One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Enjoying that pulled pork butt?
Page 1 of 2 next>
Apr 10, 2023 15:22:32   #
youngwilliam Loc: Deep in the heart
 
From Dr. Mercola
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
For the last couple of years, I’ve recommended not eating pork due to its high linoleic acid (LA) content, but there’s an even bigger reason to avoid it now. Since 2018, pork producers have been using customizable mRNA-based “vaccines” on their herds
The very first RNA-based livestock vaccine, a swine influenza (H3N2) RNA shot licensed in 2012, was developed by Harrisvaccines. The company followed up with an avian influenza mRNA shot in 2015. Harrisvaccines was acquired by Merck Animal Health later that year
CureVac developed an mRNA-based rabies shot for pigs in 2016
The swine vaccine platform Sequivity, introduced in 2018, was developed by Merck in partnership with Moderna. Sequivity can produce endlessly customized “vaccines,” none of which undergo safety testing
Americans have been eating pork treated with gene therapy for nearly five years already, and even more of our meat supply is about to get the same treatment. mRNA-lipid nanoparticle shots for avian influenza are in the works, as are mRNA shots for cows. Lobbyists for the Cattlemen’s Association recently confirmed they intend to use mRNA “vaccines” in cattle, which might affect both dairy and beef
Missouri House bill 1169 would require labeling of products that can alter your genes. It would also require companies to share information about the potential transmissibility of gene-altering interventions, and asserts that fully informed consent must be given for all vaccines, gene therapies and medical interventions.

BUY LOCAL.

Reply
Apr 10, 2023 15:55:15   #
Sonny Magoo Loc: Where pot pie is boiled in a kettle
 
Can you say "prions"?....

Reply
Apr 10, 2023 15:57:55   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
This gene technology is evil. Sooner or later something will go wrong. Very wrong. It should be stopped across the board, starting with these very wrong and dangerous Covid shots and then quickly stop all food products from these altering shots. Science has made tremendous gains without altering genes. And that is where they should be doing their work. Not changing the very basic genetics of us and our food and our medicines.

Logically Right

Reply
Apr 10, 2023 16:25:29   #
youngwilliam Loc: Deep in the heart
 
Sonny Magoo wrote:
Can you say "prions"?....



Reply
Apr 10, 2023 17:02:00   #
Marty 2020 Loc: Banana Republic of Kalifornia
 
youngwilliam wrote:
From Dr. Mercola
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
For the last couple of years, I’ve recommended not eating pork due to its high linoleic acid (LA) content, but there’s an even bigger reason to avoid it now. Since 2018, pork producers have been using customizable mRNA-based “vaccines” on their herds
The very first RNA-based livestock vaccine, a swine influenza (H3N2) RNA shot licensed in 2012, was developed by Harrisvaccines. The company followed up with an avian influenza mRNA shot in 2015. Harrisvaccines was acquired by Merck Animal Health later that year
CureVac developed an mRNA-based rabies shot for pigs in 2016
The swine vaccine platform Sequivity, introduced in 2018, was developed by Merck in partnership with Moderna. Sequivity can produce endlessly customized “vaccines,” none of which undergo safety testing
Americans have been eating pork treated with gene therapy for nearly five years already, and even more of our meat supply is about to get the same treatment. mRNA-lipid nanoparticle shots for avian influenza are in the works, as are mRNA shots for cows. Lobbyists for the Cattlemen’s Association recently confirmed they intend to use mRNA “vaccines” in cattle, which might affect both dairy and beef
Missouri House bill 1169 would require labeling of products that can alter your genes. It would also require companies to share information about the potential transmissibility of gene-altering interventions, and asserts that fully informed consent must be given for all vaccines, gene therapies and medical interventions.

BUY LOCAL.
From Dr. Mercola br STORY AT-A-GLANCE br For the... (show quote)


I just read this too, and I forwarded it to the California farm bureau for confirmation.

Reply
Apr 10, 2023 18:13:18   #
Mikeyavelli
 
youngwilliam wrote:
From Dr. Mercola
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
For the last couple of years, I’ve recommended not eating pork due to its high linoleic acid (LA) content, but there’s an even bigger reason to avoid it now. Since 2018, pork producers have been using customizable mRNA-based “vaccines” on their herds
The very first RNA-based livestock vaccine, a swine influenza (H3N2) RNA shot licensed in 2012, was developed by Harrisvaccines. The company followed up with an avian influenza mRNA shot in 2015. Harrisvaccines was acquired by Merck Animal Health later that year
CureVac developed an mRNA-based rabies shot for pigs in 2016
The swine vaccine platform Sequivity, introduced in 2018, was developed by Merck in partnership with Moderna. Sequivity can produce endlessly customized “vaccines,” none of which undergo safety testing
Americans have been eating pork treated with gene therapy for nearly five years already, and even more of our meat supply is about to get the same treatment. mRNA-lipid nanoparticle shots for avian influenza are in the works, as are mRNA shots for cows. Lobbyists for the Cattlemen’s Association recently confirmed they intend to use mRNA “vaccines” in cattle, which might affect both dairy and beef
Missouri House bill 1169 would require labeling of products that can alter your genes. It would also require companies to share information about the potential transmissibility of gene-altering interventions, and asserts that fully informed consent must be given for all vaccines, gene therapies and medical interventions.

BUY LOCAL.
From Dr. Mercola br STORY AT-A-GLANCE br For the... (show quote)

The sky is falling again...this time for real.
Whadda buncha crap.
Your genes can't be altered by simply eating the meat of a vaccinated ruminate. Same as GMO corn, or other beneficially altered plants. It doesn't transfer through a digestive system.

Reply
Apr 10, 2023 19:09:27   #
Marty 2020 Loc: Banana Republic of Kalifornia
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
The sky is falling again...this time for real.
Whadda buncha crap.
Your genes can't be altered by simply eating the meat of a vaccinated ruminate. Same as GMO corn, or other beneficially altered plants. It doesn't transfer through a digestive system.


I disagree, no gmo is beneficial. I don’t want to eat it.

Reply
Apr 10, 2023 20:07:49   #
youngwilliam Loc: Deep in the heart
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
The sky is falling again...this time for real.
Whadda buncha crap.
Your genes can't be altered by simply eating the meat of a vaccinated ruminate. Same as GMO corn, or other beneficially altered plants. It doesn't transfer through a digestive system.


Eat up, all you want. I care about what I put in my body and prefer to eat things as God made them, not food that is adulterated by man.

Reply
Apr 10, 2023 20:38:15   #
Mikeyavelli
 
youngwilliam wrote:
Eat up, all you want.


I do. Genetic altering cannot occur within the digestive process.
I avoid anything organic or non GMO. Organic food is just a way to sell inferior products at a ridiculously high price.
Plus, I make money showing off my two new navels and a developing third eye.

Reply
Apr 10, 2023 20:44:41   #
youngwilliam Loc: Deep in the heart
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
I do. Genetic altering cannot occur within the digestive process.
I avoid anything organic or non GMO. Organic food is just a way to sell inferior products at a ridiculously high price.
Plus, I make money showing off my two new navels and a developing third eye.


Funny.

I don't want to take the chance. Good clean food is to easy to come by to eat experimental chemicals.

Did you get all your boosters?



MIT confirms that RNA vaccines can be absorbed through the stomach and intestines, so what about mRNA vaccines in meat animals?

There is much debate over whether or not the administration of messenger RNA (mRNA) Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” in meat animals will in any way affect the quality of the meat. The establishment is suggesting that fully vaccinated meat is just as safe as natural meat, but what does the science say?

On Jan. 31, 2022, MIT News published a piece revealing that RNA vaccines “deliver therapies” for gastrointestinal disease straight through the stomach and intestines. This would imply that the drugs distribute into the body, including in muscle tissue.

The article is very straightforward, and our readers are encouraged to read through it for themselves to see what MIT had to say versus what the government and media are now saying in defense of mRNA “vaccine” administration in meat animals.

Does mRNA persist like many believe, or does it degrade like the government claims?

The general public is now wide awake about the threat of mRNA, and many who deliberately avoided taking the mRNA jabs during the “pandemic” worry that the food they are eating might “vaccinate” them without their knowledge and consent.

One meat producer, Alderspring Ranch and “Organic Beef Matters,” responded to inquiries it has been receiving lately about the use of mRNA “vaccines” in meat cattle. Here is what Glenn Elzinga of Alderspring Ranch had to say:

“When researching this subject, I found it very clear that no company is yet offering mRNA animal vaccines on the open market. First of all, no one drug company has laid claim to be the first to produce it, or put methodologies in place that would allow for mass production. Second, I found many articles (some very recent) stating that the grant process is still ongoing. In other words, animal pharmaceutical production companies are just now getting money to explore the new technology for all classes of livestock.”

This is somewhat reassuring, but what about in the future when mRNA “vaccines” become commercially available for American livestock? Elzinga says it is still unknown if mRNA will transfer into the meat that people eat. The government says no, of course, but the government is known to lie.

More than likely, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Department of Agriculture (USDA) will require at least a 30-day delay period between the last use of the drug and the slaughter of the animal, the idea being that the mRNA will no longer be persistent after that time.

“Most mRNA research indicates that denaturing of the genetic material occurs within several days of vaccination,” Elzinga argues. “If it so happens that somehow mRNA material remains intact through ingestion, most scientists argue that mRNA is fairly fragile and would not survive the acidic environment of the stomach.”

To be clear, Elzinga is against the use of mRNA in animals. He says he has no interest in or plans to eat mRNA “vaccinated” animal products.

“Simply put, I will not eat them,” he writes.

Unfortunately for the average consumer, not every meat producer raises animals naturally and organically like Alderspring Ranch does. And since animal vaccines, as well as human vaccines, all seem to be moving in the direction or mRNA, chances are that in the future all commercial meat will be contaminated with it to some degree – which is why it is important to source clean, pasture-raised meat and animal products from places like Alderspring Ranch, or a ranch near you, as opposed to buying it conventionally from the grocery store.

Reply
Apr 10, 2023 21:49:47   #
Mikeyavelli
 
youngwilliam wrote:
Funny.

I don't want to take the chance. Good clean food is to easy to come by to eat experimental chemicals.

Did you get all your boosters?



MIT confirms that RNA vaccines can be absorbed through the stomach and intestines, so what about mRNA vaccines in meat animals?

There is much debate over whether or not the administration of messenger RNA (mRNA) Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” in meat animals will in any way affect the quality of the meat. The establishment is suggesting that fully vaccinated meat is just as safe as natural meat, but what does the science say?

On Jan. 31, 2022, MIT News published a piece revealing that RNA vaccines “deliver therapies” for gastrointestinal disease straight through the stomach and intestines. This would imply that the drugs distribute into the body, including in muscle tissue.

The article is very straightforward, and our readers are encouraged to read through it for themselves to see what MIT had to say versus what the government and media are now saying in defense of mRNA “vaccine” administration in meat animals.

Does mRNA persist like many believe, or does it degrade like the government claims?

The general public is now wide awake about the threat of mRNA, and many who deliberately avoided taking the mRNA jabs during the “pandemic” worry that the food they are eating might “vaccinate” them without their knowledge and consent.

One meat producer, Alderspring Ranch and “Organic Beef Matters,” responded to inquiries it has been receiving lately about the use of mRNA “vaccines” in meat cattle. Here is what Glenn Elzinga of Alderspring Ranch had to say:

“When researching this subject, I found it very clear that no company is yet offering mRNA animal vaccines on the open market. First of all, no one drug company has laid claim to be the first to produce it, or put methodologies in place that would allow for mass production. Second, I found many articles (some very recent) stating that the grant process is still ongoing. In other words, animal pharmaceutical production companies are just now getting money to explore the new technology for all classes of livestock.”

This is somewhat reassuring, but what about in the future when mRNA “vaccines” become commercially available for American livestock? Elzinga says it is still unknown if mRNA will transfer into the meat that people eat. The government says no, of course, but the government is known to lie.

More than likely, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Department of Agriculture (USDA) will require at least a 30-day delay period between the last use of the drug and the slaughter of the animal, the idea being that the mRNA will no longer be persistent after that time.

“Most mRNA research indicates that denaturing of the genetic material occurs within several days of vaccination,” Elzinga argues. “If it so happens that somehow mRNA material remains intact through ingestion, most scientists argue that mRNA is fairly fragile and would not survive the acidic environment of the stomach.”

To be clear, Elzinga is against the use of mRNA in animals. He says he has no interest in or plans to eat mRNA “vaccinated” animal products.

“Simply put, I will not eat them,” he writes.

Unfortunately for the average consumer, not every meat producer raises animals naturally and organically like Alderspring Ranch does. And since animal vaccines, as well as human vaccines, all seem to be moving in the direction or mRNA, chances are that in the future all commercial meat will be contaminated with it to some degree – which is why it is important to source clean, pasture-raised meat and animal products from places like Alderspring Ranch, or a ranch near you, as opposed to buying it conventionally from the grocery store.
Funny. br br I don't want to take the chance. Go... (show quote)


I always look for the two dollars off sticker over the original price on a package of meat.
It's the same as the one that isn't two dollars off.
And never, ever, do I buy organic or free range or meats with the obituary of the animal itself or the claim that they killed the animal with compassion. For that I pay double in an already inflated Biden economy?
The results of any study is determined before the study begins.
I'm a food expert. I've been eating 3 times a day for 79 years.
I know good food, and I know bullshit. Organic and the feel good local food movement is exactly that. Bullshit.

Reply
Apr 10, 2023 22:39:16   #
Marty 2020 Loc: Banana Republic of Kalifornia
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
I always look for the two dollars off sticker over the original price on a package of meat.
It's the same as the one that isn't two dollars off.
And never, ever, do I buy organic or free range or meats with the obituary of the animal itself or the claim that they killed the animal with compassion. For that I pay double in an already inflated Biden economy?
The results of any study is determined before the study begins.
I'm a food expert. I've been eating 3 times a day for 79 years.
I know good food, and I know bullshit. Organic and the feel good local food movement is exactly that. Bullshit.
I always look for the two dollars off sticker over... (show quote)


Then how do you explain the 12 year old girls with 20 year old boobs and early puberty? I believe it’s the growth hormones that are put in commodity cattle. And I grow cattle and quit that practice 35 years ago .

Reply
Apr 11, 2023 07:55:05   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Marty 2020 wrote:
Then how do you explain the 12 year old girls with 20 year old boobs and early puberty? I believe it’s the growth hormones that are put in commodity cattle. And I grow cattle and quit that practice 35 years ago .


I just enjoy it, it don't need expainin.
Meantime, Meijer put porterhouse steaks on sale for 8.99 a pound. Bought 2 big ones with the big filet end.
Label didn't say anything about vaccine or hormones.
8.99 in Biden"s economy is a fantastic price for choice grade porterhouse.

Reply
Apr 11, 2023 08:50:18   #
Marty 2020 Loc: Banana Republic of Kalifornia
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
I just enjoy it, it don't need expainin.
Meantime, Meijer put porterhouse steaks on sale for 8.99 a pound. Bought 2 big ones with the big filet end.
Label didn't say anything about vaccine or hormones.
8.99 in Biden"s economy is a fantastic price for choice grade porterhouse.


Yes that’s a deal!

Reply
Apr 11, 2023 09:02:09   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Marty 2020 wrote:
Yes that’s a deal!


🥩🥩

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out topic: C’mon, man
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.