One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Is it discrimination and bigotry or religious persecution?
Page <<first <prev 27 of 68 next> last>>
Apr 4, 2015 01:41:32   #
Richard94611
 
And you are wrong,. Science has not been studying God. Science has been studying the shroud.


jelun wrote:
I doubt that it is and since there is no DNA to determine who that cloth, if it is really 2K years old, belongs to.

What do you think about God leaving a man to sit on death row for 30 years based on absolutely no evidence?

Reply
Apr 4, 2015 01:45:38   #
Richard94611
 
I am certain you will NOT ignore him. You may not post, but his posts to this forum are to you like the light of a candle to a moth. You will read every one of them, and then sooner or later you again won't be able to control yourself and you will reply to them.


MsAtta2d wrote:
Nope - that doesn't bug me about you at all. You're deliberately obtuse, obnoxious, and a liar. The last bugs me more than anything, and from this point on, since you refuse to see any truth about 0vomit, of which there is mountains - I am ignoring you. I have been taught to refrain from discussing things with people who don't have a brain, or cannot use the one they are supposed to have. You fit both of those. Adios moron!

Reply
Apr 4, 2015 01:50:50   #
Richard94611
 
It isn't strange at all, considering our Constitution and our Bill of Rights. Gays have the right to vote. Unborn innocent fetuses do not. Furthermore, neither gays nor straights have the right to KNOWINGLY spread aids. There have been court cases on this issue in which the partner with aids who knew he or she was ill lost the court case because they did not notify their partner about being sick and spread the disease.


Armageddun wrote:
Isn't it strange that "Gays" have more rights than unborn children.
Gays have the legal right to spread aids, while innocent children have no say-so as to the matter of life or death.

So far America has legally murdered 56 million and counting babies.

Reply
Apr 4, 2015 01:53:15   #
Richard94611
 
Marriage is about a lot more than sex. All sorts of other issues, such as property rights, are involved. Didn't you know that ? Try getting a divorce and you'll find out.


Ranger7374 wrote:
So if what you do sexually is your own business, then why make it public? Why get married?

Reply
Apr 4, 2015 02:00:05   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Richard94611 wrote:
And you are wrong,. Science has not been studying God. Science has been studying the shroud.
Obviously you have no idea of the volume of scientific investigations and research into this matter. But that is understandable. Getting a reasonable response from an atheist on questions about God is like asking someone who has never tasted a strawberry to describe the taste of a strawberry.

Experience is critical to gaining knowledge about anything.

Reply
Apr 4, 2015 02:02:11   #
Richard94611
 
BladeRunner has written: Obviously, we can disregard that HL has any understanding of the Constitution. The first significant clue is that he believes Obama is a Constitutional scholar. He was nothing more than an adjunct professor whose "study" of the document was focused entirely on holding it to the prism of his ideology and identifying what he believed were its flaws. In his own words, he proclaimed the Constitution a "charter of negative liberties."

"One of Harvard's long standing rules is "publish or get out." When he was the editor of the Harvard Law Review, he published a letter."

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

As usual, BladeRunner distorts matters. He says categorically that HL has no understanding of the Constitution, when HL may have more understanding of it than this blithering member of the Tea Party (BladeRunner), who willingly distorts matters here.

As an adjunct professor, Obama taught constitutional law, which is something I am sure BladeRunner has never done.

Earlier, at Harvard, WHEN HE WAS THE STUDENT EDITOR of the Harvard Law Review, it is highly likely he wrote editorial pieces for the Review. He was a student then, not a member of the Harvard faculty. The "publish or perish" routine applies only to faculty members at academic institutions, not to students. As usual, BladeRunner is confused.

Reply
Apr 4, 2015 02:06:32   #
Richard94611
 
Antisocialist wrote:
You dumbass, businesses have refused to serve customers without shirts or shoes and not a peep from anyone; it was a matter of decency. But let some degenerate faggot get refused service and all hell breaks loose.

You queers need to get back in your closets and stay there before someone gets hurt. You queers are disrespecting the rights of others and can't figure that out.


********************************************************

It is not always a matter of "decency" that there are dress regulations in some restaurants. For instance, not wearing a tie has nothing to do with "decency."

Were it up to you, the rights of your so-called "queers" would not include the right to exist. Sorry, Pal, look around you in the modern world. People with all sorts of sexual orientations abound, and it isn't up to you to say who has the right to be out of their closet and who doesn't.

Reply
Apr 4, 2015 02:14:29   #
Richard94611
 
As usual, BladeRunner, you think that just asserting something makes it true. Not so, you illogical ignoramus. You are probably used to just announcing something and having the crowd you run with -- your blithering Tea Party friends -- believe you.

Nice attempt at metaphor though, even though it doesn't apply here.


Blade_Runner wrote:
Obviously you have no idea of the volume of scientific investigations and research into this matter. But that is understandable. Getting a reasonable response from an atheist on questions about God is like asking someone who has never tasted a strawberry to describe the taste of a strawberry.

Experience is critical to gaining knowledge about anything.

Reply
Apr 4, 2015 02:15:41   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Richard94611 wrote:
BladeRunner has written: Obviously, we can disregard that HL has any understanding of the Constitution. The first significant clue is that he believes Obama is a Constitutional scholar. He was nothing more than an adjunct professor whose "study" of the document was focused entirely on holding it to the prism of his ideology and identifying what he believed were its flaws. In his own words, he proclaimed the Constitution a "charter of negative liberties."

"One of Harvard's long standing rules is "publish or get out." When he was the editor of the Harvard Law Review, he published a letter."

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

As usual, BladeRunner distorts matters. He says categorically that HL has no understanding of the Constitution, when HL may have more understanding of it than this blithering member of the Tea Party (BladeRunner), who willingly distorts matters here.

As an adjunct professor, Obama taught constitutional law, which is something I am sure BladeRunner has never done.

Earlier, at Harvard, WHEN HE WAS THE STUDENT EDITOR of the Harvard Law Review, it is highly likely he wrote editorial pieces for the Review. He was a student then, not a member of the Harvard faculty. The "publish or perish" routine applies only to faculty members at academic institutions, not to students. As usual, BladeRunner is confused.
BladeRunner has written: Obviously, we can disreg... (show quote)
To be or not to be fooled by a pathological liar. That is the question, dick.

Reply
Apr 4, 2015 02:17:09   #
Richard94611
 
It is your job to prove that each example is in fact a violation.


bdamage wrote:
Take each example and explain to us, with your unsurpassed knowledge, how each example is not a violation of our Constitution.

Or....do what you normally do when I present truth to you and either leave or cop out with some lame excuse why you won't back up your statement.
You posted this WAY to fast to have read more than a couple of his violations so you are also a slacker.

Reply
Apr 4, 2015 02:20:42   #
Richard94611
 
If Obama's actions were as unconstitutional as these idiots claim, he would long ago have been thrown out of office. This is certain, because you can see the depth of hatred some of the jerks in this forum have for him. Hate to say it, you conservative Republicans and members of the Tea Party, but if you don't love this country, then go somewhere else.



Haughty Lib wrote:
If you don't want to abide by the U.S. Constitution, get the fuck out of America as YOU would be the one that doesn't truly belong.

And yes, Obama is a Constitutional scholar and completely abides by the constitution, he just doesn't abide by the conservative/imbecilic distortion of it.

Reply
 
 
Apr 4, 2015 02:21:28   #
Richard94611
 
Well, I am sure not fooled by you. You don't even know who the "publish or perish" rule does and does not apply to at universities. I guess you cannot tell the difference between an enrolled student and a member of the faculty.


Blade_Runner wrote:
To be or not to be fooled by a pathological liar. That is the question, dick.

Reply
Apr 4, 2015 02:48:39   #
Ranger7374 Loc: Arizona, 40 miles from the border in the DMZ
 
Antisocialist wrote:
Then stay to fuck out of Florida.


Easy antisocialist, Easy, I too got passionate and frustrated at these fools, but no matter how heated we get or frustrated we get, let's try to keep it clean.

I too am guilty of cussing on this topic, and I know how frustrating it may be, but please try to control your anger, and use your head. Okay?

Reply
Apr 4, 2015 02:50:01   #
Richard94611
 
Hey, Loony Right-Wingers, These Are Just Your Cup of Tea (Party)


Paranoia-Rama: Muslims Take Over Idaho, Gays Overthrow America
SUBMITTED BY Brian Tashman on Friday, 4/3/2015 4:50 pm
RWW’s Paranoia-Rama takes a look at five of the week’s most absurd conspiracy theories from the Right.

Well, it seems that “homofascism” is finally here. Apparently, people who criticized an Indiana law that effectively legalized discrimination are all responsible for destroying America and ushering in a thousand years of gay darkness. And don’t even think about moving to Idaho, because it has already been “infiltrated” by Muslims who, according to one Republican official, are just itching to kill everyone.

5) Concentration Camps On Their Way

Conservatives reacted just as reasonably as you'd expect to the decisions of lawmakers in Indiana and Arkansas to amend “religious freedom” measures to make it more difficult to use them as licenses to discriminate. And by that we mean they warned that Christians in America are literally becoming gay people’s slaves and will soon be just like Jews living under Nazi rule.

The ever-rational Glenn Beck told his fans that gay people have put on “the robes of the Inquisition” and are “becoming Nazis,” asking: “You think that there isn't a Christian holocaust coming?” He warned that the “hate” spewed by gay rights advocates eventually “ends up in concentration camps.”



4) No More Churches, Thanks To Gays

Of course, most of the GOP’s potential presidential candidates have defended Indiana’s law (although Jeb Bush quickly backed away from his initial support for it).

But no one seems as worried about purported threats to religious freedom as Mike Huckabee, who alleged this week that gay rights supporters “won’t stop until there are no more churches.”



Such remarks come as no surprise as Huckabee recently starred — along with Rand Paul and several GOP congressmen — in a “documentary” about how gay rights laws will establish the “ criminalization of Christianity.”

3) Muslims ‘Infiltrating’ Idaho

A local GOP official in Idaho is very concerned that Muslims are living in, or as she puts it, “infiltrating,” the gem state, warning in a county Republican newsletter that “two-faced” Muslims are “ready to rise up and kill” their non-Muslim neighbors.

“Please, don’t wait until something bad happens,” Bonneville GOP executive director Becky Prestwich cautioned, saying that even nice Muslims are a danger since they are “taught” to “present the face of friendship to enemies but to inwardly hate them.”

She later clarified that she only meant to write about Islamic extremists, whom she claimed represent 10 percent of the Muslim community.

2) Obama’s Muslim Subliminal Messages

We know for an absolute fact that President Obama used Islamic subliminal messages during his State of the Union address earlier this year, but did you know that he also used them during his 2008 campaign for the presidency?

Michael Savage knows, and decided to reveal the shocking information several years after the fact. While speaking to self-proclaimed ex-terrorist Walid Shoebat, Savage claimed that Obama’s campaign logo really showed an Islamic crescent that put Americans “under the banner of Islam.”

Case closed.



1) Stop Persecuting Bill O’Reilly

Did you not like the film version of Bill O’Reilly’s book “Killing Jesus”? Well, it’s probably because you are an anti-Christian bigot, at least according to Bill O’Reilly.

“Any embrace of Christian tradition is a danger to the agenda of the left,” the Fox News host said. “It was easy to see that in the articles about ‘Killing Jesus.’” He said that while he “respects honest analysis” of the movie, any film critic who didn’t see the brilliance of his creation is probably biased or downright “idiotic.”

“It is open season on Christians in America,” O’Reilly lamented, suggesting that media critics simply didn’t want to see a movie about Jesus. “Judeo-Christian tradition is under assault,” he declared.



FILED UNDER

- See more at: http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/paranoia-rama-muslims-take-over-idaho-gays-overthrow-america#sthash.Zpvwneao.dpuf

Reply
Apr 4, 2015 02:52:07   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Richard94611 wrote:
Well, I am sure not fooled by you. You don't even know who the "publish or perish" rule does and does not apply to at universities. I guess you cannot tell the difference between an enrolled student and a member of the faculty.
Man, are you confused. Why don't you explain why Harvard professors held a conference in 2008 to discuss and vote on procedures for how their "publish or perish" rules should be applied online.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 27 of 68 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.