One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Senate caves to Comrade Obama
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
Apr 16, 2015 10:03:04   #
Pulfnick Loc: Knoxville, TN
 
The Senate has constitutional (Article II, Section 2, Clause 2) responsibility to provide both advice to the President and approval by 2/3 of Senators on any treaty. However the Republican lead Senate, with Bob Corker (R), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, as well as the doofless Lindsay Graham, just eliminated the 2/3 approval requirement to facilitate Obama's gift to Iran.

Now Comrade Obama has a pathway to lift all sanctions against Iran and let it develop the bomb - unless the Senate bothers to hold a vote against Obama's scheme and disapproves of it with 60 votes against. Is anybody naive enough to think the same people who were elected to get rid of Obamacare, reduce national debt, stop Obama's economic destruction, etc, will fight him on letting Iran get an atomic bomb now??

We're in deep kaka.

These Republicans in leadership positions aren't much better than the Democrats.

Reply
Apr 16, 2015 10:27:59   #
Kachina
 
Pulfnick wrote:
The Senate has constitutional (Article II, Section 2, Clause 2) responsibility to provide both advice to the President and approval by 2/3 of Senators on any treaty. However the Republican lead Senate, with Bob Corker (R), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, as well as the doofless Lindsay Graham, just eliminated the 2/3 approval requirement to facilitate Obama's gift to Iran.

Now Comrade Obama has a pathway to lift all sanctions against Iran and let it develop the bomb - unless the Senate bothers to hold a vote against Obama's scheme and disapproves of it with 60 votes against. Is anybody naive enough to think the same people who were elected to get rid of Obamacare, reduce national debt, stop Obama's economic destruction, etc, will fight him on letting Iran get an atomic bomb now??

We're in deep kaka.

These Republicans in leadership positions aren't much better than the Democrats.
The Senate has constitutional (Article II, Section... (show quote)



No they could care less what he does so long as they keep their big money and power jobs. Most of them will let him do what he wants because they are selfish, self serving, power and money hungry individuals.

Reply
Apr 16, 2015 10:34:37   #
vernon
 
Kachina wrote:
No they could care less what he does so long as they keep their big money and power jobs. Most of them will let him do what he wants because they are selfish, self serving, power and money hungry individuals.


THE 17TH AMENDMENT NEEDS TO BE REPEALED.THIS WAY THE STATES WOULD GO BACK TO TELLING SENATORS HOW TO VOTE.remember the senate was set up to be the states voice in govt not the voice of political parties.

Reply
 
 
Apr 16, 2015 10:39:18   #
moldyoldy
 
Pulfnick wrote:
The Senate has constitutional (Article II, Section 2, Clause 2) responsibility to provide both advice to the President and approval by 2/3 of Senators on any treaty. However the Republican lead Senate, with Bob Corker (R), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, as well as the doofless Lindsay Graham, just eliminated the 2/3 approval requirement to facilitate Obama's gift to Iran.

Now Comrade Obama has a pathway to lift all sanctions against Iran and let it develop the bomb - unless the Senate bothers to hold a vote against Obama's scheme and disapproves of it with 60 votes against. Is anybody naive enough to think the same people who were elected to get rid of Obamacare, reduce national debt, stop Obama's economic destruction, etc, will fight him on letting Iran get an atomic bomb now??

We're in deep kaka.

These Republicans in leadership positions aren't much better than the Democrats.
The Senate has constitutional (Article II, Section... (show quote)



Reply
Apr 16, 2015 10:40:00   #
Rufus Loc: Deep South
 
Pulfnick wrote:
The Senate has constitutional (Article II, Section 2, Clause 2) responsibility to provide both advice to the President and approval by 2/3 of Senators on any treaty. However the Republican lead Senate, with Bob Corker (R), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, as well as the doofless Lindsay Graham, just eliminated the 2/3 approval requirement to facilitate Obama's gift to Iran.

Now Comrade Obama has a pathway to lift all sanctions against Iran and let it develop the bomb - unless the Senate bothers to hold a vote against Obama's scheme and disapproves of it with 60 votes against. Is anybody naive enough to think the same people who were elected to get rid of Obamacare, reduce national debt, stop Obama's economic destruction, etc, will fight him on letting Iran get an atomic bomb now??

We're in deep kaka.

These Republicans in leadership positions aren't much better than the Democrats.
The Senate has constitutional (Article II, Section... (show quote)


I must agree. I am highly disappointed with our Republicans and the fact that they have allowed evil Hussein to destroy our country with no respect to our laws, the Constitution and the American people. Please allow me a little latitude in my language. Fuck Obama and the Republicans who do not love America.

Reply
Apr 16, 2015 11:08:54   #
robmull Loc: florida
 
Pulfnick wrote:
The Senate has constitutional (Article II, Section 2, Clause 2) responsibility to provide both advice to the President and approval by 2/3 of Senators on any treaty. However the Republican lead Senate, with Bob Corker (R), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, as well as the doofless Lindsay Graham, just eliminated the 2/3 approval requirement to facilitate Obama's gift to Iran.

Now Comrade Obama has a pathway to lift all sanctions against Iran and let it develop the bomb - unless the Senate bothers to hold a vote against Obama's scheme and disapproves of it with 60 votes against. Is anybody naive enough to think the same people who were elected to get rid of Obamacare, reduce national debt, stop Obama's economic destruction, etc, will fight him on letting Iran get an atomic bomb now??

We're in deep kaka.

These Republicans in leadership positions aren't much better than the Democrats.
The Senate has constitutional (Article II, Section... (show quote)










I can only hope the Congress is giving the liberal progressives enough rope to hang themselves with, Pulfnick!!!

Reply
Apr 16, 2015 11:41:27   #
vernon
 
Rufus wrote:
I must agree. I am highly disappointed with our Republicans and the fact that they have allowed evil Hussein to destroy our country with no respect to our laws, the Constitution and the American people. Please allow me a little latitude in my language. Fuck Obama and the Republicans who do not love America.


the republicans have only had control 4 months lets give them time.

Reply
 
 
Apr 16, 2015 12:40:50   #
the waker Loc: 11th freest nation
 
vernon wrote:
THE 17TH AMENDMENT NEEDS TO BE REPEALED.THIS WAY THE STATES WOULD GO BACK TO TELLING SENATORS HOW TO VOTE.remember the senate was set up to be the states voice in govt not the voice of political parties.


:thumbup:

Reply
Apr 16, 2015 12:45:45   #
the waker Loc: 11th freest nation
 
robert66 wrote:
Fuck any assholes that disrespect the office of president of the United States


This is America buddy, the people can still speak freely about matters of they're country, Amendment#1(already limited by this administration to free speech zones).
If you want to follow blindly, so be it, but keep in mind that how we ended up in Iraq

Reply
Apr 16, 2015 12:47:59   #
the waker Loc: 11th freest nation
 
Moldy,
You forgot Syria, and its not just Republicans.

Reply
Apr 16, 2015 12:52:55   #
votebob
 
as u get on the train for your free meal and shower, remember your words. wow

Reply
 
 
Apr 16, 2015 12:56:24   #
Workinman Loc: Bayou Pigeon
 
robert66 wrote:
Fuck any assholes that disrespect the office of president of the United States


The person who is in the office of president disrespects the United States.

Reply
Apr 16, 2015 13:02:39   #
moldyoldy
 
Workinman wrote:
The person who is in the office of president disrespects the United States.


This may be the greatest country in the world. That does not mean that the policies and choices that the country makes are the best or the most moral.

Reply
Apr 16, 2015 15:19:21   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
Workinman wrote:
The person who is in the office of president disrespects the United States.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Apr 16, 2015 19:16:20   #
Rufus Loc: Deep South
 
robert66 wrote:
Fuck any assholes that disrespect the office of president of the United States


Obama disrespects the office of president. So I agree with you.

Reply
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.