Friday night. In fact, Sean’s wife is the person seen in the original fight (including what looks like pulling a teenager’s hair) that caused her husband to call the police. He left that part out.

Yet her husband Sean is such a stellar member of the community that the police took his word for things and Officer Eric Casebolt, who has now resigned after abusing his authority, took it upon himself to round up all of the kids of color. Based on the words of a convicted criminal. But race is totally not an issue. Right! How Convenient! http://www.politicususa.com/2015/06/10/megyn-kelly-big-credibility-problem-objective-witness-pool-party.html

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

Question, when did a Class A misdemeanor become a felony? The man painted some cows to which he pleaded guilty and served 2 months for the offence.

And for this crime, he should not be allowed to call 911 when he sees someone breaking the law?

Cool Breeze

Of course you are full of it. Your sarcasm is noted.

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

Not sarcasm, just pointing out that in Texas, painting a prize winning cow is a misdemeanor, look it up. And then I asked a question, if you go to jail and do your time, do you forfeit your right to police protection or right to call the police if you see or are involved in something that is against the law.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Penny, you are dealing with an airhead here. If Obama proclaimed that the sky is red, you would be hard pressed to prove to his lemmings that it is blue. That is not a cool breeze you are talking to, it is a fart in the wind.

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

PeterS

What law was being broken? The fight was actually started by two white women who didn't like the way the black teenagers were acting--apparently the white teenagers were acting ok because they were never part of their target. According to white witnesses the women baited the teens with racial slurs and slapped one girl across the face and this this is how it escalated into a full blown fight. In Texas if you are attacked, and verbal assault and slap would count, you are allowed to defend yourself if you are attacked. So again, what law did this guy observe being broken?

Now mind you, I am not trying to stick up for the teens because I think they were wrong in their actions towards the police but the events that brought the police out were the result of a few white racists who probably couldn't stand that so many blacks were in such a high income area of McKinney. And fyi the woman starting the fight has been suspending from her job so I am apparently not the only one who thinks she was in the wrong.

Below is a photo of one of the women fighting and I am also including a short piece by the Dallas Morning News (a conservative owned newspaper) plus a youtube interview about the fight.


http://images.dailykos.com/images/147676/large/Screen_Shot_2015-06-10_at_12.09.49_PM.png?1433956271


http://crimeblog.dallasnews.com/2015/06/racist-comments-prompted-mckinney-pool-party-fight-host-says.html/

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

And this has what to do with my questions/comment? The 911 caller spent time in jail for painting a cow. A misdemeanor in Texas. Does this make him ineligible for protection under the law? Does this make him ineligible to call 911?

PeterS

You said: "And for this crime, he should not be allowed to call 911when he sees someone breaking the law?" to which I replied: "What law was being broken?"

People can do whatever they like but was he reporting that his wife was assaulting blacks, which is the crime that was committed, or, when is wife was getting her ass kicked he called the cops?

Why don't you try reading what I wrote instead of your typical kneejerk reaction to what I didn't...

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

It is called in many places, disturbing the peace, it Texas it is called disorderly conduct.

Police may use a disorderly conduct charge when a person is disturbing the peace or behaving in a disruptive manner, but is not presenting any serious danger to the public.

Examples: Using abusive, profane or vulgar language in a public place Making an offensive gesture in a public place that could incite unruly conduct Chemically creating an unreasonable odor in a public place Abusing or threatening a person in a public place Making unreasonable amounts of noise in a public place or near a private residence that is not your own Fighting in public Displaying or discharging a firearm in public Exposing one's self in public Looking or "peeping" into a private area that is not your own such as hotel rooms, homes, restrooms, or shower stalls In Texas, to prove disorderly conduct, a prosecutor must prove that the conduct was performed both intentionally and knowingly. If the conduct was being performed either unintentionally or if the person did not know their conduct was disturbing the peace, it will likely be insufficient to prove disorderly conduct. Sometimes, prosecutors may offer a plea deal in which a charge of a more serious crime may be reduced down to that of disorderly conduct in exchange for the defendant's agreement to plead guilty, or perhaps to help the prosecutor with information for a higher priority investigation. - See more at: http://statelaws.findlaw.com/texas-law/texas-disorderly-conduct-laws.html#sthash.4xr7idHc.dpuf

Why don't you try not stalking me?

PeterS

But they weren't disturbing the peace until they were attacked and self-defense would take precedence. What you are arguing is that after they were attacked they beat up the persons who attacked them therefore that constitutes disturbing the peace. Even in Texas that won't fly and as high profile as this has become republicans won't be able to sweep this under the rug.

As for stalking you--these threads aren't closed and since I live about 40 minutes from McKinney this is a topic I am interested in. My rule of thumb is that if a thread interests me I will respond to it. And since BR and you were the only conservatives responders you were the one I addressed since BR left nothing worthwhile to comment on. Okay?

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

The teen mob was trespassing on private property, violating the rules for use of the pool facility. For purposes of safety and liability, the maximum number allowed at the pool was 20 to 30, somewhere in there, and the number of teens crashing the party exceeded that established maximum by five times. The police were called to put a lid on this.

And, you are swallowing the false leftist narrative that the entire altercation was based on racism. Shame on you.

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

How do you know they were not disturbing the peace? Have you read the other side of the story? Have you even looked to see if there is another side?

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2015/06/09/the-facts-behind-the-mckinney-pool-fiasco-part-ii/#more-102081

Are you saying that a few hundred mainly blacks in a very small area were just sitting around and talking in low tones with the DJ playing parlor music. I suppose when they drank their beverages of choice, they held their pinky finger up as they enjoyed their herbal tea. I sure would like to see that. But, I am sure they were just as polite and sweet as can be to each other and so respectful of the property they were visiting. And those mean old police, even the security guard on duty.... nasty people came to break up this managed social gathering. Not to mention the homeowners, certainly they should not care if a few bottles were gently tossed at their property.... no harm and no problems. And fences around the pool, well they are intended for exercise, just like climbing a rock wall, just simple quite exercise.

A resident of the community has another story to tell: "Benet Embry just wanted a respite from the heat when he went to his neighborhood pool Friday.

Talking to CNN Monday about the national story that rolled out of that simple, mundane summer activity still has him pretty well dismayed.

The 43-year-old African-American has lived in Craig Ranch, a planned community, for eight years. It’s a nice place. Racially diverse. People get along there.

Thinking back on the pool party, he might have known it would be crowded.

The invite to the party had earlier caught fire on Twitter and social media.

Craig Ranch’s strict homeowners’ association rules prohibit bringing more than two guests to the pool.

So when crowds of teenagers showed up, huddling by the gate and shouting to let them in, things got out of hand.

Some kids jumped over the fence, Embry said. A security guard tried to get them to leave but was outnumbered, so the guard called police."


http://wreg.com/2015/06/09/teen-speaks-out-after-recording-viral-pool-party-video-2/

As for stalking, of course you are not. There is only one person on this thread and others.... of course you had to respond to me and present your well thought out discussion points, without any contention. And how ungracious of me to ask a question of the thread creator, as to whether or not a person should be considered outside of the protection of the law because they painted a cow and spent time in jail. Whether this made him, as implied, un-objective as a witness. Naturally that would bring up the question about these well mannered people at the party and if they were breaking the law. I understand. You are of course, quite right in hijacking this thread, after all I was not an active participant on the other threads (3 others) regarding this affair that does question the activities.