bigmtman wrote:
Awww! Don't be so hard on the Caddys. Over twenty years ago my Caddy got 25 mpg on a trip while my 4 cyl Ford Tempo got 26 mpg on the same trip. The Caddy was 8 cyl and out weighed the Tempo by half a ton. My current '05 Deville gets 20-22 mpg locally and 26 mpg on a trip.
BUT, in 1967 I had a 4 cyl Renault R-10 that got 35 mpg on a trip. No one believed me. It had a 4 speed, Michelins, and rack and pinion. Handled like a sports car.
You are right about your Caddy. I recall selling these cars from the 50's Caddy's from that era not only got great MPG. but were great runners and drivers. I recall a 57 I had and it got as you said 25MPG. Sometime after with all the add ons, not so good. To make matters worst during the Rodger Smith years GM took a dive for the worst. Recently I sold a few late 90's Caddy's Not so good. They were so many problems that we at the shop called them 'crapalacs' I just hope for the sake of GM and our country that the later generations of GM cars are a big improvement. most of the new ones have proven above average. As for myself I prefer Buick's ' the thinking mans Cadillac '