pelosi: obama one of the most practically non-partisan presidents: http://dailycaller.com/2013/08/02/pelosi-obama-one-of-the-most-practically-non-partisan-presidents/ I can't comment...

bayman Loc: New Jersey

http://dailycaller.com/2013/08/02/pelosi-obama-one-of-the-most-practically-non-partisan-presidents/

I can't comment on this post. You'll have to read it to get the full impact.

Dragnet

And there is also the Easter bunny, tooth fairly, and Santa clause.

Comment Loc: California

Dragnet wrote:

And there is also the Easter bunny, tooth fairly, and Santa clause.

BS. She hasn't read it so what does she know. She's had so many face lifts that have lifted her eyes out of the face. Haven't you seen? Her brain is a robo computer programed by the Democratic Party. A surf of Obama! Who would believe anything she says? The Democrats passed the Obamacare bill and nobody read it. Not one Repub. voted for it. Look at what happen! There were no checks and balances in place. A prime example of a dictatorial power. Obamacare would have been ruled unconstitutional; five justices agreed and Chief Justice Roberts was to write their opinion. But Roberts double crossed his colleagues and said that it was a tax and, therefore constitutional.

What form of gov. do we have if one party controls every segment/department of gov.? Hitler and Stalin had that power. Use your knowledge of history and gage the present and project the trend line into the future. What do you see in your crystal ball? My view ant good?

Navysnipe Loc: Old West

This from a woman who can't remember what she said a week ago. Too much botox, too much botox, too much botox...

Comment Loc: California

Navysnipe wrote:

This from a woman who can't remember what she said a week ago. Too much botox, too much botox, too much botox...

LMAO!!!!

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

Dragnet wrote:

And there is also the Easter bunny, tooth fairly, and Santa clause.

If there is no Easter Bunny where is my basket coming from every year?

If there is no Santa, who is eating the cookies and drinking the hot cider?

You are just mean to take away my happiness! :roll: :lol:

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

I would ask pardon for my forthcoming déclassé commentary.

She, Feinstein and Boxer are all beyond the age of PMS, so we must assume their hot flashes are overtaking all rational thought processes!!!!

faithistheword

AuntiE wrote:

I would ask pardon for my forthcoming déclassé commentary.

She, Feinstein and Boxer are all beyond the age of PMS, so we must assume their hot flashes are overtaking all rational thought processes!!!!

I don't think her problem is hormones--or lack thereof--.Her problem is a very small brain. And I think it reached its capacity to think a l-l-l-o-o-o-n-n-n-g-g time ago. The current democrat congressional members don't have to think, though, they take their orders from George Soros, and don't dare stray from the path. Obama is a nothing--a very dangerous nothing, but nothing nonetheless. Those congressional members have waited a long time for a stooge like Obama to come along. They had to have a brainless, communist, Islamic, arrogant puke for it to work.

rcksha

Auntie -- Have you ever thought your happiness is based on other peoples work, family viability, increased taxes and a declining employment base?
Your support of these Dems is dismantling the workforce that pays your way. What will you do when they are gone and there is no one left to pay your way?

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

rcksha wrote:

Auntie -- Have you ever thought your happiness is based on other peoples work, family viability, increased taxes and a declining employment base?
Your support of these Dems is dismantling the workforce that pays your way. What will you do when they are gone and there is no one left to pay your way?

Are you out of your freaking mind? :?: :thumbdown:

Exactly when in the perdition did I indicate support of "Dems"?

Exactly when did you perceive someone else is paying my way?

You obviously are a product of public education if your reading comprehension is so lacking!!! :!: :!: :!: :thumbdown: Consider the fact this is a polite response, because you may be assured I can do a lot better. The only reason I did not use big words is because you probably would be unable to understand them. :!: :!: :!:

By the way, there is a thing called "Quote Reply". Try using it.

PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.

AuntiE wrote:

Are you out of your freaking mind? :?: :thumbdow... (show quote)

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

Old_Gringo wrote:

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

There is much I can endure; however, supercilious, puerile, benighted, addlepate and obtuse comments are beyond my acceptance.

You get the big words, because you actually can read, comprehend and understand them.

Be well.

PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.

AuntiE wrote:

There is much I can endure; however, supercilious, puerile, benighted, addlepate and obtuse comments are beyond my acceptance.

You get the big words, because you actually can read, comprehend and understand them.

Be well.

Danke schön! Danke! My ego needed that AuntiE.

Dragnet

I you want to believe the anointed one is the most practical, non-partisan presidents we have ever had, by all means, go right ahead. I, for one, am not buying into this total nonsense.

The anointed is a complete Socialist, and wants total government control over all aspects of everyone's life (except his of course - here there can never be any reduction whatsoever on his extravagant lifestyle).

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

Dragnet wrote:

I you want to believe the anointed one is the most practical, non-partisan presidents we have ever had, by all means, go right ahead. I, for one, am not buying into this total nonsense.

The anointed is a complete Socialist, and wants total government control over all aspects of everyone's life (except his of course - here there can never be any reduction whatsoever on his extravagant lifestyle).

To whom are you responding or is it a general reply?

If it is a direct response to an individual, you should utilize "Quite Reply".

My perception is this may be a general response to the subject matter.