What to do about Cannon.. Hope I spelled her name right.. so another poll for all of us on OPP.. should the judge doing all the favors for trump be removed? If not, why not.. she has...

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

Hope I spelled her name right..

so another poll for all of us on OPP..

should the judge doing all the favors for trump be removed?

If not, why not.. she has manipulated the court proceeding for donnie and now is facing the appeal and hopefully consequences..

Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon

permafrost wrote:

Hope I spelled her name right..

so another poll for all of us on OPP..

should the judge doing all the favors for trump be removed?

If not, why not.. she has manipulated the court proceeding for donnie and now is facing the appeal and hopefully consequences..

It is a question of ethics . If she has violated ethics she will have to answer to her charges .

Liberty Tree

permafrost wrote:

Hope I spelled her name right..

so another poll for all of us on OPP..

should the judge doing all the favors for trump be removed?

If not, why not.. she has manipulated the court proceeding for donnie and now is facing the appeal and hopefully consequences..

Of all the biased ones who Trump has to deal with you whine about one who will not walk Jack Smith's crooked line.

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

permafrost wrote:

Hope I spelled her name right..

so another poll for all of us on OPP..

should the judge doing all the favors for trump be removed?

If not, why not.. she has manipulated the court proceeding for donnie and now is facing the appeal and hopefully consequences..

If not, why not.. she has manipulated the court proceeding for donnie and now is facing the appeal and hopefully consequences..

***so another poll for all of us on OPP..should the judge doing all the favors for trump be removed?
If not, why not.. she has manipulated the court proceeding for donnie and now is facing the appeal and hopefully consequences..

>>>So another poll for all of us on OPP. Should the judges doing all the favors for the prosecutors of Trump be removed? If not, why not? They have manipulated the court proceedings against Trump all along and losing many appeals. Should they face consequences?

Meanwhile, be fore warned that Permie is just spewing his hate again and is trolling Opp

Troll alert

Kevyn

permafrost wrote:

Hope I spelled her name right..

so another poll for all of us on OPP..

should the judge doing all the favors for trump be removed?

If not, why not.. she has manipulated the court proceeding for donnie and now is facing the appeal and hopefully consequences..

Her actions make a mockery of the legitimacy of her court, it is shameful. She was a controversial Trump appointee due to her lack of qualifications and should have immediately recusing herself.

Liberty Tree

Kevyn wrote:

Her actions make a mockery of the legitimacy of her court, it is shameful. She was a controversial Trump appointee due to her lack of qualifications and should have immediately recusing herself.

People like you are the real threat to America. A fair judge to you is like that one in NY.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

Kevyn wrote:

Her actions make a mockery of the legitimacy of her court, it is shameful. She was a controversial Trump appointee due to her lack of qualifications and should have immediately recusing herself.

Very well said and true as the blue.. Kevyn.....

Justice101

permafrost wrote:

Hope I spelled her name right..

so another poll for all of us on OPP..

should the judge doing all the favors for trump be removed?

If not, why not.. she has manipulated the court proceeding for donnie and now is facing the appeal and hopefully consequences..

I don't see her doing any "favors" for Trump.
She obviously offers a fairness balance in contrast to all of the lawfare and political bias going on from the leftist prosecutors and judges whose main purpose is to "Get Trump" and get him convicted of something before the November election. Clear cases of election interference.

Liberty Tree

Justice101 wrote:

I don't see her doing any "favors" for Trump.
She obviously offers a fairness balance in contrast to all of the lawfare and political bias going on from the leftist prosecutors and judges whose main purpose is to "Get Trump" and get him convicted of something before the November election. Clear cases of election interference.

They get a judge they do not own and they cannot stand it.

Justice101

Liberty Tree wrote:

They get a judge they do not own and they cannot stand it.

Yep!

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

Justice101 wrote:

I don't see her doing any "favors" for Trump.
She obviously offers a fairness balance in contrast to all of the lawfare and political bias going on from the leftist prosecutors and judges whose main purpose is to "Get Trump" and get him convicted of something before the November election. Clear cases of election interference.

US District Judge Aileen Cannon, who was appointed to the federal bench by Trump in 2020, has drawn out the case with an unusual, eyebrow-raising approach in her nearly 10-month oversight of the case, delaying rulings on what experts say are routine legal questions that must be resolved before the case can go to trial.

The longer it takes for Cannon to decide these issues, the more likely a trial would need to wait until after the November presidential election

Liberty Tree

permafrost wrote:

US District Judge Aileen Cannon, who was appointed to the federal bench by Trump in 2020, has drawn out the case with an unusual, eyebrow-raising approach in her nearly 10-month oversight of the case, delaying rulings on what experts say are routine legal questions that must be resolved before the case can go to trial.

The longer it takes for Cannon to decide these issues, the more likely a trial would need to wait until after the November presidential election

A fair trial is you greatest fear

Justice101

permafrost wrote:

US District Judge Aileen Cannon, who was appointed to the federal bench by Trump in 2020, has drawn out the case with an unusual, eyebrow-raising approach in her nearly 10-month oversight of the case, delaying rulings on what experts say are routine legal questions that must be resolved before the case can go to trial.

The longer it takes for Cannon to decide these issues, the more likely a trial would need to wait until after the November presidential election

The Sixth Amendment is very specific: "[T]he accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy[...] trial." There is no such constitutional right given to the prosecution, and such a right would not serve the public interest. Defendants very often waive their right to a speedy trial in order to have more time to prepare a defense.

When the right to a speedy trial is waived, it falls to the court (that is, the judge) to schedule the proceedings at its discretion. It may choose to take into account the wishes of the prosecution or the defense or both but is not required to do so. It may also have to do with any appeals awaiting decisions from the SCOTUS.

guzzimaestro

Liberty Tree wrote:

People like you are the real threat to America. A fair judge to you is like that one in NY.

guzzimaestro

permafrost wrote:

Very well said and true as the blue.. Kevyn.....