This case was "sort of" like the Zimmerman case except that Roderick Scott was a 42 yr. old big man and the kid was a "skinny" 17 yr. old. Scott wanted to "hold" the three who were breaking into cars for the police. However, the one kid attacked Scott and like Zimmerman, he feared bodily injury. The jury found him NOT GUILTY and that was the end of it. No riots, no threats against Scotts life. Not a peep out of Jackson, Sharpton, et al. Go figure.
The shoe's on the other foot in this case. The blacks don't care if a black kills a white person.
iowagirl wrote:
The shoe's on the other foot in this case. The blacks don't care if a black kills a white person.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
At least the race baiters and the racist blacks don't care if a black kills a white person. And personally I don't care who kills who if he is being attacked. :|
Well, let's see. We did not have the DOJ or the AG sending agitators to the scene...The POTUS did not say that the dead kid would look like his son, nor would he be like the dead kid 35 years ago. Al Sharpton, Jessie Jackson, and the NAACP did not mouth off and declare this murder vs. self defence. Most importantly, it was not Political!
Get the Picture?
Tasine wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~
At least the race baiters and the racist blacks don't care if a black kills a white person. And personally I don't care who kills who if he is being attacked. :|
Maybe we shouldn't try all these blacks that kill the blacks.
Then we wouldn't have so many problems with the bad ones.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.