Strycker wrote:
Only by believing the constitution is a fluid, thus meaningless, document can SC can make Christian nationalism work within the confines of the Constitution. The constitution itself plus amendments is very clear on what the federal government can do and what individual rights cannot be abridged. All else belongs to the states or the people.
One problem with using a 230+ year old document on which to base our government is that it has not kept up with the huge growth in population over time.
It's possible amendments ARE needed - but the ones DJ wanted to change would have allowed for less fairly allocated representation, not more.