The Supreme Court Could End Most of the Fake Trump Prosecutions This Month
The political candidate who has been dubbed a “threat to our democracy” by the establishment somehow just made the biggest fundraising haul in American history over the weekend. He sure seems popular for a guy who is going to cancel all future elections and declare himself Hitler for Life if he wins.
The anti-Trump rhetoric and fake political prosecutions are at a fever pitch right now, and we haven’t even reached the 2024 riot season yet! The good news is that the US Supreme Court will begin swatting down the fake prosecutions in just a matter of days—and we can’t wait!
Next week, the court will hear oral arguments in the Fischer v. United States case. This is the case over whether federal prosecutors can use the Enron document-shredding statute (USC 1512c2) to prosecute the January 6 protesters. More than 300 January 6ers have already had their lives destroyed by the misapplication of this statute, and at least one has committed suicide.
The whole thing is absurd. The Enron statute was designed to penalize people on Wall Street when they shred documents or destroy evidence that is under a federal subpoena. No January 6er did anything even vaguely close to that. Yet US Attorneys have successfully prosecuted January 6ers by arguing that they “corruptly” interrupted an “official proceeding,” which are some words used in the statute. Two of the four counts against President Trump in Washington, DC, are based on the Enron document-shredding law.
If the Supreme Court rules against this obvious misuse of a federal law, hundreds of January 6ers will be exonerated and two of the four counts against Trump in DC will be nuked from orbit.
Darling Mary wrote:
If the Supreme Court rules against this obvious misuse of a federal law, hundreds of January 6ers will be exonerated and two of the four counts against Trump in DC will be nuked from orbit.
Don’t hold your breath, toots. 😁
Darling Mary wrote:
The Supreme Court Could End Most of the Fake Trump Prosecutions This Month
The political candidate who has been dubbed a “threat to our democracy” by the establishment somehow just made the biggest fundraising haul in American history over the weekend. He sure seems popular for a guy who is going to cancel all future elections and declare himself Hitler for Life if he wins.
The anti-Trump rhetoric and fake political prosecutions are at a fever pitch right now, and we haven’t even reached the 2024 riot season yet! The good news is that the US Supreme Court will begin swatting down the fake prosecutions in just a matter of days—and we can’t wait!
Next week, the court will hear oral arguments in the Fischer v. United States case. This is the case over whether federal prosecutors can use the Enron document-shredding statute (USC 1512c2) to prosecute the January 6 protesters. More than 300 January 6ers have already had their lives destroyed by the misapplication of this statute, and at least one has committed suicide.
The whole thing is absurd. The Enron statute was designed to penalize people on Wall Street when they shred documents or destroy evidence that is under a federal subpoena. No January 6er did anything even vaguely close to that. Yet US Attorneys have successfully prosecuted January 6ers by arguing that they “corruptly” interrupted an “official proceeding,” which are some words used in the statute. Two of the four counts against President Trump in Washington, DC, are based on the Enron document-shredding law.
If the Supreme Court rules against this obvious misuse of a federal law, hundreds of January 6ers will be exonerated and two of the four counts against Trump in DC will be nuked from orbit.
The Supreme Court Could End Most of the Fake Trump... (
show quote)
Darling, I was interested in what you had to say up to the time I read the first sentence. The idea that this indictment was false, and that the seditious invasion of the Capitol was just a protest would be laughable if it wasn't so serious. I'm no lawyer, so I won't criticize your assertions. I'm certain that the courts can make that decision.
kemmer wrote:
Don’t hold your breath, toots. 😁
Kemmer: You better hold your toots like your prose they probably stink!
Salty: Yes they will - just keep your two worthless cents out of it!!!
Darling Mary wrote:
The Supreme Court Could End Most of the Fake Trump Prosecutions This Month
The political candidate who has been dubbed a “threat to our democracy” by the establishment somehow just made the biggest fundraising haul in American history over the weekend. He sure seems popular for a guy who is going to cancel all future elections and declare himself Hitler for Life if he wins.
The anti-Trump rhetoric and fake political prosecutions are at a fever pitch right now, and we haven’t even reached the 2024 riot season yet! The good news is that the US Supreme Court will begin swatting down the fake prosecutions in just a matter of days—and we can’t wait!
Next week, the court will hear oral arguments in the Fischer v. United States case. This is the case over whether federal prosecutors can use the Enron document-shredding statute (USC 1512c2) to prosecute the January 6 protesters. More than 300 January 6ers have already had their lives destroyed by the misapplication of this statute, and at least one has committed suicide.
The whole thing is absurd. The Enron statute was designed to penalize people on Wall Street when they shred documents or destroy evidence that is under a federal subpoena. No January 6er did anything even vaguely close to that. Yet US Attorneys have successfully prosecuted January 6ers by arguing that they “corruptly” interrupted an “official proceeding,” which are some words used in the statute. Two of the four counts against President Trump in Washington, DC, are based on the Enron document-shredding law.
If the Supreme Court rules against this obvious misuse of a federal law, hundreds of January 6ers will be exonerated and two of the four counts against Trump in DC will be nuked from orbit.
The Supreme Court Could End Most of the Fake Trump... (
show quote)
The J6ers were charged for obstructing congress but the black NY congressman that pulled the fire alarm to purposely stop a vote gets nothing.
Any democrat reading this , please explain the difference to me.
Mogon wrote:
The J6ers were charged for obstructing congress but the black NY congressman that pulled the fire alarm to purposely stop a vote gets nothing.
Any democrat reading this , please explain the difference to me.
You can’t tell the difference between pulling a fire alarm, supposedly by accident, and beating cops and busting into the Capitol, yelling, “Hang Mike Pence!”?
What’re you smokin’?!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.