King James was gay...
Apr 10, 2024 16:48:45 #
Snip>>>Though we don't know the truth about his sexual preferences, we do know that James had three intense and exclusive romantic affairs with men. It's possible that they had a sexual side, just as it's possible that had he lived today, he wouldn't have defined himself as heterosexual.
What could be sweeter than the bible you cons cling to was a fag!
What could be sweeter than the bible you cons cling to was a fag!
Apr 10, 2024 16:53:52 #
PeterS wrote:
Snip>>>Though we don't know the truth about his sexual preferences, we do know that James had three intense and exclusive romantic affairs with men. It's possible that they had a sexual side, just as it's possible that had he lived today, he wouldn't have defined himself as heterosexual.
What could be sweeter than the bible you cons cling to was a fag!
What could be sweeter than the bible you cons cling to was a fag!
Typical liberal hate filled post. Accusations with no proof. The words of your post condemn you.
Apr 10, 2024 16:53:57 #
PeterS wrote:
Snip>>>Though we don't know the truth about his sexual preferences, we do know that James had three intense and exclusive romantic affairs with men. It's possible that they had a sexual side, just as it's possible that had he lived today, he wouldn't have defined himself as heterosexual.
What could be sweeter than the bible you cons cling to was a fag!
What could be sweeter than the bible you cons cling to was a fag!
Why is it that homosexuals have a need for everyone to be homosexual?
Apr 10, 2024 16:56:07 #
PeterS wrote:
Snip>>>Though we don't know the truth about his sexual preferences, we do know that James had three intense and exclusive romantic affairs with men. It's possible that they had a sexual side, just as it's possible that had he lived today, he wouldn't have defined himself as heterosexual.
What could be sweeter than the bible you cons cling to was a fag!
What could be sweeter than the bible you cons cling to was a fag!
🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪
Apr 10, 2024 17:03:49 #
PeterS wrote:
Snip>>>Though we don't know the truth about his sexual preferences, we do know that James had three intense and exclusive romantic affairs with men. It's possible that they had a sexual side, just as it's possible that had he lived today, he wouldn't have defined himself as heterosexual.
What could be sweeter than the bible you cons cling to was a fag!
What could be sweeter than the bible you cons cling to was a fag!
See how stupid you are. He did it do the translation. He only authorized it being done,
.
You are such a Zasranets.
Apr 10, 2024 17:04:29 #
Bruce123 wrote:
Why is it that homosexuals have a need for everyone to be homosexual?
Peter’s is probably upset he can’t find a homo lover.
Apr 10, 2024 17:43:47 #
LogicallyRight
Loc: Chicago
PeterS wrote:
Snip>>>Though we don't know the truth about his sexual preferences, we do know that James had three intense and exclusive romantic affairs with men. It's possible that they had a sexual side, just as it's possible that had he lived today, he wouldn't have defined himself as heterosexual.
What could be sweeter than the bible you cons cling to was a fag!
What could be sweeter than the bible you cons cling to was a fag!
Who cares nonsense by a troll looking to start some controversy.
Troll alert
Apr 10, 2024 18:44:00 #
PeterS wrote:
Snip>>>Though we don't know the truth about his sexual preferences, we do know that James had three intense and exclusive romantic affairs with men. It's possible that they had a sexual side, just as it's possible that had he lived today, he wouldn't have defined himself as heterosexual.
What could be sweeter than the bible you cons cling to was a fag!
What could be sweeter than the bible you cons cling to was a fag!
Having so much hate is no way to live pete.
There are other translations. King James had nothing to do with the translation which was largely based on William Tyndale’s work.
Apr 11, 2024 13:10:08 #
Bruce123 wrote:
Why is it that homosexuals have a need for everyone to be homosexual?
Because they’re not gay they are miserable and misery enjoys company
Apr 11, 2024 14:13:12 #
PeterS wrote:
Snip>>>Though we don't know the truth about his sexual preferences, we do know that James had three intense and exclusive romantic affairs with men. It's possible that they had a sexual side, just as it's possible that had he lived today, he wouldn't have defined himself as heterosexual.
What could be sweeter than the bible you cons cling to was a fag!
What could be sweeter than the bible you cons cling to was a fag!
Oh please show us your proof!! WHERE did this come from??
Apr 11, 2024 19:40:20 #
LostAggie66
Loc: Corpus Christi, TX (Shire of Seawinds)
martsiva wrote:
Oh please show us your proof!! WHERE did this come from??
Several English Monarchs may have been homosexual including Richard I(the LionHearted), Edward II, JamesI/VI and Philip of France(Richard's possible paramour). Homosexuality goes back to ancient cultures also including Greece and Rome.
Apr 12, 2024 10:21:15 #
LostAggie66 wrote:
Several English Monarchs may have been homosexual including Richard I(the LionHearted), Edward II, JamesI/VI and Philip of France(Richard's possible paramour). Homosexuality goes back to ancient cultures also including Greece and Rome.
'May have been' and 'possible' are guesses! I do agree with you on ancient cultures.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.