Jim0001 wrote:
Now intent has become the go to word for criminal prosecutions... Killary,the Butcher of Benghazi didn't intend to violate portions of 18 USC and now Biden didn't Intend to break the law under 18 USC. Wonder if that will work the next time I am driving over the speed limit? I didn't intend to speed or in other words, I didn't intend to get caught.
Yes, if you are referring to Killory and her personal server as well as deleted emails then that Federal crime is one of the few that has a no intent requirement. Just the action is judged. So a reasonable person in her position who also has experience as an Attorney and former 8 year First Lady would be expected to reasonably believe that she needed a "protected" server supplied ( which is outlined in the Federal protocols for Security) and physically protected by the Federal government. Instead, she had a private server in her shed (not clear of exact location) so there is no reasonable expectation by her that such a high value target item wouldn't be susceptable to hacking, be physically stolen or damaged. So when the FBI director, who worked for the Clintons and made big money, decided that the Federal Statute would be falsly interpreted as intent is required. Nonsense for the charging statute. Two tiered system. I believe she also used her personal phone and email to conduct top secret communications. And unfortunately in the real world, not the libtard dem world anyway, our world, that argument wouldn't work to get you out of a summons..unless you are Killory.