RandyBrian wrote:
I read the article, but just to clarify: Are you presenting it to admit your statement about the judges was wrong, or you did not read the article yourself?
The article you posted CLEARLY illustrates that the judges NEVER said Roe could not or should not be overturned. They basically said, correctly so, that Roe was an established precedent, but as judges they could not speculate on any possible future cases. They would judge impartially if and when a case was presented to them. And that is what they did last summer.
So. What are you saying?
I read the article, but just to clarify: Are you ... (
show quote)
Are you keeping up with the news? Ectopicly pregnant mom nearly died today.
Happy anniversary of your posting this schmiss.