ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

Ted_68

With Jeff laundry Louisiana is starting to do good things for its self. First being that we have already declined the WHO . Now if we could ditch the napoleonic code of law and straighten out our insurance mess . We might just yet enter the 21st century

AuH20

Not to be argumentative, yet it should be noted, it is not a treaty. It was originally intended as such. They changed it when it became apparent it would not be approved by various governments. Please remember, in the United States and other nations, a treaty must be approved by the Senate.

I am going to venture out on a Dogwood Tree limb and hope my memory will serve me today. Governor DeSantis has already stated Florida would not allow WHO to dictate Florida’s handling of a health crisis. I believe one other state has said the same.

On another note, I believe a more accurate term would be plandemic. COVID was not an accident. It was a test of how far and how long the global elite could impose control. It proved frighteningly effective.

AuH20

For those of us who are TJ devotees, it is felt one of the most significant writings he proffered was nullification. After lo these many decades, states/Commonwealths are implementing the practice.

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

You state, "it should be noted, it is not a treaty. It was originally intended as such. They changed it when it became apparent it would not be approved by various governments. Please remember, in the United States and other nations, a treaty must be approved by the Senate."

My understanding is the following:
1) The World Health Organization members adopted a set of principles termed the International Health Regulations (IHR) in 1969 [1] to guide the conduct of nations during health emergencies affecting more than one country, especially malaria and smallpox.  The IHR was amended in 2005

2) The International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR) provide an overarching legal framework that defines countries’ rights and obligations in handling public health events and emergencies that have the potential to cross borders.

While the current IHRs have been considered recommendations and not orders, the members of the World Health Assembly (the WHO member states) decided to amend the existing IHR in May 2022.

3) A total of 307 amendments were proposed during 2022 by 94 member nations. The proposed amendments were first made publicly available in mid-December, 2022 [4] and were republished on February 6, 2023. (NOTE: I am not aware of a final set of amendments that have been released to the public).

4. The proposed Amendments would allow the WHO Director-General to assume the authority to direct healthcare around the world whenever he declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern.  He has already declared 3 (for Ebola, COVID-19 and monkeypox) during his six years in office.
Among the new provisions in the proposed IHR amendments are the following:
* Vaccine passports
* The guarantee of human rights has been struck out, removing the words “with full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons,” which are present in the current version of the IHRs
* The potential to enforce certain medical treatments and ban others
* A requirement for biological surveillance (such as PCR tests) to be performed on humans and animals in search of pandemic pathogens
* The requirement to monitor social media and allow only the WHO’s narrative on public health to be transmitted
* The ability to commandeer medical supplies within one country for use by another
* The requirement to share genetic sequences of pathogens, even though this could result in proliferation of biological weapons, which is banned by existing treaties such as Resolution 1540 (2004) of the UN Security Council and the Biological Weapons Convention (1972)

5. Furthermore, the current draft IHRs include no specific criteria for the Director-General of WHO to declare a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC).  A declaration could even be made without the consent of the involved nations.  And there are no provisions that make WHO officials accountable for their actions. Equally concerning, a PHEIC declaration can be issued for merely the potential for a public health emergency, and the emergency powers can be extended beyond the end of the emergency.

The proposed IHR amendments raise the possibility of a global health dictatorship, called at the whim of the WHO leadership or the whim of the WHO’s major funders. 

MY COMMENT: While I am not a lawyer, it is pretty clear to me that the intention here is to grant the Director General of the WHO dictatorial powers over health care decisions by amending a PREVIOUSLY APPROVED IHR Agreement reached by 194 member states in 2005. Therefore, to eliminate any confusion or interpretation by say President Biden or some other flunky whether the US is bound by this agreement, the "No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty Without Senate Approval Act" MUST be approved.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2024-05-08/rfk-warns-who-verge-passing-its-pandemic-treaty

https://doortofreedom.org/what-are-the-international-health-regulations/

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

Peaver Bogart Loc: Montana

I received an email the other day from JBS with a prewritten email to send to your Representatives and Senators to eliminate WHO. If anyone want to see it and send it, just google or (Duck Duck Go) John Birch Society and you should be able to find it.

bggamers Loc: georgia

Well get ready read this morning that they get that this new wave of avian flu will jumped to human and they are working to get a more current VACCINE so everyone can get their jab. Apparently there's already been a man DX with here in Texas. Don't know about any of you but I'm not going down this road again🤔☺☺