One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Does the House Dare Impeach Obama
Page 1 of 20 next> last>>
Nov 19, 2014 23:58:42   #
Yankee Clipper
 
Does the House Dare Impeach a Defiant, Out-of-Control Black President?

If Obama is an usurper to the office, he cannot be impeached, he can however be arrested and then removed. Neither will happen because of the fear of nation wide race riots. The threat of riots and Joe Biden becoming the replacement is Obama's insurance policy.

Written on Monday, November 17, 2014 by David L. Goetsch

What happens when an elected American president lets the power of the office go to his head and begins to ignore the Constitution and rule in the manner of a dictator? The answer, of course, is that the U.S. House of Representatives is empowered by the Constitution to impeach such a president, and the U.S. Senate is empowered to convict him. On the impeachment side of the Constitutional equation, Presidents Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton were impeached by the House, though not convicted by the Senate. President Nixon resigned before the House could impeach him because he knew the Senate had the votes to convict him. Impeachment is a Constitutional tool that has been used by the House of Representatives to rein in out-of-control presidents.

Being that we have the Constitutional protection of impeachment and being that is has been used in the past, Americans don’t have to worry about a president abusing his powers and becoming a quasi-dictator, right? Maybe not. The House of Representatives has used impeachment or the threat of it to prevent presidents from abusing their power in the past, but all of the presidents in question have been white. What happens when the president abusing his power is black? In today’s politically-correct, racially-charged society does the House of Representatives dare impeach a black president? This is not just a hypothetical or academic question. Rather, it is one the newly elected House of Representatives may have to answer because a defiant President Obama has made it clear he does not intend to stop ignoring the Constitution or the will of the American people. He plans to continue ruling by dictatorial fiat in the form of executive orders, orders that exceed the scope of his presidential powers as granted in the Constitution.

Before proceeding with the question of impeachment, some background is in order. Even the most optimistic Republican insiders underestimated how well the GOP would do in the mid-term elections on November 4th. Not only did Republicans pick up the seats they thought were low-hanging fruit, they picked up some seats that pundits thought were leaning toward the Democrats. The mid-term elections were about one thing and one thing only: rejecting the failed policies of Barack Obama. What political pundits missed was the depth of dissatisfaction with the president, even among Democrats. It appears that the pundits were led down the garden path by Obama’s propaganda machine—the mainstream media—and as a result were out of touch with grass roots Americans.

Being that the mid-term massacre was a rejection of everything President Obama stands for, one would think the president would be chastened, maybe even humbled. But anyone who believed this president would be humbled was under-estimating his capacity for self-delusion, not to mention his out-sized ego. Obama knows that on November 4th America rejected him and his policies, but the president’s attitude toward the Democrat’s lop-sided defeat has been to dig in his heels and defiantly reject America’s rejection of him. In his White House news conference on November 5th, the president sounded more like a petulant child who had been scolded than the chief executive of a great nation.

Incredibly, President Obama refused to accept any responsibility for his party’s election debacle. Rather, he defiantly threatened to continue governing by executive order, and herein is the rub. The Republican victory on November 4th will either be a flash in the pan or it will translate into an even more important victory in 2016. Which of these two possibilities prevails depends on what the Republican majorities in both houses of Congress do right now. If they misinterpret what happened on November 4th as an opportunity to reason with President Obama or meet him in the middle, Republicans will squander their victory. Further, if they allow President Obama to continue defiantly ruling by executive fiat like some third-world dictator, Americans who voted Republican in droves on November 4th will lose faith in them and Hillary Clinton will be our next president. However, if Republicans show they have the guts to issue a unmistakable smack down to Barack Obama, up to and including impeachment, they might just win in November and save America in the process.

President Obama has steamrolled Republicans and run roughshod over the Constitution for six years now, and as the results of the mid-term elections showed, Americans are tired of his dictatorial propensities. Consequently, the American public is not looking to Republicans to hold the president’s hand and play nice in the sandbox. They are looking to Republicans to fix the mess he has made of our country, at home and abroad. This means Americans are expecting Republicans to not just stop but reverse the Obama tidal wave of government handouts, bailouts, entitlements, regulations, foreign policy blunders, lies, distortions, and abuses of power. They are expecting Republicans to clean out government agencies that have been using their power to bully American citizens, re-establish a foreign policy that gets out in front of the world situation rather than just reacting to it or even failing to react, and re-establish the material, manpower, and technological superiority of our military.

But more than anything, Americans expect Republicans to use their Constitutional powers to rein in this out-of-control president and force him to govern within the powers granted to him by the Founders in the Constitution. If this means the House of Representatives will be forced to impeach President Obama, then Republicans in the House must be willing to do so and the Senate must be willing to convict him. The current thinking of political pundits is that President Obama is immune to impeachment because he is America’s first black president. Their thinking goes like this: If Republicans impeach Obama—no matter how much he abuses his power—they will lose all hope of winning in 2016. The pundits were wrong in their prognostications concerning the mid-term elections, and they might just be wrong about impeachment. However, even if they are right, sometimes elected officials must do what is right rather than what is politically expedient.

Let us hope that President Obama will get over his childish snit about the mid-term elections, man up, and govern like an American president is supposed to: within the bounds of his Constitutional authority. However, if he continues to defiantly ignore the Constitution and sign more and more executive orders, he will force the hand of the new Congress. My question is this: Does the new Congress—Republicans and Democrats—have the courage to use its most potent weapon for reining in an out-of-control president? If not, they should not have run for office on November 4th and are not worthy of the offices they hold.




Read more at http://patriotupdate.com/articles/house-dare-impeach-defiant-control-black-president/

Reply
Nov 20, 2014 00:01:58   #
cant beleve Loc: Planet Kolob
 
Remember when he said he isn't Emperor? Another lie.

Reply
Nov 20, 2014 00:03:59   #
Yankee Clipper
 
cant beleve wrote:
Remember when he said he isn't Emperor? Another lie. Close to it anyway.

Reply
Nov 20, 2014 00:09:00   #
Sicilianthing
 
Yankee Clipper wrote:
Does the House Dare Impeach a Defiant, Out-of-Control Black President?

If Obama is an usurper to the office, he cannot be impeached, he can however be arrested and then removed. Neither will happen because of the fear of nation wide race riots. The threat of riots and Joe Biden becoming the replacement is Obama's insurance policy.

Written on Monday, November 17, 2014 by David L. Goetsch

What happens when an elected American president lets the power of the office go to his head and begins to ignore the Constitution and rule in the manner of a dictator? The answer, of course, is that the U.S. House of Representatives is empowered by the Constitution to impeach such a president, and the U.S. Senate is empowered to convict him. On the impeachment side of the Constitutional equation, Presidents Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton were impeached by the House, though not convicted by the Senate. President Nixon resigned before the House could impeach him because he knew the Senate had the votes to convict him. Impeachment is a Constitutional tool that has been used by the House of Representatives to rein in out-of-control presidents.

Being that we have the Constitutional protection of impeachment and being that is has been used in the past, Americans don’t have to worry about a president abusing his powers and becoming a quasi-dictator, right? Maybe not. The House of Representatives has used impeachment or the threat of it to prevent presidents from abusing their power in the past, but all of the presidents in question have been white. What happens when the president abusing his power is black? In today’s politically-correct, racially-charged society does the House of Representatives dare impeach a black president? This is not just a hypothetical or academic question. Rather, it is one the newly elected House of Representatives may have to answer because a defiant President Obama has made it clear he does not intend to stop ignoring the Constitution or the will of the American people. He plans to continue ruling by dictatorial fiat in the form of executive orders, orders that exceed the scope of his presidential powers as granted in the Constitution.

Before proceeding with the question of impeachment, some background is in order. Even the most optimistic Republican insiders underestimated how well the GOP would do in the mid-term elections on November 4th. Not only did Republicans pick up the seats they thought were low-hanging fruit, they picked up some seats that pundits thought were leaning toward the Democrats. The mid-term elections were about one thing and one thing only: rejecting the failed policies of Barack Obama. What political pundits missed was the depth of dissatisfaction with the president, even among Democrats. It appears that the pundits were led down the garden path by Obama’s propaganda machine—the mainstream media—and as a result were out of touch with grass roots Americans.

Being that the mid-term massacre was a rejection of everything President Obama stands for, one would think the president would be chastened, maybe even humbled. But anyone who believed this president would be humbled was under-estimating his capacity for self-delusion, not to mention his out-sized ego. Obama knows that on November 4th America rejected him and his policies, but the president’s attitude toward the Democrat’s lop-sided defeat has been to dig in his heels and defiantly reject America’s rejection of him. In his White House news conference on November 5th, the president sounded more like a petulant child who had been scolded than the chief executive of a great nation.

Incredibly, President Obama refused to accept any responsibility for his party’s election debacle. Rather, he defiantly threatened to continue governing by executive order, and herein is the rub. The Republican victory on November 4th will either be a flash in the pan or it will translate into an even more important victory in 2016. Which of these two possibilities prevails depends on what the Republican majorities in both houses of Congress do right now. If they misinterpret what happened on November 4th as an opportunity to reason with President Obama or meet him in the middle, Republicans will squander their victory. Further, if they allow President Obama to continue defiantly ruling by executive fiat like some third-world dictator, Americans who voted Republican in droves on November 4th will lose faith in them and Hillary Clinton will be our next president. However, if Republicans show they have the guts to issue a unmistakable smack down to Barack Obama, up to and including impeachment, they might just win in November and save America in the process.

President Obama has steamrolled Republicans and run roughshod over the Constitution for six years now, and as the results of the mid-term elections showed, Americans are tired of his dictatorial propensities. Consequently, the American public is not looking to Republicans to hold the president’s hand and play nice in the sandbox. They are looking to Republicans to fix the mess he has made of our country, at home and abroad. This means Americans are expecting Republicans to not just stop but reverse the Obama tidal wave of government handouts, bailouts, entitlements, regulations, foreign policy blunders, lies, distortions, and abuses of power. They are expecting Republicans to clean out government agencies that have been using their power to bully American citizens, re-establish a foreign policy that gets out in front of the world situation rather than just reacting to it or even failing to react, and re-establish the material, manpower, and technological superiority of our military.

But more than anything, Americans expect Republicans to use their Constitutional powers to rein in this out-of-control president and force him to govern within the powers granted to him by the Founders in the Constitution. If this means the House of Representatives will be forced to impeach President Obama, then Republicans in the House must be willing to do so and the Senate must be willing to convict him. The current thinking of political pundits is that President Obama is immune to impeachment because he is America’s first black president. Their thinking goes like this: If Republicans impeach Obama—no matter how much he abuses his power—they will lose all hope of winning in 2016. The pundits were wrong in their prognostications concerning the mid-term elections, and they might just be wrong about impeachment. However, even if they are right, sometimes elected officials must do what is right rather than what is politically expedient.

Let us hope that President Obama will get over his childish snit about the mid-term elections, man up, and govern like an American president is supposed to: within the bounds of his Constitutional authority. However, if he continues to defiantly ignore the Constitution and sign more and more executive orders, he will force the hand of the new Congress. My question is this: Does the new Congress—Republicans and Democrats—have the courage to use its most potent weapon for reining in an out-of-control president? If not, they should not have run for office on November 4th and are not worthy of the offices they hold.




Read more at http://patriotupdate.com/articles/house-dare-impeach-defiant-control-black-president/
Does the House Dare Impeach a Defiant, Out-of-Cont... (show quote)


_________________________________
They better do something fast... because all faith will be lost in Congress and the Constitutional Crisis will begin tomorrow !

You have all been fooled and you are witnessing Criminal Acts in the highest office.

Your peaceful voting process has failed again...

Good Luck.

From this point going forward the groups begin to take the next steps necessary which voting fails to achieve.

Reply
Nov 20, 2014 00:21:33   #
mcmlx
 
Yankee Clipper wrote:
Does the House Dare Impeach a Defiant, Out-of-Control Black President?

If Obama is an usurper to the office, he cannot be impeached, he can however be arrested and then removed. Neither will happen because of the fear of nation wide race riots. The threat of riots and Joe Biden becoming the replacement is Obama's insurance policy.

Written on Monday, November 17, 2014 by David L. Goetsch

What happens when an elected American president lets the power of the office go to his head and begins to ignore the Constitution and rule in the manner of a dictator? The answer, of course, is that the U.S. House of Representatives is empowered by the Constitution to impeach such a president, and the U.S. Senate is empowered to convict him. On the impeachment side of the Constitutional equation, Presidents Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton were impeached by the House, though not convicted by the Senate. President Nixon resigned before the House could impeach him because he knew the Senate had the votes to convict him. Impeachment is a Constitutional tool that has been used by the House of Representatives to rein in out-of-control presidents.

Being that we have the Constitutional protection of impeachment and being that is has been used in the past, Americans don’t have to worry about a president abusing his powers and becoming a quasi-dictator, right? Maybe not. The House of Representatives has used impeachment or the threat of it to prevent presidents from abusing their power in the past, but all of the presidents in question have been white. What happens when the president abusing his power is black? In today’s politically-correct, racially-charged society does the House of Representatives dare impeach a black president? This is not just a hypothetical or academic question. Rather, it is one the newly elected House of Representatives may have to answer because a defiant President Obama has made it clear he does not intend to stop ignoring the Constitution or the will of the American people. He plans to continue ruling by dictatorial fiat in the form of executive orders, orders that exceed the scope of his presidential powers as granted in the Constitution.

Before proceeding with the question of impeachment, some background is in order. Even the most optimistic Republican insiders underestimated how well the GOP would do in the mid-term elections on November 4th. Not only did Republicans pick up the seats they thought were low-hanging fruit, they picked up some seats that pundits thought were leaning toward the Democrats. The mid-term elections were about one thing and one thing only: rejecting the failed policies of Barack Obama. What political pundits missed was the depth of dissatisfaction with the president, even among Democrats. It appears that the pundits were led down the garden path by Obama’s propaganda machine—the mainstream media—and as a result were out of touch with grass roots Americans.

Being that the mid-term massacre was a rejection of everything President Obama stands for, one would think the president would be chastened, maybe even humbled. But anyone who believed this president would be humbled was under-estimating his capacity for self-delusion, not to mention his out-sized ego. Obama knows that on November 4th America rejected him and his policies, but the president’s attitude toward the Democrat’s lop-sided defeat has been to dig in his heels and defiantly reject America’s rejection of him. In his White House news conference on November 5th, the president sounded more like a petulant child who had been scolded than the chief executive of a great nation.

Incredibly, President Obama refused to accept any responsibility for his party’s election debacle. Rather, he defiantly threatened to continue governing by executive order, and herein is the rub. The Republican victory on November 4th will either be a flash in the pan or it will translate into an even more important victory in 2016. Which of these two possibilities prevails depends on what the Republican majorities in both houses of Congress do right now. If they misinterpret what happened on November 4th as an opportunity to reason with President Obama or meet him in the middle, Republicans will squander their victory. Further, if they allow President Obama to continue defiantly ruling by executive fiat like some third-world dictator, Americans who voted Republican in droves on November 4th will lose faith in them and Hillary Clinton will be our next president. However, if Republicans show they have the guts to issue a unmistakable smack down to Barack Obama, up to and including impeachment, they might just win in November and save America in the process.

President Obama has steamrolled Republicans and run roughshod over the Constitution for six years now, and as the results of the mid-term elections showed, Americans are tired of his dictatorial propensities. Consequently, the American public is not looking to Republicans to hold the president’s hand and play nice in the sandbox. They are looking to Republicans to fix the mess he has made of our country, at home and abroad. This means Americans are expecting Republicans to not just stop but reverse the Obama tidal wave of government handouts, bailouts, entitlements, regulations, foreign policy blunders, lies, distortions, and abuses of power. They are expecting Republicans to clean out government agencies that have been using their power to bully American citizens, re-establish a foreign policy that gets out in front of the world situation rather than just reacting to it or even failing to react, and re-establish the material, manpower, and technological superiority of our military.

But more than anything, Americans expect Republicans to use their Constitutional powers to rein in this out-of-control president and force him to govern within the powers granted to him by the Founders in the Constitution. If this means the House of Representatives will be forced to impeach President Obama, then Republicans in the House must be willing to do so and the Senate must be willing to convict him. The current thinking of political pundits is that President Obama is immune to impeachment because he is America’s first black president. Their thinking goes like this: If Republicans impeach Obama—no matter how much he abuses his power—they will lose all hope of winning in 2016. The pundits were wrong in their prognostications concerning the mid-term elections, and they might just be wrong about impeachment. However, even if they are right, sometimes elected officials must do what is right rather than what is politically expedient.

Let us hope that President Obama will get over his childish snit about the mid-term elections, man up, and govern like an American president is supposed to: within the bounds of his Constitutional authority. However, if he continues to defiantly ignore the Constitution and sign more and more executive orders, he will force the hand of the new Congress. My question is this: Does the new Congress—Republicans and Democrats—have the courage to use its most potent weapon for reining in an out-of-control president? If not, they should not have run for office on November 4th and are not worthy of the offices they hold.




Read more at http://patriotupdate.com/articles/house-dare-impeach-defiant-control-black-president/
Does the House Dare Impeach a Defiant, Out-of-Cont... (show quote)


Yankee, that is an excellently written article.
Thank you for sharing it.
So will Republicans grow some? If they will step up and do what WE want them to do, I foresee landslide victories for conservatives.
WHEN WILL OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS DO WHAT WE ASK THEM TO??!
Mcmlx (frustrated)

Reply
Nov 20, 2014 00:44:59   #
Yankee Clipper
 
Sicilianthing wrote:
_________________________________
They better do something fast... because all faith will be lost in Congress and the Constitutional Crisis will begin tomorrow !

You have all been fooled and you are witnessing Criminal Acts in the highest office.

Your peaceful voting process has failed again...

Good Luck.

From this point going forward the groups begin to take the next steps necessary which voting fails to achieve. That's what I am afraid of and that's what Obama wants. If Obama doesn't back off it will be "Insurrections'r'Us" and the shit will hit the fan. I see Obama destroying the country and I see removing him from office destroying the country. Which is the lessor evil? I don't know. I just pray and insurrection doesn't occur. However, Obama will not be removed from office because of the fear of nation wide racial riots and Joe Biden would be his replacement.
_________________________________ br They better d... (show quote)

Reply
Nov 20, 2014 00:47:00   #
Yankee Clipper
 
mcmlx wrote:
Yankee, that is an excellently written article.
Thank you for sharing it.
So will Republicans grow some? If they will step up and do what WE want them to do, I foresee landslide victories for conservatives.
WHEN WILL OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS DO WHAT WE ASK THEM TO??! When we elect the right ones!
Mcmlx (frustrated)

Reply
Nov 20, 2014 02:20:02   #
Al-ien
 
Yankee Clipper wrote:
Does the House Dare Impeach a Defiant, Out-of-Control Black President?

If Obama is an usurper to the office, he cannot be impeached, he can however be arrested and then removed. Neither will happen because of the fear of nation wide race riots. The threat of riots and Joe Biden becoming the replacement is Obama's insurance policy.

Written on Monday, November 17, 2014 by David L. Goetsch

What happens when an elected American president lets the power of the office go to his head and begins to ignore the Constitution and rule in the manner of a dictator? The answer, of course, is that the U.S. House of Representatives is empowered by the Constitution to impeach such a president, and the U.S. Senate is empowered to convict him. On the impeachment side of the Constitutional equation, Presidents Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton were impeached by the House, though not convicted by the Senate. President Nixon resigned before the House could impeach him because he knew the Senate had the votes to convict him. Impeachment is a Constitutional tool that has been used by the House of Representatives to rein in out-of-control presidents.

Being that we have the Constitutional protection of impeachment and being that is has been used in the past, Americans don’t have to worry about a president abusing his powers and becoming a quasi-dictator, right? Maybe not. The House of Representatives has used impeachment or the threat of it to prevent presidents from abusing their power in the past, but all of the presidents in question have been white. What happens when the president abusing his power is black? In today’s politically-correct, racially-charged society does the House of Representatives dare impeach a black president? This is not just a hypothetical or academic question. Rather, it is one the newly elected House of Representatives may have to answer because a defiant President Obama has made it clear he does not intend to stop ignoring the Constitution or the will of the American people. He plans to continue ruling by dictatorial fiat in the form of executive orders, orders that exceed the scope of his presidential powers as granted in the Constitution.

Before proceeding with the question of impeachment, some background is in order. Even the most optimistic Republican insiders underestimated how well the GOP would do in the mid-term elections on November 4th. Not only did Republicans pick up the seats they thought were low-hanging fruit, they picked up some seats that pundits thought were leaning toward the Democrats. The mid-term elections were about one thing and one thing only: rejecting the failed policies of Barack Obama. What political pundits missed was the depth of dissatisfaction with the president, even among Democrats. It appears that the pundits were led down the garden path by Obama’s propaganda machine—the mainstream media—and as a result were out of touch with grass roots Americans.

Being that the mid-term massacre was a rejection of everything President Obama stands for, one would think the president would be chastened, maybe even humbled. But anyone who believed this president would be humbled was under-estimating his capacity for self-delusion, not to mention his out-sized ego. Obama knows that on November 4th America rejected him and his policies, but the president’s attitude toward the Democrat’s lop-sided defeat has been to dig in his heels and defiantly reject America’s rejection of him. In his White House news conference on November 5th, the president sounded more like a petulant child who had been scolded than the chief executive of a great nation.

Incredibly, President Obama refused to accept any responsibility for his party’s election debacle. Rather, he defiantly threatened to continue governing by executive order, and herein is the rub. The Republican victory on November 4th will either be a flash in the pan or it will translate into an even more important victory in 2016. Which of these two possibilities prevails depends on what the Republican majorities in both houses of Congress do right now. If they misinterpret what happened on November 4th as an opportunity to reason with President Obama or meet him in the middle, Republicans will squander their victory. Further, if they allow President Obama to continue defiantly ruling by executive fiat like some third-world dictator, Americans who voted Republican in droves on November 4th will lose faith in them and Hillary Clinton will be our next president. However, if Republicans show they have the guts to issue a unmistakable smack down to Barack Obama, up to and including impeachment, they might just win in November and save America in the process.

President Obama has steamrolled Republicans and run roughshod over the Constitution for six years now, and as the results of the mid-term elections showed, Americans are tired of his dictatorial propensities. Consequently, the American public is not looking to Republicans to hold the president’s hand and play nice in the sandbox. They are looking to Republicans to fix the mess he has made of our country, at home and abroad. This means Americans are expecting Republicans to not just stop but reverse the Obama tidal wave of government handouts, bailouts, entitlements, regulations, foreign policy blunders, lies, distortions, and abuses of power. They are expecting Republicans to clean out government agencies that have been using their power to bully American citizens, re-establish a foreign policy that gets out in front of the world situation rather than just reacting to it or even failing to react, and re-establish the material, manpower, and technological superiority of our military.

But more than anything, Americans expect Republicans to use their Constitutional powers to rein in this out-of-control president and force him to govern within the powers granted to him by the Founders in the Constitution. If this means the House of Representatives will be forced to impeach President Obama, then Republicans in the House must be willing to do so and the Senate must be willing to convict him. The current thinking of political pundits is that President Obama is immune to impeachment because he is America’s first black president. Their thinking goes like this: If Republicans impeach Obama—no matter how much he abuses his power—they will lose all hope of winning in 2016. The pundits were wrong in their prognostications concerning the mid-term elections, and they might just be wrong about impeachment. However, even if they are right, sometimes elected officials must do what is right rather than what is politically expedient.

Let us hope that President Obama will get over his childish snit about the mid-term elections, man up, and govern like an American president is supposed to: within the bounds of his Constitutional authority. However, if he continues to defiantly ignore the Constitution and sign more and more executive orders, he will force the hand of the new Congress. My question is this: Does the new Congress—Republicans and Democrats—have the courage to use its most potent weapon for reining in an out-of-control president? If not, they should not have run for office on November 4th and are not worthy of the offices they hold.




Read more at http://patriotupdate.com/articles/house-dare-impeach-defiant-control-black-president/
Does the House Dare Impeach a Defiant, Out-of-Cont... (show quote)



:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Nov 20, 2014 02:20:08   #
mcmlx
 
And what sorry excuses they are. If we get the emperor out, Biden will be gravy. And I do believe that most true blue Americans are prepared for riots.
We just have a bunch of spineless woosies in Congress.

Reply
Nov 20, 2014 04:39:49   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Yankee Clipper wrote:
Does the House Dare Impeach a Defiant, Out-of-Control Black President?

If Obama is an usurper to the office, he cannot be impeached, he can however be arrested and then removed. Neither will happen because of the fear of nation wide race riots. The threat of riots and Joe Biden becoming the replacement is Obama's insurance policy.

Written on Monday, November 17, 2014 by David L. Goetsch

What happens when an elected American president lets the power of the office go to his head and begins to ignore the Constitution and rule in the manner of a dictator? The answer, of course, is that the U.S. House of Representatives is empowered by the Constitution to impeach such a president, and the U.S. Senate is empowered to convict him. On the impeachment side of the Constitutional equation, Presidents Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton were impeached by the House, though not convicted by the Senate. President Nixon resigned before the House could impeach him because he knew the Senate had the votes to convict him. Impeachment is a Constitutional tool that has been used by the House of Representatives to rein in out-of-control presidents.

Being that we have the Constitutional protection of impeachment and being that is has been used in the past, Americans don’t have to worry about a president abusing his powers and becoming a quasi-dictator, right? Maybe not. The House of Representatives has used impeachment or the threat of it to prevent presidents from abusing their power in the past, but all of the presidents in question have been white. What happens when the president abusing his power is black? In today’s politically-correct, racially-charged society does the House of Representatives dare impeach a black president? This is not just a hypothetical or academic question. Rather, it is one the newly elected House of Representatives may have to answer because a defiant President Obama has made it clear he does not intend to stop ignoring the Constitution or the will of the American people. He plans to continue ruling by dictatorial fiat in the form of executive orders, orders that exceed the scope of his presidential powers as granted in the Constitution.

Before proceeding with the question of impeachment, some background is in order. Even the most optimistic Republican insiders underestimated how well the GOP would do in the mid-term elections on November 4th. Not only did Republicans pick up the seats they thought were low-hanging fruit, they picked up some seats that pundits thought were leaning toward the Democrats. The mid-term elections were about one thing and one thing only: rejecting the failed policies of Barack Obama. What political pundits missed was the depth of dissatisfaction with the president, even among Democrats. It appears that the pundits were led down the garden path by Obama’s propaganda machine—the mainstream media—and as a result were out of touch with grass roots Americans.

Being that the mid-term massacre was a rejection of everything President Obama stands for, one would think the president would be chastened, maybe even humbled. But anyone who believed this president would be humbled was under-estimating his capacity for self-delusion, not to mention his out-sized ego. Obama knows that on November 4th America rejected him and his policies, but the president’s attitude toward the Democrat’s lop-sided defeat has been to dig in his heels and defiantly reject America’s rejection of him. In his White House news conference on November 5th, the president sounded more like a petulant child who had been scolded than the chief executive of a great nation.

Incredibly, President Obama refused to accept any responsibility for his party’s election debacle. Rather, he defiantly threatened to continue governing by executive order, and herein is the rub. The Republican victory on November 4th will either be a flash in the pan or it will translate into an even more important victory in 2016. Which of these two possibilities prevails depends on what the Republican majorities in both houses of Congress do right now. If they misinterpret what happened on November 4th as an opportunity to reason with President Obama or meet him in the middle, Republicans will squander their victory. Further, if they allow President Obama to continue defiantly ruling by executive fiat like some third-world dictator, Americans who voted Republican in droves on November 4th will lose faith in them and Hillary Clinton will be our next president. However, if Republicans show they have the guts to issue a unmistakable smack down to Barack Obama, up to and including impeachment, they might just win in November and save America in the process.

President Obama has steamrolled Republicans and run roughshod over the Constitution for six years now, and as the results of the mid-term elections showed, Americans are tired of his dictatorial propensities. Consequently, the American public is not looking to Republicans to hold the president’s hand and play nice in the sandbox. They are looking to Republicans to fix the mess he has made of our country, at home and abroad. This means Americans are expecting Republicans to not just stop but reverse the Obama tidal wave of government handouts, bailouts, entitlements, regulations, foreign policy blunders, lies, distortions, and abuses of power. They are expecting Republicans to clean out government agencies that have been using their power to bully American citizens, re-establish a foreign policy that gets out in front of the world situation rather than just reacting to it or even failing to react, and re-establish the material, manpower, and technological superiority of our military.

But more than anything, Americans expect Republicans to use their Constitutional powers to rein in this out-of-control president and force him to govern within the powers granted to him by the Founders in the Constitution. If this means the House of Representatives will be forced to impeach President Obama, then Republicans in the House must be willing to do so and the Senate must be willing to convict him. The current thinking of political pundits is that President Obama is immune to impeachment because he is America’s first black president. Their thinking goes like this: If Republicans impeach Obama—no matter how much he abuses his power—they will lose all hope of winning in 2016. The pundits were wrong in their prognostications concerning the mid-term elections, and they might just be wrong about impeachment. However, even if they are right, sometimes elected officials must do what is right rather than what is politically expedient.

Let us hope that President Obama will get over his childish snit about the mid-term elections, man up, and govern like an American president is supposed to: within the bounds of his Constitutional authority. However, if he continues to defiantly ignore the Constitution and sign more and more executive orders, he will force the hand of the new Congress. My question is this: Does the new Congress—Republicans and Democrats—have the courage to use its most potent weapon for reining in an out-of-control president? If not, they should not have run for office on November 4th and are not worthy of the offices they hold.




Read more at http://patriotupdate.com/articles/house-dare-impeach-defiant-control-black-president/
Does the House Dare Impeach a Defiant, Out-of-Cont... (show quote)


I'll be very surprised if the Republicans do anything meaningful for a number of reasons:

1) They don't want to secure the border! Period. They didn't do it after Reagan gave amnesty to illegals, and they didn't do it after 9/11 when they really, really should have, and more significantly, could have. I remember the odd vibe Bush gave off when the subject was brought up. Until the SOUTHERN border is secure, everything else is a moot point! The Republicans have been co-conspirators in the illegal invasion because certain special interests who benefit from illegal immigrants also happen to be generous campaign donors, and everyone knows it.

2) It was not a victory for freedom loving Americans (although some strides were made) we witnessed in November...it was a victory for the Establishment. If you'll remember, they successfully sabotaged the election of a number of conservative and Libertarian candidates, and the goals of the Establishment Republicans are not all that different from the goals of the President and his ilk, they just can't be up front about because that would alienate the base, as Mr. Cruz's filibuster illustrated beautifully. They are gluttons for the status quo, and an impeachment would be out of character and not in their self-interests, and we know what comes first, don't we?

3) All that aside, what exactly will Obama's pronouncement actually mean? Not much, I think, since there are no goon squads out looking for the people who might benefit by it. No one is going to go out looking for them and they aren't going to volunteer to pay a fine...so my guess is that life will continue much as it is now for most of these illegals barring accidents. I think this is whole thing is mostly a charade, and an act of spite by a pissed off President and a party who desperately wants to change their fortunes by 2016. It's also an attempt by them to put Republicans at each other's throats even more than they already are. The real question is what will the Republicans do when the next congress is seated.

Reply
Nov 20, 2014 06:17:27   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Defund everything that POS wants, I don't care if money for toilet paper..Force bi-partisn votes of the D's on every major issue period and January, just arrest that treasonous bastard, escorted out by the Military he is dismantling now...

D's are running from that puke now--force them to show their hand, get the 2/3 majority vote a couple of times and the lame duck POS will have no power to continue to strip this Country of its very foundation!!! :evil: :twisted: :evil:

Reply
Nov 20, 2014 06:32:50   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
lindajoy wrote:
Defund everything that POS wants, I don't care if money for toilet paper..Force bi-partisn votes of the D's on every major issue period and January, just arrest that treasonous bastard, escorted out by the Military he is dismantling now...

D's are running from that puke now--force them to show their hand, get the 2/3 majority vote a couple of times and the lame duck POS will have no power to continue to strip this Country of its very foundation!!! :evil: :twisted: :evil:


I was pretty irate when the story came over the news...especially since CNN is all I get out here, but the more I think about it, the more I think it's a charade. I'm really starting to think Mr. Obama's pronouncement won't make an iota of difference except with a very small minority of people who take him up on his offer, come forward, register and pay their fine. I just don't see a hell of a lot of them doing that. No one is out looking for them. They aren't going to get deported. Why pay a fine and go through a big pile of government red tape when chances are you aren't going to get caught and your kids are automatically citizens anyway? Obama wants the base upset with the Republicans and he thinks he can gain something by cozying up to the Hispanics before the next Congress is seated. He may be partially right, but how right we'll have to see.

Reply
Nov 20, 2014 07:21:36   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
BigMike wrote:
I was pretty irate when the story came over the news...especially since CNN is all I get out here, but the more I think about it, the more I think it's a charade. I'm really starting to think Mr. Obama's pronouncement won't make an iota of difference except with a very small minority of people who take him up on his offer, come forward, register and pay their fine. I just don't see a hell of a lot of them doing that. No one is out looking for them. They aren't going to get deported. Why pay a fine and go through a big pile of government red tape when chances are you aren't going to get caught and your kids are automatically citizens anyway? Obama wants the base upset with the Republicans and he thinks he can gain something by cozying up to the Hispanics before the next Congress is seated. He may be partially right, but how right we'll have to see.
I was pretty irate when the story came over the ne... (show quote)


I don't disagree but will say this~~we have a better chance of truly strengthen our boarders now and we damn well better do it now that we DO have that chance....People spoke and this issue alone was one major reason why~~~ Keep it front and center with the Ds having to take a stand come January and get that 2/3 majority vote..BO is then DONE~~~`A couple of those and you'll see the domino effect take hold..D's will do it NOT for Country but to save their sorry arses too.... :evil: :evil:

Reply
Nov 20, 2014 07:21:36   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
BigMike wrote:
I was pretty irate when the story came over the news...especially since CNN is all I get out here, but the more I think about it, the more I think it's a charade. I'm really starting to think Mr. Obama's pronouncement won't make an iota of difference except with a very small minority of people who take him up on his offer, come forward, register and pay their fine. I just don't see a hell of a lot of them doing that. No one is out looking for them. They aren't going to get deported. Why pay a fine and go through a big pile of government red tape when chances are you aren't going to get caught and your kids are automatically citizens anyway? Obama wants the base upset with the Republicans and he thinks he can gain something by cozying up to the Hispanics before the next Congress is seated. He may be partially right, but how right we'll have to see.
I was pretty irate when the story came over the ne... (show quote)


I don't disagree but will say this~~we have a better chance of truly strengthen our boarders now and we damn well better do it now that we DO have that chance....People spoke and this issue alone was one major reason why~~~ Keep it front and center with the Ds having to take a stand come January and get that 2/3 majority vote..BO is then DONE~~~`A couple of those and you'll see the domino effect take hold..D's will do it NOT for Country but to save their sorry arses too.... :evil: :evil:

Reply
Nov 20, 2014 07:30:19   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
lindajoy wrote:
I don't disagree but will say this~~we have a better chance of truly strengthen our boarders now and we damn well better do it now that we DO have that chance....People spoke and this issue alone was one major reason why~~~ Keep it front and center with the Ds having to take a stand come January and get that 2/3 majority vote..BO is then DONE~~~`A couple of those and you'll see the domino effect take hold..D's will do it NOT for Country but to save their sorry arses too.... :evil: :evil:


We'll see. Perhaps the Supreme Court will have something to say in the matter. I don't hear anyone in the Republican leadership talking about impeachment.

Reply
Page 1 of 20 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.