Good question, where are the feminists? Is it a "conservative concept" that only biological women should compete in women's sports that is holding them back? Does that offend their liberal sensitivities? Would that make them appear less "woke" and or egalitarian in the main stream media?
ACP45 wrote:
Good question, where are the feminists? Is it a "conservative concept" that only biological women should compete in women's sports that is holding them back? Does that offend their liberal sensitivities? Would that make them appear less "woke" and or egalitarian in the main stream media?
Is that a trick question??😁 Who should compete in women's sports?? Biological women, that's who!!! No brainer!!..😁
proud republican wrote:
Is that a trick question??😁 Who should compete in women's sports?? Biological women, that's who!!! No brainer!!..😁
Correct. But the question remains, "where are the feminists?". Why are they not leading the charge? They are out in force on the issue of abortion, but I don't see mass protests from these same feminists on issues like tranny men competing against women in sports, or men choosing to use a ladies restroom because said man identifies as a woman. Why the silence on these issues?
ACP45 wrote:
Correct. But the question remains, "where are the feminists?". Why are they not leading the charge? They are out in force on the issue of abortion, but I don't see mass protests from these same feminists on issues like tranny men competing against women in sports, or men choosing to use a ladies restroom because said man identifies as a woman. Why the silence on these issues?
They are obviously cowards who are afraid of being shamed, doxed and cancelled by the radical leftists in the US (if they are heterosexuals).
Haven't you seen the pink, green and purple-haired pro-abortion activists who would never have to worry about abortion rights and seem to be on the "same page" with the LGBTQ party of perversion?!
ACP45 wrote:
Good question, where are the feminists? Is it a "conservative concept" that only biological women should compete in women's sports that is holding them back? Does that offend their liberal sensitivities? Would that make them appear less "woke" and or egalitarian in the main stream media?
It’s called women’s sports for a reason.
ACP45 wrote:
Correct. But the question remains, "where are the feminists?". Why are they not leading the charge? They are out in force on the issue of abortion, but I don't see mass protests from these same feminists on issues like tranny men competing against women in sports, or men choosing to use a ladies restroom because said man identifies as a woman. Why the silence on these issues?
Because none of them has the work ethic to be in competitive sports.
Competing in a restricted class of sports. women's sports, is a privilege society grants to women. It is society's right to decide on the definition of a woman. There is no RIGHT to compete in women's sports, it is a PRIVILEGE. The trans community complains they have no place to compete. They do, MEN's sports. They do not want to because they will lose, just as most men who are no trans.
proud republican wrote:
Is that a trick question??😁 Who should compete in women's sports?? Biological women, that's who!!! No brainer!!..😁
Agreed. Men, trans women are like a defanged pitbull, "I used to be fierce, now ugh I'll chase you away later."
Bilogocal women? Simply…women. There are no non-biological women. Thats a ridiculous concept.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.