Voters Confront Congressman For Trying To Repeal Obamacare: "We've Got To Have It"
To those voters, I have this to say. Be prepared to pay a lot for sick care. And by all means, don't get sick.
To the voters that are angry with their lawmaker(s). Your either for the ACA or not. There's to many who are riding the fence on the ACA I& its issues. Lawmakers need to either get one uniform bill with limited pages in place or not. The current 20,000 page ACA with sky rocketing prices creating debt is not the answer.
oldroy
Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
D.C.J. wrote:
To the voters that are angry with their lawmaker(s). Your either for the ACA or not. There's to many who are riding the fence on the ACA I& its issues. Lawmakers need to either get one uniform bill with limited pages in place or not. The current 20,000 page ACA with sky rocketing prices creating debt is not the answer.
I think the 2700 pages that the ACA is made up of is way too many but you saying 20,000 sounds too much like stretched leaner writing. Give some thought to what your number was.
There are very few people in the middle class who will survive in that class with Obamacare, but they don't want us to know that before it gets into effect. We have to blow it out, as a majority of people want before it sets in.
How do we get lawmakers to do anything different when our Glorious Leader is talking about the Republicans having no replacement for it. He doesn't want them to do anything to change one bit of it so he makes like it just can't be done.
oldroy
Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
OPP Newsletter wrote:
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/08/08/2436291/constituents-confront-congressman-for-supporting-obamacare-repeal-weve-got-to-have-it/
Stink Prog??? No kidding? The first thing I see in that one is the normal progressive argument that is always about pre-existing conditions. Is there anything else in the law that they can argue about and make any sense? If so, I am ready to be informed about it. They don't mention how much middle income people will have to pay if they manage to make a bit too much each year. We can't afford to kill the entire middle class just so those with pre-existing conditions can survive. Of course, the piece could have said something about what medical help will be given to all those poor people, but they have given up on that argument.
Good old Stink Prog and Media Matters.
oldroy, I'm not talking about the 2700 pages of bare basics for the ACA law itself. I'm talking about the 20,000 pages of rules, regulations, & 20+ tax structures. Just saying. If you don't know what I'm talking about look back online at the CPAC meeting, and you'll see the over 6' of papers stacked that I'm referring to.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.