One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Time to Check out Snopes Eh?
Page 1 of 8 next> last>>
Aug 8, 2013 16:17:18   #
CrazyHorse Loc: Kansas
 
Herewith an e-mail I received from a friend this date.

"The SNOPES questions continue... Soros keeps coming up!


Wow...read this one! Then check out the suggested web sites.


Many of the emails that I have sent or forwarded that had any anti Obama in it were negated by Snopes. I thought that was odd. Check this out.

Shades of Krystalnacht

Snopes, Soros and the Supreme Court's Kagan.We-l-l-l-l now, I guess the time has come to check out Snopes! Ya' don't suppose it might not be a good time to take a second look at some of the stuff that got kicked in the ditch by Snopes, do ya'?


We've known that it was owned by a lefty couple but hadn't known it to be financed by Soros!


Snopes is heavily financed by George Soros, a big time supporter of Obama! In our Search for the truth department, we find what I have suspected on many occasions.


I went to Snopes to check something about the dockets of the new Supreme Court Justice. Elena Kagan, who Obama appointed, and Snopes said the email was false and there were no such dockets. So I Googled the Supreme Court, typed in Obama-Kagan, and guess what? Yep, you got it; Snopes Lied! Everyone of those dockets are there.

So Here is what I wrote to Snopes:
Referencing the article about Elana Kagan and Barak Obama dockets:
The information you have posted stating that there were no such cases as claimed and the examples you gave are blatantly false. I went directly to the Supreme Courts website, typed in Obama Kagan and immediately came up with all of the dockets that the article made reference to. I have long suspected that you really slant things but this was really shocking. Thank You. I hope you will be much more truthful in the future, but I doubt it.

That being said, Ill bet you didn't know this.


Kagan was representing Obama in all the petitions to prove his citizenship. Now she may help rule on them. Folks, this is really ugly.
Chicago Politics and the beat goes on and on and on. Once again the US Senate sold us out!


Now we know why Obama nominated Elana Kagan for the Supreme Court. Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama. She was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship. He owed her big time. All of the requests were denied of course. They were never heard. It just keeps getting deeper and deeper, doesn't it? The American people mean nothing any longer.
It's all about payback time for those who compromised themselves to elect someone who really has no true right to even be there.

Here are some websites of the Supreme Court Docket: You can look up some of these hearings and guess what?


Elana Kagan is the attorney representing Obama!


Check out these examples:

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-8857.htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-6790..htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-724.htm


If you are not interested in justice or in truth, simply delete.
However, if you hold sacred the freedoms granted to you by the U.S. Constitution, by all means, PASS it ON!
There truly is tyranny afoot."

Knock your self out whirling dervishes, and check out the cites and respond, except that is muckitUp, LuLu, and rumitoady/CHE, you're not invited.

Poncho Villa OIllegal on the trail of Muslim Utopia
Poncho Villa OIllegal on the trail of Muslim Utopi...

Reply
Aug 8, 2013 16:31:19   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
CrazyHorse wrote:
Herewith an e-mail I received from a friend this date.

"The SNOPES questions continue... Soros keeps coming up!


Wow...read this one! Then check out the suggested web sites.


Many of the emails that I have sent or forwarded that had any anti Obama in it were negated by Snopes. I thought that was odd. Check this out.

Shades of Krystalnacht

Snopes, Soros and the Supreme Court's Kagan.We-l-l-l-l now, I guess the time has come to check out Snopes! Ya' don't suppose it might not be a good time to take a second look at some of the stuff that got kicked in the ditch by Snopes, do ya'?


We've known that it was owned by a lefty couple but hadn't known it to be financed by Soros!


Snopes is heavily financed by George Soros, a big time supporter of Obama! In our Search for the truth department, we find what I have suspected on many occasions.


I went to Snopes to check something about the dockets of the new Supreme Court Justice. Elena Kagan, who Obama appointed, and Snopes said the email was false and there were no such dockets. So I Googled the Supreme Court, typed in Obama-Kagan, and guess what? Yep, you got it; Snopes Lied! Everyone of those dockets are there.

So Here is what I wrote to Snopes:
Referencing the article about Elana Kagan and Barak Obama dockets:
The information you have posted stating that there were no such cases as claimed and the examples you gave are blatantly false. I went directly to the Supreme Courts website, typed in Obama Kagan and immediately came up with all of the dockets that the article made reference to. I have long suspected that you really slant things but this was really shocking. Thank You. I hope you will be much more truthful in the future, but I doubt it.

That being said, Ill bet you didn't know this.


Kagan was representing Obama in all the petitions to prove his citizenship. Now she may help rule on them. Folks, this is really ugly.
Chicago Politics and the beat goes on and on and on. Once again the US Senate sold us out!


Now we know why Obama nominated Elana Kagan for the Supreme Court. Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama. She was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship. He owed her big time. All of the requests were denied of course. They were never heard. It just keeps getting deeper and deeper, doesn't it? The American people mean nothing any longer.
It's all about payback time for those who compromised themselves to elect someone who really has no true right to even be there.

Here are some websites of the Supreme Court Docket: You can look up some of these hearings and guess what?


Elana Kagan is the attorney representing Obama!


Check out these examples:

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-8857.htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-6790..htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-724.htm


If you are not interested in justice or in truth, simply delete.
However, if you hold sacred the freedoms granted to you by the U.S. Constitution, by all means, PASS it ON!
There truly is tyranny afoot."

Knock your self out whirling dervishes, and check out the cites and respond, except that is muckitUp, LuLu, and rumitoady/CHE, you're not invited.
Herewith an e-mail I received from a friend this d... (show quote)


Who would have thought, especially from a Dyke?

Reply
Aug 8, 2013 18:10:13   #
rumitoid
 
CrazyHorse wrote:
Herewith an e-mail I received from a friend this date.

"The SNOPES questions continue... Soros keeps coming up!


Wow...read this one! Then check out the suggested web sites.


Many of the emails that I have sent or forwarded that had any anti Obama in it were negated by Snopes. I thought that was odd. Check this out.

Shades of Krystalnacht

Snopes, Soros and the Supreme Court's Kagan.We-l-l-l-l now, I guess the time has come to check out Snopes! Ya' don't suppose it might not be a good time to take a second look at some of the stuff that got kicked in the ditch by Snopes, do ya'?


We've known that it was owned by a lefty couple but hadn't known it to be financed by Soros!


Snopes is heavily financed by George Soros, a big time supporter of Obama! In our Search for the truth department, we find what I have suspected on many occasions.


I went to Snopes to check something about the dockets of the new Supreme Court Justice. Elena Kagan, who Obama appointed, and Snopes said the email was false and there were no such dockets. So I Googled the Supreme Court, typed in Obama-Kagan, and guess what? Yep, you got it; Snopes Lied! Everyone of those dockets are there.

So Here is what I wrote to Snopes:
Referencing the article about Elana Kagan and Barak Obama dockets:
The information you have posted stating that there were no such cases as claimed and the examples you gave are blatantly false. I went directly to the Supreme Courts website, typed in Obama Kagan and immediately came up with all of the dockets that the article made reference to. I have long suspected that you really slant things but this was really shocking. Thank You. I hope you will be much more truthful in the future, but I doubt it.

That being said, Ill bet you didn't know this.


Kagan was representing Obama in all the petitions to prove his citizenship. Now she may help rule on them. Folks, this is really ugly.
Chicago Politics and the beat goes on and on and on. Once again the US Senate sold us out!


Now we know why Obama nominated Elana Kagan for the Supreme Court. Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama. She was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship. He owed her big time. All of the requests were denied of course. They were never heard. It just keeps getting deeper and deeper, doesn't it? The American people mean nothing any longer.
It's all about payback time for those who compromised themselves to elect someone who really has no true right to even be there.

Here are some websites of the Supreme Court Docket: You can look up some of these hearings and guess what?


Elana Kagan is the attorney representing Obama!


Check out these examples:

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-8857.htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-6790..htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-724.htm


If you are not interested in justice or in truth, simply delete.
However, if you hold sacred the freedoms granted to you by the U.S. Constitution, by all means, PASS it ON!
There truly is tyranny afoot."

Knock your self out whirling dervishes, and check out the cites and respond, except that is muckitUp, LuLu, and rumitoady/CHE, you're not invited.
Herewith an e-mail I received from a friend this d... (show quote)


Let's examine the accusations.
•CLAIM: Snopes.com is 'owned by a flaming liberal' with a partisan bias.
First off, it's clear that whoever wrote this piece made it up as they went along. Anyone who has spent even a few minutes browsing Snopes.com knows that the website is owned by two people, not one. They are husband and wife David and Barbara Mikkelson of southern California. This is stated on the website and has been common knowledge for quite some time.

Second, the charge of partisanship is laid without evidence. At no time have the Mikkelsons publicly stated a political preference or affiliation, or expressed support for any particular party or candidate.

Moreover, Barbara Mikkelson is a Canadian citizen, and as such cannot vote in U.S. elections or contribute to political campaigns. In a statement to FactCheck.org, David Mikkelson said his "sole involvement in politics" is voting on election day. In 2000 he registered as a Republican, documents provided to FactCheck.org show, and in 2008 Mikkelson didn't declare a party affiliation at all. Says Mikkelson: "I've never joined a party, worked for a campaign, or donated money to a candidate" (source: FactCheck.org).

Anyone who claims proof to the contrary needs to come out with it.

A NOTE ON GEORGE SOROS: A later variant of this rumor alleges, without evidence, that Snopes.com is owned and/or financed by liberal philanthropist and hedge fund tycoon George Soros. This is false. The website is entirely self-supporting through advertising sales.


• CLAIM: Snopes.com is 'in the tank' for Obama and 'tells lies' about Republicans.
You'd think it would be easy for someone so blithely asserting that the owners of Snopes.com are "flaming liberals" to offer evidence that they're "in the tank" for Obama and "covering up" for him. None is provided.

As of this writing dozens of forwarded texts pertaining to Barack Obama and his running mate have been analyzed on Snopes.com, each meticulously researched with copious references cited. I have perused them all, not to mention the twenty-odd texts concerning Republican candidates John McCain and Sarah Palin, and find no discernible pattern of bias or deception, nor any evidence of advocacy for or against. To the contrary, I see a consistent effort to provide even-handed analyses of texts which more often than not are themselves dripping with political bias.

Here is the site to check out your lastest fabrication:http://urbanlegends.about.com/od/internet/a/snopes_exposed.htm

Reply
 
 
Aug 8, 2013 18:12:31   #
BIGEAGLE Loc: Washington State
 
oldroy wrote:
Who would have thought, especially from a Dyke?


____________________________________________

DYKES always support "GAYS", ob is a fruit cake...
What is hard to believe about that ???????????? :lol:

Reply
Aug 8, 2013 19:12:07   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
rumitoid wrote:
Let's examine the accusations.
•CLAIM: Snopes.com is 'owned by a flaming liberal' with a partisan bias.
First off, it's clear that whoever wrote this piece made it up as they went along. Anyone who has spent even a few minutes browsing Snopes.com knows that the website is owned by two people, not one. They are husband and wife David and Barbara Mikkelson of southern California. This is stated on the website and has been common knowledge for quite some time.

Second, the charge of partisanship is laid without evidence. At no time have the Mikkelsons publicly stated a political preference or affiliation, or expressed support for any particular party or candidate.

Moreover, Barbara Mikkelson is a Canadian citizen, and as such cannot vote in U.S. elections or contribute to political campaigns. In a statement to FactCheck.org, David Mikkelson said his "sole involvement in politics" is voting on election day. In 2000 he registered as a Republican, documents provided to FactCheck.org show, and in 2008 Mikkelson didn't declare a party affiliation at all. Says Mikkelson: "I've never joined a party, worked for a campaign, or donated money to a candidate" (source: FactCheck.org).

Anyone who claims proof to the contrary needs to come out with it.

A NOTE ON GEORGE SOROS: A later variant of this rumor alleges, without evidence, that Snopes.com is owned and/or financed by liberal philanthropist and hedge fund tycoon George Soros. This is false. The website is entirely self-supporting through advertising sales.


• CLAIM: Snopes.com is 'in the tank' for Obama and 'tells lies' about Republicans.
You'd think it would be easy for someone so blithely asserting that the owners of Snopes.com are "flaming liberals" to offer evidence that they're "in the tank" for Obama and "covering up" for him. None is provided.

As of this writing dozens of forwarded texts pertaining to Barack Obama and his running mate have been analyzed on Snopes.com, each meticulously researched with copious references cited. I have perused them all, not to mention the twenty-odd texts concerning Republican candidates John McCain and Sarah Palin, and find no discernible pattern of bias or deception, nor any evidence of advocacy for or against. To the contrary, I see a consistent effort to provide even-handed analyses of texts which more often than not are themselves dripping with political bias.

Here is the site to check out your lastest fabrication:http://urbanlegends.about.com/od/internet/a/snopes_exposed.htm
Let's examine the accusations. br •CLAIM: Snopes.... (show quote)


Urban Legends is another of those things you talk about. I bet that you don't know that Fact Check.org is about as far left as I think Snopes is. How about you telling me who financed the foundation of Think Progress and Media Matters and still owns them and calls the shots. Today I read something from Media Matters for the first time in over 5 years and was amazed that they weren't any different than back then. Of course, you and Fact Check do know what the main purpose in the development of Stink Prog and Media Matters was, and is.

Reply
Aug 8, 2013 19:20:17   #
bahmer
 
CrazyHorse wrote:
Herewith an e-mail I received from a friend this date.

"The SNOPES questions continue... Soros keeps coming up!


Wow...read this one! Then check out the suggested web sites.


Many of the emails that I have sent or forwarded that had any anti Obama in it were negated by Snopes. I thought that was odd. Check this out.

Shades of Krystalnacht

Snopes, Soros and the Supreme Court's Kagan.We-l-l-l-l now, I guess the time has come to check out Snopes! Ya' don't suppose it might not be a good time to take a second look at some of the stuff that got kicked in the ditch by Snopes, do ya'?


We've known that it was owned by a lefty couple but hadn't known it to be financed by Soros!


Snopes is heavily financed by George Soros, a big time supporter of Obama! In our Search for the truth department, we find what I have suspected on many occasions.


I went to Snopes to check something about the dockets of the new Supreme Court Justice. Elena Kagan, who Obama appointed, and Snopes said the email was false and there were no such dockets. So I Googled the Supreme Court, typed in Obama-Kagan, and guess what? Yep, you got it; Snopes Lied! Everyone of those dockets are there.

So Here is what I wrote to Snopes:
Referencing the article about Elana Kagan and Barak Obama dockets:
The information you have posted stating that there were no such cases as claimed and the examples you gave are blatantly false. I went directly to the Supreme Courts website, typed in Obama Kagan and immediately came up with all of the dockets that the article made reference to. I have long suspected that you really slant things but this was really shocking. Thank You. I hope you will be much more truthful in the future, but I doubt it.

That being said, Ill bet you didn't know this.


Kagan was representing Obama in all the petitions to prove his citizenship. Now she may help rule on them. Folks, this is really ugly.
Chicago Politics and the beat goes on and on and on. Once again the US Senate sold us out!


Now we know why Obama nominated Elana Kagan for the Supreme Court. Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama. She was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship. He owed her big time. All of the requests were denied of course. They were never heard. It just keeps getting deeper and deeper, doesn't it? The American people mean nothing any longer.
It's all about payback time for those who compromised themselves to elect someone who really has no true right to even be there.

Here are some websites of the Supreme Court Docket: You can look up some of these hearings and guess what?


Elana Kagan is the attorney representing Obama!


Check out these examples:

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-8857.htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-6790..htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-724.htm


If you are not interested in justice or in truth, simply delete.
However, if you hold sacred the freedoms granted to you by the U.S. Constitution, by all means, PASS it ON!
There truly is tyranny afoot."

Knock your self out whirling dervishes, and check out the cites and respond, except that is muckitUp, LuLu, and rumitoady/CHE, you're not invited.
Herewith an e-mail I received from a friend this d... (show quote)


How about factcheck and other check type websites are they controlled by the same groups?

Reply
Aug 8, 2013 19:25:24   #
BIGEAGLE Loc: Washington State
 
oldroy wrote:
Urban Legends is another of those things you talk about. I bet that you don't know that Fact Check.org is about as far left as I think Snopes is. How about you telling me who financed the foundation of Think Progress and Media Matters and still owns them and calls the shots. Today I read something from Media Matters for the first time in over 5 years and was amazed that they weren't any different than back then. Of course, you and Fact Check do know what the main purpose in the development of Stink Prog and Media Matters was, and is.
Urban Legends is another of those things you talk ... (show quote)

_____________________________________________

ALL ARE IN FOR OBUMASS...."The muslim gay-blade"....
ALL are one sided..(Liberal)....!!!
And, I wouldn't trust snopes on whether or not if they said I was a big male in stature, which I am 6' - 3" 288 lbs...
I note that all Liberal newspapers are loosing sales by the thousands,.... Wash. Post is now for sale, with only 300,000 customers far down from their millions...
People are getting more, and far better truthful coverage on the internet. :lol: :lol:

Reply
 
 
Aug 8, 2013 19:31:02   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
bahmer wrote:
How about factcheck and other check type websites are they controlled by the same groups?


I haven't believed many things from Fact Check since the late days of the Iraq war. The place has always been too left leaning for me and Obama was employed there at one time.

Reply
Aug 8, 2013 19:32:52   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
BIGEAGLE wrote:
_____________________________________________

ALL ARE IN FOR OBUMASS...."The muslim gay-blade"....
ALL are one sided..(Liberal)....!!!
And, I wouldn't trust snopes on whether or not if they said I was a big male in stature, which I am 6' - 3" 288 lbs...

I note that all Liberal news papers are loosing sales by the thousands,.... Wash. Post is now for sale, with only 300,000 customers far down from their millions...People are getting more, and far better truthful coverage on the internet. :lol: :lol:
_____________________________________________ br ... (show quote)


I got a joke from e-mail today about why we old people need to keep news papers around. An old man asked his granddaughter for her newspaper and she said they don't need them anymore so just use my IPad. Well he did and he said the fly never knew what hit him.

Reply
Aug 8, 2013 19:33:11   #
bahmer
 
BIGEAGLE wrote:
_____________________________________________

ALL ARE IN FOR OBUMASS...."The muslim gay-blade"....
ALL are one sided..(Liberal)....!!!
And, I wouldn't trust snopes on whether or not if they said I was a big male in stature, which I am 6' - 3" 288 lbs...

I note that all Liberal news papers are loosing sales by the thousands,.... Wash. Post is now for sale, with only 300,000 customers far down from their millions...People are getting more, and far better truthful coverage on the internet. :lol: :lol:
_____________________________________________ br ... (show quote)


Do you by chance mean that they are all State Run Media similar to the Hitler regime in Germany. It sure sounds like we are going down similar roads doesn't it?

Reply
Aug 8, 2013 20:09:48   #
BIGEAGLE Loc: Washington State
 
bahmer wrote:
Do you by chance mean that they are all State Run Media similar to the Hitler regime in Germany. It sure sounds like we are going down similar roads doesn't it?


______________________________________________

Allow me to "quote" a socialist , pacifist, and a 6 time SOCIALIST presidential candidate named ,
"NORMAN MATTOON THOMAS" : (Nov 20, 1884-Dec. 1968)
"The American people will never knowingly accept SOCIALISM", - But, they WILL adopt (every fragment) of the Socialist program,
until ONE-DAY, America WILL be a socialist nation, WITHOUT KNOWING HOW IT HAPPENED"?

THEREFORE, I NEED NOT RUN EVER AGAIN AS A SOCIALIST CANDIDATE, AS the (DEMOCRATIC) PARTY HAS
already (fully adopted) our program"...... :evil:

Even History has shown that a Democracy only lasts as long as the ''poorer'' and un-fortunate people continue to keep taking the "FREEBIES" that this type of Govt. gives, UNTIL, there are more "takers", than 'Donators', then the Govt. "TOPPLES".

At this 236 year of our Democracy, WE are at the point of 48% "takers", and only 52% of Donators,
So, from this situation, and then ob will now give HIS muslims and "ILLEGALS" OUR SOC. SEC.
We are near the END of a Nation... :cry: :cry: :cry:

We are GONE, without any FIGHT.... WHY ????????????
Because we kept sending the 'SAME' smooth talking (excuse this "dirty" word" ) "POLITICIANS"
back to congress and expected a DIFFERENT RESULT
...YES...It IS our own damn fault...!!! :thumbdown:
P.S. "POLITICAL-CORRECTNESS" was our other "DOWNFALL"....In A democracy, tHE MAJORITY WINS, (?) unless< you HAVE A VERY "corrupt" Supreme court THAT CONTINUALLY (self -_ADJUDICATES) :cry:

We NEED (TERM-LIMITS) for Congress, AND a "RE-CALL"
initiative in every State Constitution, or, We have no chance whatever....!!! :thumbdown:

Reply
 
 
Aug 8, 2013 20:22:14   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
oldroy wrote:
I got a joke from e-mail today about why we old people need to keep news papers around. An old man asked his granddaughter for her newspaper and she said they don't need them anymore so just use my IPad. Well he did and he said the fly never knew what hit him.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Reply
Aug 8, 2013 20:23:01   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
Rumi, your Lefty bias is showing, again.

Reply
Aug 8, 2013 22:14:00   #
rumitoid
 
Old_Gringo wrote:
Rumi, your Lefty bias is showing, again.


If you guys want to totally ignore anything that goes against your biases and call it a socialist conspiracy, fine.
Your Righty bias is showing.

Reply
Aug 8, 2013 22:21:13   #
CrazyHorse Loc: Kansas
 
rumitoid wrote:
Let's examine the accusations. Lets do that bull sh**er.
•CLAIM: Snopes.com is 'owned by a flaming liberal' with a partisan bias.
First off, it's clear that whoever wrote this piece made it up as they went along. Anyone who has spent even a few minutes browsing Snopes.com knows that the website is owned by two people, not one. They are husband and wife David and Barbara Mikkelson of southern California. This is stated on the website and has been common knowledge for quite some time.Well that is your major evidence bull sh**er. You might have at least read the post before you were willing to exhibit your bigoted opinion. On the very post it is stated: "We've known that it was owned by a lefty couple but hadn't known it to be financed by Soros! Why you brain dead obstructionists are allowed to continue to post your bigoted mindless bull sh** is beyond rationale consideration.

Second, the charge of partisanship is laid without evidence.Second, nor have you provide any contra evidence. At no time have the Mikkelsons publicly stated a political preference or affiliation, or expressed support for any particular party or candidate.Totally absolutely irrelevant. Nor has Obama claimed to be a Marxist or a Muslim, and nor have you claimed to be a liberal, or a retard.

Moreover, Barbara Mikkelson is a Canadian citizen, and as such cannot vote in U.S. elections or contribute to political campaigns. Totally absolutely irrelevant to the issue under consideration. In a statement to FactCheck.org, David Mikkelson said his "sole involvement in politics" is voting on election day.Totally absolutely irrelevant to the issue under consideration. Including particularly, being considerably funded by George Soros. In 2000 he registered as a Republican, documents provided to FactCheck.org show, and in 2008 Mikkelson didn't declare a party affiliation at all. Says Mikkelson: "I've never joined a party, worked for a campaign, or donated money to a candidate" (source: FactCheck.org).So what does that prove if he is taking money from George Soros, and doing Soros' bidding on behalf of OIllegal. You sorry piece of garbage, all you can do is be a sycophant for OIllegal while your country is going down the drain. And they tell me as an excuse for your political ignorance, that well, he is religious. May God have mercy on your petrified lemming mind and soul.

Anyone who claims proof to the contrary needs to come out with it.

A NOTE ON GEORGE SOROS: A later variant of this rumor alleges, without evidence, that Snopes.com is owned and/or financed by liberal philanthropist and hedge fund tycoon George Soros. This is false. The website is entirely self-supporting through advertising sales.You claim it isn't, rumitoady, so you need to come out with some authority and proof that the assertion is not true, not just your own ipse dixit authority. We all know what you are willing to say, OIllegal sycophant.

• CLAIM: Snopes.com is 'in the tank' for Obama and 'tells lies' about Republicans.
You'd think it would be easy for someone so blithely asserting that the owners of Snopes.com are "flaming liberals"Nowhere in the article can you find the words "flaming liberals", -- but you rumitoady are willing to present them as quoted words. That says more about your lack of religous intellectual dishonesty, than it does even about the lie of the assertion -- to offer evidence that they're "in the tank" for Obama and "covering up" for him. None is provided. What is easy is that for sure rumitoady is "in the tank" for OIllegal. The article says they receive considerable moneys from Geroge Soros, make the distinction, bull sh**er obstructionist.

As of this writing dozens of forwarded texts pertaining to Barack Obama and his running mate have been analyzed on Snopes.com, each meticulously researched with copious references cited. I have perused them all, not to mention the twenty-odd texts concerning Republican candidates John McCain and Sarah Palin, and find no discernible pattern of bias or deception, nor any evidence of advocacy for or against. You couldn't find your arse in a closet with the light on To the contrary, I see a consistent effort to provide even-handed analysis of texts which more often than not are themselves dripping with political bias.You would see that no matter what. What you obviously see is one of your few alleged sources, being exposed as a bias bigoted paid for opinion by George Soros on behalf of the usurper in chief, and you don't like it.

Here is the site to check out your lastestsic fabrication:http://urbanlegends.about.com/od/internet/a/snopes_exposed.htm What is this, another bias rumitoady liberal sycophant source?
Let's examine the accusations. color=red Lets do ... (show quote)


Quid Pro Quo, rumitoady: Once again you evidence your complete brain dead liberal sycophant lemming drone B.S. on behalf of the usurper who is taking your country down the road to Hell and attacking capitalism and your supposed Christian religion. But God can judge you on that issue.

Here is rumitoady's latest
Here is rumitoady's latest...

Hey rumitoady, compliments of The Dutchman
Hey rumitoady, compliments of The Dutchman...

Reply
Page 1 of 8 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.