One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Barry Goldwater Quotes
Mar 25, 2024 07:38:55   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
https://www.azquotes.com/author/5665-Barry_Goldwater

Those who seek absolute power, even though they seek it to do what they regard as good, are simply demanding the right to enforce their own version of heaven on earth. And let me remind you, they are the very ones who always create the most hellish tyrannies. Absolute power does corrupt, and those who seek it must be suspect and must be opposed.

A woman has a right to an abortion. That's a decision that's up to the pregnant woman, not up to the pope or some do-gooders or the religious right.

I am a conservative republican, but I believe in democracy and the separation of church and state. The conservative movement is founded on the simple tenet that people have the right to live life as they please as long as they don't hurt anyone else in the process.

Small men, seeking great wealth or power, have too often and too long turned even the highest levels of public service into mere personal opportunity.

The conservative movement, to which I subscribe, has as one of its basic tenets the belief that government should stay out of people’s private lives. Government governs best when it governs least – and stays out of the impossible task of legislating morality. But legislating someone’s version of morality is exactly what we do by perpetuating discrimination against gays.

Religious factions will go on imposing their will on others unless the decent people connected to them recognize that religion has no place in public policy. They must learn to make their views known without trying to make their views the only alternatives.

The oldest philosophy in the world is conservatism, and I go clear back to the first Greeks. ... When you say 'radical right' today, I think of these moneymaking ventures by fellows like Pat Robertson and others who are trying to take the Republican Party away from the Republican Party and make a religious organization out of it. If that ever happens, kiss politics goodbye.

While I am a great believer in the free enterprise system and all that it entails, I am an even stronger believer in the right of our people to live in a clean and pollution-free environment.

Mark my word, if and when these preachers get control of the [Republican] party, and they're sure trying to do so, it's going to be a terrible damn problem. Frankly, these people frighten me. Politics and governing demand compromise. But these Christians believe they are acting in the name of God, so they can't and won't compromise. I know, I've tried to deal with them.

I am frankly sick and tired of the political preachers telling me as a citizen that if I want to be a moral person, I must believe in A, B, C, and D. Just who do they think they are? And from where do they presume to claim the right to dictate their moral beliefs to me?

The Republicans have a positive talent for self-destruction.

The big thing is to make this country - quit discriminating against people just because they're gay. You don't have to agree with it, but they have a constitutional right to be gay. They're American citizens.

The fellow has absolutely no principles. "Money and gall" is all he has.

By maintaining the separation of church and state, the United States has avoided the intolerance which has so divided the rest of the world with religious wars.

I say further that for this great legislative body to ignore the Constitution and the fundamental concepts of our governmental system is to act in a manner which could ultimately destroy the freedom of all American citizens, including the freedoms of the very persons whose feelings and whose liberties are the major subject of this legislation.

Throughout history, government has proved to be the chief instrument for thwarting man's liberty.

And here we encounter the seeds of government disaster and collapse - the kind that wrecked ancient Rome and every other civilization that allowed a sociopolitical monster called the welfare state to exist.

Can any of us refute the wisdom of Madison and the other framers? Can anyone look at the carnage in Iran, the bloodshed in Northern Ireland or the bombs bursting in Lebanon and yet question the dangers of injecting religious issues into the affairs of state?

I have little interest in streamlining government or in making it more efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote welfare, for I propose to extend freedom. My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them. It is not to inaugurate new programs, but to cancel old ones that do violence to the Constitution, or that have failed in their purpose, or that impose on the people an unwarranted financial burden. I will not attempt to discover whether legislation is "needed" before I have first determined whether it is constitutionally permissible.

You don't have to be straight to be in the military; you just have to be able to shoot straight.

Today neither of our two parties maintains a meaningful commitment to the principle of states' rights. The 10th Amendment is not a 'general assumption' but a rule of law. States rights mean that states have a right to act or not to act, as they see fit, in areas reserved to them.

The Constitution is an instrument, above all, for limiting the functions of government.

Government can, instead of extending freedom, restrict freedom. And note ... that the 'can' quickly becomes 'will' the moment the holders of government power are left to their own devices. This is because of the corrupting influence of power, the natural tendency of men who possess some power to take unto themselves more power. The tendency leads eventually to the acquisition of all power - whether in the hands of one or many makes little difference to the freedom of those left on the outside.

Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice and moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.

Reply
Mar 25, 2024 10:46:41   #
Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon
 
slatten49 wrote:
https://www.azquotes.com/author/5665-Barry_Goldwater

Those who seek absolute power, even though they seek it to do what they regard as good, are simply demanding the right to enforce their own version of heaven on earth. And let me remind you, they are the very ones who always create the most hellish tyrannies. Absolute power does corrupt, and those who seek it must be suspect and must be opposed.

A woman has a right to an abortion. That's a decision that's up to the pregnant woman, not up to the pope or some do-gooders or the religious right.

I am a conservative republican, but I believe in democracy and the separation of church and state. The conservative movement is founded on the simple tenet that people have the right to live life as they please as long as they don't hurt anyone else in the process.

Small men, seeking great wealth or power, have too often and too long turned even the highest levels of public service into mere personal opportunity.

The conservative movement, to which I subscribe, has as one of its basic tenets the belief that government should stay out of people’s private lives. Government governs best when it governs least – and stays out of the impossible task of legislating morality. But legislating someone’s version of morality is exactly what we do by perpetuating discrimination against gays.

Religious factions will go on imposing their will on others unless the decent people connected to them recognize that religion has no place in public policy. They must learn to make their views known without trying to make their views the only alternatives.

The oldest philosophy in the world is conservatism, and I go clear back to the first Greeks. ... When you say 'radical right' today, I think of these moneymaking ventures by fellows like Pat Robertson and others who are trying to take the Republican Party away from the Republican Party and make a religious organization out of it. If that ever happens, kiss politics goodbye.

While I am a great believer in the free enterprise system and all that it entails, I am an even stronger believer in the right of our people to live in a clean and pollution-free environment.

Mark my word, if and when these preachers get control of the [Republican] party, and they're sure trying to do so, it's going to be a terrible damn problem. Frankly, these people frighten me. Politics and governing demand compromise. But these Christians believe they are acting in the name of God, so they can't and won't compromise. I know, I've tried to deal with them.

I am frankly sick and tired of the political preachers telling me as a citizen that if I want to be a moral person, I must believe in A, B, C, and D. Just who do they think they are? And from where do they presume to claim the right to dictate their moral beliefs to me?

The Republicans have a positive talent for self-destruction.

The big thing is to make this country - quit discriminating against people just because they're gay. You don't have to agree with it, but they have a constitutional right to be gay. They're American citizens.

The fellow has absolutely no principles. "Money and gall" is all he has.

By maintaining the separation of church and state, the United States has avoided the intolerance which has so divided the rest of the world with religious wars.

I say further that for this great legislative body to ignore the Constitution and the fundamental concepts of our governmental system is to act in a manner which could ultimately destroy the freedom of all American citizens, including the freedoms of the very persons whose feelings and whose liberties are the major subject of this legislation.

Throughout history, government has proved to be the chief instrument for thwarting man's liberty.

And here we encounter the seeds of government disaster and collapse - the kind that wrecked ancient Rome and every other civilization that allowed a sociopolitical monster called the welfare state to exist.

Can any of us refute the wisdom of Madison and the other framers? Can anyone look at the carnage in Iran, the bloodshed in Northern Ireland or the bombs bursting in Lebanon and yet question the dangers of injecting religious issues into the affairs of state?

I have little interest in streamlining government or in making it more efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote welfare, for I propose to extend freedom. My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them. It is not to inaugurate new programs, but to cancel old ones that do violence to the Constitution, or that have failed in their purpose, or that impose on the people an unwarranted financial burden. I will not attempt to discover whether legislation is "needed" before I have first determined whether it is constitutionally permissible.

You don't have to be straight to be in the military; you just have to be able to shoot straight.

Today neither of our two parties maintains a meaningful commitment to the principle of states' rights. The 10th Amendment is not a 'general assumption' but a rule of law. States rights mean that states have a right to act or not to act, as they see fit, in areas reserved to them.

The Constitution is an instrument, above all, for limiting the functions of government.

Government can, instead of extending freedom, restrict freedom. And note ... that the 'can' quickly becomes 'will' the moment the holders of government power are left to their own devices. This is because of the corrupting influence of power, the natural tendency of men who possess some power to take unto themselves more power. The tendency leads eventually to the acquisition of all power - whether in the hands of one or many makes little difference to the freedom of those left on the outside.

Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice and moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.
https://www.azquotes.com/author/5665-Barry_Goldwat... (show quote)


I remember his Billboards up all over the place when he ran against JFK--"In your heart you know he is right "

Reply
Mar 25, 2024 16:43:32   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
I remember his Billboards up all over the place when he ran against JFK--"In your heart you know he is right "

Yes, as I am remember them also. I also remember The Daisy ad. I believe it aired one time only, then canceled.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ynEiRvxazU

Reply
 
 
Mar 25, 2024 19:49:19   #
crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
 
slatten49 wrote:
Yes, as I am remember them also. I also remember The Daisy ad. I believe it aired one time only, then canceled.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ynEiRvxazU



It was against Lyndon B. Johson in 1964.

The Daisy Ad was cancelled after one showing when Barry Goldwater phoned Johnson at the White House and told him, in no uncertain terms, that that if he ran it again, he'd sue hm. Johnson withdrew it.

I agree with most of Goldwater's quotes but disagree with him on abortion. There is also a living fetus of human life involved.

I think it's perfectly within reason for religious leaders to try to influence elections. They also have the right to speak up and influence parties. If anyone wants to stop that, he should also try to stop Unitarian Universalists and a lot of other churches.

Goldwater & John F. Kennedy were friends from their days in the Senate and Kennedy called Goldwater a man of decency & character. He also despised Johnson as did Goldwater.

During the 1960 campaign, Goldwater was in charge of the Republican Party's efforts on behalf of Richard Nixon. Goldwater often called Kennedy to tell him how the GOP was doing in the various states. During his swing through Iowa he told Kennedy that he had Des Moines but the GOP had the state as a whole. They shared laughs about it.

Reply
Mar 26, 2024 07:10:00   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
crazylibertarian wrote:
It was against Lyndon B. Johson in 1964.

The Daisy Ad was cancelled after one showing when Barry Goldwater phoned Johnson at the White House and told him, in no uncertain terms, that that if he ran it again, he'd sue hm. Johnson withdrew it.

I agree with most of Goldwater's quotes but disagree with him on abortion. There is also a living fetus of human life involved.

I think it's perfectly within reason for religious leaders to try to influence elections. They also have the right to speak up and influence parties. If anyone wants to stop that, he should also try to stop Unitarian Universalists and a lot of other churches.

Goldwater & John F. Kennedy were friends from their days in the Senate and Kennedy called Goldwater a man of decency & character. He also despised Johnson as did Goldwater.

During the 1960 campaign, Goldwater was in charge of the Republican Party's efforts on behalf of Richard Nixon. Goldwater often called Kennedy to tell him how the GOP was doing in the various states. During his swing through Iowa he told Kennedy that he had Des Moines but the GOP had the state as a whole. They shared laughs about it.
It was against Lyndon B. Johson in 1964. br br Th... (show quote)


As is generally true from you, a fair and informative posting.

I agreed with JFK. Goldwater was a fair and decent man of character. However, for a number of reasons, his public image was far from that. I remember that, in a civics class poll, there was only one student who voted for Goldwater - me. It was a fairly common thought that LBJ would win the election, but I felt Goldwater deserved at least one Texan's vote. However, when the election came - being considerably short of twenty-one, I wasn't able to vote.

Years later, when Watergate arrived, Goldwater's turning against Nixon spelled the end to Nixon's efforts to retain his presidency.

Reply
Mar 27, 2024 00:18:50   #
BigJim
 
He ran against LBJ

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.