One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Loretta Lynch: Just Another Obama Hand-picked Radical? What Are They Hiding?
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Feb 1, 2015 02:30:37   #
Danielle Loc: Las Cruces, NM
 
Disgraced anti-gun Attorney General Eric Holder is calling it quits, but Obama's pick to replace him is Loretta Lynch, coming straight from the gun control bastion of New York City.

Okay, here we go again. While Second Amendment supporters have been urging their Senators to ask Ms. Lynch some tough questions concerning her positions on our right to keep-and-bear arms, and to oppose her if she shows any sign of sharing Holder's anti-gun views or continuing his anti-gun policies, this topic, apparently, was not the main focus of Lynch's confirmation process.

Loretta Lynch, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, is nothing but another Obama hand-picked radical. On the hot seat last week, as part of her confirmation process for U.S. attorney general, replacing outgoing AG Eric Holder, Lynch conveniently dodged questions from lawmakers about the DOJ's role in the IRS targeting scandal, arguing that since she hadn't been briefed, she couldn't comment.

According to an e-mail from the Senate Conservatives Fund: "When asked by U.S. Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) if she thought the president's executive amnesty was 'legal and constitutional,' Lynch said that she did. Lynch also told Sessions that she believes illegal aliens have a 'right' to work in the United States, just as much as any American citizen."

Can you believe that? Lynch believes that Obama's executive amnesty is "legal and constitutional?" Illegals have a right to work, just as much as any American citizen?

"Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) asked Lynch to identify the limits of executive power regarding unilateral amnesty, the investigation of illegal targeting of conservative groups by the IRS, and the use of drones on American citizens. Each time, Lynch refused to identity any limits on the president's power.

"After the confirmation hearing, Cruz said that it is 'profoundly dangerous to have an attorney general, who by her own testimony is prepared to rubber stamp unconstitutional conduct by the president."

According to an article in Townhall, "After hours of testimony this week from witnesses and questions from lawmakers sitting on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Attorney General Nominee Loretta Lynch has passed her first test on the way to becoming America's top law enforcement officer (despite justifying President Obama's executive action on illegal immigration and saying everyone in America has a right to work, regardless of how they got here)."

There's more, however, to the Lynch story than meets the everyday eye. The Dems are definitely determined to put Lynch into Holder's former position, so they must have ulterior motives.

Durning the second confirmation hearing, not only were witnesses who dared to point out current problems inside the Department of Justice scolded by Democrat Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, they were also derided for criticizing Holder. Whitehouse said it was unjust the sitting attorney general wasn't in the room to defend himself against the charges. According to the Townhall article, Whitehouse "even went so far as to say witness criticisms of DOJ policies and personnel simply represented 'Fox News soundbites' and 'conspiracy theories.'"

Typical Liberal finger-pointing, side-stepping, and fencing tactics. But, what exactly are they hiding? Why is Obama and his radical progressive Dem-rat following so determined to put Lynch into Holder's former place as Attorney General?

I highly suggest that you check out the link below for a cold, hard look at what we'll be up against if this woman becomes our next Attorney General. Now that Lynch's nomination hearings are over, lawmakers will submit additional questions in writing and are expected to vote on her confirmation next month.

Once you read it, the big picture will hit you. But, don't be surprised.

http://godfatherpolitics.com/20103/loretta-lynchs-radical-past/#4WpDwb7lzY8julMF.03

Reply
Feb 1, 2015 02:37:22   #
Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas
 
Does anyone else see the irony of a colored person with the last name LYNCH ?

Could she be a descendant of the fellow who is the subject of the link below ?

http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/Perspectives_1/Willie_Lynch_letter_The_Making_of_a_Slave.shtml

Danielle wrote:
Disgraced anti-gun Attorney General Eric Holder is calling it quits, but Obama's pick to replace him is Loretta Lynch, coming straight from the gun control bastion of New York City.

Reply
Feb 1, 2015 03:30:35   #
Grugore
 
Danielle wrote:
Disgraced anti-gun Attorney General Eric Holder is calling it quits, but Obama's pick to replace him is Loretta Lynch, coming straight from the gun control bastion of New York City.

Okay, here we go again. While Second Amendment supporters have been urging their Senators to ask Ms. Lynch some tough questions concerning her positions on our right to keep-and-bear arms, and to oppose her if she shows any sign of sharing Holder's anti-gun views or continuing his anti-gun policies, this topic, apparently, was not the main focus of Lynch's confirmation process.

Loretta Lynch, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, is nothing but another Obama hand-picked radical. On the hot seat last week, as part of her confirmation process for U.S. attorney general, replacing outgoing AG Eric Holder, Lynch conveniently dodged questions from lawmakers about the DOJ's role in the IRS targeting scandal, arguing that since she hadn't been briefed, she couldn't comment.

According to an e-mail from the Senate Conservatives Fund: "When asked by U.S. Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) if she thought the president's executive amnesty was 'legal and constitutional,' Lynch said that she did. Lynch also told Sessions that she believes illegal aliens have a 'right' to work in the United States, just as much as any American citizen."

Can you believe that? Lynch believes that Obama's executive amnesty is "legal and constitutional?" Illegals have a right to work, just as much as any American citizen?

"Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) asked Lynch to identify the limits of executive power regarding unilateral amnesty, the investigation of illegal targeting of conservative groups by the IRS, and the use of drones on American citizens. Each time, Lynch refused to identity any limits on the president's power.

"After the confirmation hearing, Cruz said that it is 'profoundly dangerous to have an attorney general, who by her own testimony is prepared to rubber stamp unconstitutional conduct by the president."

According to an article in Townhall, "After hours of testimony this week from witnesses and questions from lawmakers sitting on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Attorney General Nominee Loretta Lynch has passed her first test on the way to becoming America's top law enforcement officer (despite justifying President Obama's executive action on illegal immigration and saying everyone in America has a right to work, regardless of how they got here)."

There's more, however, to the Lynch story than meets the everyday eye. The Dems are definitely determined to put Lynch into Holder's former position, so they must have ulterior motives.

Durning the second confirmation hearing, not only were witnesses who dared to point out current problems inside the Department of Justice scolded by Democrat Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, they were also derided for criticizing Holder. Whitehouse said it was unjust the sitting attorney general wasn't in the room to defend himself against the charges. According to the Townhall article, Whitehouse "even went so far as to say witness criticisms of DOJ policies and personnel simply represented 'Fox News soundbites' and 'conspiracy theories.'"

Typical Liberal finger-pointing, side-stepping, and fencing tactics. But, what exactly are they hiding? Why is Obama and his radical progressive Dem-rat following so determined to put Lynch into Holder's former place as Attorney General?

I highly suggest that you check out the link below for a cold, hard look at what we'll be up against if this woman becomes our next Attorney General. Now that Lynch's nomination hearings are over, lawmakers will submit additional questions in writing and are expected to vote on her confirmation next month.

Once you read it, the big picture will hit you. But, don't be surprised.

http://godfatherpolitics.com/20103/loretta-lynchs-radical-past/#4WpDwb7lzY8julMF.03
Disgraced anti-gun Attorney General Eric Holder is... (show quote)


The fix is in, people. We're screwed. BOHICA!

Reply
Feb 1, 2015 05:48:29   #
larrypuckett1939
 
DANIELLE,
THE GOP IS PUSSY FOOTING AROUND WITH (IT), THAT THING IN OUR WHITE HOUSE! THEY WON'T ASK ANY TOUGH QUESTIONS,
AND SHE WILL BE CONFIRMED! TAKE IT FROM THIS 43 YEAR TEACHER
OF HISTORY AND GOVERNMENT.
true patriot




Danielle wrote:
Disgraced anti-gun Attorney General Eric Holder is calling it quits, but Obama's pick to replace him is Loretta Lynch, coming straight from the gun control bastion of New York City.

Okay, here we go again. While Second Amendment supporters have been urging their Senators to ask Ms. Lynch some tough questions concerning her positions on our right to keep-and-bear arms, and to oppose her if she shows any sign of sharing Holder's anti-gun views or continuing his anti-gun policies, this topic, apparently, was not the main focus of Lynch's confirmation process.

Loretta Lynch, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, is nothing but another Obama hand-picked radical. On the hot seat last week, as part of her confirmation process for U.S. attorney general, replacing outgoing AG Eric Holder, Lynch conveniently dodged questions from lawmakers about the DOJ's role in the IRS targeting scandal, arguing that since she hadn't been briefed, she couldn't comment.

According to an e-mail from the Senate Conservatives Fund: "When asked by U.S. Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) if she thought the president's executive amnesty was 'legal and constitutional,' Lynch said that she did. Lynch also told Sessions that she believes illegal aliens have a 'right' to work in the United States, just as much as any American citizen."

Can you believe that? Lynch believes that Obama's executive amnesty is "legal and constitutional?" Illegals have a right to work, just as much as any American citizen?

"Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) asked Lynch to identify the limits of executive power regarding unilateral amnesty, the investigation of illegal targeting of conservative groups by the IRS, and the use of drones on American citizens. Each time, Lynch refused to identity any limits on the president's power.

"After the confirmation hearing, Cruz said that it is 'profoundly dangerous to have an attorney general, who by her own testimony is prepared to rubber stamp unconstitutional conduct by the president."

According to an article in Townhall, "After hours of testimony this week from witnesses and questions from lawmakers sitting on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Attorney General Nominee Loretta Lynch has passed her first test on the way to becoming America's top law enforcement officer (despite justifying President Obama's executive action on illegal immigration and saying everyone in America has a right to work, regardless of how they got here)."

There's more, however, to the Lynch story than meets the everyday eye. The Dems are definitely determined to put Lynch into Holder's former position, so they must have ulterior motives.

Durning the second confirmation hearing, not only were witnesses who dared to point out current problems inside the Department of Justice scolded by Democrat Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, they were also derided for criticizing Holder. Whitehouse said it was unjust the sitting attorney general wasn't in the room to defend himself against the charges. According to the Townhall article, Whitehouse "even went so far as to say witness criticisms of DOJ policies and personnel simply represented 'Fox News soundbites' and 'conspiracy theories.'"

Typical Liberal finger-pointing, side-stepping, and fencing tactics. But, what exactly are they hiding? Why is Obama and his radical progressive Dem-rat following so determined to put Lynch into Holder's former place as Attorney General?

I highly suggest that you check out the link below for a cold, hard look at what we'll be up against if this woman becomes our next Attorney General. Now that Lynch's nomination hearings are over, lawmakers will submit additional questions in writing and are expected to vote on her confirmation next month.

Once you read it, the big picture will hit you. But, don't be surprised.

http://godfatherpolitics.com/20103/loretta-lynchs-radical-past/#4WpDwb7lzY8julMF.03
Disgraced anti-gun Attorney General Eric Holder is... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 1, 2015 06:43:39   #
Forkbassman Loc: Missouri
 
larrypuckett1939 wrote:
DANIELLE,
THE GOP IS PUSSY FOOTING AROUND WITH (IT), THAT THING IN OUR WHITE HOUSE! THEY WON'T ASK ANY TOUGH QUESTIONS,
AND SHE WILL BE CONFIRMED! TAKE IT FROM THIS 43 YEAR TEACHER
OF HISTORY AND GOVERNMENT.
true patriot


In 6 years has our pres picked ANYONE except a radical like himself for a position in the govt?

Reply
Feb 1, 2015 08:46:16   #
Mom8052 Loc: Lost in the mountains of New Mexico
 
larrypuckett1939 wrote:
DANIELLE,
THE GOP IS PUSSY FOOTING AROUND WITH (IT), THAT THING IN OUR WHITE HOUSE! THEY WON'T ASK ANY TOUGH QUESTIONS,
AND SHE WILL BE CONFIRMED! TAKE IT FROM THIS 43 YEAR TEACHER
OF HISTORY AND GOVERNMENT.
true patriot


*****************************
You're right Larry, they will confirm her, her reign will be only for 2 years - What damage can she do? Just as much, if not more than Holder, being black and a woman. ta'bot she is probably a Muslim to.

Reply
Feb 1, 2015 09:04:53   #
Pulfnick Loc: Knoxville, TN
 
...Loretta Lynch: Just Another Obama Hand-picked Radical? What Are They Hiding?

Danielle wrote:
Disgraced anti-gun Attorney General Eric Holder is calling it quits, but Obama's pick to replace him is Loretta Lynch, coming straight from the gun control bastion of New York City.




They are neither hiding anything, nor attempting to. Lynch is Obama. Obama and his fellow fascists have dropped any pretense of governing in the interest of our country and are pushing pure fascism pedal to the metal.

Reply
Feb 1, 2015 09:59:54   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Thought you might find this interesting ~~~

http://hotair.com/archives/2015/01/29/loretta-lynch-meets-ted-cruz-a-grand-old-time-is-had-by-all/

all but the posted video and the links to the other two at the end.......

"We’ll start off the day with some video goodness for you. As previously noted, confirmation hearings for Loretta Lynch, President Obama’s nominee to replace Eric Holder, got underway this week. One of her inquisitors was Senator Ted Cruz (R – Tex) who had plenty of questions, many related to the performance of the current Attorney General and how her approach might differ, if at all. The conversation would, in my opinion, be described as polite and professional, while still being confrontational. This first section (which starts in the first couple of minutes in the video below) deals with the limits of discretion in prosecution.

Quote :
With regard to the limits of executive power, Sen. Cruz asked, “Let me ask about your understanding of prosecutorial discretion. Would it allow a subsequent president… to state that there are other laws that the administration will not enforce – labor laws, environmental laws – would it allow a president to say every existing federal labor law shall heretofore not apply to the state of Texas because I am using my prosecutorial discretion to refuse to enforce those laws? In your judgment, would that be constitutional?”
Nominee Lynch responded, “Again, I would have to know what legal basis was being proposed for that.”
Sen. Cruz continued, “I find it remarkable that you are unable to answer that question. I can answer it straightforward. It would be patently unconstitutional for any subsequent president to refuse to enforce the tax laws, or the labor laws, or the immigration laws for the very same reason that President Obama’s actions refusing to enforce immigration laws are unconstitutional. And it is discouraging that a nominee who hopes to serve as attorney general will not give a straightforward answer to that question.”

Here’s that first video:

[posted video]

There was additional goodness, involving everything from drone strikes to free speech and whether or not the office of the Attorney General should act as an independent agent in upholding the constitution or as a political arm of the White House. Follow the next two links for the videos of those. Not much more to say here, other than noting that these are the distilled good bits from a long day on CSPAN. (Please note that these videos are not in chronological order.) Enjoy."

it is disturbing she couldn't give an answer to the question in that quote above........if you haven't already...............contact your Senators and squash this nomination like a bug......this woman would pose a serious threat to us if she's confirmed.........plus, the R Senators owe us big time for confirming that Surgeon General moron........Hari Krishna, or something like that..........I've made it a point to forget the idiots name...............

http://hotair.com/archives/2015/01/29/loretta-lynch-meets-ted-cruz-a-grand-old-time-is-had-by-all/

Reply
Feb 1, 2015 10:24:04   #
larrypuckett1939
 
I DON'T DOUBT THAT!



Mom8052 wrote:
*****************************
You're right Larry, they will confirm her, her reign will be only for 2 years - What damage can she do? Just as much, if not more than Holder, being black and a woman. ta'bot she is probably a Muslim to.

Reply
Feb 1, 2015 22:56:07   #
Danielle Loc: Las Cruces, NM
 
larrypuckett1939 wrote:
DANIELLE,
THE GOP IS PUSSY FOOTING AROUND WITH (IT), THAT THING IN OUR WHITE HOUSE! THEY WON'T ASK ANY TOUGH QUESTIONS,
AND SHE WILL BE CONFIRMED! TAKE IT FROM THIS 43 YEAR TEACHER
OF HISTORY AND GOVERNMENT.
true patriot


I agree larrypuckett1939. I know Lynch is going to be confirmed, no matter how loud we yell. The GOP is not going to face this head on with the exception of some of our conservatives like Cruz. And, besides, many of the RINOs aren't what they appear to be. Thank you for your reply -- and thank you to all who have responded. I have much less time to spend on OPP now, due to my father's condition. He is just reaching the end of his life now, and while he is still coherent and active in some ways -- he can still use a walker when he needs to -- he sleeps most of the time and needs round-the-clock supervision which I cannot provide.

And, I'm fighting a battle to keep him in care. He has been moved into a very nice facility with good caretakers (thank God!), and I'm trying to keep him there. I go over almost every evening to spend time with him. He'll be 94 in April, and who knows how much longer he will be with me? Only the Lord. He is in the Lord's hands now.

By the way, I did post the topic, Part II of "Can You Trust the White House to Protect Americans Against Radical Islam? Obama and the Muslim Brotherhood" last weekend. Lots of good info and resources in there edited and compiled from innumerable sources. I think you might be interested in reading this, as might others. Interested in your comments. I believe it got buried and is probably on page 5, 6, 7 or ? now, as it was posted in the middle of the night. I just wanted to get this information out. Part I was posted about a month ago.

You take care, and it was good to meet up with you again. God bless you and all of the patriots. When we look at all the heartbreaking stuff going on in our country, in Israel, and around the world, it helps to keep in mind that God's plan for His people is unfolding at a very rapid rate now. All of the Biblical prophecies are right on target. May all of us continue to stand firm in our love for our country and our God.

Reply
Feb 1, 2015 22:58:05   #
Nickolai
 
Grugore wrote:
The fix is in, people. We're screwed. BOHICA!









Hahahahaha, be afraid ! be very afraid !! tha boggy man gon getcha

Reply
Feb 1, 2015 23:02:02   #
larrypuckett1939
 
DANIELLE,
IT WAS GOOD TO MEET UP WITH YOU ALSO. I KEEP MY WEAPONS HANDY, AND AM READY TO MOVE AT A MINUTE'S NOTICE! SEEMS LIKE I HAVE HEARD THAT BEFORE! MAY YOU HAVE GOD ON YOUR SIDE, WITH YOUR DAD.
GOD BLESS, AN D KEEP SAFE
true patriot


Danielle wrote:
I agree larrypuckett1939. I know Lynch is going to be confirmed, no matter how loud we yell. The GOP is not going to face this head on with the exception of some of our conservatives like Cruz. And, besides, many of the RINOs aren't what they appear to be. Thank you for your reply -- and thank you to all who have responded. I have much less time to spend on OPP now, due to my father's condition. He is just reaching the end of his life now, and while he is still coherent and active in some ways -- he can still use a walker when he needs to -- he sleeps most of the time and needs round-the-clock supervision which I cannot provide.

And, I'm fighting a battle to keep him in care. He has been moved into a very nice facility with good caretakers (thank God!), and I'm trying to keep him there. I go over almost every evening to spend time with him. He'll be 94 in April, and who knows how much longer he will be with me? Only the Lord. He is in the Lord's hands now.

By the way, I did post the topic, Part II of "Can You Trust the White House to Protect Americans Against Radical Islam? Obama and the Muslim Brotherhood" last weekend. Lots of good info and resources in there edited and compiled from innumerable sources. I think you might be interested in reading this, as might others. Interested in your comments. I believe it got buried and is probably on page 5, 6, 7 or ? now, as it was posted in the middle of the night. I just wanted to get this information out. Part I was posted about a month ago.

You take care, and it was good to meet up with you again. God bless you and all of the patriots. When we look at all the heartbreaking stuff going on in our country, in Israel, and around the world, it helps to keep in mind that God's plan for His people is unfolding at a very rapid rate now. All of the Biblical prophecies are right on target. May all of us continue to stand firm in our love for our country and our God.
I agree larrypuckett1939. I know Lynch is going t... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 1, 2015 23:23:02   #
Danielle Loc: Las Cruces, NM
 
larrypuckett1939 wrote:
DANIELLE,
IT WAS GOOD TO MEET UP WITH YOU ALSO. I KEEP MY WEAPONS HANDY, AND AM READY TO MOVE AT A MINUTE'S NOTICE! SEEMS LIKE I HAVE HEARD THAT BEFORE! MAY YOU HAVE GOD ON YOUR SIDE, WITH YOUR DAD.
GOD BLESS, AN D KEEP SAFE
true patriot


Thanks, larry. May all of us have His peace, wisdom, and discernment. Thank God we have the Lord on our side! May all of us be ready to move at a moment's notice, too. He is our strength and our salvation! Selah

Reply
Feb 1, 2015 23:28:48   #
larrypuckett1939
 
AMEN!


Danielle wrote:
Thanks, larry. May all of us have His peace, wisdom, and discernment. Thank God we have the Lord on our side! May all of us be ready to move at a moment's notice, too. He is our strength and our salvation! Selah

Reply
Feb 1, 2015 23:31:31   #
Nickolai
 
Danielle wrote:
Disgraced anti-gun Attorney General Eric Holder is calling it quits, but Obama's pick to replace him is Loretta Lynch, coming straight from the gun control bastion of New York City.

Okay, here we go again. While Second Amendment supporters have been urging their Senators to ask Ms. Lynch some tough questions concerning her positions on our right to keep-and-bear arms, and to oppose her if she shows any sign of sharing Holder's anti-gun views or continuing his anti-gun policies, this topic, apparently, was not the main focus of Lynch's confirmation process.

Loretta Lynch, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, is nothing but another Obama hand-picked radical. On the hot seat last week, as part of her confirmation process for U.S. attorney general, replacing outgoing AG Eric Holder, Lynch conveniently dodged questions from lawmakers about the DOJ's role in the IRS targeting scandal, arguing that since she hadn't been briefed, she couldn't comment.

According to an e-mail from the Senate Conservatives Fund: "When asked by U.S. Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) if she thought the president's executive amnesty was 'legal and constitutional,' Lynch said that she did. Lynch also told Sessions that she believes illegal aliens have a 'right' to work in the United States, just as much as any American citizen."

Can you believe that? Lynch believes that Obama's executive amnesty is "legal and constitutional?" Illegals have a right to work, just as much as any American citizen?

"Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) asked Lynch to identify the limits of executive power regarding unilateral amnesty, the investigation of illegal targeting of conservative groups by the IRS, and the use of drones on American citizens. Each time, Lynch refused to identity any limits on the president's power.

"After the confirmation hearing, Cruz said that it is 'profoundly dangerous to have an attorney general, who by her own testimony is prepared to rubber stamp unconstitutional conduct by the president."

According to an article in Townhall, "After hours of testimony this week from witnesses and questions from lawmakers sitting on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Attorney General Nominee Loretta Lynch has passed her first test on the way to becoming America's top law enforcement officer (despite justifying President Obama's executive action on illegal immigration and saying everyone in America has a right to work, regardless of how they got here)."

There's more, however, to the Lynch story than meets the everyday eye. The Dems are definitely determined to put Lynch into Holder's former position, so they must have ulterior motives.

Durning the second confirmation hearing, not only were witnesses who dared to point out current problems inside the Department of Justice scolded by Democrat Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, they were also derided for criticizing Holder. Whitehouse said it was unjust the sitting attorney general wasn't in the room to defend himself against the charges. According to the Townhall article, Whitehouse "even went so far as to say witness criticisms of DOJ policies and personnel simply represented 'Fox News soundbites' and 'conspiracy theories.'"

Typical Liberal finger-pointing, side-stepping, and fencing tactics. But, what exactly are they hiding? Why is Obama and his radical progressive Dem-rat following so determined to put Lynch into Holder's former place as Attorney General?

I highly suggest that you check out the link below for a cold, hard look at what we'll be up against if this woman becomes our next Attorney General. Now that Lynch's nomination hearings are over, lawmakers will submit additional questions in writing and are expected to vote on her confirmation next month.

Once you read it, the big picture will hit you. But, don't be surprised.

http://godfatherpolitics.com/20103/loretta-lynchs-radical-past/#4WpDwb7lzY8julMF.03
Disgraced anti-gun Attorney General Eric Holder is... (show quote)






Lorreta Lynch is a brilliant scholar and fine woman, She even earned Bill O'Reilly's endorsement and will easily be seated or the tea baggers will continue to have to deal with Eric holder whom they hate. With a passion

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.