Check out topic: US Spy Balloon Crashes In Northeast Syria
Something I discovered that I bet you didn't know.
Apr 24, 2024 14:15:21 #
LogicallyRight
Loc: Chicago
Kevyn wrote:
Still grasping at straws. Face the fact that the Cheeto Faced Shitgibbon is going down and all of the whining in the world won’t stop it.
So says mama Cheeto Faced Shitgibbon. And she is never wrong. And still a troll
Troll alert
Apr 24, 2024 14:18:47 #
pegw wrote:
If the statute of limitations was applicable to this case, it never would have gone to trial. Different crimes have different statutes of limitations, and fraud doesn't have one at all.
This isn't about fraud stupid!
Apr 24, 2024 14:40:40 #
Kevyn wrote:
Still grasping at straws. Face the fact that the Cheeto Faced Shitgibbon is going down and all of the whining in the world won’t stop it.
Always supporting lawlessness by the left!
Apr 24, 2024 14:44:41 #
pegw wrote:
If the statute of limitations was applicable to this case, it never would have gone to trial. Different crimes have different statutes of limitations, and fraud doesn't have one at all.
Where will I stand when Trump comes back and ur fake president is prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law for all the treasonous acts he’s committed ?
Apr 24, 2024 15:38:56 #
padremike
Loc: Phenix City, Al
pegw wrote:
If the statute of limitations was applicable to this case, it never would have gone to trial. Different crimes have different statutes of limitations, and fraud doesn't have one at all.
"The U.S. Supreme Court opined in Stogner v. California in 2003 that a change of a statute of limitations cannot be retroactively applied to crimes which were committed prior to the law's change. The Court held that retroactive application would violate the constitutional ban on ex post facto laws."
So, Peg, what justification was used? Here's NY law regarding SOL.
https://www.dupeelaw.com/criminal-defense-attorney/statute-of-limitations/
Apr 24, 2024 15:46:29 #
Apr 24, 2024 15:56:45 #
Apr 24, 2024 17:01:31 #
Kevyn wrote:
Still grasping at straws. Face the fact that the Cheeto Faced Shitgibbon is going down and all of the whining in the world won’t stop it.
Knowledge is power, so understand that this Stormy case is garbage and will be thrown out and Cheeto wins😄
Apr 24, 2024 18:55:03 #
XXX wrote:
He's not going down. What I posted is a fact and that means you care nothing for law!
Whatever it takes to throw Trump in jail. He has no moral compass
Apr 24, 2024 19:03:27 #
pegw wrote:
If the statute of limitations was applicable to this case, it never would have gone to trial. Different crimes have different statutes of limitations, and fraud doesn't have one at all.
If it where someone other than Trump and if it was not an election year you might have a point
Apr 24, 2024 19:04:19 #
Justice101 wrote:
They did file a motion to dismiss. You're too lazy to do some research before you mouth off to others.
It took less than 3 seconds to find the following link.
February 15, 2024
New York judge rejects Trump motion to dismiss criminal hush money case
https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-hearings-ny-georgia/h_fb7479852d5e1bdb31cfbc8d08ca7229
It took less than 3 seconds to find the following link.
February 15, 2024
New York judge rejects Trump motion to dismiss criminal hush money case
https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-hearings-ny-georgia/h_fb7479852d5e1bdb31cfbc8d08ca7229
That's no surprise. They have Stephanie Clifford's note that there was NO affair which should have closed any sane trial. Did get it get here? Not only did the judge tapdance around the "timeline clause." He also discounted this, time will tell and we'll see what happens.
Check out topic: MAGA voters thrilled
Apr 24, 2024 20:09:43 #
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
If I was Trump I would be insulted. I mean, E. G. Carroll accused six other men of rape before she got around to Trump.
Yep, I think it was probably her primary source of income.
Apr 24, 2024 20:11:02 #
MidnightRider wrote:
That's no surprise. They have Stephanie Clifford's note that there was NO affair which should have closed any sane trial. Did get it get here? Not only did the judge tapdance around the "timeline clause." He also discounted this, time will tell and we'll see what happens.
The NY judge is ethically compromised, and he should recuse himself- although I hope that the Trump lawyers are smart enough to make the prosecutor squirm and cause the jurors to see the mockery of this sham case.
Apr 24, 2024 20:13:02 #
Justice101 wrote:
Evidently, they didn't have as much money for the lying "gold digger" to extort as Trump has.
OR, since they weren't Trump who was about to bring the axe down on the establishment, they paid her off but it wasn't sensationalized.
Apr 25, 2024 00:38:34 #
Kevyn wrote:
Still grasping at straws. Face the fact that the Cheeto Faced Shitgibbon is going down and all of the whining in the world won’t stop it.
He's not and then what happens, you take a vein or just move on to more hatred and bile spewing.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out topic: The Origins of War